On Sun, Feb 02, 2025 at 12:56:59AM -0500, M. Zhou wrote: > (5) what is the actionable outcome of this generaal resolution?
Is this actually unclear? The linked text claims this issue is urgent - usually, something is urgent because some issue demands action. > (6) is a neutral tone necessary for a proposal? I have a clear tendency > throughout the texts. I think it's okay to reveal a preference, but the "toxic candy" term is rather unfortunate. You've defined the debate with terms that dismiss the opposing viewpoint. Could you come up with a more neutral, descriptive name? Ross
