Hi all
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 02:04:10PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-22 20:50:42 CEST]:
> > Which version of MacOS do you try to boot? MOL does currently only support
> > MacOS up to 10.4.x.
>
> Gaudenz, do you have any news on this? Is upstre
* Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-22 20:50:42 CEST]:
> Which version of MacOS do you try to boot? MOL does currently only support
> MacOS up to 10.4.x.
Gaudenz, do you have any news on this? Is upstream working on having
support for 10.5.x, or is upstream rather dead? I tried to fi
Problem solved! MOL works now that I changed
the /usr/share/mol/config/molrc.post from
"of_image: ${drv}/openbios" to "of_image: ${drv}/of"
Actually, in this file there were two listings with the offending line, with
the first (line 92) actually listed as
of_image: ${dbin}/{drv}/openbios
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:36 AM, Michael Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Gaudenz:
>
> Thanks for replying. I recognize your name on some previous
> communication about problems in MOL in Debian Lenny so I'm hoping you
> can help. I was attempting to start up a MacOS 9.2.1 disk, although
Hi Gaudenz:
Thanks for replying. I recognize your name on some previous
communication about problems in MOL in Debian Lenny so I'm hoping you
can help. I was attempting to start up a MacOS 9.2.1 disk, although I
also tried to start up a disk image that had been successfully created
with MOL runn
Hi Michael
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 12:33:10PM -0400, Michael Fox wrote:
> I am trying to run the program Mac-on-Linux on Lenny running on my
> PowerBook G4/1.33 and when I type in the startup command on a terminal, I
> get the following. (I added the boldface to direct this question.)
>
> Star
Thanks Xavier. That got it working. Now I'm working on getting the dsl
connection up.
Bob
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
apt-file search X11/Xlib.h
gives me :
hugs: usr/lib/hugs/packages/X11/Graphics/X11/Xlib.hs
ivtools-dev: usr/include/IV-X11/Xlib.h
libghc6-x11-dev: usr/lib/X11-1.2/ghc-6.6/Graphic
Hi,
apt-file search X11/Xlib.h
gives me :
hugs: usr/lib/hugs/packages/X11/Graphics/X11/Xlib.hs
ivtools-dev: usr/include/IV-X11/Xlib.h
libghc6-x11-dev: usr/lib/X11-1.2/ghc-6.6/Graphics/X11/Xlib.hi
libx11-dev: usr/include/X11/Xlib.h
So I think you should do an :
apt-get install libx11-dev
Hope it
Hi,
On Friday 19 January 2007 17:01, brian wrote:
> this is nice, however the last time i tried it
> a few weeks ago, it deblesses my macosx system,
> which is a pain to correct, especially for a novice.
Could you try again please and submit an error, so this issue can be fixed and
others wont h
Thore Sittly wrote:
> I wanted to use Mac-On-Linux on my Debian PPC Kernel Version 2.6.16-2, but I
> cannot compile that mod-modules
please use the current kernels of 2.6.18-3.
Additionally, note that for those kernels we already have precompiled
modules packages (mol-modules-*) in the archive,
On Monday 13 March 2006 15:58, Jack Malmostoso wrote:
> Hello there list,
>
> I just wanted to report that mol-0.9.71pre8 works beautifully and
> loads Tiger just fine.
> You can download the sources here:
>
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~josejx/mol-0.9.71_pre8.tar.bz2
>
> I used then the mol-modules-sou
> i'm trying to get mol running and i keep finding mixed howto s. I'm running
> the test distro of debian and am having trouble compiling the modules. Has
> anyone had any luck with this ? Please point me to a good howto.
Don't know about howtos - you could post the relevant compiler errors,
in
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 03:49:32PM -0400, Caleb Storms wrote:
> hey,
>
> i'm trying to get mol running and i keep finding mixed howto s. I'm running
> the test distro of debian and am having trouble compiling the modules. Has
> anyone had any luck with this ? Please point me to a good howto.
Caleb Storms wrote:
hey,
i'm trying to get mol running and i keep finding mixed howto s. I'm running
the test distro of debian and am having trouble compiling the modules. Has
anyone had any luck with this ? Please point me to a good howto.
Thanks
Caleb
Hey Caleb,
this howto [0] d
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 11:17:38PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Also, since for 2.6.16, we move to ARCH=powerpc, there are other issues at
> > hand in the out-of-tree module packaging, but given the current issue, i am
> > having some doubt about my
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also, since for 2.6.16, we move to ARCH=powerpc, there are other issues at
> hand in the out-of-tree module packaging, but given the current issue, i am
> having some doubt about my future involvement, so you better post on
> debian-kernel about this, and
Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm currently working on update the mol package in Debian. I could need
> some comaintainers though, because Otavio who originally started the
> pkg-mol effort no longer owns any Powerpc machine.
I could help with packaging and fixing small things if
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 12:10:10 +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> The source of the mol kernel modules is included in the upstream mol
> source. This is not a separate download. If you build mol manually it will
> also build the kernel modules.
I will check what's in the autogenerated deb package the
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 09:41:17AM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 01:43:46PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:10:14AM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 09:58:22PM +0100, Jack Malmostoso wrote:
> > > > Hello
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 09:41:17AM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 01:43:46PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:10:14AM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 09:58:22PM +0100, Jack Malmostoso wrote:
> > > > Hello
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 01:43:46PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:10:14AM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 09:58:22PM +0100, Jack Malmostoso wrote:
> > > Hello there list,
> > >
> > > I just wanted to report that mol-0.9.71pre8 works be
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 07:03:45PM +0100, Jack Malmostoso wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 12:40:29 +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure what's the problem here. For me the same version works. But I
> > also used the drivers and modules from that version. Probably mixing the
> > drivers a
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 12:40:29 +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> I'm currently working on update the mol package in Debian. I could need
> some comaintainers though, because Otavio who originally started the
> pkg-mol effort no longer owns any Powerpc machine.
I'd be glad to help. Just tell me if th
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:10:21 +0100, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> My naive question : Is this error related to the fact that write access to
> journalized hfs+ has been deactivated in 2.6.15 ?
I am running it with a homemade 2.6.15, so I don't think that's the
problem. I had a similar problem with t
Hi,
Just a quick question about mol : on my mid 2005 ibook, I can run
Tiger with mol 0.9.70 debian packages and a 2.6.14 kernel, using the
patchs from http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~nissler/mol/.
But with a 2.6.15 kernel, I see the yellow screen with the penguin,
but I do not get to the wheel c
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:10:14AM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 09:58:22PM +0100, Jack Malmostoso wrote:
> > Hello there list,
> >
> > I just wanted to report that mol-0.9.71pre8 works beautifully and loads
> > Tiger just fine.
> > You can download the sources h
Hi
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 09:58:22PM +0100, Jack Malmostoso wrote:
> Hello there list,
>
> I just wanted to report that mol-0.9.71pre8 works beautifully and loads
> Tiger just fine.
> You can download the sources here:
>
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~josejx/mol-0.9.71_pre8.tar.bz2
I'm currently wor
> I hve a fresh new 2.6.15-rc2 running. Build mol via make-kpkg.
>
> $ startmol -X gives:
> insmod /lib/modules/2.6.15-rc2-aragorn/misc/mol.ko
> mol: Unknown symbol __flush_icache_range
> which was mentioned while building as well:
>
> LD [M] /usr/src/modules/mol/src/kmod/Linux/../build/mol.o
>
added the kernelparameter, didn't change a lot.
tnx anyway
Kasper
On 11/13/05, Kasper Jordaens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well I have rivafb compiled as a module, but it wasn't loaded. instead
> nvidiafb was loaded. modprobed rivafb but it didn't help, mybe I need
> to shut down mol first (bu
Hi Kasper,
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 16:55 +0100, Kasper Jordaens wrote:
> molvconfig will only detect 8bit colour depth as working modes
> resulting in quite an ugly/unworkable OSX.
Are you sure you're using rivafb? This happened to me before when using
the openfirmware fb. You should have video=riv
>
> I've recently upgraded to a 2.6.14 kernel, and then off course
> recompiled the mol module for use with the new kernel. Problem is
> molvconfig will only detect 8bit colour depth as working modes
> resulting in quite an ugly/unworkable OSX. Has anyone experienced
> this? Rebooting back into 2.6
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 06:06:59PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 the mental interface of
> Sven Luther told:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 11:59:30PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > > On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 the mental interface of
> > > Sven Luther told:
> > >
> > > > O
On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 the mental interface of
Sven Luther told:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 11:59:30PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 the mental interface of
> > Sven Luther told:
> >
> > > On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 11:16:48PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter
> > > wrote:
> > [...]
>
> > As did I, on the condition that no one else wanted the job. When you took
> > over mol, I understood that you would take care of the package in whatever
>
> Mmm, i guess i was not clear enough in that mail i sent, or you didn't read
> it or whatever.
I did read it, I do recall you mentioned se
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:30:22AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > And before you ask: setting up collaborative maintainership for a package
> > > is something I'd do with people I've worked with successfully before.
> > > Otherwise, I'd prefer to take the blame alone.
> >
> > bah. i guess with
> > And before you ask: setting up collaborative maintainership for a package
> > is something I'd do with people I've worked with successfully before.
> > Otherwise, I'd prefer to take the blame alone.
>
> bah. i guess with such thinking you rarely go into collaborative work :)
>
> Anyway, debian'
> > I filed a bugreport to fix it. It is the job of the maintainer to
> > implement it;)
>
> Yeah, ok, a quick reality check here. The mol maintainer died tragically in
> july, leaving the package all but abandoned, i did jump in because nobody else
> did and because mol was blocking the 2.6.12 ker
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 10:39:38PM -0200, Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Nov 04 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Indeed, but i believe if no default maintainer is found a grouping of
> > users and not-really-interested DDs like myself could handle this
> > package.
>
> Well, I can occasionally (very occasi
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:14:44AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > I filed a bugreport to fix it. It is the job of the maintainer to
> > > implement it;)
> >
> > Yeah, ok, a quick reality check here. The mol maintainer died tragically in
> > july, leaving the package all but abandoned, i did ju
On Nov 04 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> Indeed, but i believe if no default maintainer is found a grouping of
> users and not-really-interested DDs like myself could handle this
> package.
Well, I can occasionally (very occasionally, but better than never) see
what's going on there, if you add me on
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 11:59:30PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 the mental interface of
> Sven Luther told:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 11:16:48PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter
> > wrote:
> [...]
> > > I filed a bugreport to fix it. It is the job of the maintainer
> > > to
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 the mental interface of
Sven Luther told:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 11:16:48PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter
> wrote:
[...]
> > I filed a bugreport to fix it. It is the job of the maintainer
> > to implement it;)
>
> Yeah, ok, a quick reality check here. The mol maintainer died
>
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 11:16:48PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 the mental interface of
> Sven Luther told:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 10:22:49PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter
> > wrote:
> [...]
> > > So build the package withe the provided patch of #328826. There
> > > mu
Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 the mental interface of
> Yves-Alexis Perez told:
>
>
>>Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>>
>>>So build the package withe the provided patch of #328826. There must
>>>be more "Tiger Users" on the list to test it?
>>
>>Applied here. Tiger boots fine.
>
Wel
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 the mental interface of
Yves-Alexis Perez told:
> Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > So build the package withe the provided patch of #328826. There must
> > be more "Tiger Users" on the list to test it?
>
> Applied here. Tiger boots fine.
I know ;)
Elimar
--
Experience is so
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 the mental interface of
Sven Luther told:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 10:22:49PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter
> wrote:
[...]
> > So build the package withe the provided patch of #328826. There
> > must be more "Tiger Users" on the list to test it?
>
> Well, join the alioth pkg-mol
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 10:22:49PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 the mental interface of
> Sven Luther told:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 12:00:59AM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter
> > wrote:
> [...]
> > > You must have noticed #328826, isn't it?
> >
> > As said, my job is to
Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> So build the package withe the provided patch of #328826. There must
> be more "Tiger Users" on the list to test it?
Applied here. Tiger boots fine.
(powerbook 5,6 / tiger 10.4.2 / linux 2.6.14 )
-- Yves-Alexis Perez
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signa
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 the mental interface of
Sven Luther told:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 12:00:59AM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter
> wrote:
[...]
> > You must have noticed #328826, isn't it?
>
> As said, my job is to build the packages, and make sure they work
> with the latest kernels, someone else ne
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 12:00:59AM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 the mental interface of
> Sven Luther told:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 11:02:49PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 the mental interface of Sven Luther told:
> > >
> > > [...]
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 the mental interface of
Sven Luther told:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 11:02:49PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 the mental interface of Sven Luther told:
> >
> > [...]
> > > There is a new alioth project being prepared to commonly
> > > maintain mol,
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 11:02:49PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 the mental interface of
> Sven Luther told:
>
> [...]
> > There is a new alioth project being prepared to commonly maintain
> > mol, with otavio, nico and me right now. I will upload 2.6.14 as
> > soon as the
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 the mental interface of
Sven Luther told:
[...]
> There is a new alioth project being prepared to commonly maintain
> mol, with otavio, nico and me right now. I will upload 2.6.14 as
> soon as the svn repo for it is up, hoping nothing broke this time
> :)
Including the patches
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 12:56:26AM +0100, Felix C. Stegerman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any thoughts on when mol-modules for kernel 2.6.14 will be availabe ?
> If there's anything I can do to help / test ...
There is a new alioth project being prepared to commonly maintain mol, with
otavio, nico and me rig
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 01:15:18PM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> As a result of an unfortunate accident, Jens Schmalzing passed away.
>
> He was the maintainer of, amongst others, mol, mol-drivers-linux,
> mol-modules-* and mol-drivers-macos* [0].
[0] The complete list can be found h
Lee Braiden wrote:
On Thursday 19 May 2005 21:11, Fallen_Angel wrote:
I'm not sure the question I asked is a "bug"
I didn't say that it was. What I'm saying is that you should probably go up
the "chain" of responsibility from ubuntu's mailing lists to debian's, just
as debian itself does
On Thursday 19 May 2005 21:11, Fallen_Angel wrote:
> I'm not sure the question I asked is a "bug"
I didn't say that it was. What I'm saying is that you should probably go up
the "chain" of responsibility from ubuntu's mailing lists to debian's, just
as debian itself does when bugs are reported
Lee Braiden wrote:
On Thursday 19 May 2005 01:09, Fallen_Angel wrote:
Hi, it's been a while since I have posted to this list, and for that I
apologize. Am I still welcome to post here since I have changed to
ubuntu? At first I would think no, but then again it is based on SID,
so I am not sure
John Levin wrote:
On 19 May 2005, at 01:09, Fallen_Angel wrote:
Hi, it's been a while since I have posted to this list, and for that
I apologize. Am I still welcome to post here since I have changed to
ubuntu? At first I would think no, but then again it is based on
SID, so I am not sure. Wel
On 19 May 2005, at 01:09, Fallen_Angel wrote:
Hi, it's been a while since I have posted to this list, and for that I
apologize. Am I still welcome to post here since I have changed to
ubuntu? At first I would think no, but then again it is based on SID,
so I am not sure. Well if not tell me,
On Thursday 19 May 2005 01:09, Fallen_Angel wrote:
> Hi, it's been a while since I have posted to this list, and for that I
> apologize. Am I still welcome to post here since I have changed to
> ubuntu? At first I would think no, but then again it is based on SID,
> so I am not sure. Well if not
Hello,
On 5/18/05, Fallen_Angel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, it's been a while since I have posted to this list, and for that I
> apologize.
>Am I still welcome to post here since I have changed to
> ubuntu?
Maybe if the question is pretty focused in ubuntu, you should ask in
the ubuntu
what are the advantages of using mol instead of dual-bool?
Running several operating systems simultaneously, and being able to
run earlier versions of Mac OS on newer hardware.
virtual machines always have advantages and disadvantages over
dual booting. mol isnt a true virtual machine as it does
Hi,
Matthias writes:
> before installing mol i like to know, whether there is wlan support in
> mol and/or 3d-acceleration.
No.
> what are the advantages of using mol instead of dual-bool?
Running several operating systems simultaneously, and being able to
run earlier versions of Mac OS on new
Am 01.01.2005 um 21:33 schrieb Elimar Riesebieter:
xlibs-static-dev -> Xorg doesn't contain xf86dga.h in complete
source. There is no bug aligned to ubuntu bugzilla. So one ppc user
has to report one?
Uuuuh. In that case the problem resides between my left and right ear.
Compiling mol with Xo
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 the mental interface of
Elimar Riesebieter told:
> Hi all,
>
> do one know if there is a patch outside to run mol with 2.6.10?
Damn, must be blind or something like that.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=287267
HANN
Elimar
--
Alles was viel bedacht wird is
this happens every time i start up OS X in MOL and enter my
username/pass... a window pops up to say "unable to log you in at this
time", and then it logs me in! is there a way to stop the pop up window as
it is clearly in error...
Well... me too!
10.2 didn't do this, just 10.3 started showing
Hi,
Jesus Climent writes:
> > Thanks a lot for the patch. I changed it slightly so it doesn't break
> > with earlier kernel versions, and built and uploaded a fixed revision
> > 0.9.70-9.
>
> Do you have the patch somewhere that i could see it?
Sure. I put it in debian/pool/main/m/mol/mol_0.9
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 07:59:48AM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot for the patch. I changed it slightly so it doesn't break
> with earlier kernel versions, and built and uploaded a fixed revision
> 0.9.70-9.
Do you have the patch somewhere that i could see it?
--
Jesus Climent
Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> Therefore, the best thing is to get networking going between the Linux
> side and the Mac OS side, and then use some kind of networking
> filesystem. Personally, I've tried NFS and Netatalk with good
> results, but normally I don't bother and just copy stuff using ssh.
i
Hi,
Luca Bigliardi writes:
> mol-modules-source 0.9.70-8 does not compile for 2.6.9,
> i've attached a little patch that fix the problem.
Thanks a lot for the patch. I changed it slightly so it doesn't break
with earlier kernel versions, and built and uploaded a fixed revision
0.9.70-9.
Regard
Hi,
Sam Halliday writes:
> is there any way i could set up a directory in my debian ~/ which
> would show up as a directory in my Max OS X MOL ~/ as well? at the
> moment, i can see no way to transfer files between debian and MOL.
You can specify whole disk partitions or disk images as MOL bloc
Jens Schmalzing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
Hi,
> Arnaud Vandyck writes:
>
>> I tried the three depth, but none seems to be less green :'(
>
> Are you running mol in a X11 window or in full-screen mode?
I got it full screen, so I suppose it run full-screen mode ;-)
I've just ran molvconf
Hi,
Arnaud Vandyck writes:
> > What depth are you running at in X? 16bpp? If so, you'll have to
> > go to 8bpp in MacOS, or 15bpp or 24bpp in your X server, because
> > Apple doesn't support true 16bpp modes - it assumes 15bpp, and
> > throws the colors way out of whack.
> I tried the three dept
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sebastian Henschel wrote:
| hello...
|
| * Lucas Moulin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-07 10:31 +0200]:
|
|>I've installed mol-modules-source, built a kernel in /usr/src/linux and
|>tried to build MOL but it fails with this error :
|>
|>dh_testdir
|>dh_
hello...
* Lucas Moulin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-07 10:31 +0200]:
>
> I've installed mol-modules-source, built a kernel in /usr/src/linux and
> tried to build MOL but it fails with this error :
>
> dh_testdir
> dh_testroot
> dh_installdocs
> dh_installmodules
> dh_installchangelogs
> Use of
Hi,
Sven Luther writes:
> it's in non-free, naturally. (or contrib maybe, don't remember).
non-free is correct - the drivers are based on example code from Apple
licensed under the APSL. It's mol-drivers-macos, without the x, that
is in contrib, because the code itself is free but requires non-
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 11:38:36AM +0100, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> Thanks. vrms won't like it!
Well, you want to run a non-free OS, and you expect vrms to like it ? :)
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Hi,
Rory Campbell-Lange writes:
> Thanks for the tip. I couldn't find mol-drivers-macosx though:
They're in non-free.
> Interestingly, I can't grab the latest mol-modules either...
> mol-modules-2.6.6-powerpc: Depends: kernel-image-2.6.6-powerpc (=
> 2.6.6-4) but 2.6.6-2 is to be installed --
Thanks. vrms won't like it!
> Rory Campbell-Lange writes:
>
> > ...I couldn't find mol-drivers-macosx though:
On 27/05/04, Jens Schmalzing ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> They're in non-free.
On 27/05/04, Derrik Pates ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Do you have 'non-free' in your sources.list along w
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 11:17:46AM +0100, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> Hi Digger
>
> On 26/05/04, digger vermont ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 17:18 +0100, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> > > I'm trying to get mol to load my OSX partition.
> > >
> > > I've set
> > > blkde
Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
Thanks for the tip. I couldn't find mol-drivers-macosx though:
Do you have 'non-free' in your sources.list along with 'main'? You have
to have it, because the MacOS X support code contains a modified BootX
binary.
--
Derrik Pates
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Digger
On 26/05/04, digger vermont ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 17:18 +0100, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> > I'm trying to get mol to load my OSX partition.
> >
> > I've set
> > blkdev: /dev/hda16 -rw
> >
> > startmol --osx
> >
> > -->
On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 17:18 +0100, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> I'm trying to get mol to load my OSX partition.
>
> I've set
> blkdev: /dev/hda16 -rw
>
> startmol --osx
>
> --> The volume '/dev/hda16' is locked
> ...
> Can't read Elf32 image header
>
Anyone using mol on 2.6.6 to load OSX? I'm having problems.
On 25/05/04, Rory Campbell-Lange ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'm trying to get mol to load my OSX partition.
>
> I've set
> blkdev: /dev/hda16 -rw
>
> startmol --osx
>
> --> The volume '/dev/hda16' i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mol runs on my Tibook IV, but at startup the screen has a bluish green tint.
Anyone know what config file I have to tweak to fix this?
I'm guessing you're running it in X, using 16bpp depth? Unfortunately,
you have 3 options.
(a) use 8bpp mode in MacOS,
(b) use 15b
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Mol runs on my Tibook IV, but at startup the screen has a bluish
> green tint. Anyone know what config file I have to tweak to fix
> this?
You don't say whether this is with console or X11 mode.
If it happens in console mode, run molvconfig and select a differen
Hi,
Samuel Rydh writes:
> I have finally fixed the acceleration stuff for Mac OS 10.3.
[...]
> If the acceleration code kicks in then one should see the line
>
> 'MOL acceleration for 10.3'
>
> in the logfile.
Just thought I'd let you know that the new software works very well on
my Pism
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great, mol is up and running, however, I still have some issue where the
screen pixels go crazy upon starting mol. What could be causing this.
If you are running mol in full screen it might be that the particular
mode it starts in is not set up properly or does not
Great, mol is up and running, however, I still have some issue where the
screen pixels go crazy upon starting mol. What could be causing this. I have
attached my XF86Config-4 in case that provides any insight.
Thanks,
Derek Otto
Quoting Jens Schmalzing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> > Well, y
Hi,
> Well, ypu're probably right that this is my problem. Neither
> command came up with any matches. My question now is where can I
> get this package?
mol-drivers-macosx is in the non-free section. Add this to your
/etc/apt/sources.list, run apt-get update, and you should be fine.
> I inst
Well, ypu're probably right that this is my problem. Neither command came up
with any matches. My question now is where can I get this package? I installed
off of the mirrors.kernel.org source tree. Where did you get your version of
mol?
Thanks,
Derek Otto
Quoting Steven Blanchard <[EMAIL PROT
Hi,
Steven Blanchard writes:
> I am running debian unstable on a tibook IV. For me, the OSX
> drivers are in mol-drivers-macosx. Installing MOL defaults to
> installing the mol-drivers-linux.
> Try looking for it using one of these commands:
>
> $ dpkg -l mol-drivers-macosx
> $ apt-cache sear
I am running debian unstable on a tibook IV. For me, the OSX drivers are
in mol-drivers-macosx. Installing MOL defaults to installing the
mol-drivers-linux. Try looking for it using one of these commands:
$ dpkg -l mol-drivers-macosx
$ apt-cache search mol-drivers-macosx
Look at the man pages
On 27/01/2004, at 7:16 AM, listas wrote:
Anybody could tell me if could it be possible to have mol working
properly with Alu 17"?, i only have 8 bit and the graphics are really
ugly.
Works here on an Albook 15" (same video chipset, right?). Perhaps you
haven't configured your mol.video cor
On Thursday 11 December 2003 03:57, Gunnar von Boehn wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> First of all Many thanks for MOL -
> its a great piece of software.
>
>
> I have MOL installed on an iBook running in Yellow Dog Linux (3.0).
> The MAC OS X 10.2.8 installation runs fine in MOL.
>
>
> I wanted to us
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Volker Birk wrote:
> Ansgar Esztermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am experiencing a strange problem with MOL on woody
>
> Better use
>
> deb http://people.debian.org/~jensen woody/
Thanks, that worked -- at least I now have the necesssary modules.
MoL still won't load
Ansgar Esztermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am experiencing a strange problem with MOL on woody
Better use
deb http://people.debian.org/~jensen woody/
in your /etc/apt/sources.list for a MoL version which
works excellent.
VB.
--
X-Pie Software GmbH
Postfach 1540, 88334 Bad Waldsee
Phone +
Hi,
Lucas Moulin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Looks as if mol cannot find a bootable disk. There are several
> > reasons why this may happen:
> >
> > 1. You do not have Mac OS X installed. Insert a Mac OS X installation
> >CD and run `startmol --osx --cdboot'. Anyway, it is unlikely tha
On mar, aoû 19 08:24
Jens Schmalzing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
[...]
(I'm sending this again because it apparently did not make it the first
time...)
> Looks as if mol cannot find a bootable disk. There are several
> reasons why this may happen:
>
> 1. You do not have Mac OS X installed. Ins
1 - 100 of 230 matches
Mail list logo
