On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 the mental interface of Sven Luther told: > On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 11:16:48PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter > wrote: [...] > > I filed a bugreport to fix it. It is the job of the maintainer > > to implement it;) > > Yeah, ok, a quick reality check here. The mol maintainer died > tragically in july, leaving the package all but abandoned, i did > jump in because nobody else did and because mol was blocking the > 2.6.12 kernel transition, and because i used to work with Jens on > the 2.6 powerpc kernel packages.
AFAIR this was Martin Loschwitz? > I don't use mol and am not interested in being the sole maintainer > of it, except to make it build with newer kernel packages, and did > write so when i announced the mol 2.6.12 packages here, so read > the mailing list archive. So we need an interested maintainer! > The alternative being naturally to kick mol from the archive, or > at least the mol-modules, so they don't interfer with the kernel > packages, as mol seems abandoned upstream and there is no real > interest in doing real maintainership of them for debian, altough > Otavio proposed himself. I noticed the inactivity of upstream. At the moment we have a solution to patch mol-source running tiger. The maintainer has to be found here (or at debian-devel ....) and the upstream push at mol-general or something. Elimar -- On the keyboard of life you have always to keep a finger at the escape key;-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]