what are the advantages of using mol instead of dual-bool?
Running several operating systems simultaneously, and being able to run earlier versions of Mac OS on newer hardware.
virtual machines always have advantages and disadvantages over dual booting. mol isnt a true virtual machine as it does get into your hardware and is arch dependant, pearpc on the other hand is generally optimised for i386, but can be run on other archs (see documents elsewhere regarding running macosx on xbox and really ancient mac hardware etc)
mol is inherintally alot faster than pearpc, its advantages would have to be - not having to reboot to get at you macos (or other) applications. i dont see there being any performance benefits of a virtual machine over running macos, certinaly i wouldnt try to play games through it.
virtual machines are cool. i couldnt be bothered to list any more pros and cons, im sure you can find them on the mol or other virtual machine faqs.
Dean -- WWW: http://dean.bong.com.au LAN: http://www.bong.com.au EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 16867613
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
