On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 09:35:26AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> On 21-Jun-2005, Bill Allombert wrote:
> >
> > You can use the Debian menu system for that purpose.
> > You register webapps with a needs="web" and write menu-methods that
> > generate httpd config files from then.
>
> If you mean the
On 21-Jun-2005, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 05:37:27PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> > On 21-Jun-2005, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> > > Take a look at the apache2-doc package which installs a config
> > > fragment as /etc/apache2/conf.d/apache2-doc referring to the
> > > documentation un
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:52:52 -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 09:06:11PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:58:40 -0500, Manoj Srivastava
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (va, manoj)> said:
>> > On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 18:55:33 +0200, Miguel Gea Mi
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 05:37:27PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> On 21-Jun-2005, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 02:59:26PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> > >Yet some kind of connection needs to be established so that there's
> > >a clear default location for how PACKAGE should tell whate
On 21-Jun-2005, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 02:59:26PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> >Yet some kind of connection needs to be established so that there's
> >a clear default location for how PACKAGE should tell whatever
> >webserver is on the system that there's a new bunch of files
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 02:59:26PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
>On 20-Jun-2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 02:12:56PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
>> > - service-published content goes somewhere under /srv/
>> > - /srv/ is site-defined
>> > - thus shouldn't be clobbered by th
On 20-Jun-2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 02:12:56PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> > - service-published content goes somewhere under /srv/
> > - /srv/ is site-defined
> > - thus shouldn't be clobbered by the package manager
>
> > That last one's a bit of a blocker, isn'
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 02:12:56PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> So we have:
> - static content goes somewhere under /usr/
> - static, platform-independent content goes somewhere under
> /usr/share/
> - static, platform-independent content for PACKAGE goes under
> /usr/share/PACKAGE/
On 20-Jun-2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:58:40 -0500, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > (va, manoj)> said:
> > > /src/webapps/PACKAGE, perhaps?
> > Arrgh. /srv/webapps/PACKAGE, I meant.
>
> AFAICT, the FHS specifies that the structure of /srv is
> si
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 09:06:11PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:58:40 -0500, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (va,
> manoj)> said:
> > On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 18:55:33 +0200, Miguel Gea Milvaques
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >> Hi, On policy 11.5.4 says: "Web Applica
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:58:40 -0500, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (va,
manoj)> said:
> On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 18:55:33 +0200, Miguel Gea Milvaques
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Hi, On policy 11.5.4 says: "Web Applications should try to avoid
>> storing files in the Web Document Root. Instead
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 18:55:33 +0200, Miguel Gea Milvaques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Hi, On policy 11.5.4 says: "Web Applications should try to avoid
> storing files in the Web Document Root. Instead they should use the
> /usr/share/doc/package directory for documents and register the Web
> Appl
Chris Waters dijo [Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 05:55:56AM -0700]:
> > > No problem for me. But It could give little problems. On one of my
> > > machines a was beholden to remove /usr/share/doc directory, it broke my
> > > ldap-account-manager installation.
> >
> > Note: /usr/share/PACKAGE/www, not /usr/
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 05:55:56AM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> > Note: /usr/share/PACKAGE/www, not /usr/share/doc/PACKAGE/www.
> > Removing /usr/share/doc should not impact this web suggestion.
>
> And what happens if my WebApp package is named "doc"? Or "applnk"? Or
> "keymaps" or "locale" or
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 12:39:12AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 12:03:01AM +0200, Miguel Gea Milvaques wrote:
> > > Also, as this is a draft, the useage of "/usr/share/PACKAGE/www" may
> > > change. IMO, it's probably not going to, but it may be worth keeping
> > > (main)
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 12:03:01AM +0200, Miguel Gea Milvaques wrote:
> > Also, as this is a draft, the useage of "/usr/share/PACKAGE/www" may
> > change. IMO, it's probably not going to, but it may be worth keeping
> > (main) policy as is until we are in a position to release 1.0 of the
> > WebAp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 06:55:33PM +0200, Miguel Gea Milvaques wrote:
>
>>On policy 11.5.4 says:
>>"Web Applications should try to avoid storing files in the Web Document
>>Root. Instead they should use the /usr/share/doc/packag
On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 06:55:33PM +0200, Miguel Gea Milvaques wrote:
> On policy 11.5.4 says:
> "Web Applications should try to avoid storing files in the Web Document
> Root. Instead they should use the /usr/share/doc/package directory for
> documents and register the Web Application via the doc
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.6.2.1
Severity: normal
Hi,
On policy 11.5.4 says:
"Web Applications should try to avoid storing files in the Web Document
Root. Instead they should use the /usr/share/doc/package directory for
documents and register the Web Application via the doc-base package."
19 matches
Mail list logo
