On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:58:40 -0500, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (va, manoj)> said:
> On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 18:55:33 +0200, Miguel Gea Milvaques > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> Hi, On policy 11.5.4 says: "Web Applications should try to avoid >> storing files in the Web Document Root. Instead they should use the >> /usr/share/doc/package directory for documents and register the Web >> Application via the doc-base package." >> and in policy 12.3 says: "Packages must not require the existence >> of any files in /usr/share/doc/ in order to function." >> This points that all web applications that uses >> /usr/share/doc/package directory are breaking policy 12.3, so I >> think policy 11.5.4 must recommend other different directory. > I agree with this assessment. >> Recent works on webapps-common alioth project recommends to use the >> directory /usr/share/PACKAGE/www. > As others have suggested in this thread, since this is web > application data meant to be served by this host, it makes sense to > have a per-package sub director somewhere under /srv. > /src/webapps/PACKAGE, perhaps? Or is the draft Web Arrgh. /srv/webapps/PACKAGE, I meant. > applications policy the correct place to specify the actual path, > and just let 11.5.4 say a subdirectory under /srv, and defer to the > web applications policy for details? manoj -- Might as well be frank, monsieur. It would take a miracle to get you out of Casablanca. Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]