On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 12:39:12AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 12:03:01AM +0200, Miguel Gea Milvaques wrote: > > > Also, as this is a draft, the useage of "/usr/share/PACKAGE/www" may > > > change. IMO, it's probably not going to, but it may be worth keeping > > > (main) policy as is until we are in a position to release 1.0 of the > > > WebApps policy. > > > > No problem for me. But It could give little problems. On one of my > > machines a was beholden to remove /usr/share/doc directory, it broke my > > ldap-account-manager installation. > > Note: /usr/share/PACKAGE/www, not /usr/share/doc/PACKAGE/www. > Removing /usr/share/doc should not impact this web suggestion.
And what happens if my WebApp package is named "doc"? Or "applnk"? Or "keymaps" or "locale" or "pixmaps" or "zoneinfo"? While /usr/share/* is not the world's most overloaded namespace, its overloaded enough to cause me some concern, and if there are any reasonable alternatives (and I think there are), I would recommend using one instead. -- Chris Waters | Pneumonoultra- osis is too long [EMAIL PROTECTED] | microscopicsilico- to fit into a single or [EMAIL PROTECTED] | volcaniconi- standalone haiku -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
