-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Any suggestions?
it would help if you copy/pasted your XFreeconfig amd errorlog
Josh perrymon wrote:
> I?m having problems configuring my Dell 9300 with the x300 ATI card-
>
> I have the 17? XGA+ screen and tried the following options using XFREE86
I’m having problems configuring my Dell 9300 with the
x300 ATI card-
I have the 17” XGA+ screen and tried the following
options using XFREE86
ATI driver
Horiz- 28-100
Vert- 43-90
24 bit X 1600x1200 res I think
It bombs and says no screens found?
Any suggestions?
On Saturday 26 February 2005 01:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 09:38:40PM +0100, Mauro Darida wrote:
> > I confronted mine with yours and noticed two differences:
> > 1. DefaultDepth 16 (mine is 24)
> > 2. Section "Device"
> > you don't have Option "UseFBDev" "true"
In /var/
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 09:38:40PM +0100, Mauro Darida wrote:
> I confronted mine with yours and noticed two differences:
> 1. DefaultDepth 16 (mine is 24)
> 2. Section "Device"
> you don't have Option "UseFBDev" "true"
hmm.. It shold be better with "true" - i'll test it.
> After changing defaul
On Tuesday 22 February 2005 16:43, Marcin Bis wrote:
> copy gatos dir to /usr/X11R6/lib/modules
> copy mach64/mach64_dri.so to /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri
> copy mach64/ati[misc]_drv.o to /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers
> (overwriting existing files)
> chmod 644 those files
>
I followed your directio
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 14:52:31 +0100
Mauro Darida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, this is my lucky day, I have the same configuration: testing
> xfree86 4.3 kernel 2.6.10 self-compiled, ATI Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2x
> (rev 64). I had a look at those files; please confirm what I
>
e taken from:
> http://rainbow.mimuw.edu.pl/~mb197846/DRI/mach64-dri-xv-20030413.i386.tar.b
>z2 (You need to copy .o and .so files to /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/, do not
> run install.sh script!)
Ok, this is my lucky day, I have the same configuration: testing xfree86 4.3
kernel 2.6.10 se
to compile X.Org too.
The easy way is to install packages from:
http://www.nixnuts.net/files/
but this means installing X.Org, and (on my ATI Technologies Inc Rage
Mobility P/M AGP 2x (rev 64) ) glxinfo shows: direct rendering: No
--
Marcin Bis
--
Marcin Bis [jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [GG:17
to compile X.Org too.
The easy way is to install packages from:
http://www.nixnuts.net/files/
but this means installing X.Org, and (on my ATI Technologies Inc Rage
Mobility P/M AGP 2x (rev 64) ) glxinfo shows: direct rendering: No
--
Marcin Bis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
hi
after upgrading to sarge I eventually decided to try to get DRI acceleration
for my ATI Rage Mobility video card. I have read a lot on the subject but I
feel confused; please give me advice and corrections.
1. I want to retain debian xfree86 _and_ kernel 2.6
Is this possible? I see the Mach64
Anyone have any success with running a frame buffer other then the
standard vesa one on the Ati rage mobility M1 (mach64 variant)?
I tried the Ati mach64 one. It responds and fbset prints the right
resolution and refresh rate. The only problem is that I don't actually
get anything on screen
Anyone have any success with running a frame buffer other then the
standard vesa one on the Ati rage mobility M1 (mach64 variant)?
I tried the Ati mach64 one. It responds and fbset prints the right
resolution and refresh rate. The only problem is that I don't actually
get anything on screen
Anyone managed to get a frame buffer other then the vesa one to work for
the ati rage mobilty M1 card (on a sony vaio in my case)?
I tried aty128 but it seems that no fb is recognised. same for radeon
fb. With the atyfb I get a jumbled screen. It seems that it is
recognised and things seem to work,
Anyone managed to get a frame buffer other then the vesa one to work for
the ati rage mobilty M1 card (on a sony vaio in my case)?
I tried aty128 but it seems that no fb is recognised. same for radeon
fb. With the atyfb I get a jumbled screen. It seems that it is
recognised and things seem to work,
xv (XVideo) is an extension of XFree86 which is part of "extmod". there
is no program "xv" to find (though perhaps somewhere it might exist).
usually it is activated by having
Load"extmod"
somewhere in the section "Module" in /etc/X11/XF86Config-4.
While I have this line in my /etc/X11/XF
rehi..
* Bernhard Kleine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-16 16:13 +0200]:
> On Mit, 2003-07-16 at 13:14, Sebastian Henschel wrote:
> >
> > * "Dr. Bernhard Kleine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-16 11:58 +0200]:
> >
> > > whenever I try to look for xv it is not found in debian woody. How do
> > > you
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 03:57:08PM +0200, Bernhard Kleine wrote:
>
>you are sure? IIRC xv is the graphic viewer of unix mainframe. I
>displays bitmaps, converts them etc. That's why I wonder where this
>standard program is in the debian distribution.
xv used to be included in Debian, but it's non-
On Mit, 2003-07-16 at 13:14, Sebastian Henschel wrote:
> hi bernhard...
>
> * "Dr. Bernhard Kleine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-16 11:58 +0200]:
>
> > whenever I try to look for xv it is not found in debian woody. How do
> > you expect to use Xv extensions and xv, when there is not program with
xv (XVideo) is an extension of XFree86 which is part of "extmod". there
is no program "xv" to find (though perhaps somewhere it might exist).
usually it is activated by having
Load"extmod"
somewhere in the section "Module" in /etc/X11/XF86Config-4.
While I have this line in my /etc/X11/XF86Co
rehi..
* Bernhard Kleine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-16 16:13 +0200]:
> On Mit, 2003-07-16 at 13:14, Sebastian Henschel wrote:
> >
> > * "Dr. Bernhard Kleine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-16 11:58 +0200]:
> >
> > > whenever I try to look for xv it is not found in debian woody. How do
> > > you
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 03:57:08PM +0200, Bernhard Kleine wrote:
>
>you are sure? IIRC xv is the graphic viewer of unix mainframe. I
>displays bitmaps, converts them etc. That's why I wonder where this
>standard program is in the debian distribution.
xv used to be included in Debian, but it's non-
On Mit, 2003-07-16 at 13:14, Sebastian Henschel wrote:
> hi bernhard...
>
> * "Dr. Bernhard Kleine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-16 11:58 +0200]:
>
> > whenever I try to look for xv it is not found in debian woody. How do
> > you expect to use Xv extensions and xv, when there is not program with
hi bernhard...
* "Dr. Bernhard Kleine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-16 11:58 +0200]:
> whenever I try to look for xv it is not found in debian woody. How do
> you expect to use Xv extensions and xv, when there is not program with
> this name?
xv (XVideo) is an extension of XFree86 which is part
hi bernhard...
* "Dr. Bernhard Kleine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-16 11:58 +0200]:
> whenever I try to look for xv it is not found in debian woody. How do
> you expect to use Xv extensions and xv, when there is not program with
> this name?
xv (XVideo) is an extension of XFree86 which is part
On Don, 2003-07-10 at 15:51, Pawel Maczewski wrote:
> Hi all,
> I hava a compaq laptop with this ATI card. Installed debian (woody), xfree
> 4.2.x, recompiled 2.4.21 kernel with drm for all ati's chipsets and
> everything works ok (when I use 'ati' driver), except of the Xv extension
> (and glx
hi,
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 09:41:49AM +0200, Pawel Maczewski wrote:
> Hi, I have a Compaq armada laptop with ATI card. Is it possible to get a
> working Xv extension with Xfree4.2 or 4.3? Does anyone have such a card
> with a working Xv and glx?
I have xv working although the colors are sometim
Hi, I have a Compaq armada laptop with ATI card. Is it possible to get a
working Xv extension with Xfree4.2 or 4.3? Does anyone have such a card
with a working Xv and glx?
regards,
Pawel
--
Paweł Mączewski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Don, 2003-07-10 at 15:51, Pawel Maczewski wrote:
> Hi all,
> I hava a compaq laptop with this ATI card. Installed debian (woody), xfree
> 4.2.x, recompiled 2.4.21 kernel with drm for all ati's chipsets and
> everything works ok (when I use 'ati' driver), except of the Xv extension
> (and glx
hi,
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 09:41:49AM +0200, Pawel Maczewski wrote:
> Hi, I have a Compaq armada laptop with ATI card. Is it possible to get a
> working Xv extension with Xfree4.2 or 4.3? Does anyone have such a card
> with a working Xv and glx?
I have xv working although the colors are sometim
Hi, I have a Compaq armada laptop with ATI card. Is it possible to get a
working Xv extension with Xfree4.2 or 4.3? Does anyone have such a card
with a working Xv and glx?
regards,
Pawel
--
Paweł Mączewski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
:
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage Mobility P/M
AGP 2x
Subsystem: Compaq Computer Corporation: Unknown device b111
Flags: bus master, stepping, medium devsel, latency 66, IRQ 11
Memory at 4000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16M]
I/O ports at
e:
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage Mobility P/M
AGP 2x
Subsystem: Compaq Computer Corporation: Unknown device b111
Flags: bus master, stepping, medium devsel, latency 66, IRQ 11
Memory at 4000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16M]
I/O ports at
It works very good with gatos ati.2 driver.
Thank you.
Edgar Antonio Luna Díaz wrote:
Nicolas Delestre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
Since i updated my debian sarge on my Dell laptitude CPxJ 650 (with an
ATI Rage Mobility video card), that installed a new version of xfree
(to the 4
Tim Connors wrote:
> On Wed, 21 May 2003, Nicolas Delestre wrote:
>
>
>>Hi,
>>Since i updated my debian sarge on my Dell laptitude CPxJ 650 (with an ATI
Rage
>>Mobility video card), that installed a new version of xfree (to the 4.2.1.6
>>version), i can not u
On Wed, 21 May 2003, Nicolas Delestre wrote:
> Hi,
> Since i updated my debian sarge on my Dell laptitude CPxJ 650 (with an ATI
> Rage
> Mobility video card), that installed a new version of xfree (to the 4.2.1.6
> version), i can not use the crt port to display X on a monitor
Hi,
Since i updated my debian sarge on my Dell laptitude CPxJ 650 (with an ATI Rage
Mobility video card), that installed a new version of xfree (to the 4.2.1.6
version), i can not use the crt port to display X on a monitor (it continue to
works fine with the lcd). When i try to display X on
question is: How can I get all the modules loaded which are specified in
the Modules section of XF86Config-4?
Philipp
Philipp Haller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> My Rage Mobility (in my IBM A22e) belongs to the mach64 chipset family, so I
> went to http://dr
question is: How can I get all the modules loaded which are specified in the
Modules section of XF86Config-4?
Philipp
Philipp Haller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> My Rage Mobility (in my IBM A22e) belongs to the mach64 chipset family, so I went to
>http://dr
(==) default setting,
(++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
(==) ServerLayout "Default Layout"
(**) |-->Screen "Default Screen" (0)
(**) | |-->Monitor "Laptop Display"
(**)
(==) default setting,
(++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
(==) ServerLayout "Default Layout"
(**) |-->Screen "Default Screen" (0)
(**) | |-->Monitor "Laptop Display"
try
make-kpkg modules_images
from within /usr/src/linux with the pcmcia source in
/usr/src/modules/pcmcia...
that should build a kernel-modules-xx.deb which you can then install.
also read the documentation of make-kpkg which also makes handling different
kernels a lot easier.
greets Ben
Thanks.
I found the .config for my stock kernel also in the kernel-headers-2.4.18 dir.
OK, now I have a working kernel. But pcmcia-cs is still lacking. Thus, I
installed pcmcia-source. This gives me a tarball pcmcia-cs.tar.gz in /usr/src.
I unpacked it, but when trying to "make all", it complains
try
make-kpkg modules_images
from within /usr/src/linux with the pcmcia source in
/usr/src/modules/pcmcia...
that should build a kernel-modules-xx.deb which you can then install.
also read the documentation of make-kpkg which also makes handling different
kernels a lot easier.
greets Be
Thanks.
I found the .config for my stock kernel also in the kernel-headers-2.4.18 dir.
OK, now I have a working kernel. But pcmcia-cs is still lacking. Thus, I installed
pcmcia-source. This gives me a tarball pcmcia-cs.tar.gz in /usr/src. I unpacked it,
but when trying to "make all", it complain
od as my stock 2.4.18-bf2.4. Can I get the .config for the 2.4.18-bf2.4
> kernel from somewhere? Because this would be a good starting point for the
> new configuration.
>
>phil
>
> > On Sunday 06 October 2002 14:30, Philipp Haller wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > &
On Sun, 06 Oct 2002 18:22:32 +0200, Philipp Haller writes:
>my stock 2.4.18-bf2.4. Can I get the .config for the 2.4.18-bf2.4 kernel from
>somewhere? Because this would be a good starting point for the new configurati
>on.
they're in /boot/config-something.
regards
az
--
+ Alexander Zangerl +
ller wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > My Rage Mobility (in my IBM A22e) belongs to the mach64 chipset family, so
> > I went to http://dri.sf.net/snapshots/bleeding-edge/ and downloaded the
> > last snapshot for mach64. But when I launch ./install.sh I get the
> >
od as my stock 2.4.18-bf2.4. Can I get the .config for the 2.4.18-bf2.4
> kernel from somewhere? Because this would be a good starting point for the
> new configuration.
>
>phil
>
> > On Sunday 06 October 2002 14:30, Philipp Haller wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > &
On Sun, 06 Oct 2002 18:22:32 +0200, Philipp Haller writes:
>my stock 2.4.18-bf2.4. Can I get the .config for the 2.4.18-bf2.4 kernel from
>somewhere? Because this would be a good starting point for the new configurati
>on.
they're in /boot/config-something.
regards
az
--
+ Alexander Zangerl +
ller wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > My Rage Mobility (in my IBM A22e) belongs to the mach64 chipset family, so
> > I went to http://dri.sf.net/snapshots/bleeding-edge/ and downloaded the
> > last snapshot for mach64. But when I launch ./install.sh I get the
> >
Hi,
on a related note, does gatos modules and dri.sf.net modules complete each other
or are they in conflict with each other? I'm a bit confused about these things.
I believe I have the same chip.
lspci says:
ATI Technologies Inc Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2x (rev 64)
Cheers.
On Sun, 6 Oct
benny
On Sunday 06 October 2002 14:30, Philipp Haller wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> My Rage Mobility (in my IBM A22e) belongs to the mach64 chipset family, so
> I went to http://dri.sf.net/snapshots/bleeding-edge/ and downloaded the
> last snapshot for mach64. But when I launch ./install.
Hello all,
My Rage Mobility (in my IBM A22e) belongs to the mach64 chipset family, so I
went to http://dri.sf.net/snapshots/bleeding-edge/ and downloaded the last
snapshot for mach64. But when I launch ./install.sh I get the following error
when trying to compile the DRM kernel modules:
The
Hi,
on a related note, does gatos modules and dri.sf.net modules complete each other
or are they in conflict with each other? I'm a bit confused about these things.
I believe I have the same chip.
lspci says:
ATI Technologies Inc Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2x (rev 64)
Cheers.
On Sun, 6 Oct
benny
On Sunday 06 October 2002 14:30, Philipp Haller wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> My Rage Mobility (in my IBM A22e) belongs to the mach64 chipset family, so
> I went to http://dri.sf.net/snapshots/bleeding-edge/ and downloaded the
> last snapshot for mach64. But when I launch ./install.
Hello all,
My Rage Mobility (in my IBM A22e) belongs to the mach64 chipset family, so I went to
http://dri.sf.net/snapshots/bleeding-edge/ and downloaded the last snapshot for
mach64. But when I launch ./install.sh I get the following error when trying to
compile the DRM kernel modules:
The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 16 Jul 2002 8:02 pm, Valéry Febvre wrote:
> > I really hope one of you guys can help me, im all out of ideas.
>
> Yes, your chipset belong to mach64 chipset familly probably.
> Goto http://dri.sf.net/snapshots/bleeding-edge/ and download the
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 20:32:13 +0100
Tom Badran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a laptop (thinkpad a22m) with a rage mobility card. Depending on where
> i look (lspci, proc etc) it is reported as either a Rage Mobility LF, or a
> Rage Mobility P/M.
>
> I have x workin
I have a laptop (thinkpad a22m) with a rage mobility card. Depending on where
i look (lspci, proc etc) it is reported as either a Rage Mobility LF, or a
Rage Mobility P/M.
I have x working nicely (very smooth dvd playback etc) but i cant get DRI to
work at all (using 2.4.18 kernel with many
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 09:06:21PM + or sometime in the same epoch, Stig
Brautaset scribbled:
> Hi guys and gals,
>
> I have a Dell Latitude CPx H500GT with (reportedly) a ati rage mobility
> p in it. I was told I could get hardware scaling with the gatos driver,
> and want
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 09:06:21PM + or sometime in the same epoch, Stig Brautaset
scribbled:
> Hi guys and gals,
>
> I have a Dell Latitude CPx H500GT with (reportedly) a ati rage mobility
> p in it. I was told I could get hardware scaling with the gatos driver,
> and want
Hi guys and gals,
I have a Dell Latitude CPx H500GT with (reportedly) a ati rage mobility
p in it. I was told I could get hardware scaling with the gatos driver,
and wanted to know what people here think before I went on a possibly
useless mission to install them manually...
Do the driver exist
Hi guys and gals,
I have a Dell Latitude CPx H500GT with (reportedly) a ati rage mobility
p in it. I was told I could get hardware scaling with the gatos driver,
and wanted to know what people here think before I went on a possibly
useless mission to install them manually...
Do the driver
The problem is that there are different "Mobility" chipsets. Some are
supported by the r128 dri driver, others only work with mach64. IMHO,
the rage mobility-P is only supported by the mach64 driver. Check your
documentation for the true name (with '-P', '-LM', wha
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001 19:24:09 +0800
"Michael Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 08:58:40PM +0200, Michael Thaler wrote:
> > I have a Sony Vaio with Ati Rage Mobility. I set up X and it works
> > just fine. But yesterday someone ment
The problem is that there are different "Mobility" chipsets. Some are
supported by the r128 dri driver, others only work with mach64. IMHO,
the rage mobility-P is only supported by the mach64 driver. Check your
documentation for the true name (with '-P', '-LM', wha
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001 19:24:09 +0800
"Michael Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 08:58:40PM +0200, Michael Thaler wrote:
> > I have a Sony Vaio with Ati Rage Mobility. I set up X and it works
> > just fine. But yesterday someone ment
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 08:58:40PM +0200, Michael Thaler wrote:
> I have a Sony Vaio with Ati Rage Mobility. I set up X and it works
> just fine. But yesterday someone mentioned hardware acceleration for
> the ati driver. How can I get dri working for the ati driver? I
> installed tu
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 08:58:40PM +0200, Michael Thaler wrote:
> I have a Sony Vaio with Ati Rage Mobility. I set up X and it works
> just fine. But yesterday someone mentioned hardware acceleration for
> the ati driver. How can I get dri working for the ati driver? I
> installed tu
ohwell, lets not go too fast yet :)
> Ok lets take that later :)
>
> AdL> On Tue, 2001-10-16 at 15:24, Søren Neigaard wrote:
> >> In the old X86Free 3.x the XF86Setup had the "ATI Rage Mobility-P
> >> AGP2X" as a option I could choose, but I just upgraded
27;ve answered your questions.
greetings,
alex
On Wed, 2001-10-17 at 20:58, Michael Thaler wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 11:54:40AM +0200, Søren Neigaard wrote:
>
> I have a Sony Vaio with Ati Rage Mobility. I set up X and it works
> just fine. But yesterday someone mentioned hardware
; AdL> ohwell, lets not go too fast yet :)
> Ok lets take that later :)
>
> AdL> On Tue, 2001-10-16 at 15:24, Søren Neigaard wrote:
> >> In the old X86Free 3.x the XF86Setup had the "ATI Rage Mobility-P
> >> AGP2X" as a option I could choose, but I just upgraded
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 11:54:40AM +0200, Søren Neigaard wrote:
I have a Sony Vaio with Ati Rage Mobility. I set up X and it works
just fine. But yesterday someone mentioned hardware acceleration for
the ati driver. How can I get dri working for the ati driver? I
installed tuxracer on my notebook
27;ve answered your questions.
greetings,
alex
On Wed, 2001-10-17 at 20:58, Michael Thaler wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 11:54:40AM +0200, Søren Neigaard wrote:
>
> I have a Sony Vaio with Ati Rage Mobility. I set up X and it works
> just fine. But yesterday someone mentioned hardware
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 11:54:40AM +0200, Søren Neigaard wrote:
I have a Sony Vaio with Ati Rage Mobility. I set up X and it works
just fine. But yesterday someone mentioned hardware acceleration for
the ati driver. How can I get dri working for the ati driver? I
installed tuxracer on my
yet :)
Ok lets take that later :)
AdL> On Tue, 2001-10-16 at 15:24, Søren Neigaard wrote:
>> In the old X86Free 3.x the XF86Setup had the "ATI Rage Mobility-P
>> AGP2X" as a option I could choose, but I just upgraded to X86Free 4,
>> and I cant find my card there
fast yet :)
Ok lets take that later :)
AdL> On Tue, 2001-10-16 at 15:24, Søren Neigaard wrote:
>> In the old X86Free 3.x the XF86Setup had the "ATI Rage Mobility-P
>> AGP2X" as a option I could choose, but I just upgraded to X86Free 4,
>> and I cant find my card there
way in DRI for the mach64, a pain to set up.
ohwell, lets not go too fast yet :)
good luck,
Alex de Landgraaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, 2001-10-16 at 15:24, Søren Neigaard wrote:
> In the old X86Free 3.x the XF86Setup had the "ATI Rage Mobility-P
> AGP2X" as a option I coul
In the old X86Free 3.x the XF86Setup had the "ATI Rage Mobility-P
AGP2X" as a option I could choose, but I just upgraded to X86Free 4,
and I cant find my card there (I use the xf86cfg tool). How do I then
set my card up?
I have X running, but my screen is all black, and filled with
way in DRI for the mach64, a pain to set up.
ohwell, lets not go too fast yet :)
good luck,
Alex de Landgraaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, 2001-10-16 at 15:24, Søren Neigaard wrote:
> In the old X86Free 3.x the XF86Setup had the "ATI Rage Mobility-P
> AGP2X" as a option I coul
In the old X86Free 3.x the XF86Setup had the "ATI Rage Mobility-P
AGP2X" as a option I could choose, but I just upgraded to X86Free 4,
and I cant find my card there (I use the xf86cfg tool). How do I then
set my card up?
I have X running, but my screen is all black, and filled with
In the old X86Free 3.x the XF86Setup had the "ATI Rage Mobility-P
AGP2X" as a option I could choose, but I just upgraded to X86Free 4,
and I cant find my card there (I use the xf86cfg tool). How do I then
set my card up?
I have X running, but my screen is all black, and filled with
In the old X86Free 3.x the XF86Setup had the "ATI Rage Mobility-P
AGP2X" as a option I could choose, but I just upgraded to X86Free 4,
and I cant find my card there (I use the xf86cfg tool). How do I then
set my card up?
I have X running, but my screen is all black, and filled with
Thank you! 'chipset VESA' works beautifully.
Though not without a little effort. 'vgatest' first complained that
src/driver.h/MAX_REGS was not large enough, so I installed the source
package, and recompiled with the recommended value. After that vgatest
ran, but was corrupting my console's font.
Thank you! 'chipset VESA' works beautifully.
Though not without a little effort. 'vgatest' first complained that
src/driver.h/MAX_REGS was not large enough, so I installed the source
package, and recompiled with the recommended value. After that vgatest
ran, but was corrupting my console's font
> Hi,
>
> I'm having a rough time getting svgalib to work.
> The utilities
> distributed with the library all hang my machine (ARM Computer Inc.
> laptop, model N38W3), as does a tiny test app to retrieve the current
> chipset. I have to reboot the machine after every attempt at running
> those
Hi,
I'm having a rough time getting svgalib to work. The utilities
distributed with the library all hang my machine (ARM Computer Inc.
laptop, model N38W3), as does a tiny test app to retrieve the current
chipset. I have to reboot the machine after every attempt at running
those tools; I notice
> Hi,
>
> I'm having a rough time getting svgalib to work.
> The utilities
> distributed with the library all hang my machine (ARM Computer Inc.
> laptop, model N38W3), as does a tiny test app to retrieve the current
> chipset. I have to reboot the machine after every attempt at running
> thos
Hi,
I'm having a rough time getting svgalib to work. The utilities
distributed with the library all hang my machine (ARM Computer Inc.
laptop, model N38W3), as does a tiny test app to retrieve the current
chipset. I have to reboot the machine after every attempt at running
those tools; I notice
Okay, here's another little oddity--if I use the laptops function-F8
key combination to switch over to the external monitor manually
*before* I start up X (with the diplay option set to CRT), it comes up
clear as a bell (and thinking it's hooked up to a CRT--it will let
me display 1600x1200, for in
Okay, here's another little oddity--if I use the laptops function-F8
key combination to switch over to the external monitor manually
*before* I start up X (with the diplay option set to CRT), it comes up
clear as a bell (and thinking it's hooked up to a CRT--it will let
me display 1600x1200, for i
Thanks, but I've tried it with quite a few different resolutions.
Right now I'm testing at 1024x768.
--Daniel
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 01:20:03PM -0400, Yannick Asselin wrote:
> > Section "Screen"
> > Identifier "Screen0"
> > Device "Card0"
> > Monitor"Monitor0"
Thanks, but I've tried it with quite a few different resolutions.
Right now I'm testing at 1024x768.
--Daniel
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 01:20:03PM -0400, Yannick Asselin wrote:
> > Section "Screen"
> > Identifier "Screen0"
> > Device "Card0"
> > Monitor"Monitor0
I've sent the following message to a couple of the XFree86
mailing lists, and haven't got much back--maybe someone
here can help? Thanks.
I've been working on a Dell Latitude C600 with an
ATI Rage 128 Mobility LF (or something like that).
I want to be able to start X up on an external
monitor (as
I've sent the following message to a couple of the XFree86
mailing lists, and haven't got much back--maybe someone
here can help? Thanks.
I've been working on a Dell Latitude C600 with an
ATI Rage 128 Mobility LF (or something like that).
I want to be able to start X up on an external
monitor (as
oks clean).
Any help available is appreciated.
http://excelsior.loopysoft.com/~entropy/Matts%20Fuckup.JPG
Thanks again,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Matt Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 9:42 AM
To: debian-laptop@lists.debian.org
Subject: RE: Rage Mobility
(it looks clean).
Any help available is appreciated.
http://excelsior.loopysoft.com/~entropy/Matts%20Fuckup.JPG
Thanks again,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Matt Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 9:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Rage Mobility
Ok guys,
Ok guys, thanks for the help. If you don't hear from me, everything went
well :)
Later,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Gyurko Szabolcs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 1:41 AM
To: debian-laptop@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Rage Mobility
Because LILO accept
Ok guys, thanks for the help. If you don't hear from me, everything went
well :)
Later,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Gyurko Szabolcs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 1:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Rage Mobility
Because LILO accept only 0x f
Because LILO accept only 0x format at the prompt. If you enter the hex value
for 885 it'll work.
You can use the hex form in the config file too.
Bye.
Jon Leonard wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 06:27:48PM -0400, Alan Shutko wrote:
> > "Matt Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
