On Sun, 03 Jul 2022 17:21:13 +0200
Dietz Proepper wrote:
Hello Dietz,
>since the update to the kde version from unstable some days ago digikam
>is no longer installable.
There are several things that need to happen before digikam can be made
installable again. See https://tracker.debi
Il 03/07/22 17:21, Dietz Proepper ha scritto:
Hi,
since the update to the kde version from unstable some days ago digikam is no
longer installable.
Are there plans underway to fix that? (Simply rebuilding from source failed
due to some compilation error.)
Kindest regards,
Dietz
and
Hi,
since the update to the kde version from unstable some days ago digikam is no
longer installable.
Are there plans underway to fix that? (Simply rebuilding from source failed
due to some compilation error.)
Kindest regards,
Dietz
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
Am Freitag, 27. August 2021, 16:36:01 CEST schrieb MERLIN Philippe:
> Hello,
> the update from Kde 4:20 to 4:21 removes the digikam
> software,
> in my case blocks the installation of this new version.
> My question is the following: is there a foreseeable date
> of an update of
On vrijdag 27 augustus 2021 20:13:39 CEST MERLIN Philippe wrote:
> Sorry, for me the result of .
> export LANG=C; apt dist-upgrade -V
Maybe don't (normally) use dist-upgrade?
The normal/safe- upgrade is all you need in 99% of cases.
That sometimes, like in this case, means you have to wait a coup
Am Freitag, 27. August 2021, 17:13:26 CEST schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
> MERLIN Philippe - 27.08.21, 16:36:01 CEST:
> > the update from Kde 4:20 to 4:21 removes the digikam
> > software,
> > in my case blocks the installation of this new version.
> > My question i
Am Freitag, 27. August 2021, 17:13:26 CEST schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
> MERLIN Philippe - 27.08.21, 16:36:01 CEST:
> > the update from Kde 4:20 to 4:21 removes the digikam
> > software,
> > in my case blocks the installation of this new version.
> > My question i
On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 20:13:39 +0200
MERLIN Philippe wrote:
Hello MERLIN,
>Sorry, for me the result of .
{snip}
>The following packages will be REMOVED:
It wasn't my intention to imply that your experience was unusual;
Martin's reply indicates the problem is known, and a solution will
present in
Le vendredi 27 août 2021, 18:19:30 CEST Brad Rogers a écrit :
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 17:13:26 +0200
> Martin Steigerwald wrote:
>
> Hello Martin,
>
> >Once the release team gets to it and the builds are through it should
> >be installable again.
>
> Weird; I u
Hello,
the update from Kde 4:20 to 4:21 removes the digikam
software,
in my case blocks the installation of this new version.
My question is the following: is there a foreseeable date
of an update of digikam compatible with the 4:21?
Philippe Merlin
On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 17:13:26 +0200
Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Hello Martin,
>Once the release team gets to it and the builds are through it should
>be installable again.
Weird; I updated KDE/Plasma and digikam was not removed here. Still
installed and (just checking) it still runs.
Th
MERLIN Philippe - 27.08.21, 16:36:01 CEST:
> the update from Kde 4:20 to 4:21 removes the digikam
> software,
> in my case blocks the installation of this new version.
> My question is the following: is there a foreseeable date
> of an update of digikam compatible with the 4:21?
No
Brad Rogers - 17.02.20, 12:40:42 CET:
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 16:12:26 +0500
> Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
[…]
> >Do you mean one should install digikam instead of kipi-plugins now if
> >they need export from KDE apps?
>
> All I see here is that, despite the removal of kipi-
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 16:12:26 +0500
Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
Hello Andrey,
>Do you mean one should install digikam instead of kipi-plugins now if
>they need export from KDE apps?
All I see here is that, despite the removal of kipi-plugins, digikam
still has the export options.
Other
Thanks Rik,
I see they're now optional (digikam 6.4 depends no more on them)
and hopefully they'll land in sid in a not so distant future ...
Michal
On 17/02/2020 10:30, Michal BULIK wrote:
6.4.0 has entered testing. What about kipi-plugins ? Has it disappeared ?
Or has it been r
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 12:05:01PM +0100, Luigi Toscano wrote:
> Also, please note that they have been kept around after digikam totally
> dropped them just for compatibility purpose, but they are basically replaced
> by the Purpose framework also in the other projects. See also:
&
should install digikam instead of kipi-plugins now if they
need export from KDE apps?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
to a new source by KDE, and made part of KDE
> applications/release-service.
>
> The new source upload is in the ftp master's NEW queue:
>
> https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
Also, please note that they have been kept around after digikam totally
dropped them just for compatibility
ading (here, at least) required its removal. A log
out and back in and all the export options still exist.
You may have to remove another package (I had to remove libgdal20) prior
to upgrading digikam. It probably depends on a) what you've had
installed before and b) what you use to perform u
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 11:30:12AM +0100, Michal BULIK wrote:
>
> 6.4.0 has entered testing. What about kipi-plugins ? Has it disappeared ?
> Or has it been replaced by something else ?
Separate kipi-plugins 4:19.12.2-1 source package is in NEW.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP sign
On 17/02/2020 10:30, Michal BULIK wrote:
>
> 6.4.0 has entered testing. What about kipi-plugins ? Has it disappeared ?
> Or has it been replaced by something else ?
>
> Thank you,
> Michal
They were split to a new source by KDE, and made part of KDE
applications/release-service.
The new source
6.4.0 has entered testing. What about kipi-plugins ? Has it disappeared ?
Or has it been replaced by something else ?
Thank you,
Michal
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 22:39:12 +0100
Antoine Pardigon wrote:
Hello Antoine,
what's the status now ? (not frozen anymore ?)
6.4.0 entered unstable today.
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 22:39:12 +0100
Antoine Pardigon wrote:
Hello Antoine,
>what's the status now ? (not frozen anymore ?)
6.4.0 entered unstable today. All things being well, it'll transition
to testing in five days.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 22:39:12 +0100
Antoine Pardigon wrote:
Hello Antoine,
>what's the status now ? (not frozen anymore ?)
I'm not one of the developers, so don't can't tell you what's occurring
or how long it'll take to get digikam moving again, but
A
hello,
Am Freitag, 1. März 2019, 11:57:41 CET schrieb Andrey Rahmatullin:
On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 11:33:08AM +0100, Dietz Proepper wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a humble question - digiKam 6.0.0 is out some weeks now. Are there
> plans
> to
> package it?
We are currently frozen, by the
Am Freitag, 1. März 2019, 11:57:41 CET schrieb Andrey Rahmatullin:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 11:33:08AM +0100, Dietz Proepper wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > a humble question - digiKam 6.0.0 is out some weeks now. Are there plans
> > to
> > package it?
>
> We are c
On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 11:33:08AM +0100, Dietz Proepper wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a humble question - digiKam 6.0.0 is out some weeks now. Are there plans to
> package it?
We are currently frozen, by the way.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
a humble question - digiKam 6.0.0 is out some weeks now. Are there plans to
package it?
Kindest regards,
Dietz
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hello!
If you have:
merkaba:~> LANG=C apt dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
digikam digikam-private-libs kipi-plugins libmarblewidget-qt5-24
On giovedì 11 agosto 2016 08:25:13 CEST Pino Toscano wrote:
> In data mercoledì 3 agosto 2016 18:44:18 CEST, Valerio Passini ha scritto:
> > Hello, is there any plan to bring kipi-plugins back to gwenviev
> > considering
> > that Digikam completed the port to Plasma 5 and
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 04:43:22PM +0200, Luigi Toscano wrote:
> spectacle should carry the proper configuration to allow the snapshot with the
> Print button. khotkeys was even changed to not hardcode ksnapshot:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126091/
I've checked my two other KDE systems (not
On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 19:33:39 +0500
Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
Hello Andrey,
>I didn't understand what do you mean but I've found that it's not a
I misunderstood what you wrote. My apologies. Glad you found what
you're looking for.
After what Luigi wrote (Spectacle should be able to do what's
Andrey Rahmatullin ha scritto:
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 03:19:01PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
>>> in the KDE Daemon global hotkey section and it doesn't launch spectacle.
>> Delete ksnapshot, enter spectacle, hit 'Apply'.
> I didn't understand what do you mean but I've found that it's not a
> built
Castermans ha scritto:
> >> > Indeed installing Digikam 5 forces to remove kdegraphics package. I
> >> > think
> >> >
> >> > I can miss a few, except for ksnapshot. Is this a wrong dependency?
> >>
> >> Yes, the kdegraphics metapackag
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 03:19:01PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> >in the KDE Daemon global hotkey section and it doesn't launch spectacle.
> Delete ksnapshot, enter spectacle, hit 'Apply'.
I didn't understand what do you mean but I've found that it's not a
builting hotkey (unfortunately for a DE) but
On 14 August 2016 at 16:56, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 14. August 2016, 08:37:38 CEST schrieb Pino Toscano:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In data sabato 13 agosto 2016 20:08:01 CEST, Luc Castermans ha scritto:
>> > Indeed installing Digikam 5 forces to remove kdegraphic
On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 15:56:38 +0200
Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Hello Martin,
>The only thing I miss from kde-spectacle is simply numbering
>screenshots. It
Easy; Strip everything after 'Screenshot' in the image save pattern.
Spectacle *does* state this in the preferences.
--
Regards _
On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 19:09:34 +0500
Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
Hello Andrey,
>in the KDE Daemon global hotkey section and it doesn't launch spectacle.
Delete ksnapshot, enter spectacle, hit 'Apply'.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever im
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 08:37:38AM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> Yes, the kdegraphics metapackage needs to switch from ksnapshot to
> kde-spectacle. As people pointed out already, ksnapshot is no more
> developed, and instead there's spectacle (called kde-spectacle in Debian
> for naming issues) whi
Am Sonntag, 14. August 2016, 08:37:38 CEST schrieb Pino Toscano:
> Hi,
>
> In data sabato 13 agosto 2016 20:08:01 CEST, Luc Castermans ha scritto:
> > Indeed installing Digikam 5 forces to remove kdegraphics package. I think
> >
> > I can miss a few, except for
Hi,
In data sabato 13 agosto 2016 20:08:01 CEST, Luc Castermans ha scritto:
> Indeed installing Digikam 5 forces to remove kdegraphics package. I think
>
> I can miss a few, except for ksnapshot. Is this a wrong dependency?
Yes, the kdegraphics metapackage needs to switch from ksnapsh
start, it's aware of
the possibility that there may be more than one monitor, and that the
current desktop can span them all.
Great guys,
I installed Digikam 5. It works, incl. panorama making, which did not work
anymore in 4.14 version.
As previously reported here, movie viewing does not
there may be more than one monitor, and that the
current desktop can span them all.
Great guys,
I installed Digikam 5. It works, incl. panorama making, which did not work
anymore in 4.14 version.
As previously reported here, movie viewing does not work.
Also kde-spectacle is an improved
On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 21:08:08 +0200
Diederik de Haas wrote:
Hello Diederik,
>You can use kde-spectacle which is (apparently) the successor to
>ksnapshot
It does appear more capable than KSnapShot. For a start, it's aware of
the possibility that there may be more than one monitor, and that the
c
On zaterdag 13 augustus 2016 20:08:01 CEST Luc Castermans wrote:
> I can miss a few, except for ksnapshot.
You can use kde-spectacle which is (apparently) the successor to ksnapshot
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi,
Indeed installing Digikam 5 forces to remove kdegraphics package. I think
I can miss a few, except for ksnapshot. Is this a wrong dependency?
So I better wait?
Luc
=
root@canne:~# aptitude install digikam -t sid
De volgende NIEUWE pakketten zullen worden
Am Donnerstag, 11. August 2016, 16:28:27 CEST schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
> Hello Pino, hello Steve, hello everyone,
>
> I installed digikam, kipi plugins from experimental. I added ffmpegthumbs
> for thumbnails. I also added mplayerthumbs later just in case.
>
> I was surprise
Hello Luc,
Am Freitag, 12. August 2016, 05:57:34 CEST schrieb Luc Castermans:
> hi, how did you install it? I have testin/sid installed. When I try to
> install it aptitude proposes to remove kde-full and few other packages.
> I.e. dependencies appear to prevent installing.
I let it remove ksnaps
llo everyone,
>
> I installed digikam, kipi plugins from experimental. I added ffmpegthumbs
> for
> thumbnails. I also added mplayerthumbs later just in case.
>
> I was surprised at being greeted by the migration assistent, but then just
> went through it. (I read the mail you linked
Hello Pino, hello Steve, hello everyone,
I installed digikam, kipi plugins from experimental. I added ffmpegthumbs for
thumbnails. I also added mplayerthumbs later just in case.
I was surprised at being greeted by the migration assistent, but then just
went through it. (I read the mail you
In data mercoledì 3 agosto 2016 18:44:18 CEST, Valerio Passini ha scritto:
> Hello, is there any plan to bring kipi-plugins back to gwenviev considering
> that Digikam completed the port to Plasma 5 and it's in experimental?
See the email Steve wrote last month about
Hello, is there any plan to bring kipi-plugins back to gwenviev considering
that Digikam completed the port to Plasma 5 and it's in experimental? Thanks.
Valerio
This is probably a problem with Solid KDE interface, not digiKam. This one
detect than camera is connected and pop-up a message in KDE sys-tray.
Gilles Caulier
2015-12-31 17:45 GMT+01:00 Rainer Dorsch :
> Hi,
>
> in the latest Debian stable release (8.2) I get an error message when
>
pen. I resorted to compile
> > > Digikam myself and can assert than this is a complicated task ! Now I am
> > > back on the Debian packaged version and it works great here, even my
> > > external mysql tags database is fine.
> >
> > I can only second this, thank yo
Am Dienstag, 22. Dezember 2015, 23:02:37 CET schrieb Carsten Pfeiffer:
> On Monday 21 December 2015 19:36:27 tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
> > Thanks so much to all those who made this happen. I resorted to compile
> > Digikam myself and can assert than this is a complicated
On Monday 21 December 2015 19:36:27 tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Thanks so much to all those who made this happen. I resorted to compile
> Digikam myself and can assert than this is a complicated task ! Now I am
> back on the Debian packaged version and it works great here
On 21/12/2015 11:27, anxious...@gmail.com wrote:
Steve Robbins appears to have given us an early Christmas present. 4.14 rather
than the 5.0 betas, but it's good enough for me!
Many thanks.
anxiousmac
Thanks so much to all those who made this happen. I resorted to compile
Digikam m
On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 00:27:24 -0800 (PST)
anxious...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello anxious...@gmail.com,
>Steve Robbins appears to have given us an early Christmas present. 4.14
>rather than the 5.0 betas, but it's good enough for me!
Hopefully it'll migrate to testing on or about the 25th. Fingers
cro
Steve Robbins appears to have given us an early Christmas present. 4.14 rather
than the 5.0 betas, but it's good enough for me!
Many thanks.
anxiousmac
On Sunday, 4 October 2015 17:00:02 UTC+1, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez wrote:
>
> Current uploaders are either busy or not interested.
>
> If someone with packaging experience wants to take over digikam I'll gladly
> help, but you *definitely* need packaging experience, i
re, none of these other problems affect the rest of
> > the system in a similar way (forcing a choice between Digikam and updating
> > the rest of the system).
>
> Last I heard there was still something blocking an upload of a newer
> Digikam. But I am not sure what it was.
>
at there are other serious problems in the package --
> for example, it seems to depend on an obsolete version of GStreamer[2] --
> but as far as I'm aware, none of these other problems affect the rest of
> the system in a similar way (forcing a choice between Digikam and updating
>
version of GStreamer[2] -- but as
far as I'm aware, none of these other problems affect the rest of the system in
a similar way (forcing a choice between Digikam and updating the rest of the
system).
Shai.
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777833
[2] https://bugs.de
unning the tarball
> version on
>
> > Debian unstable?
>
> >
>
> I made it but unsuccessfully, references were always missing, not being
> an expert, I abandoned, hoping that the Digikam Debian team was going to
> bring out to us quite new Digikam. Be that anybody can give
Le samedi 3 octobre 2015, 00:41:53 anxious...@gmail.com a écrit :
> Does anyone have any experience of installing/running the tarball version
on
> Debian unstable?
>
I made it but unsuccessfully, references were always missing, not being an
expert, I abandoned, hoping that the Digik
Does anyone have any experience of installing/running the tarball version on
Debian unstable?
Or would Ubuntu packages be better?
I'm doing my best to maintain a pure Debian system, but I could really do with
Digikam again. I suppose an alternative would be a chroot, then I could wipe i
digikam purportedly includes the capability, via kipi-plugins, to import
smugmug albums.
This capability seems to have been present for several years now:
https://commit-digest.org/issues/2009-01-18/ says:
> SmugMug KIPI Plugin: plugin now also provides also import feature
> - you can do
Am Sonntag, 17. November 2013, 13:43:17 schrieb Maximiliano Curia:
> In article <20131110112241.18746.27310.reportbug@apollon> you wrote:
> > Package: digikam
> > Version: 4:3.5.0-3
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > digikam uses libmarblewidget15 from kde 4
he kdegraphics libraries it uses
> > > are available.
> >
> > And since yesterday, digikam in experimental depends on the rest of the
> > KDE 4.10 libraries.
>
> Digikam (package version 4:3.1.0-3) works fine for me (I tested installation,
> album browsing, f
;
> And since yesterday, digikam in experimental depends on the rest of the
> KDE 4.10 libraries.
Digikam (package version 4:3.1.0-3) works fine for me (I tested installation,
album browsing, face detecting, raw import). Thank you!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@list
Alle sabato 6 aprile 2013, Pino Toscano ha scritto:
> Most probably the experimental version could be made compatbile with
> KDE 4.10 in experimental once all the kdegraphics libraries it uses
> are available.
And since yesterday, digikam in experimental depends on the rest of the
Alle sabato 6 aprile 2013, Rainer Dorsch ha scritto:
> not sure if this has the same root cause as the amarok upgrade issue
> I reported in the previous post. If yes, please ignore:
>
> blackbox:~# aptitude install -t experimental digikam
The digikam version currently experim
in the previous post. If yes, please ignore:
blackbox:~# aptitude install -t experimental digikam
The following packages will be upgraded:
digikam{b} digikam-data{b}
2 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 667 not upgraded.
Need to get 19.8 MB of archives. After unpacking 3206 kB
please ignore:
blackbox:~# aptitude install -t experimental digikam
The following packages will be upgraded:
digikam{b} digikam-data{b}
2 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 667 not upgraded.
Need to get 19.8 MB of archives. After unpacking 3206 kB will be used.
The following pa
On Sunday 17 March 2013 23:58:09 Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On Sunday 17 March 2013 23:50:14 José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote:
> > Thanks
>
> Sorry. Won't bother you again.
When I ask my next question on this list, please _do_ bother me! What I like
about this list is that most of the time one d
Am Sonntag, 17. März 2013 schrieb José Manuel Santamaría Lema:
> Martin Steigerwald
>
> > Am Samstag, 16. März 2013 schrieb José Manuel Santamaría Lema:
> > > Martin Steigerwald
> > >
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for p
Diederik de Haas
> On Sunday 17 March 2013 23:50:14 José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote:
> > Thanks
>
> Sorry. Won't bother you again.
You didn't bother me, so don't worry.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Sunday 17 March 2013 23:50:14 José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote:
> Thanks
Sorry. Won't bother you again.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201303172358.0
upgrade to the 3.0.0 packages
> > in experimental?
>
> If experimental's priority is < 100 (= qt-kde.d.n.'s prio) then neither a
> safe- upgrade or a full-upgrade will trigger an upgrade to the 3.0.0
> packages.
>
> If experimental's prio is >= 1
ckages in
> experimental?
If experimental's priority is < 100 (= qt-kde.d.n.'s prio) then neither a safe-
upgrade or a full-upgrade will trigger an upgrade to the 3.0.0 packages.
If experimental's prio is >= 100 then a full-upgrade does want to upgrade
digikam to the 3.0.0 versions
Martin Steigerwald
> Am Samstag, 16. März 2013 schrieb José Manuel Santamaría Lema:
> > Martin Steigerwald
> >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Thanks for packaging digikam 3.0.
> > >
> > > Is there any way to resolve the following without m
Am Samstag, 16. März 2013 schrieb José Manuel Santamaría Lema:
> Martin Steigerwald
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > Thanks for packaging digikam 3.0.
> >
> > Is there any way to resolve the following without messing my system up?
> >
> > I read:
>
Martin Steigerwald
> Hi!
>
> Thanks for packaging digikam 3.0.
>
> Is there any way to resolve the following without messing my system up?
>
> I read:
>
>* digikam 3.0.0 uses features from unreleased kdegraphics >=4.10 & ships
>a private version
On 2013-02-11, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Is there any way to resolve the following without messing my system up?
No. unfortunately not.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive
Hi!
Thanks for packaging digikam 3.0.
Is there any way to resolve the following without messing my system up?
I read:
* digikam 3.0.0 uses features from unreleased kdegraphics >=4.10 & ships
a private version of the kdegraphics libs - this is not the Debian way :-(
* Unsatis
On 2012-09-17, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Please consider removing the conflict to phonon-backend-vlc now that
> neither Detlev nor Daniel nor me can reproduce the crash on start.
Yes. the conflicts is completely wrong (and a violation of debian policy
(which justifies a serious bug report))
>
Am Montag, 17. September 2012 schrieb Josep Febrer:
> A Dilluns, 17 de setembre de 2012 16:01:13, Martin Steigerwald va
> escriure:
> > If need be I will ask around at debian-kde for others to test the
> > Digikam packages I uploaded with phonon-backend-vlc. Readers from
> &
A Dilluns, 17 de setembre de 2012 16:01:13, Martin Steigerwald va escriure:
>
> If need be I will ask around at debian-kde for others to test the Digikam
> packages I uploaded with phonon-backend-vlc. Readers from debian-kde feel
> free to test my package builds and report your
Am Montag, 17. September 2012 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
> I am using the following packages:
>
> martin@merkaba:~> apt-show-versions | egrep
> "(phonon|digikam|alsa-|vlc)" | grep -v dbg
> alsa-base/sid uptodate 1.0.25+2+nmu2
> alsa-utils/sid uptodate 1.0.25-3
>
eb Martin Steigerwald:
> > > Hi Mark, hi Debian Qt/KDE developers,
> > >
> > > any chance to upload Digikam 4:2.9.0-2 against libmarblewidet13?
>
> […]
>
> > Hi Mark, hi Debian Qt/KDE developers, hi Martin,
> >
> > I'm using a pur sid ins
Dear Mark!
Am Mittwoch, 12. September 2012 schrieb Detlev Brodowski:
> Am Montag, 10. September 2012, 11:46:39 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
> > Hi Mark, hi Debian Qt/KDE developers,
> >
> > any chance to upload Digikam 4:2.9.0-2 against libmarblewidet13?
[…]
> Hi Mark, hi
Am Montag, 10. September 2012, 11:46:39 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
> Hi Mark, hi Debian Qt/KDE developers,
>
> any chance to upload Digikam 4:2.9.0-2 against libmarblewidet13?
>
> merkaba:~> LANG=C apt-get -t experimental install digikam
> Reading package lists... Done
Hi Mark, hi Debian Qt/KDE developers,
any chance to upload Digikam 4:2.9.0-2 against libmarblewidet13?
merkaba:~> LANG=C apt-get -t experimental install digikam
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be instal
On Thursday 28 April 2011, Michael Schuerig wrote:
[after two-way sync'ing metadata between Digikam and Nepomuk]
> Unfortunately, there was another non-intended, negative effect. In
> Digikam, I now have literally hundreds of new tags like this
>
> nepomuk:/res/d30394
I'm using KDE 4.6.2 from experimental-snapshots and Digikam 2:1.9.0-1
(re-compiled to work with 4.6.2). Looking around in the new settings
offered by Digikam, I enabled "Store metadata from Digikam in Nepomuk"
and "Read metadata from Nepomuk" (both in the setting
Dietz Pröpper:
> Dietz Pröpper:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm experiencing a little problem with digikam 1.2 and
> > kde 4.6 from experimental-snapshots, amd64.
>
> Recompiled, everything's fine now.
A little addition, kipi-plugins needs a recompile, too
Dietz Pröpper:
> Hi,
>
> I'm experiencing a little problem with digikam 1.2 and
> kde 4.6 from experimental-snapshots, amd64.
Recompiled, everything's fine now.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi,
I'm experiencing a little problem with digikam 1.2 and
kde 4.6 from experimental-snapshots, amd64.
Regardless of what I try, it keeps segfaulting on startup.
The first stack traces seemed to indicate a problem with
marble-plugins, but after deinstalling them another
segfault occurs,
Hi!
I have built it for KDE SC 4.6.1 on i386 and it appears to work.
So if anyone has interest until an official build becomes available, drop me
a note. You can build it yourself easily as well. It built out of the box
once I installed the kdepimlibs5-dev from experimental-snapshots
additiona
Hi folks,
today I've upgraded from sid KDE packages (4.5) to 4.6.1 from
qt-kde.debian.net on amd64.
As you've noted, digikam (and some others) would be removed during upgrade,
but could be reinstalled later.
Unfortunately, Digikam 1.9 from experimental depends on libmarblewidget10,
1 - 100 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
