On Sunday 17 March 2013 17:57:28 José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote: > But what about once you have upgraded to the qt-kde.d.n? Keeping the > experimental lines in sources.list: do you still need to have the packages > on hold to prevent an undesired upgrade to the 3.0.0 packages in > experimental?
If experimental's priority is < 100 (= qt-kde.d.n.'s prio) then neither a safe- upgrade or a full-upgrade will trigger an upgrade to the 3.0.0 packages. If experimental's prio is >= 100 then a full-upgrade does want to upgrade digikam to the 3.0.0 versions and suggest to remove a bunch of other packages because of unresolved dependencies. A safe-upgrade (still) doesn't upgrade it to version 3.0.0, but only says that there are 2 upgradeable packages (also digikam-data). With digikam on hold, neither full-upgrade or safe-upgrade wants to upgrade. So 'normally' you don't need to put digikam on hold, unless you've changed experimental's priority through /etc/apt/preferences(.d/). HTH, Diederik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201303172301.36309.didi.deb...@cknow.org
