Diederik de Haas <didi.deb...@cknow.org> > On Sunday 17 March 2013 17:57:28 José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote: > > But what about once you have upgraded to the qt-kde.d.n? Keeping the > > experimental lines in sources.list: do you still need to have the > > packages on hold to prevent an undesired upgrade to the 3.0.0 packages > > in experimental? > > If experimental's priority is < 100 (= qt-kde.d.n.'s prio) then neither a > safe- upgrade or a full-upgrade will trigger an upgrade to the 3.0.0 > packages. > > If experimental's prio is >= 100 then a full-upgrade does want to upgrade > digikam to the 3.0.0 versions and suggest to remove a bunch of other > packages because of unresolved dependencies. A safe-upgrade (still) > doesn't upgrade it to version 3.0.0, but only says that there are 2 > upgradeable packages (also digikam-data). > With digikam on hold, neither full-upgrade or safe-upgrade wants to > upgrade. > > So 'normally' you don't need to put digikam on hold, unless you've changed > experimental's priority through /etc/apt/preferences(.d/). > > HTH, > Diederik
Thanks, but I already know what apt priority is. I can also read 'man apt_preferences' myself. And I also already know the reply to my question will be probably "No".
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
