* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070409 09:49]:
> I think we should push the multi-arch media. Particularly, the
> x86/amd64/powerpc one can boot something like 99% of all the hardware
> debian will ever run on, without the user having to care about what arch
> his PC or Mac is, since the media d
Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
> Again, not a devotee problem.
Just for information, I get an error message when voting with
icedove and the enigmail extension (see the text at the end of
the message).
The error was not clear at all for me. All I did was to clic on
the "encryption" and "sign"
Le dimanche 08 avril 2007 à 17:42 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> So you don't believe that software will continue to push forward our minimum
> hardware requirements, the way it has for the past decade or so? What do
> you think is the minimum memory required to run a "comfortable" desktop
> sy
On Monday 09 April 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
you don't believe that software will continue to push forward our
> minimum hardware requirements, the way it has for the past decade or so?
> What do you think is the minimum memory required to run a "comfortable"
> desktop system (or workstation) to
On 2007-04-07 Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 03:39:11PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 12:28:13PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Isn't this only reported against the version in sid, which is not
> > > included in etch?
>
> > > Etch is the last Deb
Hi!
* Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070409 10:00]:
> > I think we should push the multi-arch media. Particularly, the
> > x86/amd64/powerpc one can boot something like 99% of all the hardware
> > debian will ever run on, without the user having to care about what arch
> > his PC or Mac is, s
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 03:51:54PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> * Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070409 10:00]:
>
> > > I think we should push the multi-arch media. Particularly, the
> > > x86/amd64/powerpc one can boot something like 99% of all the hardware
Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This mail is just to outline a few thoughts I have about where to take
> sbuild after the release of Etch.
> 1. Source Dependencies
> --
> I'd like to completely strip global source dependencies out of
> sbuild for Lenny since it is o
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 03:51:54PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> The multiarch media still has a small problem: for i386/amd64 they are
> no "fire and forget" thing; you still need to find out if you have an
> amd64 compatible system and start the amd64 boot process by hand.
>
> It would be
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 01:28:18PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
> What I feared was the upgrade process itself. I guess that mysql and the
> new 2.6 kernel will get installed in the same "apt-get dist-upgrade" run
> and thus if mysql-server-5.0 hangs and the user presses ctrl-c he is left
> with
On 2007-04-09 Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 01:28:18PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
> > What I feared was the upgrade process itself. I guess that mysql and the
> > new 2.6 kernel will get installed in the same "apt-get dist-upgrade" run
> > and thus if mysql-server-5.0 han
On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 17:42:31 -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> [M-F-T set appropriately]
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 11:15:56PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
>> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 10:10:58PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrot
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-sympy
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/sympy
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Descripti
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 11:07:09 +0200, Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
>> Again, not a devotee problem.
> Just for information, I get an error message when voting with icedove
> and the enigmail extension (see the text at the end of the message).
> The error w
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 03:51:54PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
>> The multiarch media still has a small problem: for i386/amd64 they are
>> no "fire and forget" thing; you still need to find out if you have an
>> amd64 compatible system an
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 12:37:16PM -0400, Matthias Julius wrote:
> Does d-i need to run in 64bit mode to be able to install a amd64
> system?
It needs a 64bit kernel to run 64bit binaries, and since many post
installs run binaries, I would say yes it does.
You could probably isntall 32bit using a
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 10:12:54AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
> What are the concrete reasons, you think, for thinking that 2008
> (and not earlier or later) is going to be the deadline? From the
> article, it seems to be mostly hand waving and pretending that the past
> is a perf
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 03:51:54PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
>
> The multiarch media still has a small problem: for i386/amd64 they are
> no "fire and forget" thing; you still need to find out if you have an
> amd64 compatible system and start the amd64 boot process by hand.
>
> It would
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 07:17:53PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> syslinux (3.31-2) unstable; urgency=medium
>
> * Including all *.c32 modules (Closes: #391152).
> * Added patch from Byron Stanoszek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to autodetect 64bit
> CPUs (Closes: #408138).
>
> -- Daniel Baumann <[
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) writes:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 12:37:16PM -0400, Matthias Julius wrote:
>> Does d-i need to run in 64bit mode to be able to install a amd64
>> system?
>
> It needs a 64bit kernel to run 64bit binaries, and since many post
> installs run binaries, I would say
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 07:16:12PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> I think we agree that Moore's law predicts the available amount of memory.
> High-end application developers will always write software that accomodates
> to that amount, so when this amount is 8 GiB, app developers will either:
>
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andy Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: pybackpack
Version : 0.5.0
Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://andrewprice.me.uk/projects/pybackpack
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Descri
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 01:34:37PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> >
> > - Use win32 + PAE. This allows your program to run in the vast majority
> > of computers, and provides the biggest profit in the short term. I hope
> > this approach will be the most common, and expect it'll sustaine
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 01:29:59PM -0400, Matthias Julius wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) writes:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 12:37:16PM -0400, Matthias Julius wrote:
> >> Does d-i need to run in 64bit mode to be able to install a amd64
> >> system?
> >
> > It needs a 64bit kernel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) writes:
> Actually I wouldn't say win64 is broken, it just has a serious lack of
> drivers, which of course will continue as long as nobody is using it.
> If microsoft wanted to solve this they should mandate 64bit drivers
> along with 32bit drivers in order to
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 07:16:12PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> - flash (I expect swfdec will be ready to replace non-free 32bit-only
> implementation)
Btw, I wonder how would Adobe feel about a feature in swfdec akin to iceweasel's
"block banners from this site" advertisement killer.
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 02:27:18PM -0400, Matthias Julius wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) writes:
>
> > Actually I wouldn't say win64 is broken, it just has a serious lack of
> > drivers, which of course will continue as long as nobody is using it.
> > If microsoft wanted to solve th
I'm proposing that we change our de-facto policy for handling of files
in /etc/udev/rules.d. Currently it is this (from udev's README.Debian):
Packages should NEVER create files in /etc/udev/rules.d/, but create a
symlink the first time the package is installed (and never try again, to
allow
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 02:50:58PM -0400, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm proposing that we change our de-facto policy for handling of files
> in /etc/udev/rules.d. Currently it is this (from udev's README.Debian):
>
> Packages should NEVER create files in /etc/udev/rules.d/, but crea
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 19:16:12 +0200, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 10:12:54AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>
>> What are the concrete reasons, you think, for thinking that 2008 (and
>> not earlier or later) is going to be the deadline? From the article,
>> it
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You mean win64-only games? Nobody dares to invest in developing that now;
> it would be suicidal.
I don't know about the practices of game developers, but, from what I
see on Linux it should be minimal effort to port a software to 64 bit
if it is writt
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I suppose you haven't seen my previous mail. Note that this problem
> (autodetecting 64-bit) is already solved in etch.
True. I've read it after I wrot mine.
Does d-i use syslinux?
Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 02:50:58PM -0400, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm proposing that we change our de-facto policy for handling of files
> > in /etc/udev/rules.d. Currently it is this (from udev's README.Debian):
> >
> > Packages should NEVER create files in
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 01:28:18PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
> > Mmm, guess I wasn't clear -- I mean that there's no point in trying to work
> > on this bug, because lenny *as a whole* will not support 2.4 kernels. (the
> > glibc maintainers are eager to drop LinuxThreads support, which mean
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 04:00:45PM -0400, Matthias Julius wrote:
> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I suppose you haven't seen my previous mail. Note that this problem
> > (autodetecting 64-bit) is already solved in etch.
>
> True. I've read it after I wrot mine.
>
> Does d-i us
Package: general
Severity: important
This problem occurs with the gnome pdf reader and xpdf, so i report to
"general". Sorry, if i got that wrong.
Xpdf for example gives me this error messages:
Error: Couldn't create a font for 'Courier'
and like the other pdf readers does not show monospaced fon
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 02:06:14PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > I think we agree that Moore's law predicts the available amount of
> > memory.
>
> Broadly. Precision, however, is not something Moore ever said
> of his statistical law,
The "perfect" prediction you want does not exis
Matthias Julius wrote:
> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I suppose you haven't seen my previous mail. Note that this problem
> > (autodetecting 64-bit) is already solved in etch.
>
> True. I've read it after I wrot mine.
>
> Does d-i use syslinux?
Just a thought, but how about
Your message dated Mon, 09 Apr 2007 21:50:32 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 03:48:06PM -0400, Matthias Julius wrote:
> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > You mean win64-only games? Nobody dares to invest in developing that now;
> > it would be suicidal.
>
> I don't know about the practices of game developers, but, from what I
> see o
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 09:42:06PM +0200, Matthias Roeder wrote:
> Package: general
> Severity: important
>
> This problem occurs with the gnome pdf reader and xpdf, so i report to
> "general". Sorry, if i got that wrong.
When you are unsure, it's usualy a good idea to file it on the package that
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just a thought, but how about booting d-i and familiarising yourself
> with it? (This goes for all DDs who have never run d-i.)
I hate to reboot just to try out d-i. :-)
Now that etch is released I will actually do that. I have one machine
left that is no
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, Matthias Julius wrote:
> Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Just a thought, but how about booting d-i and familiarising yourself
> > with it? (This goes for all DDs who have never run d-i.)
>
> I hate to reboot just to try out d-i. :-)
Actually, you don't have to. T
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 03:48:06PM -0400, Matthias Julius wrote:
>>
>> I don't know about the practices of game developers, but, from what I
>> see on Linux it should be minimal effort to port a software to 64 bit
>> if it is written right. So, I would
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 08:14:50PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> You forgot the "+PAE" part.
PAE helps the OS, not the applications. Applications still only get
32bit. Well unless the OS starts doing something weird, and it would
then require applications written explictly for some memory access
Heya,
Sam Hocevar mentioned on his platform that there is no Alpha machine
available for developers. As we have a few standing around in a cellar
at work I'd be willing to setup one or two of them to be used as
machines for developers, if there's anybody interested in that (and the
machines still
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 02:27:18PM -0400, Matthias Julius wrote:
> Workstations as well. CAD is one example. You can never have enough
> memory there. I could imagine the same is true for video processing
> or rendering and similar applications. I guess it won't become
> mainstream until there
Newly orphaned:
conquest - a real-time, multi-player space warfare game
xmaddressbook - X-based (Motif) address book
zsh30 - zsh 3.0
xmaddressbook also needs someone to take over as upstream.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI
On 04/09/07 05:20:34PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 08:14:50PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > You forgot the "+PAE" part.
>
> PAE helps the OS, not the applications. Applications still only get
> 32bit. Well unless the OS starts doing something weird, and it would
>
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 02:06:14PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 19:16:12 +0200, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 10:12:54AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> What are the concrete reasons, you think, for thinking that 2008 (and
> >> not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Clint Adams escribió:
> zsh30 - zsh 3.0
Hi, this includes all zsh packages? or just zsh30?...
Jose Luis,
- --
ghostbar on Linux/Debian 'sid' i686 - #382503
Weblog: http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - http://talug.org.ve
http://debian.org.ve - irc.debian.org #
Hi Bernd,
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 11:27:05PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Sam Hocevar mentioned on his platform that there is no Alpha machine
> available for developers. As we have a few standing around in a cellar
> at work I'd be willing to setup one or two of them to be used as
> machines fo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) writes:
> Well my farther is going to get a new system for cad soon, which the
> current plan is to have 64bit vista with solidworks 64bit running. But
> it might be another month or two before he is ready for it, so hopefully
> by then any remaining driver is
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, Matthias Julius wrote:
>
>> I hate to reboot just to try out d-i. :-)
>
> Actually, you don't have to. Try qemu.
Ahh, true. That's another chapter I havn't looked into, yet.
Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 17:20:33 -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 02:06:14PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Secondly, these large application developers you seem to speak of
>> appear to be proprietary application developers -- which mean that in
>> my eyes
55 matches
Mail list logo
