Mike Hommey wrote: > On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 02:50:58PM -0400, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm proposing that we change our de-facto policy for handling of files > > in /etc/udev/rules.d. Currently it is this (from udev's README.Debian): > > > > Packages should NEVER create files in /etc/udev/rules.d/, but create a > > symlink the first time the package is installed (and never try again, to > > allow the local system administrator to remove it). > > > > The intent is to let users disable a udev rule by removing the symlink, or > > reorder a rule to a different number by renaming the symlink. Putting a > > rules > > conffile directly in /etc/udev/rules.d/ wouldn't allow for this > > Why ? Isn't dpkg supposed to track removed conffiles ?
dpkg does not notice when you rename a conffile to a different number. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
