Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
Could you please test this and report back to the bug?
Thanks,
--Jeroen
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 05:04:02PM -0700, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
Update of /cvsroot/pkg-java/java-package/lib
In directory haydn:/tmp/cvs-serv31457/lib
Modified Files:
common.sh
Log Me
The dehs system now is regular running again every two days on alioth
(and so also on the info feed to developer.php on qa).
Looking at no_watch page[1] there are:
Total source packages without watch file: 6324
Total source packages: 8285
%: 76,33%
But seems also that there are:
1621 package
good bye.
--
Microsoft is to operating systems & security
what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking.
-- unknown; seen in Marc Merlin's .sig
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
There is a difference between a general tool (web-browser) and a
specific tool (the Sexy Losers script). The script is specifically
designed to download a hard-core pornographic comic.
I'm not saying it's a "bad" comic, just that this material should not be
associated with Debian. We might as we
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 22:28 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[snip]
> have to be done for NEW packages, e.g. inform some U.S. government
> agency about the new deb, add an override entry into the db. The only
Could you flesh that out a littl
By the way, re "dosage", Tristan wrote (in debian-mentors):
> The upstream website is at:
> http://slipgate.za.net/dosage
>
> My packages are located at:
> http://slipgate.za.net/~mithrandi/debian/dosage
I'd like to repeat that I like this program.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 22:45 -0500, SR, ESC wrote:
> good bye.
Nice of you to stop in for tea.
--
greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The technology that is
Stronger, better, faster: Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
SR, ESC dijo [Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 07:59:59PM -0500]:
> while i don't appeciate gunnar's comments - seems to me he's just
> trying to lessening the issue i brought up. and i do have a thick
> skin, i just don't see the need to have one if people are going to
> work together in a cooperative fashio
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 10:28:25PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hello.
> >
> > Our NEW queue is quite big and time needed to get package into unstable is
> > rather long. Nothing wrong with that for me, I know that ftp-masters are
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libmusepack
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : The Musepack Development Team
* URL : http://www.musepack.net
* License : 3-clause BSD
Description : Musepack (MPC) format decoder library
libmusepack allows you
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:35:42 -0500, Dale C Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> This document is only indirectly referenced in the policy manual, so
> it isn't clear how much force it has. (it could be taken as the
> mearest suggestion by the menu package maintainer)
The Debian technical
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: pyflac
Version : 0.0.2
Upstream Author : David Collett
* License : GPL
Description : Free Lossless Audio Codec [Python bindings]
FLAC stands for Free Lossless Audio Codec. Grossly oversimplified, FLAC is
similar to O
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: pymusepack
* URL : http://www.sacredchao.net/~piman/software/python.shtml
* License : GNU GPL v2
Description : Musepack (MPC) decoder library [Python bindings]
libmusepack allows you to decode files in the Musepack au
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: pymodplug
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Joe Wreschnig
* URL : http://sacredchao.net/~piman/software/python.shtml
* License : GNU GPL v2
Description : ModPlug mod-like music shared libraries [Python binding
Romain Francoise wrote:
And Debian wouldn't be fun without a few enmities, we wouldn't have great
posts like http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/07/msg01308.html or
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2001/12/msg8.html...
Huh, and here was me thinking those were perfect examples
Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> || On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:56:20 +0100
> || Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> Why not automate the NEW queue for packages with prior source versions
>>> in the archive? Worst case ftp-master has to remove a deb with silly
>>>
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 12:26:13AM +, Helen Faulkner wrote:
> Based on comments made to me by a number of women who are interested in
> contributing more to Debian, the level of agressiveness on some of the
> mailing lists and IRC channels is a problem. It is preventing people
> (women an
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 22:28 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [snip]
>> have to be done for NEW packages, e.g. inform some U.S. government
>> agency about the new deb, add an override entry into th
Bluefuture <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The dehs system now is regular running again every two days on alioth
> (and so also on the info feed to developer.php on qa).
> Looking at no_watch page[1] there are:
>
> Total source packages without watch file: 6324
> Total source packages: 8285
> %:
Sam Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is a difference between a general tool (web-browser) and a
> specific tool (the Sexy Losers script). The script is specifically
> designed to download a hard-core pornographic comic.
>
> I'm not saying it's a "bad" comic, just that this material sho
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 07:39 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 22:28 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > [snip]
> >> have to be done for NEW packages, e.g. inform some
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 07:38 +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 12:26:13AM +, Helen Faulkner wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> I wish more women would join Debian and the lists. My experience is that
> usually there's not that much aggressiveness when there are women around.
Until *
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 18:01:46 -0600, Steve Greenland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 24-Jan-05, 03:45 (CST), Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Last time I looked, invoke-rc.d was not yet a requirement to be used
>> by packages. As far as I remember, it is for sarge, but not for woody
>> and t
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:28:25 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I think ftp-master already has a more complex prioritizing than
>that. Adding a new kernel images deb tends to be real fast (with
>exceptions), adding a new deb to old source reasonable fast and
>completly new sour
Dear DDs, dear all!
First of all, thanks for the many suggestions I will take into account.
Let me sum up what:
- I have to put the arch-independent stuff into /usr/share
- I can put arch-dependent stuff for the `current' arch into /usr/lib
Up to now this is clear for me. Now for the sharing of
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 01:06 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 07:39 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 22:28 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > >> Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 08:15:52AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 18:01:46 -0600, Steve Greenland
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 24-Jan-05, 03:45 (CST), Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Last time I looked, invoke-rc.d was not yet a requirement to be used
> >> by packa
Hi,
You know, I'm parent. You look a lot like my son when he doesn't get
his way. When I don't do what he wants, he would start screaming and
making noise. I have learned that is better to ignore him for a while
until he calms down and we can have a normal conversation. If you have
contacted me in
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 02:36:04AM -0500, SR, ESC wrote:
> what's the fucking point in applying to NM when you get blasted for
> asking a simple question about release. and what's the fucking point
> when you get called luser for asking about it.
> really getting fucking sick of this crap. you fu
* Dan Jacobson
| Not starting apache2 - edit /etc/default/apache2 and change NO_START to be 0.
[...]
| Now that maintainers realized that one might like a package installed,
| but perhaps only plans to use it unoften, it only makes sense for not
| starting at boot to be offered as a friendly co
Le lun 2005-01-24 a 03:01:01 -0500, Ingo Juergensmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a dit:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 02:36:04AM -0500, SR, ESC wrote:
>
> Welcome to Debian!
that's just it, i've been subbed to this list and a debian user since
2002, i know how it's like. and i'm tired of it. i admit to doin
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 03:33:51AM -0500, SR, ESC wrote:
> > Welcome to Debian!
> that's just it, i've been subbed to this list and a debian user since
> 2002, i know how it's like. and i'm tired of it. i admit to doing the
> crap i'm complaining about, but i'm in the process shrugging that crap
>
Le lun 2005-01-24 a 03:42:24 -0500, Ingo Juergensmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a dit:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 03:33:51AM -0500, SR, ESC wrote:
>
>
> Maybe you have noticed that I don't object nor try to argument against you.
> Take that as agreeing in parts or in whole. But the wording is not where
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 02:36:04AM -0500, SR, ESC wrote:
> what's the fucking point in applying to NM when you get blasted for
> asking a simple question about release. and what's the fucking point
> when you get called luser for asking about it.
> really getting fucking sick of this crap. you f
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 13:21:36 +0100, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>* Andreas Barth [Fri, 21 Jan 2005 13:13:51 +0100]:
>> using old libs. E.g.
>> lsof | grep dpkg- | awk '{print $1, $8}' | sort +0
>> helps you to find out which ones.
>
> There is also checkrestart from the debian-goodi
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 01:16:12AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> The main problem with adding hwcap is that the number of directory
> to be traversed doubles with every addition, which is an
> exponential thing; rather than something linear.
Yes, this is a problem. But isn't it possible to chan
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 11:01:39 +0100, Michal Politowski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 10:38:20 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
>> My beef is that I want to be able to prevent a newly installed
>> package's postinst from starting the service
>
>Looks like something invoke-rc.d calls policy-
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 02:21:02 -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>echo -e '#!/bin/sh\n\nexit 101' > /chroot/usr/sbin/policy-rc.d \
>&& chmod a+x /chroot/usr/sbin/policy-rc.d
A bad hack. I hate to drop my own binaries to /usr/sbin.
Greetings
Marc
--
-
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> report. The last thing Debian needs is more ignorant assholes.
We have way too many as it is, I have to agree...
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmo
Le lun 2005-01-24 a 04:49:06 -0500, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> a dit:
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > report. The last thing Debian needs is more ignorant assholes.
"vorlon": i've killfiled you. good riddance.
> We have way too many as it is, I have to agre
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Enrico Tassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ocaml-expat
Version : 0.9.0
Upstream Author : Maas-Maarten Zeeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.xs4all.nl/~mmzeeman/ocaml/
* License : MIT/X
Description :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Enrico Tassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ocurl
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Lars Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/ocurl
* License : MIT/X
Description : OCaml bindings
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 05:01:19AM -0500, SR, ESC wrote:
> Le lun 2005-01-24 a 04:49:06 -0500, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> a dit:
> > On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > report. The last thing Debian needs is more ignorant assholes.
>
> "vorlon": i've killfiled
* Henning Makholm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050124 04:40]:
> Scripsit "SR, ESC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Scripsit Geoff Bagley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> > Is it possible to transfer some of the packages, a few at a time,
> >> > over into Woody, so that when we all change to Sarge, the servers
> >> > wil
On Jan 24, 2005 at 09:58, Enrico Tassi praised the llamas by saying:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Enrico Tassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: ocurl
> Version : 0.2.0
> Upstream Author : Lars Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://sour
Brian May wrote:
"Wouter" == Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Wouter> lsof +L 1
rebooting is the only way to make sure rebooting will work if a reboot
is required for some reason during peak usage, e.g. power failure,
etc...
In some situations it might be better to test rebooting fi
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 10:38:23AM +, Brett Parker wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 05:01:19AM -0500, SR, ESC wrote:
> > Le lun 2005-01-24 a 04:49:06 -0500, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> a dit:
> > > On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > report. The last thi
Op ma, 24-01-2005 te 16:39 +1100, schreef Brian May:
> > "Wouter" == Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Wouter> lsof +L 1
>
> rebooting is the only way to make sure rebooting will work if a reboot
> is required for some reason during peak usage, e.g. power failure,
> etc...
>
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, SR, ESC wrote:
> Le lun 2005-01-24 a 04:49:06 -0500, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> a dit:
> > On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > report. The last thing Debian needs is more ignorant assholes.
>
> "vorlon": i've killfiled you. good riddance.
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Brett Parker wrote:
> Please please *PLEASE* tell me that people like this get through NM... I
> ^ don't
> don't think I could cope with it. Looking at the IRC log, I'm not
> entirely sure what the problem is.
So far, the NM process (actually, our old DAM
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 10:42:06AM +, David Pashley wrote:
> Would it not be better to name the package ocaml-curl? Maybe we need a
> general policy on language bindings names. It is a shame we have
> libfoo-bar-perl and python-foobar.
Well, the name specified in the ITP is the source package
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Brett Parker wrote:
> Please please *PLEASE* tell me that people like this get through NM...
Remember Bruce!
/me ponders putting his listmaster hat on and asking simonrvn
to apologize the usage of whole years f-word quota in January.
--j
--
To UNSUBSCRI
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 09:51:32AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, SR, ESC wrote:
> > Le lun 2005-01-24 a 04:49:06 -0500, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> a dit:
> > > On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > report. The last thing Deb
Le dimanche 23 janvier 2005 à 10:14 +0100, Alexander Schmehl a écrit :
> PlanetPenguin Racer is a simple OpenGL racing game featuring Tux, the Linux
> mascot. The goal of the game is to slide down a snow- and ice-covered
> mountain as quickly as possible, avoiding the trees and rocks that will
>
if i insulted any of you or hurt you, i'm sorry. i just want things to change
(see what i think needs to change below).
i just feel that even to experienced people, debian, esp. the devel list and
channel (i know part of the history for the channel...), i don't feel
that it's welcoming, or friend
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Christian Perrier wrote:
We have completely abandoned the DDTP effort now, as far as I am
aware. Nicolas Bertolissio made several contributions to the code in
the past, up to end 2003. I'm not sure whether he still contributes to
it.
IMHO it is a real shame that one part of the
* SR, ESC ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
>
> again, i'm sorry if i hurt any of you.
>
> i just want things to change for the better, for everyone. change
> sometimes hurts, but if it's positive change for everyone, it should
> be welcomed, and encouraged. and if it hurts everyone, it should be
> re
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: logmon
Version : 0.4.3
Upstream Author : Andrew MacKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.edespot.com/plaidhat/code/LogMon/
* License : The Artistic License
Description : Sometimes better than tail
Th
Martin Kittel wrote:
> Andreas Metzler downhill.at.eu.org> writes:
>>
>> On a freshly installed Debian system you can happily uninstall any
>> kernel-image package because there are no[1] dependencies on it,
>> *because* installing kernels with make install is supported practice.
>> [1] Except f
Le dimanche 23 janvier 2005 à 02:56 +, Matthew Garrett a écrit :
> Your package doesn't depend on Linux 2.6. Your package depends on NPTL.
> The only NPTL implementation Debian provides is in Linux 2.6, but users
> may have built their own 2.4 kernel with NPTL patches. You should depend
> on wh
Hello Gürkan,
* Gürkan Sengün <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-24 14:52]:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: logmon
> Version : 0.4.3
> Upstream Author : Andrew MacKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.edespot.com/plaidhat/code/LogMon/
> * L
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 03:03:57PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 23 janvier 2005 à 02:56 +, Matthew Garrett a écrit :
> > Your package doesn't depend on Linux 2.6. Your package depends on NPTL.
> > The only NPTL implementation Debian provides is in Linux 2.6, but users
> > may ha
Le lundi 24 janvier 2005 à 15:19 +0100, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> > What if we removed all dependencies on mail-transport-agent,
> > just because the user can install a random MTA by himself ?
>
> We won't, because that would be silly. And even if it weren't, this
> still isn't relevant; we hav
Gürkan Sengün <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: logmon
>Version : 0.4.3
>Upstream Author : Andrew MacKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.edespot.com/plaidhat/code/LogMon/
> * License : The Artist
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 03:45:49PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 24 janvier 2005 à 15:19 +0100, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> > > What if we removed all dependencies on mail-transport-agent,
> > > just because the user can install a random MTA by himself ?
> >
> > We won't, because that
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is just insane. What if we removed all dependencies on
> mail-transport-agent, just because the user can install a random MTA by
> himself ? Why not remove all dependencies, while we're at it? The user
> may have built his own versions of all soft
On 24-Jan-05, 07:09 (CST), G?rkan Seng?n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: logmon
> Version : 0.4.3
> Upstream Author : Andrew MacKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.edespot.com/plaidhat/code/LogMon/
> * Lic
Le lundi 24 janvier 2005 à 16:02 +0100, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> > We can't list all features of some package in the Provides: field. When
> > we need a feature that was added in some version of a package, there are
> > versioned dependencies. In Debian, NPTL is available in the kernel since
> >
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: mozilla-thunderbird-locale-pt-br
Version : 1.0-1
Upstream Author : Mozilla Foundation
* URL : ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/thunderbird/releases/
* License : GPL, LGPL, MPL
Description : Mozilla Thu
"SR, ESC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> what's the fucking point in applying to NM when you get blasted for
> asking a simple question about release. and what's the fucking point
> when you get called luser for asking about it.
/me takes off his frontdesk hat and hides it under the table...
It's
Isn't multitail already doing a great job for this?
If multitail is missing some logmon feature may I suggest improving it
instead of adding jet another tail program.
Yes it is, nothing that's missing in multitail for me.
I will close the ITP. Thank you
Cheers,
Gürkan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 24 janvier 2005 à 15:19 +0100, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> > > What if we removed all dependencies on mail-transport-agent,
> > > just because the user can install a random MTA by himself ?
> >
> > We won't, because that would be silly. And even if it weren't, t
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 10:08:11AM -0600, Cesar Mendoza wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You know, I'm parent. You look a lot like my son when he doesn't get
> his way. When I don't do what he wants, he would start screaming and
> making noise. I have learned that is better to ignore him for a while
> until he ca
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt writes:
> It's nice of you to send this interesting statement to debian-devel, this
> way it will be easier for your AM and the DAM to see how you work with
> your fellow Developers.
Are there published rules explaining the limits on the public speech of
applicants, or is gu
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Delange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libapache2-mod-hash2
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Yann Droneaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://eloise.ouvaton.net/%7earch/archzoom.cgi/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]/mod-hash2--main--
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt writes:
>> It's nice of you to send this interesting statement to debian-devel, this
>> way it will be easier for your AM and the DAM to see how you work with
>> your fellow Developers.
> Are there published rules explaining the limit
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt writes:
>> It's nice of you to send this interesting statement to debian-devel, this
>> way it will be easier for your AM and the DAM to see how you work with
>> your fellow Developers.
>
> Are there published rules explaining the li
On Jan 24, 2005 at 16:51, Julien Delange praised the llamas by saying:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Julien Delange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: libapache2-mod-hash2
> Version : 1.0
> Upstream Author : Yann Droneaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL
* John Hasler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050124 18:15]:
> Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt writes:
> > It's nice of you to send this interesting statement to debian-devel, this
> > way it will be easier for your AM and the DAM to see how you work with
> > your fellow Developers.
> Are there published rules explai
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho writes,
> A package description is equally visible.
But is it equally machine parsable? If not,
is this unimportant?
pgpe34FzVBLKz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I have an HP Compaq NC6000 laptop and I have some problems getting it
to suspend. I am running the stock Debian 2.6.9 kernel (in the 686
variant, currently not sure whether it is version 1 or 2).
If I run apm (setting kernel parameters acpi=off and apm=on, loads the
apm module and starts apmd) I c
I wrote:
> Is "Are you a team player" one of your standard interview questions?
Andi writes:
> I usually take a look how an applicant behaves in a team, and would -
> ultimatly - even consider rejecting an applicant for bad social behaviour
> (in most cases, the applicant has the same attitude tow
Christian Lynbech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So the questions goes: is this a shortcoming with the HP not being
> properly supported with acpi, am I missing some command like "apm"
> which is able to do what I want or is this simply acpi not really
> having caught up with apm yet?
acpi requires
Hello.
Our NEW queue is quite big and time needed to get package into unstable is
rather long. Nothing wrong with that for me, I know that ftp-masters are
busy and that approving these packages is very important and responsible
task.
But there are two kind of packages in NEW queue.
"Totally"
Cuddle with a dame tonight
http://canaryfloweroccultate.com/sse/
stp theze : canaryfloweroccultate.com/yap/
The chimique strain oilmen atlantic .
She obdurate executrix bad chamberlain cloudburst .
amp furze ginkgo phonic watercourse pugnacious .
wyner leer summon wakefield .
Th
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
Any comments on that?
No further comments but an addition. I think there are some easy
tasks to *remove* packages like #283015 (or rather #282891). If
the situation is such simple as in this case the bug should not really
stand open for 60 days
Hello,
my name is Jose Rafael Rodriguez Galvan (yes, another Rafael :).
I am a profesor in the Department of Mathematics at the Cádiz
University (Spain) and Director of the OSLUCA [0], the Free Software
Office of the Cádiz University.
I have been using Debian for years and I think it's a good mom
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Team player" is PHB code for someone who will shut up and do what he
> is told even though he knows it is wrong.
Yes.
And Debian wouldn't be fun without a few enmities, we wouldn't have great
posts like http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/07/msg01
* John Hasler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050124 19:40]:
> I wrote:
> > Is "Are you a team player" one of your standard interview questions?
>
> Andi writes:
> > I usually take a look how an applicant behaves in a team, and would -
> > ultimatly - even consider rejecting an applicant for bad social behav
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello.
>
> Our NEW queue is quite big and time needed to get package into unstable is
> rather long. Nothing wrong with that for me, I know that ftp-masters are
> busy and that approving these packages is very important and responsible
> tas
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 05:47:59PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > we need a feature that was added in some version of a package, there are
> > versioned dependencies. In Debian, NPTL is available in the kernel since
> > version 2.6. It's as simple as that.
>
> IIRC wrong for powerpc with sarge's
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 10:28:25PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Our NEW queue is quite big and time needed to get package into unstable is
> > rather long. Nothing wrong with that for me, I know that ftp-masters are
> > busy and that approving these packages is very important and respons
Hi,
I am happy to hear release is coming soon. Also new gnome and KDE
desktop are coming to shape. At the same time, I saw many new Desktop
tasks are set up to support many localized desktop and localized
environment.
But I am lost on where to find the policy behind setting these localized
envi
On 2005-01-24 Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Last time I looked, invoke-rc.d was not yet a requirement to be used
> by packages. As far as I remember, it is for sarge, but not for woody
> and thus unuseable on woody, right?
[...]
There are almost no packages in woody which make use
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 09:31:30AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> I currently have problems with the implementation anyway, I can't
> disable tls which makes problems on Xen, nor can I disable the usage of
> optimized versions for testing of the other versions.
a quick workaround is to export LD_AS
|| On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:56:20 +0100
|| Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Why not automate the NEW queue for packages with prior source versions
>> in the archive? Worst case ftp-master has to remove a deb with silly
>> name from archive and kick the DD for it.
>>
>> Corre
Brett Parker dijo [Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 10:38:23AM +]:
> > and don't bother replying, i've unsubbed from this list. get on with
> > your lives and ignore this if you can't/won't deal with it - i don't
> > want to deal with people that will waste my time for their petty little
> > politics.
>
>
John Hasler dijo [Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 10:54:49AM -0600]:
> Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt writes:
> > It's nice of you to send this interesting statement to debian-devel, this
> > way it will be easier for your AM and the DAM to see how you work with
> > your fellow Developers.
>
> Are there published ru
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[deletia]
While Debian fully supports sharing /usr/share between differen hosts
and even different archs the actual packaging system (dpkg in
particular) does not realy support this. This a bit of a sore point in
Debian.
A mor
Am Dienstag, 25. Januar 2005 00:40 schrieb Gunnar Wolf:
> [Person with *very* delicate skin quitting NM]
>
> I don't know (and don't want to, don't point me to it ;-) ) who
> advocated a person with such a delicate skin to enter NM. I mean, NM
> is for people who are _already_ somewhat involved in
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
