On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 10:42:06AM +0000, David Pashley wrote: > Would it not be better to name the package ocaml-curl? Maybe we need a > general policy on language bindings names. It is a shame we have > libfoo-bar-perl and python-foobar.
Well, the name specified in the ITP is the source package name,
one-to-one with upstream name.
For ocaml related package, the debian ocaml policy states that binary
package names should have the form lib<name>-ocaml{,-dev}, in this case
the binary package names of ocurl will be "libcurl-ocaml-dev" and
"libcurl-ocaml".
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy
[EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity
of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
