On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 08:15:52AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 18:01:46 -0600, Steve Greenland > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On 24-Jan-05, 03:45 (CST), Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Last time I looked, invoke-rc.d was not yet a requirement to be used > >> by packages. As far as I remember, it is for sarge, but not for woody > >> and thus unuseable on woody, right? > >> > >> Do we already have packages that provide policy-rc.d? A quick apt-get > >> search didn't show any. > > > >At present, the standard way to control this to edit the symlinks (or > >runlevel.conf, if using file-rc). This is good, because '/etc/init.d/foo > >start' > >still works. > > > >The standard for the future is invoke-rc.d. If a package doesn't support > >this, then the thing to do is to submit a wishlist bug for invoke-rc.d > >support, NOT create some new ad-hoc method. > > I am not a native speaker, but to me it looks like your message > doesn't fit the questions I asked.
Steve answered your first question. The second question makes no sense, since policy-rc.d is supposed to be written by the administrator to fit their local policy. - Matt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
