Christian Lynbech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So the questions goes: is this a shortcoming with the HP not being > properly supported with acpi, am I missing some command like "apm" > which is able to do what I want or is this simply acpi not really > having caught up with apm yet?
acpi requires a fairly large amount of userland support. I've been doing a lot of work on this, and intend to push it back into Debian post-Sarge. It's not as simple as running something like acpi -s - nor will just echoing 3 into /proc/acpi/sleep work for many machines. On the other hand, every report I've had for the nc6000 has been a failure. The 4000 seems to have similar issues. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
