On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 10:53:28AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > although, now I am getting confused about the difference between a
> > debian developer and a debian maintainer. I labeled most items with 'DD'
> > thinking that's who did stuff. More things
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 08:04:21AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
Hi Martin,
>
> source package: dsc + (diff) + orig.tar.gz
> binary package: deb
> source upload: changes + list of files therein
I added some of this to my diagram. not 100% yet.
> nah, we turn software into debian packages by
Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> although, now I am getting confused about the difference between a
> debian developer and a debian maintainer. I labeled most items with 'DD'
> thinking that's who did stuff. More things to research.
The maintainer is the guy (or entity) who is listed in th
Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Kevin Mark [Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:09:03 -0500]:
>
>> so, there is no 'bug' to the bts to orphan a package, simply a note to
>> debian-devel? So folks are expected to troll it to pickup packages?
>> ok. I will change the ITO to 'read about orphanded packag
Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 01:11:33PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>> martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > h. There are more rules as to when packages migrate from unstable to
>> >testing.
>> > i. You use both meanings of "priority" (changelo
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 07:34:27AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Kevin Mark [Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:09:03 -0500]:
>
> > > And I've never read "ITO" as a tag for orphaning bug. Either one mails
> > > to -devel (or wherever) saying that they intend to give away or orphan
> > > some packages, but this
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> And I've never read "ITO" as a tag for orphaning bug.
This would be RFA?
Greetings
Bernd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
also sprach Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.15.1314 +0100]:
> > b. Developers do not tag bugs, they sign packages. Is that what you
> >meant? Also, note that at the moment, most only sign source
> >packages and binary uploads, not the binary packages themselves.
>
> NACK. you lost
* Kevin Mark [Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:09:03 -0500]:
> > And I've never read "ITO" as a tag for orphaning bug. Either one mails
> > to -devel (or wherever) saying that they intend to give away or orphan
> > some packages, but this isn't a bug, just conversation. In the BTS, I
> > think the tag is simpl
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 05:34:38PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 02:27 -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > Hi debianista,
> >
> > after my initial work on a diagram, and the comments and the work of
> > madduck, I had some time to redo my diagram to produce a totally new
> > concept
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 01:11:33PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > h. There are more rules as to when packages migrate from unstable to
> >testing.
> > i. You use both meanings of "priority" (changelog and control)
> >without making it clear wh
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 11:24:18AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> Great work! I am glad to see you got down with dia; I love that
> tool. Here are some comments:
Its cool that it exports to xfig as a way to use both tools.
>
> a. I am not sure what the "process realm" is.
ACK. r
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 02:27 -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> Hi debianista,
>
> after my initial work on a diagram, and the comments and the work of
> madduck, I had some time to redo my diagram to produce a totally new
> concept. any comment appreciated.
>
> http://kmark.home.pipeline.com/newdebian.p
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> h. There are more rules as to when packages migrate from unstable to
>testing.
> i. You use both meanings of "priority" (changelog and control)
>without making it clear which one is meant.
Furthermore, for testing propagation i'ts "urgency" tha
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 10:29:37AM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
> Hi Kev, list!
>
> On Tuesday 15 February 2005 08:27, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > after my initial work on a diagram, and the comments and the work of
> > madduck, I had some time to redo my diagram to produce a totally new
> > concept. an
Hi Kevin,
Great work! I am glad to see you got down with dia; I love that
tool. Here are some comments:
a. I am not sure what the "process realm" is.
b. Developers do not tag bugs, they sign packages. Is that what you
meant? Also, note that at the moment, most only sign source
packages and
Hi Kev, list!
On Tuesday 15 February 2005 08:27, Kevin Mark wrote:
> after my initial work on a diagram, and the comments and the work of
> madduck, ÂI had some time to redo my diagram to produce a totally new
> concept. any comment appreciated.
Really nice and clean. Great to see such fundamenta
Hi debianista,
after my initial work on a diagram, and the comments and the work of
madduck, I had some time to redo my diagram to produce a totally new
concept. any comment appreciated.
http://kmark.home.pipeline.com/newdebian.png
http://kmark.home.pipeline.com/newdebian.dia
cherio,
Kev
ps.
18 matches
Mail list logo
