On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 05:34:38PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote: > On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 02:27 -0500, Kevin Mark wrote: > > Hi debianista, > > > > after my initial work on a diagram, and the comments and the work of > > madduck, I had some time to redo my diagram to produce a totally new > > concept. any comment appreciated. > > > > http://kmark.home.pipeline.com/newdebian.png > > http://kmark.home.pipeline.com/newdebian.dia > > Not to find fault with something that will clear up much confusion in > the Debian Sphere of Being, but I am wonder where the contributions back > to upstream are in this picture?
Hi Greg, in my original diagram (http://kmark.home.pipeline.com/debian.png), I included an indication of that. I will be including it in this one, but have not done so yet. > > Where should it go? I don't know. Debian is one of the largest > contributors to upstream(s), with bug-fixes, feature adds and > improvements in code cleanliness. As well as being upstream for many > things. > > Also, shouldn't it also be noted the distributions that are based on > Debian that give-back to upstream (like Ubuntu and the plugin-dev and > pmount thing). woun't that be out of the scope of my diagram? > Given I don't know if it warrants, as it would be a user > submission with patch to the DBTS. > > Other than that, I think its very good looking, I don't have the > knowledge to judge whether it is accurate of not. > -- thanks for the input. cheers, Kev -- counter.li.org #238656 -- goto counter.li.org and be counted! (__) (oo) /------\/ / | || * /\---/\ ~~ ~~ ...."Have you mooed today?"...
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
