On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 07:34:27AM +0100, Adeodato Sim� wrote: > * Kevin Mark [Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:09:03 -0500]: > > > > And I've never read "ITO" as a tag for orphaning bug. Either one mails > > > to -devel (or wherever) saying that they intend to give away or orphan > > > some packages, but this isn't a bug, just conversation. In the BTS, I > > > think the tag is simply "O". > > > so, there is no 'bug' to the bts to orphan a package, simply a note to > > debian-devel? So folks are expected to troll it to pickup packages? > > ok. I will change the ITO to 'read about orphanded package on > > debian-devel'. > > Please compare [1], [2], and [3]. Basically: > > 1. maintainer writes -devel > 2. maintainer writes -devel and files RFAs > 3. maintainer submits O: bug against wnnp and CC's -devel > > [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/02/msg00346.html > [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/02/msg00534.html > [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/02/msg00676.html > > But orphaning bugs can be filed without sending mail to -devel, though > this makes them less effective. > Hi Adeodato, thanks for the info. I tried to add it. although, now I am getting confused about the difference between a debian developer and a debian maintainer. I labeled most items with 'DD' thinking that's who did stuff. More things to research. see you in the funny pages, Kev
-- counter.li.org #238656 -- goto counter.li.org and be counted! (__) (oo) /------\/ / | || * /\---/\ ~~ ~~ ...."Have you mooed today?"...
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature