On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 10:29:37AM +0100, David Schmitt wrote: > Hi Kev, list! > > On Tuesday 15 February 2005 08:27, Kevin Mark wrote: > > after my initial work on a diagram, and the comments and the work of > > madduck, I had some time to redo my diagram to produce a totally new > > concept. any comment appreciated. > > Really nice and clean. Great to see such fundamental processes documented > properly! Some things though, perhaps someone can help me out here:
Thanks!
>
> * buildd: there is more than one of them and I always thought the results are
> checked (and signed) manually by the buildd admins?
someone just emailed me about this.
>
> * propagation from experimental to unstable: I always thought that required a
> re-upload?
see above.
>
> * "testing packages propagate to stable" is perhaps better called "release:
> testing becomes new-stable"?
see above.
cheers,
Kev
--
counter.li.org #238656 -- goto counter.li.org and be counted!
(__)
(oo)
/------\/
/ | ||
* /\---/\
~~ ~~
...."Have you mooed today?"...
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
