Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 698095 + sid
Bug #698095 [haskell-yesod-auth] FTBFS: build-depends on missing:
libghc-persistent-dev
Added tag(s) sid.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
698095: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b
Wheezy has version 0.9.0.4-2 or 0.9.0.4-2+b1 of libghc-persistent-dev,
so this bug concerns sid only. I am hence setting a "sid" tag.
-Ralf.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 22:05:12 -0600
Rob Browning wrote:
Rob> So are you saying that emacsen-common somehow created the
Rob> problematic symlink?
Hell yeah. Sorry if that wasn't clear. The first thing I did before
anything else was removing the links by hand (with rm), then I unpacked
the emacse
Package: enigmail
Version: 2:1.1.2-2~bpo60+1
Severity: grave
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Following a (possibly automatic) upgrade I have lost the functionality
to sign/encrypt Emails with this add-on. I admit that I have been
confused by whether upgrading via use of Enigma
Ian Zimmerman writes:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 21:17:57 -0600
> Rob Browning wrote:
>
> Ian> "The relevant information" is indeed there - but there is a
> Ian> subdirectory "emacs" as well as one for the specific flavor
> Ian> (emacs23 in this case). The machinery looks at the directory and
> Ian>
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #698175 [python-sidl] python-sidl: needs rebuild because of python-numpy
ABI change; must add corresponding versioned dependency
Added tag(s) pending.
--
698175: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698175
Debian Bug Tracking Syst
Control: tags -1 + pending
I uploaded to DELAYED/2 a NMU of babel fixing this bug. The debdiff is
attached. Please let me know if I should delay the upload longer.
Regards,
--
.''`.Sébastien Villemot
: :' :Debian Developer
`. `' http://www.dynare.org/sebastien
`- GPG Key: 40
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 21:17:57 -0600
Rob Browning wrote:
Ian> "The relevant information" is indeed there - but there is a
Ian> subdirectory "emacs" as well as one for the specific flavor
Ian> (emacs23 in this case). The machinery looks at the directory and
Ian> thinks "emacs" is one of the flavors
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 19:09:36 -0800
Ian Zimmerman wrote:
Ian> No, it happens to me too and I am certain I never messed with these
Ian> directories manually.
Ian>
Ian> I think I know what the problem is. Look at #695501.
Ian>
Ian> "The relevant information" is indeed there - but there is a
Ian>
Ian Zimmerman writes:
> "The relevant information" is indeed there - but there is a subdirectory
> "emacs" as well as one for the specific flavor (emacs23 in this case).
> The machinery looks at the directory and thinks "emacs" is one of the
> flavors that must be handled.
Which machinery do you
Antoine Beaupré writes:
> anarcat@angela:~$ ls -ald /etc/emacs*
> drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 jan 22 19:16 /etc/emacs
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 oct 3 10:43 /etc/emacs23 -> /etc/emacs/
>
> So yeah, this is a symlink pointing to itself... Not sure how I managed
> that one, but I don't remember
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 18:29:27 -0800
Ian Zimmerman wrote:
Antoine> It looks like I may have created the 'emacs23' symlink 4 months
Antoine> ago - I suspect something broke back then and this was the
Antoine> workaround I found.
Ian> No, it happens to me too and I am certain I never messed with the
Ian Zimmerman writes:
> Antoine Beaupré :
>
>> It looks like I may have created the 'emacs23' symlink 4 months ago -
>> I suspect something broke back then and this was the workaround I
>> found.
>
> No, it happens to me too and I am certain I never messed with these
> directories manually.
Not
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2013 02:48:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#698541: fixed in zabbix 1:2.0.4+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #698541,
regarding zabbix: CVE-2013-1364: possible to override LDAP configuration
parameters via the API
to be marked as done.
This mean
control: severity -1 normal
control: reassign -1 release.debian.org
control: user -1 release.debian@packages.debian.org
control: usertag -1 rm
> Please remove latrine from Debian testing, it is too outdated to go into
> wheezy. A new release is upcoming, so there is no need to remove it from
>
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #698645 [latrine] latrine: please remove from testing
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> reassign -1 release.debian.org
Bug #698645 [latrine] latrine: please remove from testing
Bug reassigned from package 'latrine' to 'release.debian.or
Antoine Beaupré :
> It looks like I may have created the 'emacs23' symlink 4 months ago -
> I suspect something broke back then and this was the workaround I
> found.
No, it happens to me too and I am certain I never messed with these
directories manually.
--
Ian Zimmerman
gpg public key: 1024D
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 691180
Bug #691180 [connman] connman: Connman won't run due to missing libxtables.so.7
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
691180: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?
close 691180
thanks
Hi,
there have been new uploads of connman both into testing and unstable,
the issue has been resolved as the package has been rebuilt in both
cases.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 698572 + patch
Bug #698572 [src:setools] setools: FTBFS: symbols file mismatch
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
698572: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=6985
Hello,
For the record, python-cupshelpers is also missing the dependency as
it's also explicitly importing python-dbus.
Cheers
Laurent Bigonville
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 627810 serious
Bug #627810 [system-config-printer-udev] system-config-printer-udev: Lack of
dependency of python-dbus
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 651204 + fixed-upstream
Bug #651204 [system-config-printer] CVE-2011-4405
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> tags 596691 + fixed-upstream
Bug #596691 [system-config-printer] system-config-printer: could not handle a
printer share name with non-A
Package: emacsen-common
Version: 2.0.5
Severity: grave
I get this trying to upgrade from 2.0.3 to 2.0.5:
Setting up emacsen-common (2.0.5) ...
Install emacsen-common for emacs23
emacsen-common: Handling install of emacsen flavor emacs23
>>Error occurred processing /etc/emacs23/site-start.d/00debi
It seems that version 3.3.6 of the package introduced new symbols for
the libraries, but the .symbols files for arm and m68k architectures
were not updated.
The files that are obsolete are (* denotes the architecture):
libapol4.symbols.*
libqpol1.symbols.*
libseaudit4.symbols.*
Also, I notice tha
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:12:13PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Control: found -1 2.88dsf-34
> Control: severity -1 serious
>
> I upgraded several machines in the last days and _every_ one failed to
> reboot after that:
Does the following patch help with this?
Also, it would help greatly to have
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #698809 [reportbug] Debian Reportbug simply quits in 80% of all cases
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
> tags -1 +moreinfo
Bug #698809 [reportbug] Debian Reportbug simply quits in 80% of all cases
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
698809: http:/
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Rolf Heinrichs
wrote:
> Package: Reportbug
> Version: Squeeze 6.06 amd64, Gnome
did you forge this version yourself? please don't and please report
the exact version of reportbug you're using.
> Try
> i was mainly referring to your objection of changing MAXPDSTRING due to
> limitations of MAX_PATH. anything regarding this?
My objection is that its a big unknown what will happen and this is supposed
to be a releases candidate situation. All sorts of things are done based on
MAXPDSTRING, and
Package: Reportbug
Version: Squeeze 6.06 amd64, Gnome
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Trying to use Reportbug with user rights to report a problem: usually
after trying to selected a package Reportbug simply quits. No useful
info in logs.
Best regards,
Rolf Heinrichs
On 01/23/2013 10:18 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Changing MAXPDSTRING will affect everything in Pd, and as another long time
upstream developer, I've never heard of anyone changing it. It does not seem
like a change to make in the final phase of the release cycle. I think it
makes much mo
On 12/09/2012 07:54 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Hey Roland,
Good to see you working on Pd too :) About your patch, I think increasing
MAXPDSTRING is dangerous because Pd uses MAXPDSTRING as the max path length as
well. I think Debian's maximum path length is quite a bit shorter than 1
Hello,
the source package is now available at
http://people.debian.org/~treinen/ace/
I would appreciate if you could check that everything is fine before I
will upload it to sid. If possible I would like to upload over the coming
weekend at latest.
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 08:39:14AM +0100, Ra
Changing MAXPDSTRING will affect everything in Pd, and as another long time
upstream developer, I've never heard of anyone changing it. It does not seem
like a change to make in the final phase of the release cycle. I think it
makes much more sense to remove the new thing that's triggering the i
On 01/23/2013 09:46 PM, IOhannes zmölnig wrote:
On 12/09/2012 07:54 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Hey Roland,
Good to see you working on Pd too :) About your patch, I think
increasing MAXPDSTRING is dangerous because Pd uses MAXPDSTRING as the
max path length as well. I think Debian's maxi
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 09:58:01PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> I think it should be removed from s390x.
> Is there an easy way to do that without a rebuild with exclusion in arch spec?
It could be added to Packages-arch-specific and you'd need a removal of the
existing s390x binaries. So that wo
Hi
I think it should be removed from s390x.
Is there an easy way to do that without a rebuild with exclusion in arch spec?
// Ola
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 02:49:04PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Package: tightvncserver
> Version: 1.3.9-6.4
> Severity: serious
>
> Xvnc is broken on s390x (compil
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 08:28:00PM +0100, Thomas Girard wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 23/01/2013 08:39, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > OK. Here is what I will try tonight when I get back from work:
> > - repack the orig.tar.gz without the two windows executables, the TAO
> > source tree, and the files in exam
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:44:47 +0200 Boris Pek wrote:
> control: tags 698527 confirmed
> control: found 698527 5.5.0.svn.4499.dfsg-1
>
> Hi,
>
> This is really bad news for us.
Actually, this is really bad news for every Free Software supporter...
And I am very sorry to be the bringer of bad news
Here is what I came up with, if this seems to make sense and is
considered as a patch, *please do proofread and test it, I did no
such thing on my end.*
One small remark: the "+" after ssl_key and ssl_cert (lines 122+123)
mean "match one or more of the last character". Thus, a config line like
On 01/14/2013 03:10 PM, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
So what we really need is more testing before an upload even happens.
In theory there is a team maintaining this package but in practice the
others have even less free time than I do and this last year I have
had next to no time at all. (I mean i
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 698231 + pending
Bug #698231 [memcached] memcached: CVE-2013-0179
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
698231: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698231
Debian B
On 01/23/2013 03:10 PM, Herwin Weststrate wrote:
Here is what I came up with, if this seems to make sense and is
considered as a patch, *please do proofread and test it, I did no
such thing on my end.*
One small remark: the "+" after ssl_key and ssl_cert (lines 122+123)
mean "match one or more
tags 698231 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for memcached (versioned as 1.4.13-0.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards,
Salvatore
diff -Nru memcached-1.4.13/debian/changelog memcached-1.4.13/debian/changelog
--- m
On 2013-01-23 19:58 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Guillem Jover (guil...@debian.org):
>
>> I'll check this further and most probably reassign to the other
>> packages.
>
> And probably lower the bug severity, as IMHO, "grave" (or any RC
> severity) is overflated.
Well, "serious" might
On 2013-01-23 12:35 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 03:40:34 +0100, Uwe Storbeck wrote:
>> Package: dpkg
>> Version: 1.16.9
>> Severity: grave
>> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
>
> I doubt this is a problem in dpkg, otherwise this should have shown
> up early on. F
Hello,
On 23/01/2013 08:39, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> OK. Here is what I will try tonight when I get back from work:
> - repack the orig.tar.gz without the two windows executables, the TAO
> source tree, and the files in examples/ that are under Addison Wesley
> licence.
There is something slight
Hi,
On 23/01/2013 09:08, Johnny Willemsen wrote:
Agreed, but I believe Sun intent here was to ensure that
standardization and implementation efforts (IDL to C++ and IIOP
marshalling rules) do not get ruined by code modifications. Yes, I am
interpreting.
@Johnny: any opinion on this? See [1] fo
On 23/01/13 19:48, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2013-01-23 Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>> On 23/01/13 19:04, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>>> On 2013-01-23 Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> ..]
I'm attaching the debdiff. I rebuilt libgcrypt11 with the attached debdiff.
After installing
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 693839 + pending
Bug #693839 [flash-kernel] debian-installer: kernel install fails on armel
buffalo linkstation pro, missing uboot-mkimage
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 694928 + pending
Bug #694928 [flash-kernel] flash-kernel: postinst modifies /etc/default/rcS
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
694928: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep
Quoting Guillem Jover (guil...@debian.org):
> I'll check this further and most probably reassign to the other
> packages.
And probably lower the bug severity, as IMHO, "grave" (or any RC
severity) is overflated.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello,
On 23/01/2013 08:33, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> Relicensing is probably the best solution, generally speaking, but I suppose
> it will come too late for wheezy.
Ack.
On 23/01/2013 09:08, Johnny Willemsen wrote:
>> Agreed, but I believe Sun intent here was to ensure that
>> standardization and
Hello,
On 22/01/2013 23:30, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> I'm afraid Johnny was not CC'ed in your mail, do not forget to add
> pkg-ace-devel to the CC list
There's no need to add pkg-ace-devel@ since bug #697848 is on ace, the
maintainer (pkg-ace-devel@) gets all mail about it.
Regards,
Thomas
On 2013-01-23 Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> On 23/01/13 19:04, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > On 2013-01-23 Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
..]
> >> I'm attaching the debdiff. I rebuilt libgcrypt11 with the attached debdiff.
> >> After installing it, sudo works as expected.
>> [...]
>> Accor
On 23/01/13 19:30, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> On 23/01/13 19:04, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> On 2013-01-23 Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>>> severity 658896 serious
>>> thanks
>>> justification: Breaks unrelated software. It renders sudo unusable on
>>> systems with LDAP/PAM
>> [...]
>
On 23/01/13 19:04, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2013-01-23 Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>> severity 658896 serious
>> thanks
>> justification: Breaks unrelated software. It renders sudo unusable on
>> systems with LDAP/PAM
> [...]
>
>> What fixed the issue was applying the patch
>> no_globa
On 2013-01-23 Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> On 03/11/12 17:46, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
> > We cannot switch to a GPLv2-incompatible gnutls stack on Debian
> > currently.[1]
> > cu andreas
> > [1] We will need to do this for wheezy + 1, because Debian
> > does not have the manpower to
On 2013-01-23 Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> severity 658896 serious
> thanks
> justification: Breaks unrelated software. It renders sudo unusable on systems
> with LDAP/PAM
[...]
> What fixed the issue was applying the patch
> no_global_init_during_thread_callbacks.diff
> from http://bugs
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 368297 658896
Bug #368297 [libgcrypt11] sudo-ldap failes when you change uri to ldaps
Bug #545414 [libgcrypt11] sudo-ldap: sudo fails with "sudo: setreuid(ROOT_UID,
user_uid): Operation not permitted" for ldap users
Bug #566351 [libgcr
If nobody is working on this bug, I'm offering to prepare an NMU
Nick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
On 01/15/2013 21:24, Thomas Girard wrote:
>> the following license conditions (from 6.1.2-1's d/copyright) look quite
>> non-free as they restrict how the program may be modified:
>
> I assume you are referring to DFSG#3 here? Or DFSG#1?
I mean DFSG#3.
>>
>> [...] You
>> may copy and
There's a slight problem and that is I can't reproduce the problem
with 5.4.4-11 in amd64 wheezy chroot neither with mediawiki package
nor the vanilla mediawiki 1.20.2, so I cannot confirm if the 5.4.4-12
fixed the error or not.
Could one of the affected people please confirm? Unless you confirm
Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:17:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#698120: fixed in acetoneiso 2.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #698120,
regarding acetoneiso: Depends on fuse-utils; uninstallable in sid
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
On 03/11/12 17:46, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2012-10-24 Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> [...]
>> Maybe the rebuild without gcrypt is a solution. I don't know, I have
>> no idea what other functionality then might be missing.
>
> Hello,
> It is not possible currently for Debian to use nettle instead of
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 698490 git-effort/git-changelog: predictable /tmp filenames
> (CVE-2012-6114)
Bug #698490 {Done: Jonathan Wiltshire } [git-extras]
git-effort/git-changelog: predictable /tmp filenames
Changed Bug title to 'git-effort/git-changelog: predi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 658896 serious
Bug #658896 [libgcrypt11] sudo: setresuid(ROOT_UID, ROOT_UID, ROOT_UID):
Operation not permitted
Bug #368297 [libgcrypt11] sudo-ldap failes when you change uri to ldaps
Bug #545414 [libgcrypt11] sudo-ldap: sudo fails with
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch
Bug #694888 [ca-certificates-java] ca-certificates-java: early triggered
jks-keystore may fail and leave the temporary /etc/java-7-openjdk/jvm-$arch.cfg
Bug #694889 [ca-certificates-java] ca-certificates-java: early triggered
jks-keystore may fail and
Followup-For: Bug #694888
Control: tag -1 patch
attaching a patch to check for nss.cfg before reading it
Andreas
diff -Nru ca-certificates-java-20121112+nmu1/debian/changelog ca-certificates-java-20121112+nmu2/debian/changelog
--- ca-certificates-java-20121112+nmu1/debian/changelog 2012-11-29 00:
On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 03:40:34 +0100, Uwe Storbeck wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.16.9
> Severity: grave
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
I doubt this is a problem in dpkg, otherwise this should have shown
up early on. From the looks of it, it seems specific problems in those
pac
Just want to note here that a patch for the virtualbox source package to
modify the source to compile against Linux 3.7 is in #696011, curtesy of
Stefan Lippers-Hollmann.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
w
Processing control commands:
> tags 698527 confirmed
Bug #698527 [elmer] elmer: executable ElmerGUI.real links with both
GPL-licensed and GPL-incompatible libraries
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> found 698527 5.5.0.svn.4499.dfsg-1
Bug #698527 [elmer] elmer: executable ElmerGUI.real links with both
GP
Processing control commands:
> tags 698527 confirmed
Bug #698527 [elmer] elmer: executable ElmerGUI.real links with both
GPL-licensed and GPL-incompatible libraries
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #698527 to the same tags previously set
> found 698527 5.5.0.svn.4499.dfsg-1
Bug #698527 [elme
control: tags 698527 confirmed
control: found 698527 5.5.0.svn.4499.dfsg-1
Hi,
This is really bad news for us. Bug also affects package in stable [1],
which cannot be fixed and should be removed from it.
[1] http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/elmer
Regards,
Boris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hello,
Florian Schlichting (23/01/2013):
> > As this only happens for me when connecting to a host that resolves to
> > both ipv4 and ipv6 (for irssi-plugin-xmpp that is: '/xmppconnect -h
> > localhost ', NOT '/xmppconnect -h 127.0.0.1 '), I suppose the
> > GIO watch is triggered once for each pr
Hi. The current vbox-kompat-3.6-3.7.patch won't cleanly apply after the
virtualbox source package was updated for a CVE vulnerability, so I'm
attaching another version that does. This new patch doesn't change anything
else, so won't fix compiling virtualbox modules against Linux 3.8.
-- Chr
severity 698714 minor
thanks
Why don't you enter an administrative DN?
Am Dienstag, 22. Januar 2013, 18:08:16 schrieben Sie:
> Package: gosa
> Version: 2.7.4-4
> Severity: grave
>
> --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to configure my Gosa installation following
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 698714 minor
Bug #698714 [gosa] [gosa] Configuring GOsa failed
Severity set to 'minor' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
698714: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
Hi,
* Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 01:15:39PM +0100, Alexander Neumann wrote:
> > This bug should be fixed ASAP squeeze, for example Hetzner[1] was allocated
> > 5.9.0.0/16, so a lot of mail servers are hit by this bug. A very simple
> > patch is attached.
> Note that if you're
Hi,
For the AW license, I would recommend to check that on the regular ACE
mailing list, the files where added by Doug Schmidt himself.
Theoretically TAO_IDL can be replaced at some point by ridlc as new IDL
compiler which doesn't have this license problem, but probably that is 6
months of w
Hi,
I'm more annoyed by #697848. The first two issues raised by Ansgar were
not yet discussed with upstream because I need a confirmation on what
is exactly the issue. If this is what I underlined in my reply then I
am afraid we will have no easy solution except for moving ace to
non-free.
I a
Hi Julien,
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:10:13PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> Andreas, we can't remove packages that have rdeps. Stable needs to be
> self-contained.
Sorry for this beginners mistake and the extra work to check for you.
I tried to give this package another shot but stumbled wa
82 matches
Mail list logo
