On 2013-01-23 12:35 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 03:40:34 +0100, Uwe Storbeck wrote: >> Package: dpkg >> Version: 1.16.9 >> Severity: grave >> Justification: causes non-serious data loss > > I doubt this is a problem in dpkg, otherwise this should have shown > up early on. From the looks of it, it seems specific problems in those > packages you list, probably from fragile /use/share/doc/ symlink > transition handling, and symlinks remaining on the system from packages > older than the ones in squeeze.
That seems to be correct. > It seems the only involved packages are e2fsck-static, e2fsprogs, > libtiff-tools, libtiff4 and libtiffxx0c2. > >> grappa:~# md5sum /usr/share/doc/e2fsprogs/copyright >> 726570c997e520841dbf8f7611b173ae /usr/share/doc/e2fsprogs/copyright >> >> grappa:~# grep copyright /var/lib/dpkg/info/e2fsprogs.md5sums >> 51a47eee51e75de66777fc781af2f063 usr/share/doc/e2fsprogs/copyright > > I'll check these out later today. The e2fsck-static package switched from a symlink to a directory in /usr/share/doc with version 1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02+dfsg-1, but apparently never included a maintainer script to remove the symlink. Not sure if it is worth fixing that three Debian releases later. >> grappa:~# debsums --changed >> /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools/README >> /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools/TODO >> /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools/changelog.Debian.gz >> /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools/changelog.gz > > This one seems clearish, a previous version of libtiff-tools used to > symlink /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools to /usr/share/doc/libtiff4. Also > the maintainer script removes the /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools on > upgrade if it's a directory and not symlink, which makes those > disappear only on upgrade not on a clean installation. This certainly needs to be fixed. Cheers, Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org