Hello, On 23/01/2013 08:33, Ralf Treinen wrote: > Relicensing is probably the best solution, generally speaking, but I suppose > it will come too late for wheezy.
Ack. On 23/01/2013 09:08, Johnny Willemsen wrote: >> Agreed, but I believe Sun intent here was to ensure that >> standardization and implementation efforts (IDL to C++ and IIOP >> marshalling rules) do not get ruined by code modifications. Yes, I am >> interpreting. >> >> @Johnny: any opinion on this? See [1] for the context. > > The intent of Sun is to keep IIOP mandatory in the code, but as far as I > know we can ship the code without problems. Ok, so assuming eventually ridlc replaces TAO_IDL, we'll still have the IIOP issue. Any chance to have this piece of code relicensed? How can we proceed? Regards, Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
