I'm afraid I'll have to add two new (short) strings to flash-kernel
and change one string. This is because I've added the ability to make
certain embedded systems bootable that need a special boot image on
disk. The current messages talk about writing the kernel to flash and
this is not appropria
Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hello Barry,
Looking at the output data I fail to see how this mess happened. I'd
like to ask you to do another test for us. Please boot d-i and after
wireless has been properly setup grab the following information:
/proc/net/dev
lspci -knn
My current bet is that wireles
oldsys-preseed_2.0_armel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
oldsys-preseed_2.0.dsc
oldsys-preseed_2.0.tar.gz
oldsys-preseed_2.0_armel.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hello Barry,
Looking at the output data I fail to see how this mess happened. I'd
like to ask you to do another test for us. Please boot d-i and after
wireless has been properly setup grab the following information:
/proc/net/dev
lspci -knn
My current bet is that wireles
Accepted:
oldsys-preseed_2.0.dsc
to pool/main/o/oldsys-preseed/oldsys-preseed_2.0.dsc
oldsys-preseed_2.0.tar.gz
to pool/main/o/oldsys-preseed/oldsys-preseed_2.0.tar.gz
oldsys-preseed_2.0_armel.udeb
to pool/main/o/oldsys-preseed/oldsys-preseed_2.0_armel.udeb
Override entries for your packag
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Greetings from the Cambridge BSP!
While reinstalling an IA64 with a d-i daily-build netinst CD, the
"Detect disks" stage failed. Here's a snippet from the syslog:
[...]
Jun 28 11:34:59 kernel: Probing I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It looks as though the problem is:
* libparted1.8-udeb depends on the architecture-specific package libunwind7
on ia64, because the parted library requires libunwind.so.7
* src:libunwind does not build any udebs at all
According to experimental bu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 488267 udev 0.114-2
Bug#488267: lenny-beta2-netinst: wifi interface renaming causes big glitch on
first reboot
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `udev'.
> retitle 488267 Wireless NIC gets renamed to wlan0_rename
Bug#488267
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 488374 parted 1.8.8.git.2008.03.24-7
Bug#488374: installation-reports: [ia64] missing libunwind.so.7 =>
parted_devices cannot find disks
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `parted'.
> severity 488374 serious
Bug#488374: ins
reassign 488267 udev 0.114-2
retitle 488267 Wireless NIC gets renamed to wlan0_rename
thanks
On Saturday 28 June 2008, Barry Tennison wrote:
> I hope you can make something of this. I'm still at a loss to
> understand where wlan0 gets renamed to wlan0_rename and "by whom" - it
> does seem to be s
reassign 488374 parted 1.8.8.git.2008.03.24-7
severity 488374 serious
retitle 488374 [ia64] libparted depends on libunwind for which no udeb exists
thanks
On Saturday 28 June 2008, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Jun 28 11:35:02 main-menu[648]: (process:3835): parted_devices: error
> while loading shared
On Saturday 28 June 2008, Jochen Plumeyer wrote:
> I wanted to test the "Debian Installer Lenny Beta 2" CD images with
> qemu again (installing both from virtual Windoze XP and the "normal"
> way), but the kernel freezes (I tried the KDE-CD-1 and businesscard
> images).
I just tried the LennyBeta2
Hi,
On Saturday 28 June 2008 17:43, Frans Pop wrote:
> Yes, looks like that was about a year ago (even if the changelog does not
> mention it).
Ah, ok.
> > I tried to explain that in the bug report. We (Debian Edu) use it to
> > modify the profile which gets installed...
> Sorry, but that is Gre
Hello,
Frans Pop, le Sat 31 May 2008 18:59:32 +0200, a écrit :
> On Saturday 31 May 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > What is the status of the kernel support and the l-m-e packaging?
> >
> > Attached is the patch to l-m-e which I have used.
>
> OK. But my question actually was: when can we expe
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 07:37:53PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Robert Millan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > > OK. In that case I think "Reserve BIOS boot area:" would have my vote.
> >
> > Here's a new patch with all the requested changes.
>
> OK for debconf templates.
And the rest?
On Saturday 28 June 2008, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > How/why exactly does it need to be different for a laptop than for a
> > desktop?
>
> I believe it only differs in that it installs some more packages -
> implemented as described above.
This seems to indicate that instead of having a different pr
Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > I tried to explain that in the bug report. We (Debian Edu) use it to
>> > modify the profile which gets installed...
>> Sorry, but that is Greek to me. What is a profile, what does it do?
>
> In a normal Debian Edu installation the user is prompted to
2008/6/28 Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> If the font size changes (which IMO is a good thing), we will probably
> need to adjust the "font size correction" currently done in D-I by the
> gtk-set-font script in the rootskel-gtk package.
> Or does the "There is no change to the udeb" mean that the
2008/6/27 Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Please go ahead.
We noticed one more rendering bug in Kalyani.ttf and after fixing it,
we will upload the package in one or two days.
Regards
Praveen
--
പ്രവീണ് അരിമ്പ്രത്തൊടിയില്
I know my rights; I want my phone call!
What use is a phone c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Boot method: CD
Image version: Lenny d-i beta 2
Date: 2008-06-28
Machine: HP Workstation zx2000
Partitions:
(parted) print
Disk /dev/hda: 80.0GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table
Hi,
***
Warning!
This letter contains a virus which has been
successfully detected and cured.
***
Wrought in silver. Faugh! Here was no poverty, he incessantly
played the spy upon him, accompanying smile lighting up
his facebut it was a constrained discerning call abandonment.
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.9
Severity: normal
If a Release file fails to verify because it is out of sync with the
Release.gpg on one mirror, debootstrap will cache the file, and reuse it
if it's run a second time, with a different mirror. Result is that the
second mirror also appears to fa
Your message dated Sat, 28 Jun 2008 21:29:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#488264: regression: errors out on empty include-debs
option
has caused the Debian Bug report #488264,
regarding regression: errors out on empty include-debs option
to be marked as done.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 488267 kernel-wedge
Bug#488267: Wireless NIC gets renamed to wlan0_rename
Bug reassigned from package `udev' to `kernel-wedge'.
> retitle 488267 Should add hostap modules
Bug#488267: Wireless NIC gets renamed to wlan0_rename
Changed Bug title
On Friday 27 June 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
> > Changelog is not correct: this does not only affect CD installs, but
> > affects _any_ install method as none of them will have security
> > sources active during base installation.
>
> Ok, but CDs are the primary debeficiary.
Well, i
On Saturday 28 June 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Attached are two more patches. Once fixes the above, and the other
> > adds a preseed setting.
>
> The Template: pkgsel/upgrade seems to be missing a Default.
And should have (to silence Lintian):
Description: for internal use; can be preseeded
type
I've been working on a fix for bug #479431, and before I apply it to
d-i, I want to make you aware of it, since it can have repercussions to
DSAs and release management.
To summarize the problem for non-d-i developers:
If a user is installing from a CD or mirror, debootstrap is used to
insta
Attached patchset is tested, and worked ok for upgrading a beta2 netinst
system to current testing.
I want to let the security and release teams know about this change
before applying it.
--
see shy jo
From f799c15bb58a2f1a4d895710e481f8d97afc2fcc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
> tags 479431 patch
Bug#479431: pkgsel: Upgrade packages if (security) updates are available
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Ple
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: network
Image version:
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/armel/images/daily/iop32x/netboot/ -- June
28 2008
Date: June 28, 2008
Machine: Thecus N2100
Partitions:
Disk /dev/sda: 160.0 GB, 160041885696 bytes
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: network
Image version: Lenny beta2 netboot
Date: Sat Jun 28 23:23:17 BST 2008
Machine: HPPA D9000 D390
Partitions: Didn't come that far
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elabo
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.35
Severity: normal
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: CD
Image version: Lenny beta2 amd64 KDE CD
Date:
Machine: AMD 780G, integrated ATI HD3200, SATA HDD
Partitions:
FilesystemType 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/
On Sunday 29 June 2008, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> Boot stops after: Freeing unused kernel memory: 228k freed
I see:
2: console=ttyB0
Which leads me to suspect that this may be #484366.
Can you try booting with 'BOOT_DEBUG=3' and at the debug shell removing
the "/bin/cttyhac
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: network
Image version:
Date:
Machine: Sparc 64
Partitions:
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial boot: [o ]
Detect net
Dear Frans,
thank you for your quick reply on my report! Sorry for my delayed
answer.
After some more reading I think I understand better now what is
happening. So if the problem is in the domain of grub and not debian
specific, I think it would be reasonable to close the bug.
On the other h
Quoting Martin Michlmayr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> +Template: flash-kernel-installer/progress_disk
> +Type: text
> +# This item is a progress bar item when an embedded device is
> +# configured so it will boot from disk
> +# :sl4:
> +_Description: Configuring system to make it bootable
If this is di
* Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-29 08:11]:
> > +# configured so it will boot from disk
> > +# :sl4:
> > +_Description: Configuring system to make it bootable
>
> If this is displayed in a progress bar, it should have an ellipsis:
No, this is the title of the progress bar.
Anyway
Quoting Martin Michlmayr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> * Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-29 08:11]:
> > > +# configured so it will boot from disk
> > > +# :sl4:
> > > +_Description: Configuring system to make it bootable
> >
> > If this is displayed in a progress bar, it should have an ell
38 matches
Mail list logo
