On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:34:09 +0100 Samuel Thibault
wrote:
> While upgrading from console-data's keymaps to console-setup, my caps
> lock became a shift lock, and the caps lock led doesn't work any more.
This issue still exists in current sid and bookworm.
Is that still this issue
Your message dated Sat, 08 Mar 2025 13:28:48 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: #901255netcfg-static: Unable to configure fe80::1 as a
gateway
has caused the Debian Bug report #901255,
regarding netcfg-static: Unable to configure fe80::1 as a gateway
to be marked as done.
This means
02.03.2025 13:33, Tobias Frost wrote:
Dear Busybox maintainers,
currently stable has three open CVEs which are already fixed for LTS
already but remain unfixed for stable. We'd like to avoid a situation
where people updating from an LTS release to stable and then regress
into having the
Dear Busybox maintainers,
currently stable has three open CVEs which are already fixed for LTS
already but remain unfixed for stable. We'd like to avoid a situation
where people updating from an LTS release to stable and then regress
into having the CVEs not fixed.
For this I'
On 2025-02-25 15:03, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Control: reassign -1 partman-efi
On 25/02/2025 at 14:36, Ralf Bergs wrote:
it would be great if d-i would advise users that an ESP created as a
logical volume within LVM will (likely?) not be accessible to the UEFI.
I recently had this issue, and
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
it would be great if d-i would advise users that an ESP created as a
logical volume within LVM will (likely?) not be accessible to the UEFI.
I recently had this issue, and it caused me quite some effort to
understand why Grub
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 partman-efi
Bug #1098883 [debian-installer] debian-installer: d-i should warn if ESP is a
logical volume within LVM
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'partman-efi'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of b
Control: reassign -1 partman-efi
On 25/02/2025 at 14:36, Ralf Bergs wrote:
it would be great if d-i would advise users that an ESP created as a
logical volume within LVM will (likely?) not be accessible to the UEFI.
I recently had this issue, and it caused me quite some effort to
understand
Package: keyboard-configuration
Version: 1.234
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
* What led up to the situation?
Checking for defects with a new version
test-[g|n]roff -mandoc -t -K utf8 -rF0 -rHY=0 -rCHECKSTYLE=10 -ww -z < "man
page"
[Use "groff -e ' $'
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 plasma-discover
Bug #1095504 [discover] discover: Discover displays a thin line at the bottom
in fullscreen mode
Bug reassigned from package 'discover' to 'plasma-discover'.
No longer marked as found in versions discover/2.1.2-
tuation?**
>When running **Discover in fullscreen mode**, a **thin line or gap appears at
>the bottom of the screen**.
>This issue **only occurs in Discover** – all other applications (e.g., Dolphin,
>Firefox, Konsole) do not have this problem.
>
>**What exactly did you do (or
Package: console-setup
Version: 1.234
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
* What led up to the situation?
Checking for defects with a new version
test-[g|n]roff -mandoc -t -K utf8 -rF0 -rHY=0 -rCHECKSTYLE=10 -ww -z < "man
page"
[Use "groff -e ' $' -e '\\~$&#
Package: discover
Version: 2.1.2-10
Severity: minor
X-Debbugs-Cc: luc...@diplomats.com
Dear Maintainer,
**What led up to the situation?**
When running **Discover in fullscreen mode**, a **thin line or gap
appears at
the bottom of the screen**.
This issue **only occurs in Discover** – all
Отправлено с iPhone
from a variety of live images:
* The live image apt sources are added including non-free-firmware
* Network apt sources are added without non-free-firmware
Initially tested in a VM (where the firmware-summary listed no needed
firmware packages, as expected).
I've just run a d-i install fro
Hi Gioele,
Gioele Barabucci (2025-01-13):
> currently d-i installs `linux-image-$arch` regardless of the kind of
> machine it is installed on.
That's the general idea but that's not really what's actually happening
(devil, details, etc.).
> When used inside a virtua
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20241227
Dear debian-installer developers,
currently d-i installs `linux-image-$arch` regardless of the kind of
machine it is installed on.
When used inside a virtual machine, it could make sense to ask the user
if they want to install linux-image-cloud
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 1092863 ITP: opaque-store -- store encrypted blobs of information
> online, protected by a password using the OPAQUE protocol
Bug #1092863 [wnpp] ITP: opaque-store - store encrypted blobs of information
online, protected by a pa
Package: console-setup
Version: 1.233
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
* What led up to the situation?
Checking for defects with a new version
test-[g|n]roff -mandoc -t -K utf8 -rF0 -rHY=0 -rCHECKSTYLE=10 -ww -z < "man
page"
[Use "groff -e ' $' " to find
Your message dated Mon, 06 Jan 2025 07:40:08 +0100
with message-id <7d61853e-2524-411a-8e50-8be222dcc...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: #1067105After installing Debian wont let you in with a
given User/Password combination
has caused the Debian Bug report #1067105,
regarding After inst
Hi Thomas,
noone answered on your bugreport yet, sorry.
That may be, because it was assigned to a not-existing package
(there is no package with name "debian installer").
Thomas Schweikle wrote:
> Package: Debian installer
> Version: As on Debian live-CD/DVD for Debian
ht use this font at some point
because there's nothing better — this could have been the case for
Japanese and MotoyaLCedar — then switch to a better one — this could
have been the case for BIZ UDGothic), and maybe prune fonts on the
debian-cd side.
There might be other udebs that are used at b
Your message dated Tue, 24 Dec 2024 00:34:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1040216: fixed in cdebconf 0.275
has caused the Debian Bug report #1040216,
regarding cdebconf: confmodule: Erranous behaviour if IFS does not start with a
space during db_*
to be marked as done.
This means
Source: hw-detect
Version: 1.164
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: p...@hands.com
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: openqa
Hello maintainers of ethdetect,
When a description of a network kernel module uses the same separator as
cdebconf uses, the selection code behaves
Your message dated Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:01:08 +0100
with message-id <20241126210108.3ef88e31fa9275f7ad575...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: #385219 partman-auto-lvm recipes should support a free
space partition type.
has caused the Debian Bug report #385219,
regarding partman-auto-lvm r
Your message dated Mon, 25 Nov 2024 00:19:45 +0100
with message-id <5255c356-ef34-4b51-8b86-7ffb70b1d...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: #251415Please add a "storage sever" recipe with big /var
and small /home
has caused the Debian Bug report #251415,
regarding Please add
On 23/11/2024 at 15:33, Holger Wansing wrote:
Ah, indeed I forgot that part.
I should have known, that you understand that all better than I do ;-))
No worries, even I tend to forgot about my own work sometimes.
But I would not fix a regression with another regression knowingly.
By the way
On 23/11/2024 at 15:05, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
The new PRIORITY values defined in other recipes
Correction: the new MINIMUM and PRIORITY values.
(atomic, home, multi, small_disk) were designed to limit the swap size
to approximately 5% of disk size.
And the new MAXIMUM values limit the sw
Hi,
Pascal Hambourg wrote (Sat, 23 Nov 2024 15:05:15
+0100):
> On 23/11/2024 at 14:32, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > Pascal Hambourg wrote (Sat, 23 Nov 2024 14:17:31
> > +0100):
> >> On 23/11/2024 at 14:03, Holger Wansing wrote:
> >>>
> >>> but the
On 23/11/2024 at 14:32, Holger Wansing wrote:
Pascal Hambourg wrote (Sat, 23 Nov 2024 14:17:31
+0100):
On 23/11/2024 at 14:03, Holger Wansing wrote:
but the main issue (a heavy swap partition eats up most disk space) is
now solved with the server recipe, so I think it's ok to close
Hi,
Pascal Hambourg wrote (Sat, 23 Nov 2024 14:17:31
+0100):
> On 23/11/2024 at 14:03, Holger Wansing wrote:
> >
> > but the main issue (a heavy swap partition eats up most disk space) is
> > now solved with the server recipe, so I think it's ok to close this report.
On 23/11/2024 at 14:03, Holger Wansing wrote:
but the main issue (a heavy swap partition eats up most disk space) is
now solved with the server recipe, so I think it's ok to close this report.
This bug report could even have been closed in 2020 after the
introduction of partman-auto/ca
Hi,
Pascal Hambourg wrote (Sat, 23 Nov 2024 13:55:45
+0100):
> On 23/11/2024 at 12:03, Holger Wansing wrote:
> >
> >> I was a bit surprised when I did a quick Debian Stable install on my new
> >> workstation (384 Gb RAM, 512 Gb ssd) and ended up with just 80 Gb usabl
On 23/11/2024 at 12:03, Holger Wansing wrote:
I was a bit surprised when I did a quick Debian Stable install on my new
workstation (384 Gb RAM, 512 Gb ssd) and ended up with just 80 Gb usable
diskspace, thanks to a 400 Gb swap partition that the Debian installer
created. I think a warning
Your message dated Sat, 23 Nov 2024 12:03:14 +0100
with message-id <20241123120314.5bc9e4c1323842aea360d...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: #969450 partman-auto: on a machine with 384 Gb Ram and 512
Gb SSD, creates 400 Gb swap partition
has caused the Debian Bug report #969450,
reg
On 10/22/24 17:32, Nick Gawronski wrote:
Hi, I have installed debian 12.6 successfully on my System76 Serval WS 11
laptop on the first nvme drive that is two terabytes. On the second drive
I have windows 10 pro 64 bits which is also two terabytes and have two
more drives that are four terabytes
Your message dated Thu, 10 Oct 2024 19:03:46 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1036317: rootskel-gtk: Please consider shipping a
“dark” version of the banner
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036317,
regarding rootskel-gtk: Please consider shipping a “dark” version of the banner
to
Aurelien Jarno (2024-09-15):
> As a general rule, we are trying to get rid of P-a-s, even if we are
> taking ages for that. So we would definitely prefer if d-i has an
> explicit list of architecture. Or alternatively just leave it FTBFSing
> on those architectures.
ACK. Will do th
Hi,
On 2024-09-14 01:31, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please consider the attached patch for P-a-s (sid branch only). I haven't
> had any pushback at the time (even if I didn't cc this list…), but if an
> explicit list in Architecture is what we have to do, th
Hi,
Please consider the attached patch for P-a-s (sid branch only). I haven't
had any pushback at the time (even if I didn't cc this list…), but if an
explicit list in Architecture is what we have to do, that can be arranged…
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)
Your message dated Wed, 28 Aug 2024 10:35:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#983325: fixed in os-prober 1.83
has caused the Debian Bug report #983325,
regarding allow to build the package without a udeb
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Package: partman-crypto
Version: 125
After the fix for #1017542 was applied (version 125 of partman-crypto), a
warning message is printed on each boot on new installations. It's only
cosmetic, but it would still be nice if that warning could be removed...
boot message (from 125 on
On 08/07/2024 at 11:23, Luca Boccassi wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jul 2024 at 10:21, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Looking at systemd changelog:
* Make /tmp/ a tmpfs by default. Restore the upstream default and make
/tmp/ a tmpfs. Can be overridden with: touch
/etc/systemd/system/tmp.mount or
On 05/07/2024 02:20, Steve McIntyre wrote:
...
The thornier problem is the shim-signed that's in unstable right
now. It hasn't migrated to testing yet (and won't without an unblock
AFAICS), so there is a comparatively limited set of machines with it
installed. I'm *tempted* t
On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 09:50:39PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Nod. Apologies for the surprise this time. I was hoping to minimise
> the pain with quick uploads and migration, but... :-(
Why are the levels not enforced by Debian Breaks/Conflicts as well?
Bastian
--
The face of war has never
On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 09:29:11PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
>There are other alternative on your test systems:
>
> 1. disable secure boot while testing (which of course is *not* the
>right answer long-term!)
>
> 2. use mokutil --set-sbat-policy from a running system
>
>That's BIOS-based tests for me.
>
>> 2. use mokutil --set-sbat-policy from a running system to go back to
>> a previous SBAT minimum level, or delete the policy altogether
>>
>> 3. if you're testing in a qemu VM, you can also use "virt-fw
Steve McIntyre (2024-07-03):
> There are other alternative on your test systems:
ACK, ta.
> 1. disable secure boot while testing (which of course is *not* the
> right answer long-term!)
That's BIOS-based tests for me.
> 2. use mokutil --set-sbat-policy from a running
bat-revocations shows:
>sbat,1,2022052400
>grub,2
>* Boot with a freshly built live sid image [3]
>* mokutil --list-sbat-revocations shows:
>sbat,1,2024010900
>shim,4
>grub,3
>grub.debian,4
>* Boot with the bookworm image again -> the SBAT error message is shown.
>
d known insecure) versions of grub and shim will
not load on a Secure Boot system. Unfortunately, the split between
unstable and testing makes for this awkward problem here. Once the new
shim-signed migrates into testing and things are in sync again, this
*particular* issue will be solved. I'
On 03/07/2024 18:21, Roland Clobus wrote:
Thanks! That did the trick, it shows one offending entry, which causes
this issue: grub,3 (see screenshot)
Oops. Actually, it is shim which causes the issue, as the screenshot
shows that shim has version 3, and at least version 4 is required.
OpenP
! That did the trick, it shows one offending entry, which causes
this issue: grub,3 (see screenshot)
Whenever the virtual machine was booted in secure UEFI boot with a newer
version, that would revoke the version for GRUB.
To reproduce:
* Use the stock OVMF_VARS_4M.ms.fd
* Boot with the live
Your message dated Sat, 15 Jun 2024 10:34:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1073169: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.135
has caused the Debian Bug report #1073169,
regarding debootstrap: support working on a nodev filesystem (e.g. /tmp)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
/-/merge_requests/109
,
> so why would it fail on nodev?
>
> When you're root and on a nodev filesystem, mknod still works. What
does
> not work is writing to that device. Hence, the bind mounting code
does
> not come into effect here. That also leads us to a relatively obvious
> sol
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:genext2fs
Bug #1073169 [debootstrap] debootstrap: support working on a nodev filesystem
(e.g. /tmp)
Added indication that 1073169 affects src:genext2fs
--
1073169: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1073169
Debian Bug Track
;/tmp/...' mounted with noexec or nodev
I thought Johannes fixed debootstrap to work without mknod via
https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debootstrap/-/merge_requests/109,
so why would it fail on nodev?
When you're root and on a nodev filesystem, mknod still works. What does
not wor
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 787279 +pending
Bug #787279 [rootskel-gtk] Cannot disable screen blanking with Jessie preseed
installation
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
787279: https://bugs.debian.or
n : debian-installer component to install systemd-boot
> > as the bootloader
>
> Could we have some kind of heads-up via X-D-Cc to debian-boot@ for such
> things, please? Discovering we have a new package under our namespace
> via a “Processing” mail from ftpmaster is awkward.
S
Cc to debian-boot@ for such
things, please? Discovering we have a new package under our namespace
via a “Processing” mail from ftpmaster is awkward.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
As a matter of fact, the solution I posted doesn't work either.
Therefore, be sure on the man page, to mention the true sequence needed:
# debootstrap
(missing step goes here)
# debootstrap --second-stage
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 plasma-discover 5.27.5-2
Bug #1068833 [discover] discover: A game installed via Discover doesn't start
Bug reassigned from package 'discover' to 'plasma-discover'.
No longer marked as found in versions discover/2.1.2-10.
Ign
Control: reassign -1 plasma-discover 5.27.5-2
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 21:49:48 + Ilkka Kallioniemi
wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 21:45:53 +0200 Pascal Hambourg
wrote:
> Discover is a hardware identification system. Aren't your confusing with
> plasma-discover ?
Yes, I am. Sorry fo
On 11/04/2024 at 20:22, Ilkka Kallioniemi wrote:
Package: discover
(...)
When installing game MegaGlest using Discover, the installed game is not fully
installed.
Discover is a hardware identification system. Aren't your confusing with
plasma-discover ?
Package: discover
Version: 2.1.2-10
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: ifonxordgmdwhqy...@cazlg.com
Dear Maintainer,
When installing game MegaGlest using Discover, the installed game is not fully
installed.
Menu items appear correctly, but the application is missing an important
package.
A quick
That's a weird bug to have open, especially considering the last entry from
2019.
I landed here because dpkg have thrown a message on me
Unpacking dpkg (1.21.22) over (1.21.21) ...
Setting up dpkg (1.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1065033 src:pam
Bug #1065033 [debootstrap] debootstrap: Fails for *sid* with `cannot move
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpam.so.0 as its destination exists as a symlink`
Bug reassigned from package 'debootstrap' to 'src:pam&
Hello Paul,
On 29/02/2024 06:52, Paul Menzel wrote:
...
I am unable to bootstrap Debian sid/unstable. It worked some weeks ago.
...
This is part of the t64 transition.
It will start to work soon, as more packages have transitioned.
With kind regards,
Roland Clobus
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Des
-merged...
I: Extracting util-linux...
I: Extracting zlib1g...
E: cannot move /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpam.so.0 as its destination
exists as a symlink
Kind regards,
Paul
Package: debian-installer
On my new laptop, d-i prints "No Ethernet card was detected. If you know
the name of the driver (etc)". This confused me, as I thought it _also_
couldn't find the wifi driver (since it's a new laptop, it's possible
the d-i kernel doesn't k
found 1063858 3.2.1
severity 1063858 minor
thanks
-12.5.0-amd64-DLBD-2.iso, section "About This
Disc" says: "[...]this disc is number 2 of a set of 1 discs"
1. This is obviously false, not only in the DLBD images.
While we're at it, could we tidy up the generating script in a few more
minor details, without separ
media
testing, which #debian-cd asked me to report as a bug.
Steps to reproduce:
- boot into expert install (we used text mode)
- accept defaults until "Configure the package manager"
- asked to choose http, https or ftp for file downloads
- choose https
Expected result: maybe one of th
Your message dated Mon, 11 Dec 2023 15:03:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1051964: fixed in debian-installer-utils 1.148
has caused the Debian Bug report #1051964,
regarding adding a local preseed file into the initrd breaks CD/USB media usage
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Wed, 8 Nov 2023 21:49:51 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Works in buster
has caused the Debian Bug report #921815,
regarding debootstrap umount "host" /proc when running in a Docker container
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
To whom it may concern
I'm looking for a specific machine object file. The file is en_US.mo. If
you have a copy or can whip one up real quick, could you attach it to a
reply? Thank you.
Sincerely,
--
Joel A. Zrolka
®
6300 N. 11th St.
Apt.# 31
McAllen, Texas
78504
Cell Phone: (956
Your message dated Fri, 27 Oct 2023 00:20:54 +0100
with message-id <20231026232054.gg8...@tack.einval.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#1054459: debian-installer: Debian 12.2 amd64 netinst
failes to find a kernel image for a Dell 7812
has caused the Debian Bug report #1054459,
regarding
cc:d...@caltech.edu, st...@einval.com
Hi Steve,
The Supermicro system that created the netinst flash drive image is a xeon
with ecc; its root filesystem system is a btrfs raid1 mirror pair.
I did not verify the checksum of the netinst image after copying to flash.
My bad because recreating
y only with the
>Dell 7812 with an Xeon E5 CPU.
>
>The debian 12.2.0 amd64 netinst.iso boots normally and seems to start
>normally.
> When it gets to finding a kernel to install, it complains that it cannot
>find a suitable kernel.
>
>I had the same results with debian 12.
start
normally.
When it gets to finding a kernel to install, it complains that it
cannot find a suitable kernel.
I had the same results with debian 12.2 adm64 dvd-1.iso and dlbd-1.iso
When I booted the debian 12.2 amd64 live.iso system, its installer ran OK.
I am running on the system
Source: debian-installer-utils
Version: 1.147
Severity: normal
I'm hacking together an installer for an rpi4 locally, copying all the
files onto a FAT-formatted USB drive. I also want to do some minor
config in a preseed late_command, so I've modified the initrd to add a
pr
Hey,
I'm currently trying to boot a netinstall Image in a DHCPv6 only
environment, so no IPv4 DHCP nor SLAAC is available. During auto
configuration, DHCPv6 seems to work fine, the configuration succeeds,
the host finds its hostname and domain search list of the network its
in, but
ition hard drives: [O]
Install base system:[O]
Install tasks: [O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Overall install:[O]
Comments/Problems:
Hi,
I don't have a bug to report, installation went smooth this time! Just
a suggestion to make: My laptop has a built-in fingerpr
Your message dated Wed, 16 Aug 2023 16:02:18 -0400
with message-id <87sf8i92np@digitalmercury.freeddns.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#757182: debian-installer: Please provide a warning
about BTRFS
has caused the Debian Bug report #757182,
regarding debian-installer: Please provide a w
On Wednesday, 16 August 2023 10:34:56 AEST Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> Nine years since this bug was filed, and three years since Fedora has
> been using btrfs by default, I think this bug can be closed.
BTRFS is quite reliable now and no warnings are needed.
--
My Main Blog http://etbe.
eadlocks
>> that
>> prevent writing to disk, and other problems. After some discussion on the
>> BTRFS mailing list (see the above URL for the archive) the consensus seems to
>> be that we should have a warning. BTRFS isn't at the stage where someone
>> wit
P.S.
> Dimitri John Ledkov writes:
>
>> On 6 August 2014 03:46, Russell Coker wrote:
snip
>>> be that we should have a warning. BTRFS isn't at the stage where someone
>>> with
>>> little knowledge of it can just use it. To have it work relia
50X, "-cpu host -smp 6" flags in qemu
Memory: "-m 6000" flag in qemu
Partitions: "Guided partition" method during the installation with a
single root partition.
The entire qemu command:
qemu-system-x86_64 -nic user,model=virtio-net-pci -cpu host -smp 6 -m
6000 -enable-k
"$*" is expanded by the shell: "$*" will be still
expanded using the IFS of the calling shell.
Example of this fault behavior:
$ dash -c 'IFS="."; set -- a b c; IFS=" " printf "%s\n" "$*"'
a.b.c.
This means that any db_foo comman
Austin Moss (2023-06-28):
> Thank you for taking a look at this. Attached an archive with
> /var/log/installer/syslog for you.
The relevant parts of the log are likely the following:
Jun 27 22:03:08 netcfg[4939]: DEBUG: Network config complete
Jun 27 22:03:08 netcfg[4939]: DEB
Hi Austin,
And thanks for your detailed report.
Austin Moss (2023-06-28):
>When installing Debian with the graphical installer from the DVD ISO, one
> of
> the steps during the installer prompts users to connect to a network to
> retrieve up to date packages. Later in the in
Package: debian-installer
Version: stable 20230607 amd64
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: aus...@themosses.org
Hello debian-installer maintainers,
When installing Debian with the graphical installer from the DVD ISO, one of
the steps during the installer prompts users to connect to a network to
that this means a maintenance burden for downstream
distributions that would like to use an unsigned GRUB. But then, that's
their choice…
In Kali I fixed it another way, we now use the "monolithic unsigned
grub" inside our installer, instead of the "legacy" grub styl
Hi Arnaud,
Arnaud Rebillout (2023-06-22):
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> This issue doesn't affect Debian (as Debian's installer images come with
> a signed GRUB), but it affects Debian derivatives that use a unsigned
> GRUB in their installer. In particular, it did break t
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20230607
Severity: normal
User: de...@kali.org
Usertags: origin-kali
Dear Maintainer,
This issue doesn't affect Debian (as Debian's installer images come with
a signed GRUB), but it affects Debian derivatives that use a unsigned
GRUB in their ins
On 21/06/2023 at 03:55, tomas k wrote:
On Fri, 2023-06-09 at 13:32 +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
With /usr-merged layout (default since buster IIRC), a separate /usr
must be mounted before running any program. The initramfs mounts a
separate /usr before running init, but the installer rescue
On Fri, 2023-06-09 at 13:32 +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> On 09/06/2023 at 01:27, tomas k wrote:
> >
> > I'm on a different system than the problem one. For years I have
> > had to boot knoppix
> > and run a chroot to change a password I've forgotten, becau
Niltze [Hello]!
On 2023-06-15 04:38, Qi Hou wrote:
Dear experts in Debian,
Pardon me for bothering you, but I have to turn to you for advice.
Recently, I've been struggling to customize a Debian (Bullseye)
installer ISO tarball.
My intention is to embed some features and a specific k
Dear experts in Debian,
Pardon me for bothering you, but I have to turn to you for advice.
Recently, I've been struggling to customize a Debian (Bullseye) installer
ISO tarball.
My intention is to embed some features and a specific kernel(5.10.x) into
the ISO
tarball. Then, after deployin
Package: console-setup-linux
Version: 1.221
In X, * A produces "Å" (U+00C5 LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH
RING ABOVE).
But on the console, I get "Ĺ" (U+0139 LATIN CAPITAL LETTER L WITH ACUTE)
instead.
-- System Information:
Versions of packages console-setup-linux
On 09/06/2023 at 01:27, tomas k wrote:
I'm on a different system than the problem one. For years I have had to boot
knoppix
and run a chroot to change a password I've forgotten, because I use a separate
usr partition,
and rescue thinks it's the root directory. Butr without etc
1 - 100 of 1677 matches
Mail list logo
