Hi, On 2024-09-14 01:31, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > Please consider the attached patch for P-a-s (sid branch only). I haven't > had any pushback at the time (even if I didn't cc this list…), but if an > explicit list in Architecture is what we have to do, that can be arranged…
As a general rule, we are trying to get rid of P-a-s, even if we are taking ages for that. So we would definitely prefer if d-i has an explicit list of architecture. Or alternatively just leave it FTBFSing on those architectures. Cheers Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://aurel32.net
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
