Bug#288476: Problems with fr_CA installs

2005-01-04 Thread Christian Perrier
reopen 288476 clone 288476 -1 reassign -1 libpaper1 retitle -1 Incorrectly defaults to A4 when the locale is fr_CA severity -1 minor reassign 288476 localization-config severity 288476 normal retitle 288476 Keyboard for fr_CA installs is incorrect thanks The above properly assign bugs to the (I su

Processed: Re: Problems with fr_CA installs

2005-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 288476 Bug#288476: nForce 2 success Bug reopened, originator not changed. > clone 288476 -1 Bug#288476: nForce 2 success Bug 288476 cloned as bug 288693. > reassign -1 libpaper1 Bug#288693: nForce 2 success Bug reassigned from package `installa

tasksel_2.19_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2005-01-04 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: tasksel_2.19.dsc to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.19.dsc tasksel_2.19.tar.gz to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.19.tar.gz tasksel_2.19_all.deb to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.19_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 272360 278186 286053 286054 286

Bug#286054: marked as done (tasksel: significant trailing whitespace in .desc)

2005-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Jan 2005 20:02:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#286054: fixed in tasksel 2.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#286053: marked as done (tasksel: README typo)

2005-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Jan 2005 20:02:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#286053: fixed in tasksel 2.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#272360: marked as done (Manual package selection does not allow manual package selection)

2005-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Jan 2005 20:02:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#272360: fixed in tasksel 2.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#278186: marked as done (tasksel: Preseeding needs using the localized values of task names)

2005-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Jan 2005 20:02:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#278186: fixed in tasksel 2.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#286539: marked as done (tasksel: Missing languages in Makefile)

2005-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Jan 2005 20:02:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#286539: fixed in tasksel 2.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processing of tasksel_2.19_i386.changes

2005-01-04 Thread Archive Administrator
tasksel_2.19_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: tasksel_2.19.dsc tasksel_2.19.tar.gz tasksel_2.19_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Re: cdimage.debian.org down ?

2005-01-04 Thread Joey Hess
Xavier Poinsard wrote: > cdimage.debian.org isn't responding. > Is it overloaded or down ? While it's down you can get CDs here: http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/ -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Sarge branch build dies with free blocks count == 0

2005-01-04 Thread Daniel Dickinson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I seem to have take more than my share of idiot pill lately. Perhaps I can improve my track record with intelligent messsage. At least my stuff on the wiki apparently works. Joey Hess wrote: | Daniel Dickinson wrote: | |>It turns out that this problem

Bug#284996: Some follow-up to #284996

2005-01-04 Thread Steve Kleiser
  Some follow up;  Suspecting the problem might be caused by the drive, and since the hard drive is easily changed on this laptop model, I removed the 8GB drive and replaced it with a Toshiba MToshiba MK2101MAN 2.1GB 2.1GB. The same symptoms persist with the MK2101MAN. The laptop was booted using a

Re: Bug#288269: localechooser: Can cause problems in floppy/netboot installations for unstable

2005-01-04 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > I suspect that the reason is to avoid having the s390 console prompt you > for what language to use, and then, horrors, try to use something other > than English. I doubt Japanese or even French displays well on this most > limited of consoles. Even Fren

Re: cannot find iso for sarge i386 install CD

2005-01-04 Thread Frans Pop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 04 January 2005 22:28, woody marvel wrote: > http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/rc2/sarge- >i386-netinst.iso Server is down (dead). Try later. Cheers, FJP -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/L

cannot find iso for sarge i386 install CD

2005-01-04 Thread woody marvel
anyone having problems wih this? http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/rc2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso Sincerely, woody marvel === -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#288475: Debian Sarge installation CD-ROM, built on 20041118

2005-01-04 Thread Jaap van Wingerde
postmodern programmer wrote: > Rather, the submitter must have had a woody source in his > sources.list to find this bug. The version of fileutils in testing > is 5.2.1-2. > In any case, I agree, this isn't a bug in Debian. The installer wrote the stable source in the sources.list! Debian vers

Bug#282756: (lspci ; lspci -n) | sort

2005-01-04 Thread Christian Perrier
> :00:0f.1 0101: 1166:0211 > :00:0f.1 IDE interface: ServerWorks OSB4 IDE Controller If I'm correct it seems the correct module is not loaded for that one, am I right? To the bug submitter : could you do a "lsmod" on the installed 2.6 system? I think this may help. -- To UNSUBSCR

Bug#278186: Should we correct 278186?

2005-01-04 Thread Christian Perrier
VERY late replay, sorry. I left it prewritten in my outgoing mailbox. Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > I've been holding off on this patch because a) preceived lack of testing > b) it could break existing preseed files for translated installs. > > I'm glad to see that you've dealt with a

Bug#288476: Problems with fr_CA installs (was: Re: Bug#288476: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#288476: nForce 2 success))

2005-01-04 Thread Christian Perrier
CC'ing the french l10n list.please keep all addresses CC'ed to answers. (problem with default paper size in fr_CA installs and problems with keyboard layout in X in the same install) > /etc/papersize is not related to KDE, but to dpkg-reconfigure libpaper1 > so affects all programs, like OOo

Bug#288522: debian-installer: WLAN config settings become lost (perhaps misplaced) upon first boot

2005-01-04 Thread Joey Hess
Michael Gilbert wrote: > i'm using the i386 debian-installer RC2 > (http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/rc2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso) > on a dell inspiron 8200 laptop with a dell truemobile 1150 wlan card > on a TI PCI-1410 cardbus. i use a non-standard SSID and a secure WEP

Bug#288475: Debian Sarge installation CD-ROM, built on 20041118

2005-01-04 Thread Joey Hess
Michael Stone wrote: > Yes. Installing woody over top of sarge won't work. ISTR that the > install cds use[d?] "stable" instead of "sarge" in the sources.list--I > don't know why. That would be a really serious bug, but they don't. They use whatever the symbolic distribution name for sarge current

Bug#288269: localechooser: Can cause problems in floppy/netboot installations for unstable

2005-01-04 Thread Joey Hess
Christian Perrier wrote: > Shortening the CC list. After all, we all 3 read -boot..:-) > > Would adding *chooser to the initrd list for s390 be an option? > Indeed, why aren't they on the initrd? I assume there's a very good > reason, for sure, but I'd just like to know. I suspect that the reason

Bug#288614: Package: installation-reports

2005-01-04 Thread Phil
Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: RC2 uname -a: Linux deb 2.6.8-1-386 #1 Thu Nov 11 12:18:43 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: Jan. 03, 2005 Method: Booted from CD Image, downloaded from cdimage.debian.org using a different debian installation. Machine: Gigabyte 7vT600P-RZ(-C) P

Re: Desktop task broken on !(i386/powerpc)

2005-01-04 Thread Joey Hess
Joerg Friedrich wrote: > Then we have no tool for the experienced user. Searching through a list > of more than 1 Packages is no option. Perhaps you're not aware that aptitude allows browsing of the task contents and selecting/deselecting individual parts of a task? -- see shy jo signature

yaboot-installer_1.0.3_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

2005-01-04 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: yaboot-installer_1.0.3.dsc to pool/main/y/yaboot-installer/yaboot-installer_1.0.3.dsc yaboot-installer_1.0.3.tar.gz to pool/main/y/yaboot-installer/yaboot-installer_1.0.3.tar.gz yaboot-installer_1.0.3_powerpc.udeb to pool/main/y/yaboot-installer/yaboot-installer_1.0.3_powerpc.udeb

Processing of yaboot-installer_1.0.3_powerpc.changes

2005-01-04 Thread Archive Administrator
yaboot-installer_1.0.3_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: yaboot-installer_1.0.3.dsc yaboot-installer_1.0.3.tar.gz yaboot-installer_1.0.3_powerpc.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a su

Re: cdimage.debian.org down ?

2005-01-04 Thread David Schmitt
Xavier Poinsard wrote: cdimage.debian.org isn't responding. Is it overloaded or down ? Down. The hardware died earlier today. See http://lists.debian.org/debian-cd/2005/01/msg00022.html for details Regards, David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble

Bug#288475: Debian Sarge installation CD-ROM, built on 20041118

2005-01-04 Thread Michael Stone
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 11:09:34PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: Fileutils 4.1-10 is from woody, not from sarge. The version of fileutils in sarge is a transitional package only. Yes. Installing woody over top of sarge won't work. ISTR that the install cds use[d?] "stable" instead of "sarge" in the

Re: Bug#288140: [sparc] USB keyboard handling broken on SunBlade 150

2005-01-04 Thread Wiktor Wandachowicz
I would like to confirm once again, that on the SunBlade 150 booting from the debian-installer CD still gives me a non-working USB keyboard. I used a: http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/daily/sparc/20050103/sarge-sparc-businesscard.iso This has been discussed in depth in following bug report

cdimage.debian.org down ?

2005-01-04 Thread Xavier Poinsard
cdimage.debian.org isn't responding. Is it overloaded or down ? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: debian installer, uml, kernel 2.6

2005-01-04 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 06:17:50PM -0500, Raylynn Knight wrote: > On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 08:52 +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 11:28:52PM -0500, Raylynn Knight wrote: > > > On Sat, 2004-12-18 at 15:12, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > > > Yeah, but which of the images do you use ?

Processed: reassign 288049 to discover1-data

2005-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 288049 discover1-data Bug#288049: installation-reports: LSI MegaRAID 467 (aka Dell PERC2/DC) not detected, was detected in RC1 w/2.6 kernel Bug reassigned from package `discover1-data' to `discover1-data'. > End of message, stopping processin

Processed: Re: Processed: reassigning LSI MegaRAID 467 (aka Dell PERC2/DC) not detected

2005-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 02:18:30AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > # > > reassign 288049 disover1-data > # > Warning: Unknown package 'disover1-data' > # > Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `disover1-data'. > reassign 28

Bug#282756: (lspci ; lspci -n) | sort

2005-01-04 Thread Geert Stappers
(lspci ; lspci -n) | sort :00:00.0 0600: 1166:0009 (rev 05) :00:00.0 Host bridge: ServerWorks CNB20LE Host Bridge (rev 05) :00:00.1 0600: 1166:0009 (rev 05) :00:00.1 Host bridge: ServerWorks CNB20LE Host Bridge (rev 05) :00:01.0 0300: 5333:8904 (rev 01) :00:01.0 VGA compatib

Re: Processed: reassigning LSI MegaRAID 467 (aka Dell PERC2/DC) not detected

2005-01-04 Thread Geert Stappers
# On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 02:18:30AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: # > > reassign 288049 disover1-data # > Warning: Unknown package 'disover1-data' # > Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `disover1-data'. reassign 288049 discover1-data thanks sorry for the typo Cheer

Processed: reassigning

2005-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 282756 discover1-data Bug#282756: installation-reports Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `discover1-data'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system a

Bug#288049: installation-reports: LSI MegaRAID 467 (aka Dell PERC2/DC) not detected, was detected in RC1 w/2.6 kernel

2005-01-04 Thread Geert Stappers
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 09:51:06AM -0800, Dan Dennison wrote: > On 1/2/05 1:54 AM, "Geert Stappers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is _needed_: > 2.6 kernel -- megaraid > 2.4 kernel -- megaraid2 Acknowledge > > That still leaves two PCI IDs, > > I hope that someone can translate it in loadin

Processed: reassigning LSI MegaRAID 467 (aka Dell PERC2/DC) not detected

2005-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 11:00:50AM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > # > > # > In bugreport #288413 is a simular situation. > reassign 288049 disover1-data Bug#288049: installation-reports: LSI MegaRAID 467 (aka Dell PERC2/DC) not detected, was detected

Bug#288476: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#288476: nForce 2 success)

2005-01-04 Thread Filipus Klutiero
Debian Bug Tracking System a écrit : This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report #288476: nForce 2 success, which was filed against the installation-reports package. It has been closed by one of the developers, namely Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Their explanation is attac

Bug#288352: installation-reports, need more information

2005-01-04 Thread Geert Stappers
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 06:16:01PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > > Output of lspci and lspci -n: couldn't get here > > Could you try booting a Knoppix CD and send us the output of: > > (lspci -v ; lspci -n) | sort STOP do (lspci ; lspci -n ) | sort So without the verbose flag. > Knowin

Bug#288475: marked as done (Debian Sarge installation CD-ROM, built on 20041118)

2005-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:56:32 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#288475: Debian Sarge installation CD-ROM, built on 20041118 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#288475: Debian Sarge installation CD-ROM, built on 20041118

2005-01-04 Thread Christian Perrier
> Fileutils 4.1-10 is from woody, not from sarge. The version of fileutils in > sarge is a transitional package only. So, the only way the bug reporter could trigger this was by selecting fileutils manually from dselect? If so, the bug can probably be closed as such behaviour may be expected whe

Bug#288475: Debian Sarge installation CD-ROM, built on 20041118

2005-01-04 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:48:30AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > > Fileutils 4.1-10 is from woody, not from sarge. The version of fileutils in > > sarge is a transitional package only. > So, the only way the bug reporter could trigger this was by selecting > fileutils manually from dselect?