reopen 288476
clone 288476 -1
reassign -1 libpaper1
retitle -1 Incorrectly defaults to A4 when the locale is fr_CA
severity -1 minor
reassign 288476 localization-config
severity 288476 normal
retitle 288476 Keyboard for fr_CA installs is incorrect
thanks
The above properly assign bugs to the (I su
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 288476
Bug#288476: nForce 2 success
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> clone 288476 -1
Bug#288476: nForce 2 success
Bug 288476 cloned as bug 288693.
> reassign -1 libpaper1
Bug#288693: nForce 2 success
Bug reassigned from package `installa
Accepted:
tasksel_2.19.dsc
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.19.dsc
tasksel_2.19.tar.gz
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.19.tar.gz
tasksel_2.19_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.19_all.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 272360 278186 286053 286054 286
Your message dated Tue, 04 Jan 2005 20:02:08 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#286054: fixed in tasksel 2.19
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 04 Jan 2005 20:02:08 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#286053: fixed in tasksel 2.19
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 04 Jan 2005 20:02:08 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#272360: fixed in tasksel 2.19
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 04 Jan 2005 20:02:08 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#278186: fixed in tasksel 2.19
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 04 Jan 2005 20:02:08 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#286539: fixed in tasksel 2.19
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
tasksel_2.19_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
tasksel_2.19.dsc
tasksel_2.19.tar.gz
tasksel_2.19_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Xavier Poinsard wrote:
> cdimage.debian.org isn't responding.
> Is it overloaded or down ?
While it's down you can get CDs here: http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I seem to have take more than my share of idiot pill lately.
Perhaps I can improve my track record with intelligent messsage. At
least my stuff on the wiki apparently works.
Joey Hess wrote:
| Daniel Dickinson wrote:
|
|>It turns out that this problem
Some follow up; Suspecting the problem might be caused by the drive, and since the hard drive is easily changed on this laptop model, I removed the 8GB drive and replaced it with a Toshiba MToshiba MK2101MAN 2.1GB 2.1GB. The same symptoms persist with the MK2101MAN. The laptop was booted using a
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I suspect that the reason is to avoid having the s390 console prompt you
> for what language to use, and then, horrors, try to use something other
> than English. I doubt Japanese or even French displays well on this most
> limited of consoles.
Even Fren
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 22:28, woody marvel wrote:
> http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/rc2/sarge-
>i386-netinst.iso
Server is down (dead). Try later.
Cheers,
FJP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/L
anyone having problems wih this?
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/rc2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
Sincerely,
woody marvel
===
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
postmodern programmer wrote:
> Rather, the submitter must have had a woody source in his
> sources.list to find this bug. The version of fileutils in testing
> is 5.2.1-2.
> In any case, I agree, this isn't a bug in Debian.
The installer wrote the stable source in the sources.list!
Debian vers
> :00:0f.1 0101: 1166:0211
> :00:0f.1 IDE interface: ServerWorks OSB4 IDE Controller
If I'm correct it seems the correct module is not loaded for that one,
am I right?
To the bug submitter : could you do a "lsmod" on the installed 2.6
system? I think this may help.
--
To UNSUBSCR
VERY late replay, sorry. I left it prewritten in my outgoing mailbox.
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I've been holding off on this patch because a) preceived lack of testing
> b) it could break existing preseed files for translated installs.
>
> I'm glad to see that you've dealt with a
CC'ing the french l10n list.please keep all addresses CC'ed to answers.
(problem with default paper size in fr_CA installs and problems with
keyboard layout in X in the same install)
> /etc/papersize is not related to KDE, but to dpkg-reconfigure libpaper1
> so affects all programs, like OOo
Michael Gilbert wrote:
> i'm using the i386 debian-installer RC2
> (http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/rc2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso)
> on a dell inspiron 8200 laptop with a dell truemobile 1150 wlan card
> on a TI PCI-1410 cardbus. i use a non-standard SSID and a secure WEP
Michael Stone wrote:
> Yes. Installing woody over top of sarge won't work. ISTR that the
> install cds use[d?] "stable" instead of "sarge" in the sources.list--I
> don't know why.
That would be a really serious bug, but they don't. They use whatever
the symbolic distribution name for sarge current
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Shortening the CC list. After all, we all 3 read -boot..:-)
>
> Would adding *chooser to the initrd list for s390 be an option?
> Indeed, why aren't they on the initrd? I assume there's a very good
> reason, for sure, but I'd just like to know.
I suspect that the reason
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: RC2
uname -a: Linux deb 2.6.8-1-386 #1 Thu Nov 11 12:18:43 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: Jan. 03, 2005
Method: Booted from CD Image, downloaded from cdimage.debian.org using a
different debian installation.
Machine: Gigabyte 7vT600P-RZ(-C)
P
Joerg Friedrich wrote:
> Then we have no tool for the experienced user. Searching through a list
> of more than 1 Packages is no option.
Perhaps you're not aware that aptitude allows browsing of the task
contents and selecting/deselecting individual parts of a task?
--
see shy jo
signature
Accepted:
yaboot-installer_1.0.3.dsc
to pool/main/y/yaboot-installer/yaboot-installer_1.0.3.dsc
yaboot-installer_1.0.3.tar.gz
to pool/main/y/yaboot-installer/yaboot-installer_1.0.3.tar.gz
yaboot-installer_1.0.3_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/y/yaboot-installer/yaboot-installer_1.0.3_powerpc.udeb
yaboot-installer_1.0.3_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
yaboot-installer_1.0.3.dsc
yaboot-installer_1.0.3.tar.gz
yaboot-installer_1.0.3_powerpc.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
Xavier Poinsard wrote:
cdimage.debian.org isn't responding.
Is it overloaded or down ?
Down. The hardware died earlier today.
See http://lists.debian.org/debian-cd/2005/01/msg00022.html for details
Regards, David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 11:09:34PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Fileutils 4.1-10 is from woody, not from sarge. The version of fileutils in
sarge is a transitional package only.
Yes. Installing woody over top of sarge won't work. ISTR that the
install cds use[d?] "stable" instead of "sarge" in the
I would like to confirm once again, that on the SunBlade 150 booting from
the debian-installer CD still gives me a non-working USB keyboard. I
used a:
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/daily/sparc/20050103/sarge-sparc-businesscard.iso
This has been discussed in depth in following bug report
cdimage.debian.org isn't responding.
Is it overloaded or down ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 06:17:50PM -0500, Raylynn Knight wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 08:52 +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 11:28:52PM -0500, Raylynn Knight wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2004-12-18 at 15:12, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > > > Yeah, but which of the images do you use ?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 288049 discover1-data
Bug#288049: installation-reports: LSI MegaRAID 467 (aka Dell PERC2/DC) not
detected, was detected in RC1 w/2.6 kernel
Bug reassigned from package `discover1-data' to `discover1-data'.
>
End of message, stopping processin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 02:18:30AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> # > > reassign 288049 disover1-data
> # > Warning: Unknown package 'disover1-data'
> # > Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `disover1-data'.
> reassign 28
(lspci ; lspci -n) | sort
:00:00.0 0600: 1166:0009 (rev 05)
:00:00.0 Host bridge: ServerWorks CNB20LE Host Bridge (rev 05)
:00:00.1 0600: 1166:0009 (rev 05)
:00:00.1 Host bridge: ServerWorks CNB20LE Host Bridge (rev 05)
:00:01.0 0300: 5333:8904 (rev 01)
:00:01.0 VGA compatib
# On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 02:18:30AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
# > > reassign 288049 disover1-data
# > Warning: Unknown package 'disover1-data'
# > Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `disover1-data'.
reassign 288049 discover1-data
thanks
sorry for the typo
Cheer
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 282756 discover1-data
Bug#282756: installation-reports
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `discover1-data'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system a
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 09:51:06AM -0800, Dan Dennison wrote:
> On 1/2/05 1:54 AM, "Geert Stappers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is _needed_:
> 2.6 kernel -- megaraid
> 2.4 kernel -- megaraid2
Acknowledge
> > That still leaves two PCI IDs,
> > I hope that someone can translate it in loadin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 11:00:50AM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> # >
> # > In bugreport #288413 is a simular situation.
> reassign 288049 disover1-data
Bug#288049: installation-reports: LSI MegaRAID 467 (aka Dell PERC2/DC) not
detected, was detected
Debian Bug Tracking System a écrit :
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#288476: nForce 2 success,
which was filed against the installation-reports package.
It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Their explanation is attac
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 06:16:01PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Output of lspci and lspci -n: couldn't get here
>
> Could you try booting a Knoppix CD and send us the output of:
>
> (lspci -v ; lspci -n) | sort
STOP do
(lspci ; lspci -n ) | sort
So without the verbose flag.
> Knowin
Your message dated Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:56:32 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#288475: Debian Sarge installation CD-ROM, built on 20041118
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
> Fileutils 4.1-10 is from woody, not from sarge. The version of fileutils in
> sarge is a transitional package only.
So, the only way the bug reporter could trigger this was by selecting
fileutils manually from dselect?
If so, the bug can probably be closed as such behaviour may be
expected whe
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:48:30AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Fileutils 4.1-10 is from woody, not from sarge. The version of fileutils in
> > sarge is a transitional package only.
> So, the only way the bug reporter could trigger this was by selecting
> fileutils manually from dselect?
43 matches
Mail list logo