On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 06:17:50PM -0500, Raylynn Knight wrote: > On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 08:52 +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 11:28:52PM -0500, Raylynn Knight wrote: > > > On Sat, 2004-12-18 at 15:12, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > > > Yeah, but which of the images do you use ? what is the name of it ? I > > > > use the > > > > zImage.chrp, so hopefully yours is named zImage.nubus or something ? > > > > > > > A 'Mach Kernel' image is created. > > > > Yep, guessed such. Ideally, we would integrate the appleboot stuff with the > > arch/ppc/boot stuff directly, sounds cleaner, but well. > > > > I have built a kernel, and put it at : > > > > http://people.debian.org/~luther/Mach Kernel > > > > could you download it an try booting with it just to make sure ? It > > contains a > > random initrd image, so it will fail in the end, but i want to make sure it > > will boot or something. > Sorry for the delay in responding. Holiday's bring family obligations. > > Booting this kernel with the MkLinux Booter on my PowerBook 5300 > (running Debian Sarge) with the same boot options my normal boot kernel > has gets me as far as: > > Linux Version 2.4.27, Compiled #4 dim déc 19 14:47:28 CET 2004 > One PPC 603e Processor, 48 MB RAM, 77.61 Bogmips Total > pb5300 > > Updating the linuxlogo... linuxlogo > INIT: Id "1" respawning to fast: disabled for 5 minutes > INIT: Id "2" respawning to fast: disabled for 5 minutes > INIT: Id "3" respawning to fast: disabled for 5 minutes > INIT: Id "4" respawning to fast: disabled for 5 minutes > INIT: Id "5" respawning to fast: disabled for 5 minutes > INIT: Id "5" respawning to fast: disabled for 5 minutes > INIT: no more processes left in this runlevel > > I can ssh in, but can't seem to get console access.
Ok, this means that the kernel works, but that there is some kind of userland problem. Can you have a look at the config file and see what the problem is ? > > BTW, i can possibly get hands on a 68k mac, but i have some fear that it > > might > > be 040LC based, no chance to run linux on this one, right ? > > > It may or may not work, depending on the Mask revision of the 040LC > processor. I can't recall what the range of bad mask revisions is. You > can however replace the LC040 with an RC040. Just a matter of pulling > one chip and inserting the full '040. I've done this successfully with > an LC476, an LC575 and a Performa 636. Ah, the problem is it would be difficult to get hands on a real '040 by now, but i will see. I will try to get it from my uncle anyway, since he never used it, and he dearly needs the freespace, not that it will stay free for long though :) Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
