Steve Langasek wrote:
> More significant would be the aboot-base debootstrap fix, which would
> seem to require the new debootstrap package in sarge. (3 days too young
> right now per the usual testing waiting period.)
debootstrap-udeb 0.31 is already in testing.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
D
linux-kernel-di_0.56_source+alpha+m68k+s390.changes isn't signed with PGP/GnuPG
Removing linux-kernel-di_0.56_source+alpha+m68k+s390.changes, but keeping its
associated files for now.
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
Package: partman
Version: beta3 netinstall of testing -- sparc 32
Severity: normal
On the silly question where "Manually configure partitions" is the
only choice, the "go back" option proceeds to disk partitioning rather
than returning to the d-i menu.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
parted_server: === Starting the server
parted_server: main_loop: iteration 1
parted_server: Opening infifo
/lib/partman/init.d/30parted: IN: OPEN hd-1 /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target3/lun0/disc
parted_server: Read command: OPEN
parted_server: command_open()
parted_server: Request to open hd-1
parte
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
When using the beta-3 netboot mini-iso, debian-installer downloads and
unpacks both the sparc32 and sparc64 kernels. Since only one of the two
will be usable on the system, this is a waste of both network useage and
memory.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: beta 3 100Mb iso, from
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta3/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.25-1-386 #1 Tue Feb 24 08:11:13 EST 2004 i686 unknown
Date: Fri Mar 26 22:25:10 PST 2004
Method: Boot from
Jeremie Koenig wrote:
> There's a new version of the images which should fix your problems:
> http://sprite.fr.eu.org/d-i-oldworld/floppy/
>
> One of ofonlyboot.img and boot.img should work for you (the other will
> probably give no video output).
Just testing here too... On a 4400/200 system, t
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 04:44:46PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> - Possibly some alpha netboot fixes, but I'm unsure of the status.
As am I. At least the miniiso image is now usable, but I haven't been
able to convince my alpha to netboot from SRM, so I have no idea whether
the images work for netb
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 09:01:30PM -0700, toff wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 01:31:50PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > You had to mount the CD in order to eject it?
>
> Yes, if I don't mount it first I get a message like
>
> 'unable to eject, last error: inappropriate ioctl for device'
Th
On Sat, 2004-03-27 at 13:01, Jeremie Koenig wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 12:00:21PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > 1.0d4 has numerous issues and will not work with recent kernels afaik.
> >
> > Why is there a problem using the more recent one ?
>
> I have only succeeded loading "mib
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > - Powerpc (non-oldworld/etc).
> > - New builds of the businesscard images on all supported arches, since
> >the current beta3 ones are broken by exim changes.
> > - Possibly some alpha netboot fixes, but I'm unsure of the status.
> > - Possibly some mips or spar
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 04:44:46PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> I think that we now have a working set of powerpc install media using
> the sarge_d-i (not the default sid_d-i) CDs, and other images in the
> archive. If someone can verify that, we can put out an update to beta3
> tomorrow with these ch
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 12:00:21PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> 1.0d4 has numerous issues and will not work with recent kernels afaik.
>
> Why is there a problem using the more recent one ?
I have only succeeded loading "miboot.image" files. This is annoying,
because Debian kernel packa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Tried 2.6.4-1.i686 which downloaded but there were problems loading pcmcia
> modules for this kernel version. This is a PC not inn need of PCMCIA.
Can you send us a copy of /var/log/debian-installer/syslog and
/var/log/debian-installer/messages from the system you ins
Your message dated Fri, 26 Mar 2004 20:10:36 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Fri, 26 Mar 2004 20:08:12 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
On Sat, 2004-03-27 at 03:28, Jeremie Koenig wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 08:55:40AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > Where did you get your "upstream" version ? miBoot is distributed as
> > part of the BootX package (shares some sources with it) and is GPLed
> >
> > Make sure you get a
Package: anna
Version: 0.054
Severity: minor
anna installs kernel-image packages. Would the attached patch be
OK?
--
Matt Kraai[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://ftbfs.org/
Index: packages/anna/anna.c
===
--- packages/
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 2004/03/26 daily sparc-sarge-businesscard.iso
uname -a: Linux opal 2.4.24-sparc32 #1 Fri Jan 30 16:04:55 EST 2004
sparc unknown
Date: 2004/03/04
Method: network installation, CD-ROM, mirror: sunsite.ualberta.ca, not
proxied
Machine: Sun SPARC
Your message dated Fri, 26 Mar 2004 18:17:09 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#240171: fixed in kbd-chooser 0.47
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
uname -a: <2.4.>
Date:
Method:
I have a sarge .iso that I downloaded from debian.org and I am not able to
complete installation because the installer apparentlly cannot read a hard
drive. I have tried installation on two different systems - an ASSA mobo
with a VIA chipset, and an Intel board. I have also tried installation with
Accepted:
kbd-chooser_0.47.dsc
to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_0.47.dsc
kbd-chooser_0.47.tar.gz
to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_0.47.tar.gz
kbd-chooser_0.47_i386.udeb
to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_0.47_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 240171
T
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
uname -a: <2.4.>
Date:
Method:
kbd-chooser_0.47_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kbd-chooser_0.47.dsc
kbd-chooser_0.47.tar.gz
kbd-chooser_0.47_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hm, you should have CC'd me your reply as I'm not subscribed to the
lists, but I found it in the archive :)
> There are TWO question by the pcmcia-cs when installing a base
> system with Debian installer beta3.
In the actual installer? Not in the base installation afterwards?
> The first one ask
Quoting Joshua Kwan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 13:35:54 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Today, I did a complete i386 base system installation under VmWare,
> > using Debian Installer beta3. This means that, when arrived at tasksel
> > screen, I didn't choose any task and just fi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 240331 base-config
Bug#240331: apt: CDROMs must be manually ejected and mounted on Apple/Mac/PowerPC
Bug reassigned from package `apt' to `base-config'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
I think that we now have a working set of powerpc install media using
the sarge_d-i (not the default sid_d-i) CDs, and other images in the
archive. If someone can verify that, we can put out an update to beta3
tomorrow with these changes:
- Powerpc (non-oldworld/etc).
- New builds of the busines
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> AFAIK this change was for all architectures. So all bootloaders will
> have to be added explicitly now (for their relevant architecture).
As far as I can tell it was only for i386. alpha, ia64,
m68k, powerpc, sparc, mipsel, hppa, all still have boot loaders listed
in deboot
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 09:34:13PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Joey Hess wrote:
> > Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > > I think that most bootloaders are pulled in by debootstrap, so appear on
> > > > tasks/base-sarge. lilo and grub are an exception as debootstrap installs
> > > > neither.
> > >
> > >
Joey Hess wrote:
> Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > I think that most bootloaders are pulled in by debootstrap, so appear on
> > > tasks/base-sarge. lilo and grub are an exception as debootstrap installs
> > > neither.
> >
> > Didn't this change recently (or was that only for cdebootstrap)?
>
> Yes, un
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 01:58:17PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Jeremie Koenig wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 06:49:33PM +0100, sprite wrote:
> > > I'd need svn write access in order to maintain oldworld stuff without
> > > bothering Sven.
> > >
> > > Could someone add me to the alioth project ?
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 01:11:46AM +0100, Nikolai Prokoschenko wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 12:21:55AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
>
> > po/
> > /
> >/
> >.po -> /trunk/packages//debian/po/.po
> >/
> >.po -> /trunk/packages//debian/po/.po
> >
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > I think that most bootloaders are pulled in by debootstrap, so appear on
> > tasks/base-sarge. lilo and grub are an exception as debootstrap installs
> > neither.
>
> Didn't this change recently (or was that only for cdebootstrap)?
Yes, until recently debootstrap installe
> > - Is is ok to have bootloaders for i386 listed but not for others?
> I think that most bootloaders are pulled in by debootstrap, so appear on
> tasks/base-sarge. lilo and grub are an exception as debootstrap installs
> neither.
Anyway, this boot loaders should only be listed in the i386 arch,
Jeremie Koenig wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 06:49:33PM +0100, sprite wrote:
> > I'd need svn write access in order to maintain oldworld stuff without
> > bothering Sven.
> >
> > Could someone add me to the alioth project ?
>
> Oops, forgot my username. (jkoenig-guest)
Done.
--
see shy jo
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.22-sb1-swarm-bn-di_0.53_mips.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-mips/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.22-sb1-swarm-bn-di_0.53_mips.udeb
fat-modules-2.4.22-sb1-swarm-bn-di_0.53_mips.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-mips/fat-modules-2.4.22-sb1-swarm-bn-di_0.53_mips.ud
Joey Hess wrote:
> Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > When adding the kernel/bootloader packages for mips/mipsel in
> > debian-cd I found some probably arch-dependent packages were on
> > this list unconditionally. The appended patch is my best guess
> > about it, but I'm not sure about some issues:
> >
> >
Your message dated Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:18:28 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#240192: fixed in debian-installer 20040326
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 06:49:33PM +0100, sprite wrote:
> I'd need svn write access in order to maintain oldworld stuff without
> bothering Sven.
>
> Could someone add me to the alioth project ?
Oops, forgot my username. (jkoenig-guest)
--
Jeremie Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
I'd need svn write access in order to maintain oldworld stuff without
bothering Sven.
Could someone add me to the alioth project ?
--
Jeremie Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted:
debian-installer-demo_20040326_i386.deb
to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer-demo_20040326_i386.deb
debian-installer_20040326.dsc
to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer_20040326.dsc
debian-installer_20040326.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-instal
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 239997 + fixed
Bug#239997: installation-reports debian-installer beta3
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 05:13:03PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
>
> >On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 03:06:06PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> On debian-installer mailing list I found that you are working on powerpc
> >> kernel for debian/debian-in
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 07:11 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> I do also think it's not needed. Rather than removing the questions,
> lowering their priority to medium could however be a conservative
> measure.
Yes, of course.
> As default installs are done at high priority, the pcmcia-cs screen
clone 239441 -1
retitle -1 When some partition is mounted requires manual pvcreate
thanks
On 24.III.2004 at 23:28 Matthew Woodcraft wrote:
>
> Also, I found I needed to run pvcreate even on installer runs when I
> hadn't changed the partition at all (that is, there was already a
> partition there
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 240145 -1
Bug#240145: Beta3 installation report
Bug 240145 cloned as bug 240298.
> reassign 240145 partman
Bug#240145: Beta3 installation report
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partman'.
> retitle 240145 Forgets mount poin
debian-installer_20040326_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer_20040326.dsc
debian-installer_20040326.tar.gz
debian-installer-demo_20040326_i386.deb
debian-installer-images_20040326_i386.tar.gz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> When adding the kernel/bootloader packages for mips/mipsel in
> debian-cd I found some probably arch-dependent packages were on
> this list unconditionally. The appended patch is my best guess
> about it, but I'm not sure about some issues:
>
> - Is discover actually needed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 240228 grub-installer
Bug#240228: installation-reports: beta3 installation report
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `grub-installer'.
> retitle 240228 Windows OS was not included in the menu
Bug#240228: installation-reports
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 08:55:40AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Where did you get your "upstream" version ? miBoot is distributed as
> part of the BootX package (shares some sources with it) and is GPLed
>
> Make sure you get an up to date version.
I've tried to use the version in BootX
Frans Pop wrote:
> Also, I have seen several Installation-reports (including my own ;-) asking
> for a return of the question to _remove_ PCMCIA on systems that don't support
> it. This question _was_ asked during Woody installations.
hw-detect's pcmcia bus detection code was broken. Now that th
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: ../sarge_d-i/i386/beta3/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: did not get that far
Date: 26/Mar/2004
Method: From CD Rom
Machine: Dell Inspiron 8000
Processor: i686
Memory: 385832
Root Device: /dev/hda0
Root Size/partition table: -
Output of lspc
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 13:35:54 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Today, I did a complete i386 base system installation under VmWare,
> using Debian Installer beta3. This means that, when arrived at tasksel
> screen, I didn't choose any task and just finished the installation.
This is not a base syst
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
2004-03-26
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-i386/current/images/floppy/boot.img
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-i386/current/images/floppy/root.img
uname -a
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 01:50:21PM +0100, Jeremie Koenig wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 03:40:38AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > I commited this stuff yesterday to SVN.
>
> Thanks !
No problem. I have also been in contact with the bemac shop to get hand
on a oldworld pmac myself, if the occasio
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 12:47:22PM +0100, Pip Oomen wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
>
> >Do you have RAID on that machine's disk ? This may be one of the
> >problems.
>
> RAID is supported on the machine, but not used. The nightly of march
> 25th has the same problem as the nightly from the 22th, i.
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 06:37:28PM +, Chris Tillman wrote:
> I was attempting to find a proper kernel on CD #1 which I had downloaded.
> Here is the list I found:
>
> # cd /cdrom/pool/main/k
> # find . | grep 'kernel-image'
>
> ./kernel-image-2.2.10-powerpc-apus
> ./kernel-image-2.2.10-powerp
Hello All,
When adding the kernel/bootloader packages for mips/mipsel in
debian-cd I found some probably arch-dependent packages were on
this list unconditionally. The appended patch is my best guess
about it, but I'm not sure about some issues:
- Is discover actually needed for most arches?
- Is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 26 March 2004 11:33, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> The second one asks whether PCMCIA should be actived after being
> installed (default=TRUE)
>
> There also, the default is safe so I think the pr
Your message dated Fri, 26 Mar 2004 14:23:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#238251: indigo2 mips install
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 03:46:04AM -0500, Rick_Thomas wrote:
> It got to the point where I was supposed to pick a repository mirror.
> Every one I tried it said was "bad"!
> Got any clues?
I've had a similar problem, but once I reconfigured the network a few
times and checked my cable, things go
i'm resolving the problem with teh 100Mo CD
installation. the 22/03/04 version is OK but the
25/03/04 dont't use the dhcp and the lan is not runing
Yahoo! Mail : votre e-mail personnel et gratuit qui vous suit partout !
Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.be
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 03:40:38AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> I commited this stuff yesterday to SVN.
Thanks !
> Two problems remain now, one of them not being all that important
> maybe.
>
> 1) miboot and rsrce need to be packaged. Can you provide us with a
> status report on this one, and
How does Debian use filesystem space?
Today, I did a complete i386 base system installation under VmWare,
using Debian Installer beta3. This means that, when arrived at tasksel
screen, I didn't choose any task and just finished the installation.
The chosen language was French (this probably doesn
Sven Luther wrote:
Do you have RAID on that machine's disk ? This may be one of the
problems.
RAID is supported on the machine, but not used. The nightly of march
25th has the same problem as the nightly from the 22th, i.e. it boots
correctly, but the debian-installer never presents its 'initial
Hej
Du har svarat på ett mail som är automatiskt genererat av Sökandebanken vilket innebär
att det inte blir läst. Har Du någon fråga kring Sökandebanken eller Vikariebankn,
kontaktar Du AMS Infocenter, tel: 020-420 420 eller skickar ett mail till [EMAIL
PROTECTED] eller [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
V
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: beta3
uname -a: Linux debian 2.6.4-1-686 #1 Sat Mar 13 19:25:38 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: Mon Mar 22 19:51:00 CET 2004
Method: Using the 100MB image from beta 3, booted from hdb, installed the rest via
network from my pri
Quoting Petter Reinholdtsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> [Christian Perrier]
> > I haven't closely followed the discover transition discussions. It
> > appears to me that discover is currently "pinting" to discover2 since
> > a few days.
>
> Yes, the new version was uploaded as package discover on tuesd
Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > When, exactly? I haven't seen them. I thought it was installed during
> > the first stage of the installation, and that packages' debconf
> > dialogues weren't shown during that stage.
>
> So did I. But two days ago, I ran an install on VmWare wi
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: 2.4.25-1-386
Date: march 26. 2004
Method: boot device cd-rom
Machine: VIA EPIA ME6000 (on board viedo, lan, sound)
Processor: VIA Samuel 2
cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : CentaurH
Well... I got some free time so I set up a beige G3 with a known-good
floppy drive and brand-new IDE hard drive. I decided to see how far I
could get on that machine with a floppy based installation. Last night
it couldn't find a disk drive to partition. I wondered if it was just a
matter of the
74 matches
Mail list logo
