On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 01:47:28PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Eddy Petrisor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Where: tools_isoscan
> > String: "The ISO image you downloaded is may be corrupt."
> > Problem: "is may be" not correct
> > Suggestion: "is may be" becomes "may be"
>
> I'm probably
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 11042004 business card CD
uname -a: (This is the uanem from my previously installed unstable partition)
Linux polo 2.4.25-powerpc #1 jeu mar 4 13:53:12 CET 2004 ppc GNU/Linux
Date: 8am Friday, March 12 CET
Method: CD install from businesscar
亲爱的朋友： 您好！
欢迎您点击http://www.up100.net进入爱普格瑞初一至高三网络题库俱乐部，您可轻松定制获得最新、最权威的分章练习、模拟试题、真题题库、习题详解、网上答疑辅导等超值服务。您所花费的代价仅相当于一、两本辅导书的价钱（80元4个月的会员资格），但您得到的是总数超过十万道及时更新的题目！
借助Internet强大的功能，您还可以获得电脑自动判题、历史成绩记录、自动选题、题目收藏等增值服务。当然，要特别强调的是您还可以按章节、知识点、题型、难易程度等不同条件检索您所需要的题目，这会让您的孩子更有针对
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 10:03:08AM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
> Hi Dennis,
[...]
> > as some of you may have noticed, I am working on a status-page for
> > 2nd-stage installer packages. I think it's running fine now:
> >
> > http://people.debian.org/~seppy/d-i/2nd-stage/
>
> Well, does this real
Hi, here's a not-so-successful IA64 install report:
I tried the March 10 IA64 business card ISO on an HP zx6000
workstation (I also tried various netinst and business card builds
from the previous week earlier).
I ran into a couple of problems and ended up giving up without being
able to install
We are Trusted by University and Industry for the past 4 years
and we have an excellent reputation.
in any field of your choice but are not limited to:
Bachelors, Masters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD)
Give us a calll at 1 212 629 1971 to receive your diiploma withinn days.
Package: discover
Version: 1.5-2
Severity: normal
discover has dependency:
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4), libdiscover1, debconf (>> 0.5), ash | dash
But ash has dependency:
Pre-Depends: dash
So "ash | dash" is misleading.
Look at this example:
# apt-get install discover
The following NEW pac
Hi,
I did apt-get upgrade yesterday, and additionaly installed the latest
kernel-image(4.25 and 6.3) debs. The system was not updated from about
mid February. I've rebooted the system after the upgrade, just to verify
everything is ok. Unfortunately now I'm getting the:
Kernel panic: VFS: Unable
Your message dated Thu, 11 Mar 2004 18:28:23 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug #235044 closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-11 20:05]:
> > > > I don't see how it could be a no-op. At a minium, you could choose the
> > > > other partitioning scheme.
> > >
> > > I was in the menu showing me my partition table and those options. I
> > > choose "undo chang
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-11 20:05]:
> > > I don't see how it could be a no-op. At a minium, you could choose the
> > > other partitioning scheme.
> >
> > I was in the menu showing me my partition table and those options. I
> > choose "undo changes" and it did not do anything at al
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-11 19:51]:
> > > > It's useful if you don't like the scheme you chose, or if you didn't
> > > > choose to autopartition, or if you edit something and mess it up, etc.
> > >
> > > Would it be possible to only show it when it actuall
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > It's useful if you don't like the scheme you chose, or if you didn't
> > choose to autopartition, or if you edit something and mess it up, etc.
>
> Would it be possible to only show it when it actually is useful. In
> my case, choosing it basically was a noop.
I don't
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-11 19:51]:
> > > It's useful if you don't like the scheme you chose, or if you didn't
> > > choose to autopartition, or if you edit something and mess it up, etc.
> >
> > Would it be possible to only show it when it actually is useful. In
> > my case, choo
Hi Dennis,
At Fri, 12 Mar 2004 01:11:56 +0100,
Dennis Stampfer wrote:
> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 00:59:07 +0100
> From: Dennis Stampfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [l10n] Status pages for 2nd-stage installer-packages
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Your message dated Thu, 11 Mar 2004 17:36:49 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug #234681 closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-11 19:09]:
> > Well, I just did "automatically partition" so I don't think this menu
> > option should be there again.
>
> It's useful if you don't like the scheme you chose, or if you didn't
> choose to autopartition, or if you edit something and mess it u
How about a quick and dirty solution:
Asking the user which CPU he uses in the installer and providing a
"fallback" 386 kernel.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 12:14:26AM +0100, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> Package: base-config
> Version: 2.14
>
> debconf should be configured (dpkg-reconfigure debconf) with base-config to
> choose the question priority.
Hi,
I think that this question is asked if you choose a lower priority
befo
* Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-12 10:04]:
> A lot of your problems sound like they stemmed from the wrong
> partition type for the partition you wanted to use as a physical
> volume, but then 83 is a short typo from 8e, so you may have had it
> right.
Oh, I wrote 83... yes, that's a
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Debian-installer-version: daily sid build from 10-March-2004
> Config network: [ ] Didn't ask me to configure it even two I have 2 net cards
This is a known bug with that build, it should be fixed in today's build.
(Or maybe tomorrow's, there were initrd changes.)
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: http://gluck.debian.
org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso 10-Mar-2004
uname -a: nms
Date: 11-Mar-2004
Method: CD, then net, via PCMCIA NIC. No proxy.
Machine: IBM Thinkpad 600E
Processor: PII/266
Memory: 128MB
Roo
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 12:09:02AM +0100, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> Package: debian-installer
> Version: 20040310
>
> The kernel used after installation should be chosen according to the
> installed CPU.
it tries to do that, but the detection logic isn't finished.
It's related to bug #214441
* Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-26 20:51]:
> > Configure the network using dynamic addressing (DHCP)
> > Error
> > An error occured and the network configuration process has been aborted.
> > ...
> >
> > Since I didn't chose DHCP, it would be good if a short explanation could
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 11:56:07PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-07 13:38]:
> > > I've uploaded a package with your patch.
> >
> > I tested the daily build for 20040305, which included lvmcfg 0.17, and it
> > now works properly, lvm10 is installed o
Hey list,
as some of you may have noticed, I am working on a status-page for
2nd-stage installer packages. I think it's running fine now:
http://people.debian.org/~seppy/d-i/2nd-stage/
It is and looks similar to [0]Denis' status page, which generates the
status from CVS (means: debian-installe
* Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-07 13:38]:
> > I've uploaded a package with your patch.
>
> I tested the daily build for 20040305, which included lvmcfg 0.17, and it
> now works properly, lvm10 is installed on a system that uses LVM.
And that works for you? The LVM is created is ve
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: daily sid build from 10-March-2004
uname -a: 2.4.25
Method: boot from IDE CD-ROM, using netinst ISO, installin to SCSI disk
Machine: No-name desktop PC
Processor: P2
Memory: 128 MB
Root Device: SCSI, also has a IDE CD-ROM
Ba
Speaking as a user only -- I *much* prefer the first approach. The
duplication of effort is mostly just cut and paste, isn't it?
Rick
On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 13:27, Joey Hess wrote:
> Miroslav Kure wrote:
> >
> > There are basically two possibilities:
> > 1. Toss the old stuff and describe inst
Jeremie Koenig wrote:
> The build system top-level Makefile invokes dpkg-architecture each time
> it reenters (ie quite often), which slows it down. The attached patch
> makes "make list" significantly faster.
Thanks, I'd wondered why that was so slow!
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description:
Package: base-config
Version: 2.14
debconf should be configured (dpkg-reconfigure debconf) with base-config to
choose the question priority.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: base-config
Version: 2.14
I am asked no question whether MD5 passwords should be used or not.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20040310
The kernel used after installation should be chosen according to the
installed CPU.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20040310
The installer should ask for NIS information.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The build system top-level Makefile invokes dpkg-architecture each time
it reenters (ie quite often), which slows it down. The attached patch
makes "make list" significantly faster.
--
Jeremie Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
build.diff.gz
Description: Binary data
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On 8.III.2004 22:38 at Nicholas Breen wrote:
> >
> > The partitioning tool proved troublesome.
> > - Default partition table selection should be 'dvh'.
>
> I think in partman it is 'dvh'.
It should only be dvh for the SGI subarchitectures, Other mipsen use
msdos labels.
Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: uname -a: Date: <03/11/2004 – 14:00 PST>Method: Machine: Processor: PIII - 750Memory: 512MBRoot Device: Root Size/partition table: < / = 3.4GB | swap = 1.4GB | /home = 7.0GB >Output of lspci: Base System Installation Checklist: Initial
Accepted:
prebaseconfig_0.55.dsc
to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_0.55.dsc
prebaseconfig_0.55.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_0.55.tar.gz
prebaseconfig_0.55_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_0.55_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank y
prebaseconfig_0.55_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
prebaseconfig_0.55.dsc
prebaseconfig_0.55.tar.gz
prebaseconfig_0.55_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
> I have a Dell Optiplex Computer, no floppy drive and the hard disk
> is a ST3120026AS ATA disk.
> downloaded only the first CD from 3 different sites. BTW the date of the
> file is Jan 2003, Is that correct?
that installer won't work on your hardware. get one from late february or
built in ma
Joey Hess wrote:
[snip]
> > Is it realistic to expect that eventually *all* arches will keep their
> > files in the unified archive scheme and moreover that they will use
> > same names?
No, simply because some arches don't have subarches, and introducing a
"generic" subarch is ugly.
> I'm not su
Kt, 2004-03-11 20:18, Florian Effenberger raÅÄ:
> > Sorry, what debconf window title do you mean?
>
> I don't remember, but it was on the CD installer from the 20040310 CD. I
> think it was "Passwd setup", but I', not quite sure.
Yes, I have seen this title in English too, when I was installing
i
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 05:55:28PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Hello DIST,
>
> Where is the mailinglist that propagates changes that have been
> committed on the CVS?
Follow instructions found on
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch-resources#s-pts-commands
(source packa
Accepted:
partman_22.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_22.dsc
partman_22.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_22.tar.gz
partman_22_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_22_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Unlike old outdated silly products such as excersices, pumps, weights, and even surgery
Natural Rapid Growth Formula is guaranteed to lncrease your peenis size and thickness.
Not only is Natura1 Rapid Gr0wth Formula guaranteed to deliver results, its also safe,
permanent and easy to use! Its so eas
partman_22_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman_22.dsc
partman_22.tar.gz
partman_22_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 03:19:06PM +0100, cobaco wrote:
> in that case, as I'm doing the Dutch translations, could you add me
> (cobaco-guest) to the pkg-discover project?
>
Done.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
I have a Dell Optiplex Computer, no floppy drive and the hard disk
is a ST3120026AS ATA disk.
I have Fedora running on it. I would like to install Debian on another
partition. I am new to Debian. I have tried to install Woody and ran into
problems, even when booting bf24. I am trying now to
Your message dated Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:00:16 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug #227055 closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Geert Stappers wrote:
> Where is the mailinglist that propagates changes that have been
> committed on the CVS?
>
> It is not at http://lists.debian.org
They go through the PTS. Unlike other packages in the PTS though, you
sign up for the entire set of d-i packages in a bundle. I belive the
pseud
Hello DIST,
Where is the mailinglist that propagates changes that have been
committed on the CVS?
It is not at http://lists.debian.org
Cheers
Geert Stappers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Thu, 11 Mar 2004 17:44:15 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line partman xfs: bad entry in /etc/fstab
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
> Sorry, what debconf window title do you mean?
I don't remember, but it was on the CD installer from the 20040310 CD. I
think it was "Passwd setup", but I', not quite sure.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: install
Severity: normal
Followup-For: Bug #228960
I had the same problem with the sarge-installer, hardware detection was
freezing at about 90%, saying something of floppy not available and so
on.
When I started the installer with kernel-Parameter noapic then
everything worked fine.
Fo
Miroslav Kure wrote:
> Well, after some cleaning of the install manual is apparent, that the
> greatest mess is in the en/install-methods/downloading-files.xml (and
> connected build/*-{images|tarballs}.ent). The mess comes from
> referencing too much installation files in the past releases.
>
> T
I'm not going to try to edit the xml, but here are some comments on the
USB memory stick documentation.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Note, that the USB stick should contain one partition at least 128 MB
> in size (smaller setups are possible if you follow linkend="usb-copy-flexible"/>). Since most
Your message didn't have a Package: line at the start (in the
pseudo-header following the real mail header), or didn't have a
pseudo-header at all.
This makes it much harder for us to categorise and deal with your
problem report. Please _resubmit_ your report to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and tell us which
> > You mean 5 1/2 inch floppies? Unlikely. It is doable, but it's a
> > matter of someone wanting to do it.
>
> Of course 5 1/2", silly me.
they're 5.25, not 5.5 inch floppies, by the way :)
elijah
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
Package: lvmcfg
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
I tried to put the root filesystem on an lvm volume. /boot was not on
lvm, so I'd have expected this could work. But I got this during kernel
install:
mkinitrd: constituent device /dev/goo/meee does not exist
Apparently lvm is not configured inside the
Package: prebaseconfig
Tags: d-i
W. Borgert wrote:
> I had a small problem, not sure whether this is a bug or what.
> For some reasons(*) I like to install LILO, not GRUB. d-i
> doesn't let me a choice and installes GRUB. Before finishing
> d-i and rebooting I selected in the menu to install LIL
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 01:17:56PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> You mean 5 1/2 inch floppies? Unlikely. It is doable, but it's a matter
> of someone wanting to do it.
Of course 5 1/2", silly me.
Well, after some cleaning of the install manual is apparent, that the
greatest mess is in the en/install-
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/daily/i386/current/
uname -a: Linux geometry 2.4.25-1-386 #1 Tue Feb 24 08:11:13 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: Tue Feb 24 08:11:13 EST 2004
Method: Network (broadband) / Aptitude
Machine: VA Linux Dua
Florian Effenberger wrote:
> Package: debian-installer
> Version: 20040310
>
> Some strings are not translated into German. Example: "setup" should be
> "Konfiguration" (in the debconf window title)
Sorry, what debconf window title do you mean?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital
W. Borgert wrote:
> when asked for the right Debian mirror I chose a local mirror setup
> by myself. That worked perfectly. Unfortunately, the security site
> of Debian seems to be included always. I do not want to have the
> security site in the sources.list, because the machine does not have
>
Erich Waelde wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Donald Duck writes:
> > Wanted to try Sarge. Got Official jigdo files for the testing distribution
> > on CD.
> > Downloaded only 'Debian GNU/Linux testing "Sarge" - Official Snapshot i386
> > Binary-1 (20040306)'.
> >
> > While booting the CD (mode linux or exp
Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Where: tools_isoscan
> > String: "The ISO image you downloaded is may be corrupt."
> > Problem: "is may be" not correct
> > Suggestion: "is may be" becomes "may be"
>
> I'm probably the culprit for that one. I probably meant "is maybe
> corrup". I have changed this (an
Eddy Petrisor wrote:
> Where: partman_partman
> String: "Contiunue the partitioner?"
> Problem: is this correct?
> Suggestion: "Contiunue the partitioning?"
"Continue with partitioning?"
Should be easy to fix, translations can be unfuzzied as this is unlikely
to change them.
> Where: tools_isos
1. I copied the last lines of the kernel panic by hand:
Partition Check
modprobe: can't locate module sysfs
Journalled Block Dev. driver loaded
LVM loaded
Mount: /dev2/root2 is not a valid block device (6x)
Mount: you must specify a fs type
Pivot-root: no such file or dir.
/sbin/init: 338: cannot
Erich Waelde wrote:
> I did a vmware install using
> http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/i386/20040309/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
That's a day out of date, and almost two.
> I found that /etc/fstab was the source of the problem
>
> /dev/sda3 / xfs defaults,errors=remount-ro 0 1
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 215639
Bug#215639: No CD eject button
Bug#215724: No CD eject button
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2004-03-11 14:54, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Zitat von Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > OK, that's fine. Indeed, if you add me to the commiters list, I
> >
> > David, finally, what do you
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 02:54:19PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> I added you to the pkg-discover project. (I hope David does not completely
> disagree with me on this.)
> IMO we can also add individual translators if the ask for CVS access. I think
> that d-i has shown that the probablility of t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 237152
Bug#237152: Ultra Enterprise 450 installation report
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Removed pending tag.
> thanks
Stoppi
Hi,
when asked for the right Debian mirror I chose a local mirror setup
by myself. That worked perfectly. Unfortunately, the security site
of Debian seems to be included always. I do not want to have the
security site in the sources.list, because the machine does not have
internet access - just
Hi,
I had a small problem, not sure whether this is a bug or what.
For some reasons(*) I like to install LILO, not GRUB. d-i
doesn't let me a choice and installes GRUB. Before finishing
d-i and rebooting I selected in the menu to install LILO.
That failed with an error message like "LILO install
Until now I had a very kind help from Joey Hess, but recently he is probably
very busy; can someone suggest me what to do?
I am trying to install debian for the first time in my life and I choose sarge
because I was told that the new installer helps.
Joey wrote that the installer "is failing
Your message dated Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:16:30 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#237394: first and last name of the normal user account is not
asked in setup
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Whole$ale Meds on the Web!
Buy your personal prescription drugs on the internet and $ave!
Weight Loss, Muscle, Pain Relief, Allergies,
Men Women's Health, Impotence, Heartburn, Migraines
- XANAX - VALIUM -
Ambien - Lipitor - Nexium -
Paxil - Phentermine - Viagra - Vioxx
Check out our Canadian Ge
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 237397 base-config
Bug#237397: set proxies should be entered in /etc/environment
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `base-config'.
> tags 237397 d-i
Bug#237397: set proxies should be entered in /etc/environment
There were no tag
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 237152 +pending
Bug#237152: Ultra Enterprise 450 installation report
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> clone 237152 -1
Bug#237152: Ultra Enterprise 450 installation report
Bug 237152 cloned as bug 237410.
> reassign -1 libparted1.6-0
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 237396 base-config
Bug#237396: proxy is not being used in install after reboot
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `base-config'.
> tags 237396 d-i
Bug#237396: proxy is not being used in install after reboot
There were no tags se
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 237395 netcfg
Bug#237395: DHCP is used automatically
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `netcfg'.
> tags 237395 wontfix d-i
Bug#237395: DHCP is used automatically
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix, d-i
> severity 2373
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 237387 locales
Bug#237387: Selected installation language should be set as system-wide default
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `locales'.
> retitle 237387 locales: Should use debian-installer settings as defaults
Bug#237387:
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/daily/i386/20040310/netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux kalypso 2.6.3 #1 Wed Mar 10 22:33:41 CET 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
(first thing I did after the upgrade, was update to 2.6)
Date: 2004-04-09 18:15 GM
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 10.03.2004
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a:
Date: 11.03.2004
Method: Burned image to CD-R and booted from it.
Machine: Intel 865PERL equiped computer
Processor: Pentium 4 HT 2,8
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
3/09/2004
uname -a: Linux debian 2.4.23-backstreet-ruby #1 Fri Jan 2 16:08:29 CST 2004 i686
unknown
Date: 03/11/2004 7:00 CST
Method: From iso image burned
Zitat von Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > OK, that's fine. Indeed, if you add me to the commiters list, I
>
> David, finally, what do you decide ?
>
> If you want, you can add my bubulle login to commiters and I'll handle
> all translat
Your message dated Thu, 11 Mar 2004 13:37:29 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line CONGRATULATIONS
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 11 Mar 2004 13:37:29 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line CONGRATULATIONS
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
> IMHO, this suggestion is very valuablethough some may object for
> various reasons
> I assign this to base-config but I'm not completely sure
> Many thanks for these very precise reports of your wishes for the
> Debian installer.
No problem ;-) Thanks for your kind words and for reac
Quoting Florian Effenberger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hm - it does not work with the most recent installer CD (20040310).
Probably shadow didn't get into it as this is a "normal" package which
is not part of the Debian Installer.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 02:50:12PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On 10.III.2004 at 14:32 Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> >
> > The only non-default d-i choices I made were manual partitioning and
> > distribution unstable.
>
> Should partman be default partitioner on m68k or it is too slow?
That's a
> Which version did you test ?
The installer CD is the most current one, 20040310.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 237152 -1
Bug#237152: Ultra Enterprise 450 installation report
Bug 237152 cloned as bug 237398.
> reassign -1 ddetect
Bug#237398: Ultra Enterprise 450 installation report
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `ddetect'.
> retitle
No, this was not a known problem.
On 11.III.2004 at 13:40 W. Borgert wrote:
>
> I just tried to install a machine with two SCSI disks, but only the
> first disk should be used. Using XFS for all partitions but swap on
> the first disk lead to an error message "could not mount partition
> of type
reassign 237396 base-config
tags 237396 d-i
thanks
Quoting Florian Effenberger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: debian-installer
> Version: 20040310
>
> The set proxy is not being used in the installer after the system rebooted.
> This leads to apt-get errors.
Which version did you test ?
This i
reassign 237397 base-config
tags 237397 d-i
thanks
Quoting Florian Effenberger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: debian-installer
> Version: 20040310
>
> When you set a proxy in the setup, it should be automatically entered in
> /etc/environment with
>
> ftp_proxy=
> http_p
On 10.III.2004 at 22:26 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On 10.III.2004 at 10:40 Nick Rusnov wrote:
> >
> > If I try to change the filesystem types in Partman, (eg, setting /home
> > to XFS), it fails to create the swap partition (Failed to Mount swap
> > partition IDE master, partition #5 on none). If I h
reassign 237387 locales
retitle 237387 locales: Should use debian-installer settings as defaults
tags 237387 d-i
thanks
> Package: debian-installer
>
> The selected installation language should be set as system-wide default.
> Example: When I select "de_DE" as installer language, my /etc/environm
reassign 237395 netcfg
tags 237395 wontfix d-i
severity 237395 wishlist
thanks
Quoting Florian Effenberger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: debian-installer
> Version: 20040310
>
> DHCP is used automatically. I would like to see the woody-behaviour where
> you got asked whether to use DHCP or not.
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
