Speaking as a user only -- I *much* prefer the first approach. The duplication of effort is mostly just cut and paste, isn't it?
Rick On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 13:27, Joey Hess wrote: > Miroslav Kure wrote: > > > > There are basically two possibilities: > > 1. Toss the old stuff and describe installation files for each arch > > individually. > > pros: Easier to maintain, no need to wory your changes affect > > other architectures. > > cons: Some duplicate work > > 2. Describe general, stable and valid layout of the archive > > pros: More elegant, smaller > > cons: If there will be more exceptions, it will turn into the > > mess it is currently. > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
