Your message dated Thu, 11 Mar 2004 17:44:15 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line partman xfs: bad entry in /etc/fstab
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Mar 2004 12:55:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 11 04:55:35 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from lml.bas.bg [195.96.224.121]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B1Pio-0002Ly-00; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 04:55:35 -0800
Received: from anton by lml.bas.bg with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1B1Png-0002rU-00; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:00:36 +0200
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:00:35 +0200
From: Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Erich Waelde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: XFS file system does not accept errors=remount-ro
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08
X-Spam-Level:
Package: partman-xfs
Severity: important
Tags: d-i
On 11.III.2004 at 09:58 Erich Waelde wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I did a vmware install using
> http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/i386/20040309/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
>
>
> I did a typo in the boot line and ended in the default install :-)
> Thus I got to use the new partitioner partman.
>
> I was impressed to see a message, that xfs for /boot is not such a good
> idea, so I went back to repartition ... very impressive.
>
> In general I didn't like the many menus, but I can see that the logic
> behind it is much more capable. So I'll get used to it, I guess.
>
>
> So I chose
> /dev/discs/disc0/part1 => 128 MB swap
> /dev/discs/disc0/part2 => 32 MB ext3 /boot
> /dev/discs/disc0/part1 => 800 MB xfs /
>
> The reboot failed into some strange state. I was able to get in adding
> init=/bin/bash
> to the boot options. / was mounted readonly.
>
> I found that /etc/fstab was the source of the problem
>
> /dev/sda3 / xfs defaults,errors=remount-ro 0 1
> --------------------------^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> instead of ignoring, mount (of xfs) will fail with this option.
> I managed to remount
> mount -o remount,rw -t xfs /dev/sda3 /
> and change the file.
>
> If someone will tell me, which package exactly this should go, I'll resend
> as a bug report.
>
> The rest of the install was a piece of cake! Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
> Erich
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 237406-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Mar 2004 16:44:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 11 08:44:22 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gpm.stappers.nl [213.84.119.166]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B1TID-0003zX-00; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 08:44:22 -0800
Received: by gpm.stappers.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 00ED21800; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 17:44:15 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 17:44:15 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: partman xfs: bad entry in /etc/fstab
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at
11:37:22AM -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geert Stappers)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08
X-Spam-Level:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 11:37:22AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Erich Waelde wrote:
> > I did a vmware install using
> > http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/i386/20040309/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
>
> That's a day out of date, and almost two.
>
> > I found that /etc/fstab was the source of the problem
> >
> > /dev/sda3 / xfs defaults,errors=remount-ro 0 1
> > --------------------------^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Yes, this was fixed two days ago though.
>
> --
> see shy jo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
