On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 11:56:07PM +0000, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-07 13:38]: > > > I've uploaded a package with your patch. > > > > I tested the daily build for 20040305, which included lvmcfg 0.17, and it > > now works properly, lvm10 is installed on a system that uses LVM. > > And that works for you? The LVM is created is version2, and so lvm10 > cannot even see it. At least I think this is what happens here on my > system (#237534).
Hmm, yes, it did work for me. I just read your epic adventure (#237534). A lot of your problems sound like they stemmed from the wrong partition type for the partition you wanted to use as a physical volume, but then 83 is a short typo from 8e, so you may have had it right. AFAIK, d-i isn't doing lvm2 yet, so lvm10 should be appropriate still (lvm2 isn't in the 2.4 series kernels is it?). I'm going away for the weekend, but Monday's a public holiday, so I'll try and hose my machine completely on Monday and test with the latest daily build. Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
