Package: discover Version: 1.5-2 Severity: normal discover has dependency: Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4), libdiscover1, debconf (>> 0.5), ash | dash
But ash has dependency: Pre-Depends: dash So "ash | dash" is misleading. Look at this example: # apt-get install discover The following NEW packages will be installed: ash dash discover discover-data libdiscover1 # apt-get install dash discover The following NEW packages will be installed: dash discover discover-data libdiscover1 Should we put ash in Recommends or Suggests if it is not actually required? Since discover is now used in d-i, it is no longer too "optional". It would be better if we are more conservative in terms of dependency. Regards, Alan -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.3 Locale: LANG=zh_TW.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_HK Versions of packages discover depends on: ii dash 0.4.21 The Debian Almquist Shell ii debconf 1.4.11 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdiscover1 1.5-2 hardware identification library -- debconf information excluded -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
