Hi All,
It is IBM T20 2647-41H. Failed with latest nightly of d-i while it can't
load ds.o hence can't start pcmcia-cs. Manually loaded yenta-socket worked.
# lspci
...
00:02.0 Cardbus bridge: Texas Instruments PCI1450 (rev 03)
00:02.1 Cardbus bridge: Texas Instruments PCI1450 (rev 03)
...
02:00
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 07:03:48AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Well, I may be wrong (and cannot check, being currently offline), but
> discover is now maintained by "us", D-I Team
>
> Where are the package sources (except in the archive..:-))) ?
>
> Shouldn't we setup an Alioth project
Quoting Dennis Stampfer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: discover
> Version: N/A; reported 2004-03-09
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch, d-i, l10n
>
> Hi,
>
> could you please add this translation into German?
Well, I may be wrong (and cannot check, being currently offline), but
discover is now
Hi
The problem is that the image that is placed on the ramdisk under
installation has become larger than 8192 Kb. You can work around this by
applaying: linux ramdisk_size=16384on the boot-prompt.
Håvard
> Identical problem here. Soltek SL-75KAV/-X MB, AMD Duron 1300 MHz.
>
> Phil.
>
> On Wed, 1
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 03-08-2004 i386 netboot (from ftp.debian.org)
uname -a: N/A: install failed; installer is running 2.4.25-1-386
Date: 20040310 12am
Method: PXE install
Machine: Dell PowerEdge 400SC
Processor: Pentium 4 2.8Ghz
Memory: 640MB
Root Device: ICH5
Accepted:
partman-xfs_4.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_4.dsc
partman-xfs_4.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_4.tar.gz
partman-xfs_4_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_4_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
debian-installer_20040310_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer_20040310.dsc
debian-installer_20040310.tar.gz
debian-installer-demo_20040310_i386.deb
debian-installer-images_20040310_i386.tar.gz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
linux-kernel-di_0.46_source+i386+alpha+ia64+m68k+mips+mipsel+powerpc+s390+sparc.changes
isn't signed with PGP/GnuPG
Removing
linux-kernel-di_0.46_source+i386+alpha+ia64+m68k+mips+mipsel+powerpc+s390+sparc.changes,
but keeping its associated files for now.
Greetings,
Your Debian queue d
partman-xfs_4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-xfs_4.dsc
partman-xfs_4.tar.gz
partman-xfs_4_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Identical problem here. Soltek SL-75KAV/-X MB, AMD Duron 1300 MHz.
Phil.
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, david wrote:
> Hi,
> Whilst trying to cold boot from CD1 of build 20040306 the following error
> overwrites itself (forever)
> "Attempted to access bejond end of device 1:00 rw=0 want=820, limit 8
Hi, I use to have intercourse problems releasing to earlier until i found ciallas.
This really raise the quality of your relationship add excitment to it.
Too see all the benefits read on
http://herbaltablet.com/sv/index.php?pid=eph2145
http://herbaltablet.com/sv/applepie.php
Hi,
Whilst trying to cold boot from CD1 of build 20040306 the following error
overwrites itself (forever)
"Attempted to access bejond end of device 1:00 rw=0 want=820, limit 8192"
at least that my best guess as it is very hard to read. The 820 appears to
cycle through to 824.
This is on 'bot
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 10:31:16PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Obs. That upload was not supposed to go to the debian archive. It
> was supposed to go to the skolelinux archive.
>
> Sorry about this.
>
> Its only change is to add more HW support, so the upload should not
> break anything
Accepted:
lvmcfg-utils_0.18_all.udeb
to pool/main/l/lvmcfg/lvmcfg-utils_0.18_all.udeb
lvmcfg_0.18.dsc
to pool/main/l/lvmcfg/lvmcfg_0.18.dsc
lvmcfg_0.18.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/lvmcfg/lvmcfg_0.18.tar.gz
lvmcfg_0.18_all.udeb
to pool/main/l/lvmcfg/lvmcfg_0.18_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTE
Hi,
I just had a successful install on a Sparc64 today (already sent the
report, but have not got the message back confirming the BTS
number). Maybe it is caused by your specific framebuffer model (the
Creator 3d)? I found at least another report of a successful install
on a Sparc64 (227854), but
Accepted:
partman-reiserfs_3.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_3.dsc
partman-reiserfs_3.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_3.tar.gz
partman-reiserfs_3_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_3_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted:
partman-ext3_14.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_14.dsc
partman-ext3_14.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_14.tar.gz
partman-ext3_14_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_14_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribut
Accepted:
partman-partitioning_11.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_11.dsc
partman-partitioning_11.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_11.tar.gz
partman-partitioning_11_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_11
Accepted:
partman-xfs_3.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_3.dsc
partman-xfs_3.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_3.tar.gz
partman-xfs_3_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_3_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
partman_21.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_21.dsc
partman_21.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_21.tar.gz
partman_21_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_21_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Rejected: partman-target_10_i386.changes: a file with this name already exists in the
Done directory.
Rejected: md5sum and/or size mismatch on existing copy of partman-target_10.dsc.
Rejected: partman-target_10_all.udeb: old version (10) in unstable >= new version (10)
targeted at unstable.
Reje
Package: installation-reports
Version: 20040309
Severity: normal
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 2004-03-09,
http://people.debian.org/~jbailey//d-i/sparc/daily/cdrom-mini.iso
uname -a: Linux refri 2.4.24-refri #1 SMP Fri Jan 16 14:06:22 CST 2004 sparc64
GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-03
partman-partitioning_11_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-partitioning_11.dsc
partman-partitioning_11.tar.gz
partman-partitioning_11_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
partman-reiserfs_3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-reiserfs_3.dsc
partman-reiserfs_3.tar.gz
partman-reiserfs_3_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
partman-ext3_14_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-ext3_14.dsc
partman-ext3_14.tar.gz
partman-ext3_14_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
partman-target_10_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-target_10.dsc
partman-target_10.tar.gz
partman-target_10_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
partman_21_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman_21.dsc
partman_21.tar.gz
partman_21_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
partman-xfs_3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-xfs_3.dsc
partman-xfs_3.tar.gz
partman-xfs_3_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 06:14:00PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>
> I managed to track the problem down to bterm, which segfaults. I could
> use the installer passing the boot option
> "debian-installer/framebuffer=false".
>
> This bug seems to be related to #232720.
now that sparc image are a
Accepted:
partman-auto_10.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_10.dsc
partman-auto_10.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_10.tar.gz
partman-auto_10_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_10_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribut
(new) lvmcfg-utils_0.18_all.udeb optional debian-installer
lvmcfg without the main menu item
lvmcfg_0.18.dsc
to pool/main/l/lvmcfg/lvmcfg_0.18.dsc
lvmcfg_0.18.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/lvmcfg/lvmcfg_0.18.tar.gz
lvmcfg_0.18_all.udeb
to pool/main/l/lvmcfg/lvmcfg_0.18_all.udeb
Changes: lvmcfg (0.18)
Accepted:
partman-basicfilesystems_16.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_16.dsc
partman-basicfilesystems_16.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_16.tar.gz
partman-basicfilesystems_16_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-basicfil
Accepted:
partman-lvm_3.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_3.dsc
partman-lvm_3.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_3.tar.gz
partman-lvm_3_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_3_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
partman-auto_10_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-auto_10.dsc
partman-auto_10.tar.gz
partman-auto_10_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
partman-basicfilesystems_16_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-basicfilesystems_16.dsc
partman-basicfilesystems_16.tar.gz
partman-basicfilesystems_16_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
partman-lvm_3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-lvm_3.dsc
partman-lvm_3.tar.gz
partman-lvm_3_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 07:15:55PM +0100, Johannes Behr said
> On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 19:02, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Johannes Behr wrote:
> > > OK, works better --- but still not through.
> > >
> > > boot, network/DHCP setup, loading of installer components from
> > > a mirror works.
> > >
> > > The
lvmcfg_0.18_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lvmcfg_0.18.dsc
lvmcfg_0.18.tar.gz
lvmcfg_0.18_all.udeb
lvmcfg-utils_0.18_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
The partman-lvm stuff has a few rough edges, but it works. I have never
set up lvm before, and know nothing about it, and I just booted a debian
system with /usr in a lvm volume.
One question: Does it support root filesystem on lvm?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
OK got these off the machine by floppy.
Maybe someone can spot a problem ?
If there's anything else which would help please let me know.
---
/var/log/boot:
Tue Mar 9 23:07:08 2004: bootlogd.
Tue Mar 9 23:07:08 2004: Loading /etc/console/boottime.kmap.gz
Tue Mar 9 23:07:08 2004: Activating swap
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 07-Mar-2004, from
http://ftp.pl.debian.org/debian/dists/unstable/main/installer-i386/current/
uname -a: I'm on different install, now
Date: 08-Mar-2004
Method: from floppy then network on a previously prepeared ext3 filesyste
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 10:09:09PM +0100, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 10:38:23PM -0500, Nicholas Breen wrote:
> > Package: installation-reports
> >
> > #236970.) Fortunately, this also turned up a different problem:
> > the kernel-image-2.4.22-r5k-ip22 package had been ins
Nicholas Breen wrote:
> The attached patch corrects the parameters sent to genisovh[1] in mips's
> build_miniiso target. After doing so, the image is bootable and appears
> to be installing normally.
Thanks. Duplicated work btw, a similiar thing is sitting on my disk.
> genisovh is still unpacka
Package: discover
Version: N/A; reported 2004-03-09
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch, d-i, l10n
Hi,
could you please add this translation into German?
Thank you!
Dennis
#
#Translators, if you are not familiar with the PO format, gettext
#documentation is worth reading, especially sections
Thomas Poindessous wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 10:38:23PM -0500, Nicholas Breen wrote:
> > Package: installation-reports
> >
> > #236970.) Fortunately, this also turned up a different problem:
> > the kernel-image-2.4.22-r5k-ip22 package had been installed, which
> > will not boot on this ma
Package: discover
Version: 1.5-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: i10n
Attached is a Swedish translation of discover's debconf template.
--
Andrà Dahlqvist
#
#Translators, if you are not familiar with the PO format, gettext
#documentation is worth reading, especially sections dedicated to
#this
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 10:38:23PM -0500, Nicholas Breen wrote:
> Package: installation-reports
>
> #236970.) Fortunately, this also turned up a different problem:
> the kernel-image-2.4.22-r5k-ip22 package had been installed, which
> will not boot on this machine! Installing the r4k-ip22 im
Accepted:
discover-data-udeb_1.2004.02.08-2.skolelinux.1_all.udeb
to pool/main/d/discover-data/discover-data-udeb_1.2004.02.08-2.skolelinux.1_all.udeb
discover-data_1.2004.02.08-2.skolelinux.1.dsc
to pool/main/d/discover-data/discover-data_1.2004.02.08-2.skolelinux.1.dsc
discover-data_1.2004.0
On Tuesday 09 March 2004 21:36, Joey Hess wrote:
> Your dns is out of date.
> http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/
Right. The DNS-servers of my provider are not yet in sync :-(
I commented out the forwarders in my local DNS-server config. Success!
>
> > Could I get CVS access to d-i on my alioth a
Package: discover-data
Version: 1.2004.02.08-2
Severity: important
Debian-Edu was told about some PCI ids which uses the hpt366 kernel
module. Here is a patch to update pci.lst:
Index: debian/changelog
===
RCS file: /var/lib/cvs/sk
discover-data_1.2004.02.08-2.skolelinux.1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
discover-data_1.2004.02.08-2.skolelinux.1.dsc
discover-data_1.2004.02.08-2.skolelinux.1.tar.gz
discover-data-udeb_1.2004.02.08-2.skolelinux.1_all.udeb
discover-data_1.2004.02.08-
Accepted:
netcfg-dhcp_0.54_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_0.54_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.54_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_0.54_i386.udeb
netcfg_0.54.dsc
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.54.dsc
netcfg_0.54.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.54.tar.gz
netcfg_0.5
[Debian Installer]
> Accepted:
> discover-data-udeb_1.2004.02.08-2.skolelinux.1_all.udeb
> to
> pool/main/d/discover-data/discover-data-udeb_1.2004.02.08-2.skolelinux.1_all.udeb
> discover-data_1.2004.02.08-2.skolelinux.1.dsc
> to pool/main/d/discover-data/discover-data_1.2004.02.08-2.skolelin
So I'm running a test install and notice kernel-image-2.4.24-amiga-di
being installed as a d-i component. Hmmm, I say, my mac should never
need that particular kernel and why would the boot image need a kernel
anyway -- it's already booted.
I believe it's because some linux-kernel-di modules depen
Accepted:
archdetect_0.73_i386.udeb
to pool/main/d/ddetect/archdetect_0.73_i386.udeb
ddetect_0.73.dsc
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.73.dsc
ddetect_0.73.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.73.tar.gz
ethdetect_0.73_all.udeb
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ethdetect_0.73_all.udeb
hw-detect-full
netcfg_0.54_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netcfg_0.54.dsc
netcfg_0.54.tar.gz
netcfg_0.54_i386.udeb
netcfg-dhcp_0.54_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.54_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: debian-installer
Version: N/A; reported 2004-03-09
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I tried to install a diskless client and mount an nfs-root-partition.
(No harddrives inside the diskless client, rootfs should be on my
server). First Problem: nfs-modules aren't loaded or "reachable" in
/lib/module
ddetect_0.73_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ddetect_0.73.dsc
ddetect_0.73.tar.gz
hw-detect_0.73_all.udeb
ethdetect_0.73_all.udeb
hw-detect-full_0.73_all.udeb
archdetect_0.73_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Accepted:
netcfg-dhcp_0.53_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_0.53_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.53_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_0.53_i386.udeb
netcfg_0.53.dsc
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.53.dsc
netcfg_0.53.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.53.tar.gz
netcfg_0.5
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 2004-03-09 from
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
Date: 2004-03-09
Method: base packages from cd, then security upgrade from inet.
Machine:
Processor: P4 (Prescott/HT) 2.8GHz
Memory: 512MiB
netcfg_0.53_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netcfg_0.53.dsc
netcfg_0.53.tar.gz
netcfg_0.53_i386.udeb
netcfg-dhcp_0.53_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.53_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nicholas Breen wrote:
> The attached patch corrects the parameters sent to genisovh[1] in mips's
> build_miniiso target. After doing so, the image is bootable and appears
> to be installing normally.
>
> genisovh is still unpackaged - the path I'm calling it from certainly
> won't work for anyone
Frans Pop wrote:
> I get server not responding.
Your dns is out of date.
192.25.206.28 cvs.alioth.debian.org alioth.debian.org d-i.alioth.debian.org
> Could I get CVS access to d-i on my alioth account fjpop-guest as Translator?
Done.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital sign
The attached patch corrects the parameters sent to genisovh[1] in mips's
build_miniiso target. After doing so, the image is bootable and appears
to be installing normally.
genisovh is still unpackaged - the path I'm calling it from certainly
won't work for anyone else. The only obvious difficult
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 06:01:29PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On 8.III.2004 22:38 at Nicholas Breen wrote:
> > The partitioning tool proved troublesome.
> > - Default partition table selection should be 'dvh'.
>
> I think in partman it is 'dvh'.
At least as of version 17 (most recent on my
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 02:00:26PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 10:44:43AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > I would like to finish it tonight, my TODO currently contains:
> > - When displaying select and multiselect questions, text height must
> > be computed to not di
When updating my working copies of d-i and tasksel, I get loud complaints
from the SSH transport:
The RSA host key for cvs.alioth.debian.org has changed,
and the key for the according IP address 192.25.206.28
is unknown. This could either mean that
[snip]
It is also possible that the RSA host key
I get server not responding.
This means dead links from http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/:
- no manual (http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/)
- no CVS repository tarball (http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/cvsrepo.tar.gz)
- no ???
Is this a known problem? Are there alternatives available?
A
Hi,
W. Borgert writes:
> Hello,
>
> today I sat down together with an experienced Linux/UNIX admin and
> we went through the complete installation with RAID1. Unfortunately,
> we didn't succeed. We have two identical HDs and created four
> partitions on each in an identical layout. We s
On 9.III.2004 at 13:35 Joey Hess wrote:
> Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> > > What about doing something with the mount.d script output? It seems
> > > that is designed to allow undoing of mount.d changes, but currently
> > > it's thrown away and we have this more hardcoded umount_target
> > > instead.
>
100% zh_CN (Merged PO file: 905t1f)
100% uk (Merged PO file: 905t1f)
100% sk (Merged PO file: 902t4f)
100% lt (Merged PO file: 905t1f)
100% ko (Merged PO file: 904t2f)
100% ja (Merged PO file: 902t4f)
100% fr
100% fi (Merged PO file: 904t2f)
100% da (Merged PO file: 904t2f)
100% bg (Merg
Accepted:
netcfg-dhcp_0.52_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_0.52_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.52_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_0.52_i386.udeb
netcfg_0.52.dsc
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.52.dsc
netcfg_0.52.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.52.tar.gz
netcfg_0.5
Title: Vous souhaitez vous implanter à létranger
Vous
souhaitez vous implanter à létranger ? Réduire votre fiscalité ?
Contactez
nous dès aujourdhui au :
001
775 201 0191
Notre société est spécialisée dans lincorporation
internationale dentreprises et vous fera bénéficier dune off
netcfg_0.52_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netcfg_0.52.dsc
netcfg_0.52.tar.gz
netcfg_0.52_i386.udeb
netcfg-dhcp_0.52_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.52_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> > What about doing something with the mount.d script output? It seems
> > that is designed to allow undoing of mount.d changes, but currently
> > it's thrown away and we have this more hardcoded umount_target
> > instead.
>
> This was designed to work for filesystems like U
On 9.III.2004 at 11:44 Joey Hess wrote:
>
> > However swap can be turned on in the scripts that do mkfs and turned
> > off back in them. I am going to do this.
>
> Well I guess that would work.
I added to definitions.sh two new functions: enable_swap and
disable_swap. I added them to partman-
> - lowmem package must enter archive
> - Check archive for udebs that need to be built on various arches;
>make sure everything is up-to-date. Also, make sure that eg,
>appropriate kernel debs have entered the archive on each
>architecture.
one thing I noticed with a recent daily bu
Accepted:
partman-basicfilesystems_15.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_15.dsc
partman-basicfilesystems_15.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_15.tar.gz
partman-basicfilesystems_15_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-basicfil
Your message didn't have a Package: line at the start (in the
pseudo-header following the real mail header), or didn't have a
pseudo-header at all.
This makes it much harder for us to categorise and deal with your
problem report. Please _resubmit_ your report to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and tell us which
Miroslav Kure wrote:
> I'm currently trying to update Sarge install manual to reflect the
> reality. Of course, I've read INSTALLATION-HOWTO, but that reflects
> current state, not intended state. So, could somebody kindly help me
> with the following?
>
> 1. Will we have boot images for 1.2 inch
Quoting Dafydd Harries ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I'll try and get cy with UTF-8 listed as supported in glibc. In the
> meantime, what should be done?
I'm not completely sure. Maybe replacing it by ISO-8859-14 is
wise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
Accepted:
partman_20.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_20.dsc
partman_20.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_20.tar.gz
partman_20_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_20_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
partman-basicfilesystems_15_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-basicfilesystems_15.dsc
partman-basicfilesystems_15.tar.gz
partman-basicfilesystems_15_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 12:15:07PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Bastian Blank wrote:
> > The following packages have broken dependencies:
> > - partman: hw-detect-full
> What's broken about it? It needs complete hardware detection to see all
> disks.
disc-detection? Real package alway overrule Provid
Thomas Poindessous wrote:
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 03:13:00PM -0700, Peter Karbaliotis wrote:
This time it actually got to the point of installing a kernel image.
Unfortunately, the installer chose kernel-image-2.4.24-sparc64-smp when
it should have chosen kernel-image-2.4.24-sparc32.
I think t
Feb 27, 04 purchased Dell 8300. Pen 4/ 3GHZ/ 120 HD/ 1024 memory.
I am not a computer expert. I have had nothing but problems with this machine
since I purchased it. When I log on the System 32 window opens up and I get
an error message from McAfee that states that the Active Shield is missing
comp
partman_20_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman_20.dsc
partman_20.tar.gz
partman_20_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
Accepted:
partman-target_10.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_10.dsc
partman-target_10.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_10.tar.gz
partman-target_10_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_10_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you
I managed to track the problem down to bterm, which segfaults. I could
use the installer passing the boot option
"debian-installer/framebuffer=false".
This bug seems to be related to #232720.
Many thanks to Petter Reinholdtsen (pere) on irc (#debian-boot).
regards,
Reinhard
--
To UNS
Hi.
I'm currently trying to update Sarge install manual to reflect the
reality. Of course, I've read INSTALLATION-HOWTO, but that reflects
current state, not intended state. So, could somebody kindly help me
with the following?
1. Will we have boot images for 1.2 inch floppies on i386?
2. Will w
partman-target_10_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-target_10.dsc
partman-target_10.tar.gz
partman-target_10_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 12:13:55PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> I'm also considering downgrading baseconfig-udeb, since only experts
> should use it anyway. Also possibly autopartkit, for similar reasons,
> and to save memory.
The same with partitioner and the progs for the filesystems which can be
p
Sven Luther wrote:
> chrp, chrp-rs6k and prep will be working this time around, i think
> everything is there, but i need to fiddle the build system for it still
> to build the initrd images, but i do this already by hand, and
> everything is in place for it. This would use the powerpc netboot
> in
Your message dated Tue, 9 Mar 2004 11:36:50 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line FWD: Fixed in NMU of partman-target 9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Nikolai Prokoschenko wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 07:36:02PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > This is becoming very annoying for me, not only is it now three times as
> > much work to release large quantities of packages, but the changelogs
> > are bloated and wrong. Until this is fixed, I am just p
On Sunday 07 March 2004 17:56, Erich Waelde wrote:
[snip]
> I managed to set up a /target tree on lvm on raid1 on scsi, but base
> install failed (could not download coreutils), and no smoke test has taken
> place. See below for details.
>
> To summarize: I found all the neccessary tools! Good work
Bastian Blank wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> The following packages have broken dependencies:
> - partman: hw-detect-full
What's broken about it? It needs complete hardware detection to see all
disks.
> - partitioner (deprecated): hw-detect-full
Same.
> - many others: explicite dependencies against lib
Bastian Blank wrote:
> The following priorities are currently wrong:
> - hw-detect(-full): must be lower as only usable on some arches.
Unless this causes install failures on some arches, I think it's too
complicated to get the dependencies just right to downgrade this before
the release. We would
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 07:36:02PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> This is becoming very annoying for me, not only is it now three times as
> much work to release large quantities of packages, but the changelogs
> are bloated and wrong. Until this is fixed, I am just putting "* Maybe
> some translations
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
