On 14102 March 1977, Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
>> The main point that makes it entirely unusable is its usage of a
>> new subdomain for serving the javascript FOR EVERY NEW REQUEST.
>> This is beyond stupid and disallows any kind of javascript blocker
>> in your browser, unless you allow it to tru
On 14102 March 1977, Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
>>* sandstorm: larjona, there was some grumbles about sandstorm (around
>>20:00 UTC), I asked Ganneff et al to let you know the issues but what
>>they said in IRC may be sufficient for feedback?
> Yes, it's probably enough. I have no logs, can anybody
On 14073 March 1977, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> With the current models, ideally, the Chairs would:
[...]
> - not be too involved in the organization of the current DebConf(s),
> so that there's no conflict between opinions expressed a mere organizer,
> and opinions expressed as a chair
[...]
This d
Hi,
The term "local team" has become loaded in DebConf history, and we might
just want to avoid using it.
But it'd be wrong to deny the underlying concept, the existence of a
group that identifies primarily with the organisation of a particular
instance of DebConf at any given point in time, no m
On 14027 March 1977, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> Don't tell me that such "warning" will prevent you from swimming in
>> Neckar. In about every DC location I've been at and where you were, I
>> saw you swimming (usually at hours that the average geek would call
>> "crazy"), so I can't even imagine that
On 13771 March 1977, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> You may want to actually commit the website directory, would help a lot
> to have it appear in git...
And who would have thought, as soon as its there, the site is available.
You may want to fixup something:
"LCA20105 Debian Miniconf &a
On 13771 March 1977, Andrew Ruthven wrote:
>> You either missed the last part of the sentence with the existing repos,
>> or you wanted to have the ikiwiki thing run and commit its output.
>> *Currently* we don't support an ikiwiki setup directly (especially not
>> with those path and url settings)
On 13764 March 1977, Andrew Ruthven wrote:
> Just wondering the nz2015 site will go live on the webhost? I'm itching
> to send out a CFP.
And I looked at it just now.
Let me quote again what I answered back whenever:
>> > Martin said he creates the git repo for you, same form as the other mini
>>
On 13738 March 1977, martin f. krafft wrote:
> also sprach Andrew Ruthven [2014-10-22 23:09 +0200]:
>> Excellent. It looks like in the past the miniconf numbering was
>> sequential, but miniconf10 was based on the year. Any preferences
>> for how we refer to the miniconf next year? Given miniconf
On 13689 March 1977, Joey Hess wrote:
>> That being said, they're there as web URLs, not files; I simply forgot
>> about the web front-end.
>> Maybe it's possible to have git-annex magic some links to the mirrors
>> (CC'ed joeyh); else, I will need to poke Ganneff (also CC'ed) about
>> space usage
On 13539 March 1977, Kees Cook wrote:
> - who will be running network infrastructure (e.g. dhcp, dns, mirrors, etc)
The DebConf Admins, which for a running conf is a mix of the global
admins plus any "local" admin. Where local admin is a set of people that
includes people from past DebConfs who w
On 13528 March 1977, Tássia Camões wrote:
>> Be careful with the gender data in penta, it has lead to various
>> discussions around it. Its a tri-value state, with true as male, false
>> as female and unset as "undefined", and I sure don't need to explain how
>> much this does not fit what many pe
On 13527 March 1977, Tássia Camões wrote:
> Could you also consider gathering statistics per gender? AFAIK we have
> this info in penta.
Be careful with the gender data in penta, it has lead to various
discussions around it. Its a tri-value state, with true as male, false
as female and unset as "
Am 25.03.2014 07:32, schrieb Steve Langasek:
The best source of data for this is going to be the penta database.
Is
there someone here that's willing to volunteer their time to run some
queries and answer some questions? If you don't already have access
to the
penta database, that's ok - if
On 13315 March 1977, Ana Guerrero Lopez wrote:
>> list where families can get to know each other before the conference
>> and start planning playdates, child care, and other family friendly
>> activities would likely be really helpful. (Hopefully with some local
>> orga team members also on the li
Hi
as you might have noticed, its time to open registration... And as its
tradition, every DebConf wants to know different things from the
users. Wouldn't be fun if its always the same...
And as we stay one more year with pentabarf it magically got to me to
change it. I didn't only change the UI,
On 13136 March 1977, Didier Raboud wrote:
> This has now happenned; the minutes are available there:
> https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf13/Meetings/20130228#Minutes
* Ganneff
to organise hacking fest in Fulda.
Well, yes. Rough Plan would be to get all of
https://wiki.debconf.org/w
>> If the https connections are considered too onerous for some reason, i'd
>> be happy to try to help troubleshoot and improve the situation, if
>> that's desired.
> https hasn't been too onerous for Nokia:
> http://gizmodo.com/5975095/nokias-xpress-browser-decrypts-your-https-data
> Two factor a
Hi
as all websites, including the wiki, have moved servers, there are some
changes. Most of them are "behind the scenes", but a little of it is
visible to everyone.
- debconf7.debconf.org is no longer a wiki. It was, back whenever, and
never got changed. Until today. I used "mw2html"[1] and aft
Am 26.11.2012 01:34, schrieb Steve Langasek:
The DebConf team has run separate infrastructure for mailing lists
for a
number of years. This is pointlessly redundant.
Who are you to decide where others spend their time doing things?
The lists.debconf.org mailserver has now crashed, and been
Hi
the host where lists had been on for the last 6 years died...
And while I had the plan to move the lists anyways, I didn't want to do
it in a hurry now, but meh. So I just moved the lists. At least, the
mail part for now. The web part (lists archive), isn't visible yet. I
activate apache tomor
Hi
Im not unhappy with them "being shoved down to the bottom", I'm
unhappy
with them being exiled to a "oh, we also have those over there
page",
basically communicating "we don't value it (IMO)".
OK, when I said normalize, I don't believe there was a consensus to
"hide" these sponsors, just t
On 13031 March 1977, Brian Gupta wrote:
>> No.
>> They do contribute at least the value of a Bronze Sponsor.
>> And they do it year-round.
> I think we need to look at this objectively.
> Let's break it down.. I don't know the quantity or sizing of VM that
> each hosting provider contributes.. no
On 13031 March 1977, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
>> We also felt that somehow we should normalize the placement of these
>> sponsors, but that this could be deferred for future discussion if we
>> at least addressed the naming issue.
> IMO we should move them to the Supporters page in separate Section
On 13031 March 1977, Brian Gupta wrote:
> There was consensus in the sponsors-team meeting today, that labeling
> certain hosting providers as "Permanent sponsors" is suboptimal, as it
> it could confuse our otherwise "permanent" regular "financial"
> sponsors the impression that some sponsorship
On 13014 March 1977, Holger Levsen wrote:
> http://layer-acht.org/fotos/670_Switzerland_DC13-pre/ has some photos I took
> this weekend. Please excuse the crappy quality! :-)
http://layer-acht.org/fotos/670_Switzerland_DC13-pre/20121027_027_Sm.jpg.61.html
Seriously?
Are you actively trying to k
Am 14.08.2012 09:25, schrieb Eric Dantan Rzewnicki:
- Resources? I can have this on a VM of my personal machine, but I'd
very much rather if we have a instance where more people can log
in
and hack on it. A DebConf machine? A Debian machine? Would be
good. But *please* not a painfully un
On 12901 March 1977, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
>>> - reports: move the reports into the dcXX repository in a directory
>>> report. So /reports/dc11 becomes /report in the dc11.git repository.
>> Why not keep the reports all together?
> I don't know why they were initially put into a separate direc
On 12900 March 1977, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> - dc0 - dc13, fr2010.mini, in201x.mini: each into it's own repository
> - reports: move the reports into the dcXX repository in a directory
> report. So /reports/dc11 becomes /report in the dc11.git repository.
Why not keep the reports all togethe
On 12898 March 1977, Noël Köthe wrote:
> when entering account data I prefer to use https access especially in
> "unsafe";) networks like debconf.
> https://wiki.debconf.org points to DebConf7 (Edinburgh) with the CN
> debconf7.debconf.org
As it is since 2007. wiki.debconf.org never had ssl.
--
On 12899 March 1977, Noël Köthe wrote:
> 2. remove https configure from wiki.debconf.org apache so people like me
> will not try to use get an error and report it.
There *is* no ssl config for wiki.debconf.org, so there is nothing to
remove.
--
bye, Joerg
With a name like "TikiWiki", it seems o
>> > Is there anyone around with such experience? I of course know the game
>> > and roughly what I need to do to make it happen. And such task quite
>> > obviously fits my dummy skills (no programming, no fancy and
>> > complicated database operations, etc..)
>> If you want to use that fancy and c
>> Oh, and I hope for a CSS thats not limiting the amount of screenspace in
>> use (width) to something small. :)
> There is an endless discussion about fixed width and fluid width. Mostly
> fluid width is associated with a more generic approach, which, in my
> opinion is not correct, since resolu
On 12694 March 1977, Felix Delattre wrote:
> we have news from the website team. First of all we have a design
> proposal (http://i.imgur.com/4svVh.png) which should be discussed during
> this week, so we can go on with implementing this soon. So, please leave
> your feedback!
Does look nice, not
>> Many thanks for your work on handling the reimbursements!
>> Cheers.
> Just a quick note for people still waiting the reimbursements from FFIS
> (Europe). My reimbursement arrived today, if yours did not show in your
> account yet, it will probably appear tomorrow or so :)
Or a bit later. It
On 12582 March 1977, Richard Darst wrote:
> Could you (or someone who knows) give me the information on travel
> sponsorship money movements which happened in cash during DC11?
> I understand that cash was withdrawn from debian.ch, and given to
> people for whom the money could not be transferred
Heyho,
as it gets forgotten let me remind all (future) bids what DebConf offers
you besides the wiki to prepare your bid:
- You can have a mailinglist within lists.debconf.net
(debconfxy-...@lists.debconf.net - like debconf13-m...@l.dc.n)
- If you need/want more than "just" the wiki to prep
> People are denied travel sponsorship every year. This year, it
> included a very active Debian community member, Clint Adams. I am
> further disappointed in this decision as Clint was key to DebConf10.
> I don't think Clint should be left out like this. The argument from
> the travel sponsors
On 12542 March 1977, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> For that we would need a list of all Talks / Sessions, their speakers
> and their E-Mail addresses. I found part of the data at [1], but that
> doesn't include any contact details. So could you create such a list
> for us? (Or a list of al
but i don't believe h01ger, so lets see and test.
If you can read this you can stop reading now, test worked.
If you are still reading than you wasted some time of your live.
And if you still haven't managed to stop, my condolences.
What, still reading? Meet me at DebConf, I can teach you how
On 12525 March 1977, Richard Darst wrote:
> Right now I would just do the main database, not the log tables,
> unless someone who knows more says that would be a good idea, too.
Dont blank logs.
--
bye, Joerg
Some AM after a mistake:
Sigh. One shouldn't AM in the early AM, as it were.
__
> While at it, we should also encourage people to rate the events they
> attended to, in order to give feedback to the authors/presenters.
We HAVE a feedback system.
We turn it on each DebConf.
Attendees are lazy.
If you get them to use it, great.
--
bye, Joerg
I think Smithers picked me beca
>> Somebody else from the team already informed me about my status, but
>> I haven't gotten any email regarding travel sponsorship.
> same here :\
Jun 19 23:54:53 vir postfix/smtp[24604]: 9436D384BD: to=,
relay=master.debian.org[70.103.162.29]:25, delay=3.8, delays=0.06/0.01/1.7/2,
dsn=2.0.0,
On 12517 March 1977, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> Somebody else from the team already informed me about my status, but
> I haven't gotten any email regarding travel sponsorship.
> Reporting it here in case there were a problem with more emails,
> If you are waiting for travel sponsorship and you did not
Hi,
someone approached me today with the following thought / idea:
"As your sponsorship meeting is a bit late, how about approving travel
sponsorship for a selected set of people earlier? It seems a shame to
wait until the meeting is done as the travel prices will go up in the
meantime, so peo
>> Second: We just set a date for the IRC meeting. It will be held on
>> Sunday, 19 June, startng at 18:00 UTC
> great! thanks a lot already! :-)
> "but", when (+how) will we decide and inform about accom+food sponsorship?
> (+inform people and ask for reconfirmation.)
Entirely different area.
Heyho,
first, there has been an addition to the team: Gregor Herrman got added
on suggestion from our DPL - as our DPL can't be available during our
IRC meeting.
Second: We just set a date for the IRC meeting. It will be held on
Sunday, 19 June, startng at 18:00 UTC
(use date -d @1308506400
Hi
> I hope you like ti :) http://www.microsoft.ba/
Actually: No.
MS is known to not like such a thing (domain squatting) much.
And the last thing we need is them going after us. Especially as this is a
bit worse than just grabbing one of "their" domains.
If you want to keep this (very) bad joke
On 12494 March 1977, Adnan Hodzic wrote:
> Could I be added to this as well, if anything for "audit" purposes.
I dont think thats a good idea. You have enough other things do to.
And for audit: If you really think we do/did something wrong: Our
ratings are in pentabarf and the result of our meeti
On 12495 March 1977, Dejan Marjanovic wrote:
> It's just a PHP & MySQL backend, but AFAIK anything dynamic such as
> PHP language is not allowed on DebConf11.DebConf.org...
No. Yes.
No, php and mysql is not ruled out. Yes, it is strongly
discouraged. Very much so, as usually the stuff that gets o
> Actually, I am part of the DebConf localteam, I am making
> http://debconf11.com/, with Adnan's blessing, we will redirect
> everything considering travel and staying in Banja Luka from
> Debconf.org to this website, because it has to be dynamic.
Err. What kind of dynamic? And what exactly for
Hello world,
as I got kicked into doing this job 2 meetings ago: The travel
sponsorship team just started its work. This year it consists of
Me, Myself and I (obviously)
Martin Würtele
Neil McGovern
Bdale Garbee
Faidon Liambotis
Meike Reichle
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Andrew Lee
Velimir Iveljic
S
On 12475 March 1977, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> For earlier DebConfs (IIRC up to DC7), attendees got a printed copy of
> the proceedings. I always liked having this, being able to read the
> articles presented for the talks before they were presented (to be
> better prepared for the information), or ref
On 12478 March 1977, ValessioBrito wrote:
> Oky, now NO JS (99%), only with hyperlinks to IFRAME, see:
> http://valessiobrito.info/tmp/dc11/webwatch-nojs/
Well. That page doesnt do much for me when I disable javascript, besides
playing the video.
> TAB Chat CGI:IRC on OFTC.net is channel #DebCo
>>> TAB2, is CGI:IRC on irc.debian.org #DebConf11 ..or one channel per
>>> room.
>> I don't think we should provide a web2irc gateway. They are so often
>> misused for trolls, its not nice. How about simply providing a link to
>> one of the known ones (or leaving it out at all and just telling
On 12477 March 1977, ValessioBrito wrote:
> Create a propostal page with (HTML5 embeed) and others widgets
> JavaScript, to watch DebConf11... See:
Way too much Javascript. Can we keep the main site usable WITHOUT any
javascript? I know we already annoy people much by requiring JS for the
registr
On 12478 March 1977, Adnan Hodzic wrote:
> +10!
>> http://valessiobrito.info/tmp/dc11/webwatch/
> I'm loving it, could just add Twitter besides Chat on IRC or before
> Identi.ca? I think once completed we should add this on main page
> below the "menu" and above from "Latest News".
Independent of
>> i just created DC11 entry in our production pentabarf, with a set of
>> days for it. No rooms or anything else, no logo. But any pentabarf admin
>> can now easily modify that conference entry (dont press "Delete" :) ).
>> You most probably want to put a logo there, change names of days, add
>>
Heyho,
i just created DC11 entry in our production pentabarf, with a set of
days for it. No rooms or anything else, no logo. But any pentabarf admin
can now easily modify that conference entry (dont press "Delete" :) ).
You most probably want to put a logo there, change names of days, add
rooms, m
On 12423 March 1977, Velimir Iveljic wrote:
> i've looked into this some more and as i understand it, the only
> problem here is that in order for them to get a visa (for 90 days) is
> they have to travel far away!
> When i say "only" i don't mean it's a small problem!
> We will make some kind of
Hi
lets see if you can fix this, at least for attendees of DC11:
The regulations for a visa for Taiwanese people is quite offending and
entirely not helpful for DebConf...
Let me cite their webpage:
--88---
A decision passed by the Counci
>> last night I wrote a small article on my blog about progress of
>> organization of dc11. It was suggested to me, that this article should
>> also be published on blog.dc.o, so if you agree with that, the article
>> can be found at http://bit.ly/gmYYQ9 .
> Also, please update the links on the b
Hey,
i just finished merging the blog and the reports svn into debconf-data
preserving their entire history.
They are there in their own subdirectories as
- the blog one really needs to be one dir, not many splitted into the
individual conf directories, for the service to work on our webhost
>> Pentabarf side we need
>> 1 someone to fixup the static html of http://penta.debconf.org
> Whoever does this, I've always thought the "Create Account" and "Log
> In" (or "Register") links should also be in a more prominent place,
> such as on the side bar.
Not hard to do.
>> 2 create the dc1
On 12409 March 1977, Richard Darst wrote:
> Do we want to use Pentabarf? (assuming yes since it's a bit late to
> change). If so, what needs to be done to it before we can start?
Pentabarf side we need
1 someone to fixup the static html of http://penta.debconf.org
2 create the dc11 entry in
On 12406 March 1977, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> But the most important part is that we decided that the next meeting in
> which we should get a decision which of the 2 bids is going to host
> DebConf 12 will be on
> 22nd March 2011, starting at 20:00 UTC
> in #debconf-team on
Hey world,
as you might know from past mails there had been a short meeting today
where last questions around DebConf12 bids could be dealt with.
The major goal to sort out questions the bid teams might have did not
need to be kicked as they simply do not have any open question
currently. Instead
>> > http://wiki.debconf.org -> OK!
>> > https://wiki.debconf.org -> DC7 ?
>> Not a bug, exactly as configured.
>> debconf7.debconf.org has same IP and its using ssl
> why is it configured like this?
Because thats how it came to life?
And actually has been since 2007.
> I agree with Valessio.
Th
> report bug:
> http://wiki.debconf.org -> OK!
> https://wiki.debconf.org -> DC7 ?
Not a bug, exactly as configured.
debconf7.debconf.org has same IP and its using ssl
--
bye, Joerg
joshk: okay. I've manned a Debian booth before. I need to give
you a quick training session.
"So,
Sorry, i need a test message once, please ignore.
--
bye, Joerg
"If you are using an Macintosh e-mail program that is not from Microsoft, we
recommend checking with that particular company. But most likely other e-mail
programs like Eudora are not designed to enable virus replication"
-- http
>> Since we from the local team for the DebConf11 are in the process of making a
>> rough estimate of the DC11 cost, so we can plan our budget more efficiently,
>> we would like to know if it will be possible for us to get access to the
>> debconf-team svn over at http://www.debconf.org/resources.
On 12195 March 1977, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> Last week, I wrote a script which generates an HTML page that lists all
> the packages that have a representative at this DebConf, and who they
> are. Then I got sick yesterday and didn't post it... Its a big file
> ~700KB of HTML.
> Here it
On 11802 March 1977, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I told you that I can not open an RT ticket and I wonder what
> the sense of a request tracker which can not effectively used
> might be ...
*EVERYONE* in the world can open rt tickets. Its as simple as sending
mail.
>> ... if we do not want to tap in
Hey,
I need an address to have our machines from TK delivered too.
Ideally they will be able to take a pallet of stuff a few days before
DebCamp starts and be able to have it a day or two after DebConf ends
until it gets picked up.
--
bye, Joerg
[Es geht um MySQL]
(14:35) grummel. als ob ein s
On 11739 March 1977, martin f. krafft wrote:
> The reason why we need this link is because the tuxbrain people
> insisted on having a referrer check as minimal measure to avoid
> being swamped with unauthorised requests.
Done.
It is shown to all people who have a login to pentabarf when they go
i
On 11731 March 1977, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Its not the first time you missed the deadline. More like the third, i
>> think. Why do you always miss it, its not like its something we dont
>> tell people.
> I fail to recall missing the deadline for sponsoring before.
Hrm. *Checking*.
Oh, well,
> Yestarday I went to IRC channel and asked for the deadline; I've been
> informated that it was 15th of April. I lose it and I'd like the know
> how is being decided by the team about exceptions on the deadline.
Its not the first time you missed the deadline. More like the third, i
think. Why do
> Last year we had a "Room Preference" box... Why Isn't it there anymore?
The room_preference was (and still is) dependent on reconfirmation. As
we did not yet start Reconfirmation phase it is not displayed yet.
--
bye, Joerg
Sesse: I doubt that many people will switch network
On 11728 March 1977, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> All those fields rated from 1 to 5 right? How about:
Yes.
> Contributor:
> 1 - Seldomly
> 2 - Regular
> 3 - Active
> 4 - Very Active / Orga team
> 5 - Extra point for people organizing events/Talks/BOFs at debconf.
> Members are supposed to
> Requ
> - on the left, below or above "permanent sponsors"
> - on the right, below the "regular sponsors" (below the lowest level, I'd say)
Look at the dc8 page and do it like that.
Ie lowest sponsor level and call it "Supports".
--
bye, Joerg
I'm James Troup, long term source of all evil in Debian.
On 11721 March 1977, Ana Guerrero wrote:
>> > process. Committee process people in penta using the voting system and then
>> > have a meeting to talk about the results. Last year, he had two meetings,
>> > and
>> > some people did not have enough time and look on the debian's involvement
>> > of
> That all sounds fine to me, but judging from the maximum times
> allotted on the agenda page (and assuming only 3 bids), that's more
> like a 4-5 hour meeting. Do we need to split this up or reduce the
> amount of information covered?
Maybe we need to cut down the time allowed for various topic
Hi
i think the doodle poll is now running for a long enough time, and today
I did not see any further action on it (until yesterday people changed
things).
The currently best date for it seems to be Sunday, 22nd February, 19:00 UTC.
While this is also not entirely perfect we simply won't have one
Hi
one point of todays DC10 meeting was "How to go on".
We decided that we have one further meeting during which the final
decision will be taken.
For that we obviously need a good time that fits all bids and a few of
us global orga people. Hence I created a doodle poll, so everyone
involved in a
>> Need a moderator (or two) for it, as its a spanish list (Well, spanish
>> localteam, so pretty much expected to be). And my spanish
>> is basically absent...
> I can moderate it.
Great. Passwords and stuff in seperate mail.
Should you want to change settings, feel free to do it (or to ask me).
Hi
just created debconf9-localt...@lists.debconf.org.
Need a moderator (or two) for it, as its a spanish list (Well, spanish
localteam, so pretty much expected to be). And my spanish
is basically absent...
http://lists.debconf.org/lurker/list/debconf9-localteam.html
--
bye, Joerg
> What would
On 11533 March 1977, Philipp Kern wrote:
> did the reimbursement already happen? Because I didn't receive anything
> yet...
No. If it is and the money goes out I send mail to the people, so they
can look.
Its all prepared and ready to go out, we are "only" waiting for the
money to get out of .a
On 11484 March 1977, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 12:28:05AM +0200, Amaya wrote:
>> Faidon Liambotis wrote:
>> > Oh and FWIW, I wasn't using DebConf's VoIP but my own, but this
>> > wouldn't make a difference, it was one big single network.
>> FWIIW, I could roam during l
On 11475 March 1977, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
>> If you are interested, please prepare a Location proposal following our
>> checklist[1] and send it either to me directly or to our team
>> mailinglist[2].
> I hereby propose New York City. Our proposal currently has a wiki page
> here, answering many
Hi
in case you (seriously) want to present a location for a future DebConf
and want to have a mailinglist or website available:
DebConf does provide the space / resources for it, if you want them. You
can have hostnames out of the debconf.net domain, either pointing at you
or also including hosti
On 11465 March 1977, A. Mennucc wrote:
>> Secure Connection Failed
>> debconf8.debconf.org uses an invalid security certificate.
>> The certificate is not trusted because the issuer certificate is unknown.
>> The certificate is not valid for any server names.
>> (Error code: sec_error_unknown_iss
>> Since DebConf is organized by a team, not only by Joerg, proposals should be
>> send
>> to the public mailing list. So we all can make questions/help to the people
>> who is willing to do the hard work of hosting us.
> I sure want keep it secret but forward stuff to the lists.
Yes, there is a
On 11464 March 1977, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> Since DebConf is organized by a team, not only by Joerg, proposals should be
> send
> to the public mailing list. So we all can make questions/help to the people
> who is willing to do the hard work of hosting us.
I sure want keep it secret but forward
On 11445 March 1977, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> So... What would you think about us printing Debconf attendance and
> participation certificates? It is quite an easy task to do (of course,
> I am volunteering to implement whatever is needed), and will make life
> easier/better for many people. Yes, myse
> yes, go ahead with the last ping. After that I'll need either to collect
> manually the papers submitted as attachments or, once more, ask for
> someone to automate the collection. After that I'll try to combine them
> together in a single LaTeX/PDF document.
We might be able to ease that, not
On 11443 March 1977, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> like last year(s) we got LinuxMagazine as Sponsor again (albeit a little
> late this year). Which means we should prepare a A4 page to be printed
> in the Magazines right after DebConf.
> The specs for that are:
> A4, 297mm * 210mm, plus
Hi
like last year(s) we got LinuxMagazine as Sponsor again (albeit a little
late this year). Which means we should prepare a A4 page to be printed
in the Magazines right after DebConf.
The specs for that are:
A4, 297mm * 210mm, plus 3mm additional bleed each side
hi-res PDF, downloadable somewh
On 11393 March 1977, Nicholas Zatkovich wrote:
> All of the pages on debconf.org that are on https have invalid
> security certificates, such as https://penta.debconf.org/. It says
> they have untrusted issuers.
No, they are all valid. You just need to have the new SPI cert for it,
you can get th
On 11384 March 1977, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> all access to DebConf machines has been disabled as of a few minutes
> ago. All passwords have been reset, all ssh keys deleted.
> Also, all apaches stopped until we replaced all the ssl certificates
> (today).
All of it is now recove
Hi
all access to DebConf machines has been disabled as of a few minutes
ago. All passwords have been reset, all ssh keys deleted.
There is (not yet) a way for people with an account to get their access
back, but it will be soon enabled again (using the mail gateway as
normal, but its currently tu
1 - 100 of 274 matches
Mail list logo
