woohooo! awesome news!
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Sudha Ponnaganti <
sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Yay :-) Congratulations everyone!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 11:42 AM
> To: cloudstack-
3.0.2 or 4.x+
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> Awesome :) I guess I can switch to the 3.0.x version...that seems to be the
> closest.
>
> Thanks, David!
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 2:47 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>
> > There is no such vers
you rock rohit!
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Ahmad Emneina wrote:
> > +1 I was actually wishing for this, this morning!
>
> Alright will push the change tomorrow, the fix is simple, we'll also
> change fixed/
+1 I was actually wishing for this, this morning!
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
> Would like to get the feel of what community thinks of having "profile"
> abilities in CloudMonkey.
>
> I have multiple CS instances at the moment and AFAIK I have to reconfigure
> CloudMo
i doubt this would work. each cloudstack injects the system template with
its keys. the keys are there for the management server to program said
system vm are you following me?
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
> Correct, there is no deep integration like agent, however
I'd update the building with maven section on cwiki. but I dont know how to
describe the impatient profile, beyond 'it pleases alex'.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> Oh and btw, I checked in a new profile called impatient. With it, I cut
> off a whole minute (about 25% for
If ebtables -F restores vm service(s)... it sounds like a bug.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Quick question, I deployed a basic zone today on 4.1 for testing, and
> I chose the default network provider WITHOUT security groups. The
> result was that all of the instance
doc site i'm referring to:
https://incubator.apache.org/cloudstack/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.0.0-incubating/html/Installation_Guide/index.html
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Ahmad Emneina wrote:
> i think it just needs some configuration tweak to make it work, then
> again
The api-server.log file is probably the best place to look.
one can also capture api calls from a web browser using firebug or
developer tools.
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I'm looking for a way to capture all API calls I make when I go through
> initial
+1.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Vijayendra Bhamidipati <
vijayendra.bhamidip...@citrix.com> wrote:
> +1
>
>
>
> On Mar 11, 2013, at 9:43 AM, "Chip Childers"
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to invite the CloudStack community to vote on whether
> > Apache CloudStack is ready to grad
Awesome work Prasanna! Kudos for the tremendous effort!!!
Ahmad
On Mar 10, 2013, at 8:48 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> Update:
>
> The setup is now reliably functional with xen and kvm hosts coming up
> successfully, mgmt servers spinning up fine, server health is also
> good with systemvms
We're in good hands, thanks Radhika!
Ahmad
On Mar 9, 2013, at 1:31 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath
wrote:
> Ahmad, I am in the process of documenting the API changes for IPv6 support
> plus additional info.
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne..
to the UI.
>
> Ahmad - any reasoning you can share around why you suggest having it in
> the UI?
>
> >
> > --Sheng
> > >
> > >>
> > >> API only, or both UI and APIs ? I am in the process of documenting
> this feature.
> > &
wow! what a resource.
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Nguyen Anh Tu wrote:
> Great, Sebastien!
>
> 2013/3/8 Alex Huang
>
> > Sebastien,
> >
> > Absolutely love it!
> >
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+University
> >
> > But why under Community? Why n
a devcloud kitchen sounds enticing. I'd love to see that for the system vm
as well. Where admins/dev's can pick and choose what
components/technologies to include in their final baked image.
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote:
> IMO, nice to hav
I can see that as a possible use case for zone-wide
> iSCSI Primary Storage.
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Ahmad Emneina wrote:
>
>> i've seen the request to expose luns to vm's which would more or less be
>> zone wide primary storage. as far as it being some
i've seen the request to expose luns to vm's which would more or less be
zone wide primary storage. as far as it being something people would do in
real life is another question.
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> Well, I'm trying to think if it would be beneficial for my
UI + docs on how to use the feature via api and its caveats (system
template X).
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Sheng Yang wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 01:50:20PM -0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Since we didn't plan to
+1 to fostering guruism.
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> With the discussion in the BVT thread and other evidence from the
> check-ins, I think there are some confusion on when to and what to write in
> a unit test.
>
> Unit tests are a philosophy thing and I usually stay aw
>
> For a developer to checkin:
>
> - S/he must writes marvin tests for their feature and add it to
> the BVT.
>
> - S/he must run the checkin tests to verify everything works.
>
+1 to the above suggestions. there has been a lot of breakage on master
recently, this should elimina
I think for minimal impact or change to the UI, can i suggest just
prompting that the server needs a restart once? Have some variable track if
the user has ack'ed the restart message, and subsequent changes to params,
wont trigger the same pop-up.
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Pranav Saxena wro
Kudos Sebs!
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Congratulations Sebastien
>
> Animesh
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> > Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 2:14 PM
> > To: cloudstack-d
Another long overdue well deserved addition. my compliments.
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Congrats Marcus! Welcome on board :)
>
>
> On 03/01/2013 06:27 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>
>> Hi folks
>>
>> The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudSt
wow, roll your own template sounds awesome. Rohit == awesomesauce
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Chiradeep Vittal <
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 3/1/13 4:03 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote:
> >
> >- Saw systemvms started from the template, saw patching happening,
> >logged in with cred
I would imagine it's best to leverage on the underlying hypervisors' HA
mechanisms, configured oud-of-band of cloudstack. I find cloudstacks
implementation a little laggy compared to the paid for variety. CloudStack
does a well enough job to figure out which host the vm eventually lands on.
On We
+1 long overdue.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012, at 11:58 PM, Sanjay Tripathi wrote:
> > Please let me know your comments/suggestions.
>
> +1 yes please!
>
> We have a demo instance of CloudStack that I use for presentations, and
> we have ancient
Congrats Noa
Ahmad
On Feb 27, 2013, at 8:45 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> well done
>
> On Feb 27, 2013, at 11:44 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi
> wrote:
>
>> Congratulations Noa
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, February
Congrats Sateesh!
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack has
> asked Sateesh Chodapuneedi to become a committer and we are pleased to
> announce that they have accepted.
>
>
>
> Being a committer enables easier
Wow, it's been a long time coming. Congrats Radhika!
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Hi folks:
>
> The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack
> has asked Radhika Puthiyetath to become a committer and we are plea
+1 I'm a fan of this feature.
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Hari Kannan wrote:
> Hello All,
>
>
>
> I wish to propose "Changing account ownership enhancement" in CloudStack -
> I have added some details here
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Change+account+membersh
You should modify the setting in your global params, search for allowed, sec or
storage. Put in the private address or range in there where you'll be
downloading from.
Ahmad
On Feb 25, 2013, at 6:06 AM, Peyman Navidy wrote:
> Hello Dear,
>
> We installed Cloudstack 3 in to my university (Shi
after deleting a network you still have to wait for it to be garbage
collected. to speed it up you might have to modify the following global
setting:
network.gc.interval
network.gc.wait
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 03:27:02AM +, Alex Henevel
that is the equivalent.
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> Yeah...vmops.log was right in the root of my source tree. Is that the
> equivalent file?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:19 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote:
>
> > cound you find vm
Awesome work Prasanna! Hopefully we can attribute qualities like stable,
testable, supportable to cloudstack in no time.
Ahmad
On Feb 22, 2013, at 6:47 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> The build pipeline for running marvin tests on physical hardware is
> now finally shaping up. The test-matrix
+1... couldnt refrain.
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Sonny Chhen wrote:
> +1
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> Thank You and Best Regards,
>
> Sonny H. Chhen
> www.SChhen.com
>
> On Feb 21, 2013, at 4:52 PM, "Alex Huang" wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I like to discuss nominating Animesh as a committer
Enough of this coder-mance. Bang out the reviews already!!! :p
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 03:37:43AM +0530, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2/14/13 1:43 AM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >Personally I'm okay with eith
The runbook was a super valuable effort. Id love to see it carried forward
in its new incarnation. +1
On Feb 13, 2013 7:55 PM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote:
> +1 Go for it
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 09:18:42AM -0500, David Nalley wrote:
> >> Hi
+1
Apache cloudstack sounds Excellent!
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> I agree with all the comments, from my side I think we're more mature
> now than we were more than half year ago.
>
> We've two releases so far, third one to happen next. We've our release
> timelines
Yay!!! congrats Likitha!
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Sanjay Tripathi <
sanjay.tripa...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Congrats Likitha.
>
> Regards,
> Sanjay
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Prachi Damle [mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 12:44 AM
> > To
one could divy the customer accounts into separate domains. That way down
the line, if you expect the customers to want dedicated hardware, all
you'll have to do is associate it with the domain/account.
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> Hi
Scrape the log for ' now listening on port 8080' or parse netstat output for
something similar? Possibly keep trying to access the API until a valid
response is given. Just throwing these out there, disregard if they are useless
to you.
Ahmad
On Feb 13, 2013, at 9:51 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wr
before getting back a Job ID, but CS
> must just give you back a Job ID and then fail later.
>
> Sounds good - thanks!
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Ahmad Emneina wrote:
>
>> create a huge service offering might be the easiest, quickest, most
>> reliab
create a huge service offering might be the easiest, quickest, most
reliable failure :)
I'm sure there are other creative ways.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm just getting started using the CloudStack API.
>
> I wan
ould have mentioned I have tried to make sure
> connectivity is still good. I'll try nulling out the mgmt_server_id in the
> host table and see if that works.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > On Feb 11, 2013, at 3:23 PM, Ahmad Emneina aemne...@gmail.com>>
> > wrot
from the management server, can you ssh to that host? can you execute xe
commands on that host? if yes to both those, null out the mgmt_server_id
from your host in the host table... then issue the force reconnect. see if
that helps.
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Caleb Call wrote:
> We have a
rming to see if I can write a
>> script to enable this functionality before 4.2 (and for customers who won't
>> upgrade to 4.2 right away when it comes out).
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Ahmad Emneina wrote:
>>
>>> got it. the iops are share
e VM
>> Instance, for example, running on the same SolidFire volume, I can't
>> guarantee any individual VM its IOPS (as its IOPS may be absorbed unequally
>> by the other VM(s) running on the same volume).
>>
>> Does that make sense? If you see some flaw in my lo
Welcome Will, we look forward to the contribution(s)!
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Will Stevens wrote:
> Hey Everyone,
> My name is Will Stevens and I am the lead developer at CloudOps (
> www.cloudops.com). At CloudOps we build and manage public and private
> clouds.
>
> We are working wi
Hey Mike,
The cleanest approach as a user would be:
I create multiple targets on the solid fire. Each with a different IOPs
setting (assuming you can control max iops for volumes this way). I'd mount
each to the hypervisor and create a specific service offering for each.
That way youre interceptin
I dont think one can call any ticket closed until its sub tasks are all
sorted. so +1 to that.
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 4:15 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> >> On Feb 5, 2013, at 6:10 P
+1 for write new apache code as per spec. since thats what will eventually
have to happen.
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> On Feb 5, 2013, at 8:46 PM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
> > wrote:
> >> I'd like Donal to
+1 cloud-init is the way to go IMO. It's also supported as long as the vm
can query its respective virtual router/dhcp server, since thats where
cloudstack places the user/meta data.
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 3:35 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> On 02/03/2013 12:44 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>
>> Hi
+1 on deprecation while bringing in the new. Does this avert the need for a
major version increment, or is this a big enough feature to warrant the big
five oh?
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 01:35:58AM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> > On Thu,
Awesome work Mice,
+1 to immutable vm's, and who last called me states.
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> Hi Mice,
>
> Sorry it took so long to review this. Wanted to as soon as I saw it on
> the list but was sick and didn't get a chance. In general, I think the
> code is
+1
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Frank Zhang wrote:
> +1
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: rohityada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com] On Behalf
> > Of Rohit Yadav
> > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 5:35 PM
> > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [M
Excellent news Koushik, congratulations!
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack
> has asked Koushik Das to become a committer and we are pleased to
> announce that they have accepted.
>
> Being a committer enabl
Can we not group the tests vs standardizing all test to work against
devcloud? that way one can run the devcloud test suite against devcloud and
not be bothered with failing advanced zone tests.
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> On the integration testing, my impressions
are you able to provision vm's, outside of cloudstack, using that
host/iscsi target?
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Yeah, I'm trying to use OpenXenManager, but am seeing mixed results.
> Sometimes it just crashes.
>
> It did
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13563196#comment-13563196
]
Ahmad Emneina commented on CLOUDSTACK-1068:
---
IMO the more info the be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13563186#comment-13563186
]
Ahmad Emneina commented on CLOUDSTACK-1068:
---
I'd like to see acco
I'd like to see account names, to which the router belongs to/services.
On 1/25/13 3:01 PM, "Sheng Yang (JIRA)" wrote:
>Sheng Yang created CLOUDSTACK-1068:
>--
>
> Summary: Names in VR list is useless
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-1068
>
On 1/23/13 3:55 PM, "kdam...@apache.org" wrote:
>I get it, so it was a generalized statement by the author.
>
>Thanks
>
>-kd
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
>>Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 3:44 PM
>>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>Subject:
On 1/10/13 5:35 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" wrote:
>I would like to merge my network-refactoring branch to master
>
>The main objective of this piece of refactoring was to:
>- reduce and eliminate unneeded dependencies on the orchestration piece
>- move queries to the network data into the api project
Woot woot! Good stuff Sebastian, congrats!
Ahmad
On Jan 3, 2013, at 9:57 AM, "Pranav Saxena" wrote:
> Congrats Sebastien !
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 11:23 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apa
Awesome news, congrats Joe!
Ahmad
On Jan 3, 2013, at 5:34 AM, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote:
> Well Done Joe,
>
> -sebastien
>
> On Jan 3, 2013, at 2:32 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
> wrote:
>
>> Congratulations Joe
>>
>> Animesh
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Noah Slater [mailto:nsl
Congrats Kelcey!
John Kinsella wrote:
(Apologies for sending this late, we were working on this over the Holidays and
the announcement didn't go out)
The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack
has asked Kelcey Damage to become a committer and we are pleased to
announce
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-717?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13540610#comment-13540610
]
Ahmad Emneina commented on CLOUDSTACK-717:
--
This is when asyncblock is
Ahmad Emneina created CLOUDSTACK-717:
Summary: cloudmonkey fails to parse/print response
Key: CLOUDSTACK-717
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-717
Project: CloudStack
of
>this map and a logical swap of the KVM and Xen labels. I have since
>submitted a patch to correct it [2], and Chip has merged it into master.
>Therefore, a repo must contain commit
>14f589702a3a4a473d661677b02f254f5dca9016 for the JSON specified above to
>function properly.
&g
Hey John,
Would it be painful to merge the networks, to one physical network? I believe
anthony thinks basic + multiple physical networks doesn’t/wont work. This might
also narrow down where the issue could be.
On 12/17/12 9:01 AM, "John Burwell"
mailto:jburw...@basho.com>> wrote:
Prasanna,
On 12/13/12 2:00 PM, "Joe Brockmeier" wrote:
>in on Apache mail at least once per day next week. I will be hard
>offline much of the following week, though - assuming I can resist the
>call of the keyboard.
Good luck, and enjoy!
--
Æ
On 12/6/12 10:03 AM, "John Burwell" wrote:
>Marcus,
>
>My question, more specifically, is are VLANs required to implement
>traffic labels? Also, can traffic labels be configured in Basic
>networking mode or do I need to switch my configuration to Advanced?
Hey John,
Traffic labels don¹t requir
On 12/2/12 9:37 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack
>has asked Chiradeep to become a member of the PPMC and we are pleased to
>announce that he has accepted.
>
>Please join me in congratulating Chiradeep!
>
>Regards,
>Chip
>on behalf o
On 11/26/12 11:49 AM, "David Nalley" wrote:
>The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack
>has asked Hugo to become a member of the PPMC and we are pleased to
>announce that he has accepted.
>
>Please join me in congratulating Hugo,
>
>--David
>on behalf of the CloudStack
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13500040#comment-13500040
]
Ahmad Emneina commented on CLOUDSTACK-498:
--
Isn't that what he di
Ahmad Emneina created CLOUDSTACK-507:
Summary: fix api docs for listSSHKeyPairs
Key: CLOUDSTACK-507
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-507
Project: CloudStack
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13499006#comment-13499006
]
Ahmad Emneina commented on CLOUDSTACK-505:
--
In attempt to redeem my
On 11/16/12 10:26 AM, "Ahmad Emneina (JIRA)" wrote:
>Ahmad Emneina created CLOUDSTACK-505:
>
>
> Summary: cloudstack logs the private key in plaintext
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-505
> URL: ht
Ahmad Emneina created CLOUDSTACK-505:
Summary: cloudstack logs the private key in plaintext
Key: CLOUDSTACK-505
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-505
Project: CloudStack
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ahmad Emneina closed CLOUDSTACK-497.
Resolution: Invalid
invalid, the private key needs to be captured upon creation and
$ rpm -qpR cloud-agent-libs-4.0.0-0.140.el6.4.0.x86_64.rpm
>cloud-core = 4.0.0
>cloud-deps = 4.0.0
>cloud-utils = 4.0.0
>commons-httpclient
>jakarta-commons-logging
>java >= 1.6.0
>jpackage-utils
>rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
>rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePr
On 11/15/12 6:01 PM, "Satoshi Kobayashi"
wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I have noticed that dependency is missing in RPM of KVM Agent.
>LibvirtComputingResource class and BridgeVifDriver class are dependent
>on LinuxBridge. They execute "brctl" command internally. However, the
>package (bridge-utils) in whic
Ahmad Emneina created CLOUDSTACK-497:
Summary: createSSHkeypairs doesnt save the private key to the db,
so list sshkeypair doesnt return a private key
Key: CLOUDSTACK-497
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira
I believe you have to submit patches and bug fixes. After some successful
commits, i believe you will be asked/elected to become a committer. Get to it,
and look forward to seeing you eventually become a cloudstack committer.
Ahmad
On Nov 10, 2012, at 11:11 PM, "Jianwei Li (c)" wrote:
> Hi th
This sounds incredibly valuable, and what you propose with devcloud sounds like
platinum.
Ahmad
On Nov 9, 2012, at 6:18 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote:
> Awesome! Keep us posted.
>
> From: Prasanna Santhanam [prasanna.santha...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, Nov
ey.damage
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net]
>Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 2:22 PM
>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Feedback on site redesign
>
>On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 01:50:26PM -
I'd like to see collapsable site map or just reduce the daunting list of
links on the side. Most of the stuff is redundant and lives on the wiki,
right?
Ideally narrowing the sections to the following would rock:
News/Blogs, Docs, Communique(forums,irc,joeb's email...), Wiki and
Downloads
Bonus p
On 10/31/12 3:04 PM, "Joe Brockmeier" wrote:
>Once the Website redesign is finished and cloudstack.org is pointed to
>the Apache site, I'd like to turn attention to the wiki and start
>cleaning it up and making sure things are easily found.
>
>Next Tuesday I'm going to spend most of the day worki
I welcome our new overlords! :p
On 10/31/12 11:10 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I was working on a CLI for cloudstack, it's based on Marvin (the
>neglected robot) and called cloudmonkey after our beloved mascot :D
>
>I've committed that on master, please review:
>https://git-wip-us.apache.org
I'd like to call peoples attention to
http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/nightly-smoke-kvm/1/console, what were
looking at here is the culmination of some seriously awesome work. In
brief, this is an automated setup that deploys the latest cloudstack (in a
vm) and provisions 'fresh' hypervisors runn
+1 this sounds immense and promising.
Ahmad
On Oct 30, 2012, at 5:37 PM, "Marcus Sorensen" wrote:
> Occasionally in the agent logs I see:
>
> sudo: unable to resolve host r-410-VM
>
> When virtual router commands are run. I decided to dig into it today,
> and added "127.0.0.1 r-410-VM" to the
On 10/30/12 1:58 PM, "Busy Dev" wrote:
>For 3.0 and pre-release 4.0, I have always had to create a "cloudbr0"
>bridge in CentOS6.3 in order for the host to be successfully added to the
>environment... Is this really necessary? The basic install guide does not
>mention this requirement at all and
+1
Used the binary bits for rhel6 on centOS 6.3
-xenserver HV
-NSF storage
Advanced zone
3 tier vpc with ACLs for inter VLAN communication.
Also tested VPN connectivity from my Mac running 10.6.8, into my guests
isolated network
Ahmad
On Oct 26, 2012, at 7:30 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
> On
+1
Cant wait to see more monkeys easing the provisioning in the cloud.
Ahmad
On Oct 26, 2012, at 7:59 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>> Howdy all,
>>
>> So - this is a discussion that we need to have, but I've been holding
>> off on star
On 10/23/12 8:41 PM, "amber-qian" wrote:
>Hi,
>I'm a student, I want to learn more about the open source cloud about
>the virtual machine schedule policy, I know Eucalyptus use round robin
>and greedy policy, OpenStack use randomized policy, but I searched the
>internet, can't find cloudstac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ahmad Emneina closed CLOUDSTACK-286.
this was observed on a Citrix CloudPlatform release and verified NOT to be an
issue with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ahmad Emneina resolved CLOUDSTACK-286.
--
Resolution: Invalid
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
this doesnt affect the
On 10/22/12 1:27 PM, "Ahmad Emneina" wrote:
>When you access cloudstack through the regular api endpoint
>:8080/client you will need to authenticate to execute commands. 8096
>is the unauthenticated admin port, which should be locked down on
>production installs.
>
>O
When you access cloudstack through the regular api endpoint
:8080/client you will need to authenticate to execute commands. 8096
is the unauthenticated admin port, which should be locked down on
production installs.
On 10/22/12 1:25 PM, "Musayev, Ilya" wrote:
>I c. . so the API Key and Signature
+1 I don¹t think it should be abandoned, but shouldn¹t hold up the release
either.
On 10/19/12 10:00 AM, "Will Chan" wrote:
>+1.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
>> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 9:55 AM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.a
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
