+1 I don¹t think it should be abandoned, but shouldn¹t hold up the release either.
On 10/19/12 10:00 AM, "Will Chan" <will.c...@citrix.com> wrote: >+1. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] >> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 9:55 AM >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: [VOTE][ASFCS40] Drop OVM from the supported HV list for 4.0.0- >> incubating release? >> >> Hi all, >> >> Following up on the OVM discussion thread [1], it appears that we don't >> have a full consensus yet. In order to move forward and make a >>decision as >> a community, I would like to formally call a vote on this issue. >> >> I'm proposing that we drop support of OVM for 4.0.0-incubating. I am >>NOT >> proposing that this drop is permanent. If someone were to decide that >>this >> is important enough to fix / update that code, then I would be in full >> support of that effort. >> >> IMO, we can't block a release just because of preference. So if you >>vote -1 >> for dropping support, I would like to know how you can help get OVM >>fixed >> (coding, testing, documenting) for the release. >> >> So, for the vote, please respond with one of the following: >> >> [ ] +1 : we should drop support of OVM from the 4.0.0-incubating >>release [ ] >> 0 : you don't have an opinion [ ] -1 : we should not drop support of >>OVM, >> and do the work required to get it ready prior to a 4.0.0-incubating >>release >> >> Thanks all! >> >> -chip >> >> >> [1] http://markmail.org/message/ey5zbnhdjik2m2em > -- Æ
