Re: First SF bay area cloudstack meetup!

2013-02-08 Thread Animesh Chaturvedi
Well as for audience I was thinking both dev and users. This being our first one when John and I discussed we wanted to keep it simple. For the subsequent meetups we can either do theme based or have separate tracks for dev and users. We still got just over a week to refine the talks so folks pl

Re: what's rule for using @Component and xml bean file

2013-02-08 Thread Kelven Yang
Apologize for such a long email first, if you are interested, please read on... Auto-scan globally is never a good idea and we are currently doing it just for the reason of getting existing code quickly converted. I'm currently profiling some details on how much time Spring has spent for scanning

RE: what's rule for using @Component and xml bean file

2013-02-08 Thread Darren Shepherd
Frank, This is probably not the answer you looking for, but I have to just throw in my two cents. When should you use @Component? Never. The cleanest way to use the Spring container is to *never* "import org.springframework". Only bootstrap and obviously spring specific code should import spri

Re: can't deploydb on 4.1 branch, why don't you face it?

2013-02-08 Thread Rohit Yadav
This occurs because db.properties is hard coded in Transaction and in the encryption checker, quick work around would be to follow Sinisa's hack (see the comment on the issue). But anyway we're passing absolute paths to DatabaseCreator so the fix would be to either make sure the db.properties file

Re: what's rule for using @Component and xml bean file

2013-02-08 Thread Rohit Yadav
So, the rule of thumb is that if you want to give the sysadmin an option to disable a component (like a plugin for example), you define that bean (name, class map) in a context xml file, else you use the @Component annotation on the class (generally an impl) so spring creates a singleton/bean and a

Re: [DISCUSS][INFRA] Setting up gerrit

2013-02-08 Thread Rohit Yadav
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 1:21 AM, David Nalley wrote: > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Alex Huang wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> I like to propose that we setup gerrit as the review mechanism. Here are my >> reasons >> >> - Committer status in Apache is a reflection of one's commitment to the >>

Re: First SF bay area cloudstack meetup!

2013-02-08 Thread Manan Shah
I believe a demo would be a good thing as well for the users who are not too familiar with CloudStack. Regards, Manan Shah On 2/8/13 7:33 PM, "John Kinsella" wrote: >Decent question. I think for the first event we picked a few topics that >we thought would be of general interest, but what we

[Propose] Propose following features for 4.1 release.....

2013-02-08 Thread Ram Ganesh
Hi, I would like to propose following features which are at various stages in the review board(hit review board by Jan 31st) for inclusion into 4.1 release. CLOUDSTACK-713 Limit Resources to domain/accounts - Achieved "Ship it" status but not sure if it is in master branch. CLOUDSTACK-705 IP Ad

Re: First SF bay area cloudstack meetup!

2013-02-08 Thread John Kinsella
Decent question. I think for the first event we picked a few topics that we thought would be of general interest, but what we really want to get out of the night is to see what the audience wants more of - then we can steer future meetings either towards more user-focused issues, more dev or hac

RE: First SF bay area cloudstack meetup!

2013-02-08 Thread Alex Huang
Actually, that's a really good point. It is user group so shouldn't we demonstrate devCloud and deployment tips. Troubleshooting tips. Etc? I didn't even think about that when we talked. --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] > Sent: Friday, Februar

Re: Console Access via API

2013-02-08 Thread Kelven Yang
Try this URL form http://xx.xx.xx.xx:8080/console?cmd=access&vm=xxx&signature=x Kelven On 2/8/13 6:49 AM, "Antonio Petrocelli" wrote: >Hello, > >Under CloudStack UI interface, the console link is: >http://xx.xx.xx.xx:8080/client/console?cmd=access&vm=x > >I'm trying to use signi

[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-1216) UUID is null for admin and failed to register user key with 4.1

2013-02-08 Thread Rayees Namathponnan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rayees Namathponnan closed CLOUDSTACK-1216. --- Min's comments below closing the defect UUID column is added later into C

Re: Building SystemVM template appliance

2013-02-08 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
On 2/7/13 7:27 PM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: >On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Chiradeep Vittal > wrote: >> I undid your fix :) to leave it modular. > >:) I made it thinking would be easier to hack only one postinstall.sh >script. Pl. also backport to 4.1 (CLOUDSTACK-1066's fix version is >4.1, thoug

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1066) Fix the scripts to generate systemvm template

2013-02-08 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13575030#comment-13575030 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1066: -

what's rule for using @Component and xml bean file

2013-02-08 Thread Frank Zhang
I see client/tomcatconf/componentContext.xml.in defining lots of beans while I also see many beans use @Component Is there any guideline here?

Re: First SF bay area cloudstack meetup!

2013-02-08 Thread Sheng Yang
No, what I meant is, who is our audience? Developers? Or users? I don't think users would be much interested in how to write a plugin. They would interested in how I can use it more. --Sheng On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Yes, please check the agenda, we plan to cov

RE: [DISCUSS] Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules

2013-02-08 Thread Prachi Damle
I have updated the FS with the addition of the DeploymentPlanningManager entity. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/FS+-+Affinity-Anti-affinity+groups -Prachi -Original Message- From: Prachi Damle Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 1:38 PM To: Alex Huang; cloudstack

RE: First SF bay area cloudstack meetup!

2013-02-08 Thread Animesh Chaturvedi
Yes, please check the agenda, we plan to cover writing plugins as one of the talks Animesh > -Original Message- > From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] > Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 4:52 PM > To: Abhijith Chandrashekar > Cc: John Kinsella; d...@incubator.apache.org>; > Subjec

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1181) mvn deploy db failing with NPE

2013-02-08 Thread Sinisa Denic (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13575015#comment-13575015 ] Sinisa Denic commented on CLOUDSTACK-1181: -- This hack resolved my issue: di

Re: First SF bay area cloudstack meetup!

2013-02-08 Thread Sheng Yang
Well, I think it's user group? Do we want to focus on the development - even demonstrating an plugin development? --Sheng On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Abhijith Chandrashekar wrote: > John, can this session be recorded? I will not be in the area on that date.. > > Thanks, > Abhijith > > -O

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1220) Ipv6 - Better error message when deploy Vm fails to get a free Ip address.

2013-02-08 Thread Anthony Xu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13575002#comment-13575002 ] Anthony Xu commented on CLOUDSTACK-1220: can you check if existing VM can acc

RE: can't deploydb on 4.1 branch, why don't you face it?

2013-02-08 Thread Frank Zhang
I don't know I just do mvn clean install -Doss I firstly thought it's an deprecated jar in my maven cache, but it convinced it's 4.1 JAR by name > -Original Message- > From: Edison Su > Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 4:35 PM > To: Frank Zhang; Vijayendra Bhamidipati; cloudstack- > d...

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-1220) Ipv6 - Better error message when deploy Vm fails to get a free Ip address.

2013-02-08 Thread Sangeetha Hariharan (JIRA)
Sangeetha Hariharan created CLOUDSTACK-1220: --- Summary: Ipv6 - Better error message when deploy Vm fails to get a free Ip address. Key: CLOUDSTACK-1220 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTAC

[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-1113) Ipv6 - Not able to deploy a new VM in this network because of "Unable to allocate Unique Ipv6 address"

2013-02-08 Thread Sangeetha Hariharan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sangeetha Hariharan closed CLOUDSTACK-1113. --- Tested with latest build from network refactor branch: Default value for ne

Re: [ACS41][QA]Blockers to run automation

2013-02-08 Thread Min Chen
UUID column is added later into CloudStack system, and we never set up not-null constraint on UUID since internally we still use internal DB id to identify resource. Thanks -min On 2/8/13 4:00 PM, "Rayees Namathponnan" wrote: >HI Min, > >Thanks for fixing the issue >https://issues.apache.org/ji

RE: can't deploydb on 4.1 branch, why don't you face it?

2013-02-08 Thread Edison Su
cloud-utils-4.1.0-SNAPSHOT-tests.jar? What's the jar used for? For test? > -Original Message- > From: Frank Zhang [mailto:frank.zh...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 4:29 PM > To: Vijayendra Bhamidipati; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: can't deploydb on 4.1

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1199) External DNS not being added to reslov.conf

2013-02-08 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574998#comment-13574998 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1199: -

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1218) Shared Network - After network restart with clean option , router is assigned a different Ipv6 address. Name resolution for the existing guest Vms in the network f

2013-02-08 Thread Sangeetha Hariharan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574995#comment-13574995 ] Sangeetha Hariharan commented on CLOUDSTACK-1218: - Network restart do

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1199) External DNS not being added to reslov.conf

2013-02-08 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574994#comment-13574994 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1199: -

RE: can't deploydb on 4.1 branch, why don't you face it?

2013-02-08 Thread Frank Zhang
Hmm, it's different issue. CS-1181 says NPE caused by db.properties not on classpath, this issue is a wrong db.properites file presenting in cloud-utils-4.1.0-SNAPSHOT-tests.jar. CS-1181 is no harm as you can ignore the NPE and continue deploying db. The issue I encountered totally stops deployin

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1218) Shared Network - After network restart with clean option , router is assigned a different Ipv6 address. Name resolution for the existing guest Vms in the network f

2013-02-08 Thread Anthony Xu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574990#comment-13574990 ] Anthony Xu commented on CLOUDSTACK-1218: does network restart stop all VMs on

RE: can't deploydb on 4.1 branch, why don't you face it?

2013-02-08 Thread Vijayendra Bhamidipati
Hi Frank, This issue is being tracked in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1181 . The workaround is to comment out the code in Transaction.java that checks whether the db.properties file contains a parameter for encryption. It needs to be fixed - everyone deploying a fresh db wi

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1181) mvn deploy db failing with NPE

2013-02-08 Thread Hugo Trippaers (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574983#comment-13574983 ] Hugo Trippaers commented on CLOUDSTACK-1181: I actually broke this by acc

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-1205) Ipv6 - Ubuntu 12.10 guest Vms looses default route (after it expiration time ~ 30 mts) when ipv6.autoconfig parameters are disabled except for net.ipv6.conf.lo.aut

2013-02-08 Thread Sangeetha Hariharan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sangeetha Hariharan reassigned CLOUDSTACK-1205: --- Assignee: Sheng Yang > Ipv6 - Ubuntu 12.10 guest Vms looses

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-1219) Ipv6 - Provide better error messages when deploying a Vm with Ip an address that is outside the network's ip range / if the ip address already is assigned to another

2013-02-08 Thread Sangeetha Hariharan (JIRA)
Sangeetha Hariharan created CLOUDSTACK-1219: --- Summary: Ipv6 - Provide better error messages when deploying a Vm with Ip an address that is outside the network's ip range / if the ip address already is assigned to another Vm.

RE: [ACS41][QA]Blockers to run automation

2013-02-08 Thread Rayees Namathponnan
HI Min, Thanks for fixing the issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1216 Why we are allowing UUID null ? is there any reason for this ? I removed the blocker from this defect mysql> desc user; +--+-+--+-+-+---

RE: First SF bay area cloudstack meetup!

2013-02-08 Thread Abhijith Chandrashekar
John, can this session be recorded? I will not be in the area on that date.. Thanks, Abhijith -Original Message- From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 2:59 PM To: ; Subject: First SF bay area cloudstack meetup! I don't plan on mentioning all o

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1218) Shared Network - After network restart with clean option , router is assigned a different Ipv6 address. Name resolution for the existing guest Vms in the network f

2013-02-08 Thread Sheng Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574963#comment-13574963 ] Sheng Yang commented on CLOUDSTACK-1218: The issue is the same as ipv4, we di

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-1216) UUID is null for admin and failed to register user key with 4.1

2013-02-08 Thread Rayees Namathponnan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rayees Namathponnan updated CLOUDSTACK-1216: Priority: Major (was: Blocker) > UUID is null for admin and faile

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1216) UUID is null for admin and failed to register user key with 4.1

2013-02-08 Thread Rayees Namathponnan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574959#comment-13574959 ] Rayees Namathponnan commented on CLOUDSTACK-1216: - HI Min, Thanks fo

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-1218) Shared Network - After network restart with clean option , router is assigned a different Ipv6 address. Name resolution for the existing guest Vms in the network fai

2013-02-08 Thread Sangeetha Hariharan (JIRA)
Sangeetha Hariharan created CLOUDSTACK-1218: --- Summary: Shared Network - After network restart with clean option , router is assigned a different Ipv6 address. Name resolution for the existing guest Vms in the network fails.

can't deploydb on 4.1 branch, why don't you face it?

2013-02-08 Thread Frank Zhang
'mvn -P developer -pl developer -Ddeploydb' greets me below error: [INFO] [INFO] --- exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:java (create-schema) @ cloud-developer --- > WARNING: Provided file does not exist: /home/frank/dev/incubator-cloudstack/utils/conf/db.properties.override [WARNING] java.lang.refle

[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-1141) Ipv6 - After network restart (and reboot router) , we do not see the existing vms dnsentries not being programmed in the router.

2013-02-08 Thread Sangeetha Hariharan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sangeetha Hariharan closed CLOUDSTACK-1141. --- Closing this issue as the original issue mentioned in the bug is fixed and

RE: [VOTE] Revert back to old mailing list mechanism, which would add "Reply-To: mailing list" to every mail it send out

2013-02-08 Thread kdamage
+0 (Binding) I liked the way things were and am also of the mindset that the system apache set up is good enough. This is really an argument on preference, and to me that’s an un-winnable debate. Imposing preference on an open community is awkward at best. This entire exercise has been to cast

First SF bay area cloudstack meetup!

2013-02-08 Thread John Kinsella
I don't plan on mentioning all of these here, but for the first time I thought I would… The first bay area CloudStack meet up is being hosted by Brocade in San Jose on the 20th of February, from 6pm-9pm. Brief agenda: 6:00 Registration, grab a beer and pizza 6:45 An Introduction to Apache Cloud

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-1107) Ipv6 - Unable to extend Ip range for a Ipv6 network using craeteVlanIpRange() command - Error code 530 returned.

2013-02-08 Thread Sheng Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sheng Yang resolved CLOUDSTACK-1107. Resolution: Fixed > Ipv6 - Unable to extend Ip range for a Ipv6 network using crae

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1107) Ipv6 - Unable to extend Ip range for a Ipv6 network using craeteVlanIpRange() command - Error code 530 returned.

2013-02-08 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574921#comment-13574921 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1107: -

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1107) Ipv6 - Unable to extend Ip range for a Ipv6 network using craeteVlanIpRange() command - Error code 530 returned.

2013-02-08 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574911#comment-13574911 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1107: -

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1107) Ipv6 - Unable to extend Ip range for a Ipv6 network using craeteVlanIpRange() command - Error code 530 returned.

2013-02-08 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574912#comment-13574912 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1107: -

Re: [VOTE] Revert back to old mailing list mechanism, which would add "Reply-To: mailing list" to every mail it send out

2013-02-08 Thread Sheng Yang
Hi Kelcey, +1 means you want to previous mailing list way, which would add "Reply-To" mail header to override the original author in the reply. That would forgo the ability to capture the original author in the reply-all. -1 means you want to maintain the "reply-all" and "cc: mailing list" style

RE: [VOTE] Revert back to old mailing list mechanism, which would add "Reply-To: mailing list" to every mail it send out

2013-02-08 Thread kdamage
Before I vote, I am still not sure I understand the full implications of this vote. Am I voting to add the "Reply-To: mailing list" to the current system, if I understand, forgoing the ability to capture the original author in the reply-all function? Or, Am I voting to maintain the "reply-all" a

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1181) mvn deploy db failing with NPE

2013-02-08 Thread Ryan Dietrich (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574885#comment-13574885 ] Ryan Dietrich commented on CLOUDSTACK-1181: --- I rolled back to commit d3ffce

Re: [ACS41][QA]Blockers to run automation

2013-02-08 Thread Min Chen
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1216 is resolved. Thanks -min On 2/8/13 1:59 PM, "Prachi Damle" wrote: >Updated the bug with details and assigned to Rohit to fix why the 4.1 >schema is not getting setup. > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1200 > >-Prachi > >--

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1216) UUID is null for admin and failed to register user key with 4.1

2013-02-08 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574882#comment-13574882 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1216: -

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-1216) UUID is null for admin and failed to register user key with 4.1

2013-02-08 Thread Min Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Min Chen resolved CLOUDSTACK-1216. -- Resolution: Fixed > UUID is null for admin and failed to register user key with 4.1 >

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1216) UUID is null for admin and failed to register user key with 4.1

2013-02-08 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574879#comment-13574879 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1216: -

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-774) Supporting kickstart in CloudStack baremetal

2013-02-08 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574876#comment-13574876 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-774: ---

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1216) UUID is null for admin and failed to register user key with 4.1

2013-02-08 Thread Rayees Namathponnan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574874#comment-13574874 ] Rayees Namathponnan commented on CLOUDSTACK-1216: - I am using rpm pac

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1181) mvn deploy db failing with NPE

2013-02-08 Thread Ryan Dietrich (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574864#comment-13574864 ] Ryan Dietrich commented on CLOUDSTACK-1181: --- Just throwing my 2 cents here,

RE: [ACS41][QA]Blockers to run automation

2013-02-08 Thread Prachi Damle
Updated the bug with details and assigned to Rohit to fix why the 4.1 schema is not getting setup. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1200 -Prachi -Original Message- From: Min Chen Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 1:20 PM To: Haroon Abdelrahman; Sudha Ponnaganti; cloudstac

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-1200) Unknown column 'vm_instance.disk_offering_id' in table vm_instance, db exception shown in MS log

2013-02-08 Thread Prachi Damle (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Prachi Damle reassigned CLOUDSTACK-1200: Assignee: Rohit Yadav (was: Prachi Damle) > Unknown column 'vm_instance.d

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1200) Unknown column 'vm_instance.disk_offering_id' in table vm_instance, db exception shown in MS log

2013-02-08 Thread Prachi Damle (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574860#comment-13574860 ] Prachi Damle commented on CLOUDSTACK-1200: -- The need of storing disk_offerin

Re: Master is out of licensing compliance (WAS: [jenk...@builds.apache.org: Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-rat-master #753])

2013-02-08 Thread Sebastien Goasguen
On Feb 8, 2013, at 10:45 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Feb 8, 2013, at 10:27 PM, David Nalley wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: >>> >>> On Feb 8, 2013, at 10:19 PM, David Nalley wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Sebastien Goasguen

Re: git commit: refs/heads/master - Add ASL to scripts as a temporary workaround for RAT breakage. This will get changed to MIT license later

2013-02-08 Thread Chip Childers
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 01:52:26PM -0800, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > > > On 2/8/13 1:08 PM, "David Nalley" wrote: > > >On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:05 PM, wrote: > >> Updated Branches: > >> refs/heads/master 82dc16e58 -> 606fa9df7 > >> > >> > >> Add ASL to scripts as a temporary workaround for R

RE: [MERGE] Security Group in Advanced zone

2013-02-08 Thread Anthony Xu
It doesn't explicitly say anything about writing unit test for existing java file modification when do merge. To make everyone feel fair, we should have a criteria we can stick to. Since you've been monitoring the merge/ check in, you may know better what criteria it should be, please start one.

Re: git commit: refs/heads/master - Add ASL to scripts as a temporary workaround for RAT breakage. This will get changed to MIT license later

2013-02-08 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
On 2/8/13 1:08 PM, "David Nalley" wrote: >On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:05 PM, wrote: >> Updated Branches: >> refs/heads/master 82dc16e58 -> 606fa9df7 >> >> >> Add ASL to scripts as a temporary workaround for RAT breakage. This >>will get changed to MIT license later >> > > >Wait - so is this co

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-1217) Need to refactor cloud-engine createVM flow to handle Storage and Network allocation separately.

2013-02-08 Thread Prachi Damle (JIRA)
Prachi Damle created CLOUDSTACK-1217: Summary: Need to refactor cloud-engine createVM flow to handle Storage and Network allocation separately. Key: CLOUDSTACK-1217 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/C

Re: Master is out of licensing compliance (WAS: [jenk...@builds.apache.org: Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-rat-master #753])

2013-02-08 Thread Chip Childers
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 01:06:31PM -0800, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > I added the ASL to the veewee stuff for the systemvm as a temporary > measure to pass RAT checks. OK - I'll clean it up over the weekend then. We don't want to leave it like that for long. Thanks Chiradeep. -chip

Re: Help for DevCloud?

2013-02-08 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
I hope you followed the link to https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/DevCloud Which is the newer way of doing it. On 2/8/13 1:10 PM, "Shishir Pardikar" wrote: >All, > >I have installed the DevCloud on my machine and am trying to play with it >to get my feet wet on Cloud Stack

Re: Master is out of licensing compliance (WAS: [jenk...@builds.apache.org: Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-rat-master #753])

2013-02-08 Thread Sebastien Goasguen
On Feb 8, 2013, at 10:27 PM, David Nalley wrote: > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: >> >> On Feb 8, 2013, at 10:19 PM, David Nalley wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: On Feb 8, 2013, at 9:58 PM, Chip Childers wr

Re: '[PROPOSAL]' Third party plugins

2013-02-08 Thread Chip Childers
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 01:31:36PM -0800, Brian Federle wrote: > The code is pretty much ready, I am just doing preliminary testing of it > before I merge down. I should have it complete and in master by beginning of > next week, including a basic tutorial on how to implement/install UI plugins.

Re: [MERGE] Security Group in Advanced zone

2013-02-08 Thread Chip Childers
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 01:27:46PM -0800, Anthony Xu wrote: > So we changed the criteria for merge, should we post a formal document for > the criteria? In case someone is not aware of that. I'm not sure if we have *any* formal document somewhere, but that's a good idea! Do you want to start one

Re: '[PROPOSAL]' Third party plugins

2013-02-08 Thread Brian Federle
The code is pretty much ready, I am just doing preliminary testing of it before I merge down. I should have it complete and in master by beginning of next week, including a basic tutorial on how to implement/install UI plugins. Thanks, Brian On Feb 8, 2013, at 1:21 PM, David Nalley wrote: > S

Re: Master is out of licensing compliance (WAS: [jenk...@builds.apache.org: Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-rat-master #753])

2013-02-08 Thread David Nalley
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Feb 8, 2013, at 10:19 PM, David Nalley wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: >>> >>> On Feb 8, 2013, at 9:58 PM, Chip Childers wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 03:52:25PM -0500, David Nalley

RE: [MERGE] Security Group in Advanced zone

2013-02-08 Thread Anthony Xu
So we changed the criteria for merge, should we post a formal document for the criteria? In case someone is not aware of that. Anthony > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 12:52 PM > To: Anthony Xu > Cc: 'David

Re: Master is out of licensing compliance (WAS: [jenk...@builds.apache.org: Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-rat-master #753])

2013-02-08 Thread Sebastien Goasguen
On Feb 8, 2013, at 10:19 PM, David Nalley wrote: > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: >> >> On Feb 8, 2013, at 9:58 PM, Chip Childers wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 03:52:25PM -0500, David Nalley wrote: On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Chip Childers w

Re: '[PROPOSAL]' Third party plugins

2013-02-08 Thread David Nalley
Sonny: et al: I see work going on in the ui-plugins feature branch that I assume is where this work is happening for this. What is the current status of this work? Thanks, --David On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Sonny Chhen wrote: > Hello All, > > I would like to discuss a new feature that is

Re: Master is out of licensing compliance (WAS: [jenk...@builds.apache.org: Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-rat-master #753])

2013-02-08 Thread Chip Childers
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 10:17:43PM +0100, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Feb 8, 2013, at 9:58 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 03:52:25PM -0500, David Nalley wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Chip Childers > >> wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Builds are cont

Re: [ACS41][QA]Blockers to run automation

2013-02-08 Thread Min Chen
I am looking at the bug, could not reproduce this by running locally from source code. Have updated the bug to ask for setup details. Rayees, please update the bug at your earliest convenience. Thanks -min On 2/8/13 11:39 AM, "Haroon Abdelrahman" wrote: >Min and Prachi, > >Could you pls check y

Re: Master is out of licensing compliance (WAS: [jenk...@builds.apache.org: Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-rat-master #753])

2013-02-08 Thread David Nalley
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Feb 8, 2013, at 9:58 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 03:52:25PM -0500, David Nalley wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Chip Childers >>> wrote: Hi all, Builds are continuing to fail rig

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1216) UUID is null for admin and failed to register user key with 4.1

2013-02-08 Thread Min Chen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574833#comment-13574833 ] Min Chen commented on CLOUDSTACK-1216: -- Please share the setup details. Also, pl

Re: Master is out of licensing compliance (WAS: [jenk...@builds.apache.org: Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-rat-master #753])

2013-02-08 Thread Sebastien Goasguen
On Feb 8, 2013, at 9:58 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 03:52:25PM -0500, David Nalley wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Chip Childers >> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Builds are continuing to fail right now... Due to the check-in of the >>> .po files. >>> >>> The of

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1066) Fix the scripts to generate systemvm template

2013-02-08 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574826#comment-13574826 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1066: -

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1066) Fix the scripts to generate systemvm template

2013-02-08 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574825#comment-13574825 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1066: -

Help for DevCloud?

2013-02-08 Thread Shishir Pardikar
All, I have installed the DevCloud on my machine and am trying to play with it to get my feet wet on Cloud Stack. I am able to login via the VM console or by ssh'ing, but I am not able to launch the management console via the browser. I have followed the instructions and read the posts here

Re: git commit: refs/heads/master - Add ASL to scripts as a temporary workaround for RAT breakage. This will get changed to MIT license later

2013-02-08 Thread David Nalley
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:05 PM, wrote: > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/master 82dc16e58 -> 606fa9df7 > > > Add ASL to scripts as a temporary workaround for RAT breakage. This will get > changed to MIT license later > Wait - so is this content MIT licensed or ASL licensed? Who owns it? We sh

Re: Master is out of licensing compliance (WAS: [jenk...@builds.apache.org: Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-rat-master #753])

2013-02-08 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
I added the ASL to the veewee stuff for the systemvm as a temporary measure to pass RAT checks. On 2/8/13 12:58 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 03:52:25PM -0500, David Nalley wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Chip Childers >> wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > Builds are c

Re: Master is out of licensing compliance (WAS: [jenk...@builds.apache.org: Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-rat-master #753])

2013-02-08 Thread Chip Childers
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 03:52:25PM -0500, David Nalley wrote: > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Chip Childers > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Builds are continuing to fail right now... Due to the check-in of the > > .po files. > > > > The offending issues can be seen in the Rat report here: > > htt

Re: Master is out of licensing compliance (WAS: [jenk...@builds.apache.org: Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-rat-master #753])

2013-02-08 Thread Chip Childers
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 12:51:13PM -0800, Anthony Xu wrote: > I checked in a build fix 5 minutes ago, I can build now. > > Anthony > It wasn't your commit that broke it... Sorry for grabbing the report that was tied to your commit, but it was the most recent one to hit my inbox. The build being

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1066) Fix the scripts to generate systemvm template

2013-02-08 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574812#comment-13574812 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1066: -

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1066) Fix the scripts to generate systemvm template

2013-02-08 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574810#comment-13574810 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1066: -

Re: Master is out of licensing compliance (WAS: [jenk...@builds.apache.org: Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-rat-master #753])

2013-02-08 Thread David Nalley
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi all, > > Builds are continuing to fail right now... Due to the check-in of the > .po files. > > The offending issues can be seen in the Rat report here: > https://builds.apache.org/job/cloudstack-rat-master/744/artifact/target/rat.txt > >

Re: [MERGE] Security Group in Advanced zone

2013-02-08 Thread Chip Childers
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 12:42:17PM -0800, Anthony Xu wrote: > CloudStack has plug-in framework to add different devices to > CloudStack, most of the code should be done in new java files. > But they need to add a new API to add the device to CloudStack, > this new API may cross several managers,

RE: Master is out of licensing compliance (WAS: [jenk...@builds.apache.org: Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-rat-master #753])

2013-02-08 Thread Anthony Xu
I checked in a build fix 5 minutes ago, I can build now. Anthony > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 12:48 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Master is out of licensing compliance (WAS: > [j

Master is out of licensing compliance (WAS: [jenk...@builds.apache.org: Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-rat-master #753])

2013-02-08 Thread Chip Childers
Hi all, Builds are continuing to fail right now... Due to the check-in of the .po files. The offending issues can be seen in the Rat report here: https://builds.apache.org/job/cloudstack-rat-master/744/artifact/target/rat.txt Do folks think that we should (1) correct them, or (2) exclude them f

RE: [MERGE] Security Group in Advanced zone

2013-02-08 Thread Anthony Xu
CloudStack has plug-in framework to add different devices to CloudStack, most of the code should be done in new java files. But they need to add a new API to add the device to CloudStack, this new API may cross several managers, if there is no unit test for those managers, requiring them to add

Re: [MERGE] Security Group in Advanced zone

2013-02-08 Thread Chip Childers
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 12:32:57PM -0800, Anthony Xu wrote: > My point is adding unit test for existing java file should be separate task, > it should not block developers to change java file. As I said before, we > should file a bug for each java file which doesn't have unit test, and > arrange

Re: [MERGE] Security Group in Advanced zone

2013-02-08 Thread David Nalley
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Anthony Xu wrote: > My point is adding unit test for existing java file should be separate task, > it should not block developers to change java file. As I said before, we > should file a bug for each java file which doesn't have unit test, and > arrange resource

RE: [MERGE] Security Group in Advanced zone

2013-02-08 Thread Anthony Xu
My point is adding unit test for existing java file should be separate task, it should not block developers to change java file. As I said before, we should file a bug for each java file which doesn't have unit test, and arrange resources to fix these bugs. Anthony > -Original Message

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-737) Security Groups Isolation in Advanced Zone

2013-02-08 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574797#comment-13574797 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-737: ---

  1   2   3   >