Well as for audience I was thinking both dev and users. This being our first
one when John and I discussed we wanted to keep it simple. For the subsequent
meetups we can either do theme based or have separate tracks for dev and users.
We still got just over a week to refine the talks so folks pl
Apologize for such a long email first, if you are interested, please read
on...
Auto-scan globally is never a good idea and we are currently doing it just
for the reason of getting existing code quickly converted. I'm currently
profiling some details on how much time Spring has spent for scanning
Frank,
This is probably not the answer you looking for, but I have to just
throw in my two cents. When should you use @Component? Never. The
cleanest way to use the Spring container is to *never* "import
org.springframework". Only bootstrap and obviously spring specific code
should import spri
This occurs because db.properties is hard coded in Transaction and in
the encryption checker, quick work around would be to follow Sinisa's
hack (see the comment on the issue).
But anyway we're passing absolute paths to DatabaseCreator so the fix
would be to either make sure the db.properties file
So, the rule of thumb is that if you want to give the sysadmin an
option to disable a component (like a plugin for example), you define
that bean (name, class map) in a context xml file, else you use the
@Component annotation on the class (generally an impl) so spring
creates a singleton/bean and a
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 1:21 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I like to propose that we setup gerrit as the review mechanism. Here are my
>> reasons
>>
>> - Committer status in Apache is a reflection of one's commitment to the
>>
I believe a demo would be a good thing as well for the users who are not
too familiar with CloudStack.
Regards,
Manan Shah
On 2/8/13 7:33 PM, "John Kinsella" wrote:
>Decent question. I think for the first event we picked a few topics that
>we thought would be of general interest, but what we
Hi,
I would like to propose following features which are at various stages in
the review board(hit review board by Jan 31st) for inclusion into 4.1
release.
CLOUDSTACK-713 Limit Resources to domain/accounts
- Achieved "Ship it" status but not sure if it is in master branch.
CLOUDSTACK-705 IP Ad
Decent question. I think for the first event we picked a few topics that we
thought would be of general interest, but what we really want to get out of the
night is to see what the audience wants more of - then we can steer future
meetings either towards more user-focused issues, more dev or hac
Actually, that's a really good point. It is user group so shouldn't we
demonstrate devCloud and deployment tips. Troubleshooting tips. Etc? I
didn't even think about that when we talked.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
> Sent: Friday, Februar
Try this URL form
http://xx.xx.xx.xx:8080/console?cmd=access&vm=xxx&signature=x
Kelven
On 2/8/13 6:49 AM, "Antonio Petrocelli" wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Under CloudStack UI interface, the console link is:
>http://xx.xx.xx.xx:8080/client/console?cmd=access&vm=x
>
>I'm trying to use signi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rayees Namathponnan closed CLOUDSTACK-1216.
---
Min's comments below closing the defect
UUID column is added later into C
On 2/7/13 7:27 PM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Chiradeep Vittal
> wrote:
>> I undid your fix :) to leave it modular.
>
>:) I made it thinking would be easier to hack only one postinstall.sh
>script. Pl. also backport to 4.1 (CLOUDSTACK-1066's fix version is
>4.1, thoug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13575030#comment-13575030
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1066:
-
I see client/tomcatconf/componentContext.xml.in defining lots of beans while I
also see many beans use @Component
Is there any guideline here?
No, what I meant is, who is our audience? Developers? Or users?
I don't think users would be much interested in how to write a plugin.
They would interested in how I can use it more.
--Sheng
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
wrote:
> Yes, please check the agenda, we plan to cov
I have updated the FS with the addition of the DeploymentPlanningManager
entity.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/FS+-+Affinity-Anti-affinity+groups
-Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Prachi Damle
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 1:38 PM
To: Alex Huang; cloudstack
Yes, please check the agenda, we plan to cover writing plugins as one of the
talks
Animesh
> -Original Message-
> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 4:52 PM
> To: Abhijith Chandrashekar
> Cc: John Kinsella; d...@incubator.apache.org>;
> Subjec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13575015#comment-13575015
]
Sinisa Denic commented on CLOUDSTACK-1181:
--
This hack resolved my issue:
di
Well, I think it's user group? Do we want to focus on the development
- even demonstrating an plugin development?
--Sheng
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Abhijith Chandrashekar
wrote:
> John, can this session be recorded? I will not be in the area on that date..
>
> Thanks,
> Abhijith
>
> -O
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13575002#comment-13575002
]
Anthony Xu commented on CLOUDSTACK-1220:
can you check if existing VM can acc
I don't know
I just do
mvn clean install -Doss
I firstly thought it's an deprecated jar in my maven cache, but it convinced
it's 4.1 JAR by name
> -Original Message-
> From: Edison Su
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 4:35 PM
> To: Frank Zhang; Vijayendra Bhamidipati; cloudstack-
> d...
Sangeetha Hariharan created CLOUDSTACK-1220:
---
Summary: Ipv6 - Better error message when deploy Vm fails to get a
free Ip address.
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1220
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTAC
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sangeetha Hariharan closed CLOUDSTACK-1113.
---
Tested with latest build from network refactor branch:
Default value for ne
UUID column is added later into CloudStack system, and we never set up
not-null constraint on UUID since internally we still use internal DB id
to identify resource.
Thanks
-min
On 2/8/13 4:00 PM, "Rayees Namathponnan"
wrote:
>HI Min,
>
>Thanks for fixing the issue
>https://issues.apache.org/ji
cloud-utils-4.1.0-SNAPSHOT-tests.jar? What's the jar used for? For test?
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Zhang [mailto:frank.zh...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 4:29 PM
> To: Vijayendra Bhamidipati; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: can't deploydb on 4.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574998#comment-13574998
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1199:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574995#comment-13574995
]
Sangeetha Hariharan commented on CLOUDSTACK-1218:
-
Network restart do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574994#comment-13574994
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1199:
-
Hmm, it's different issue.
CS-1181 says NPE caused by db.properties not on classpath, this issue is a
wrong db.properites file presenting in cloud-utils-4.1.0-SNAPSHOT-tests.jar.
CS-1181 is no harm as you can ignore the NPE and continue deploying db. The
issue I encountered totally stops deployin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574990#comment-13574990
]
Anthony Xu commented on CLOUDSTACK-1218:
does network restart stop all VMs on
Hi Frank,
This issue is being tracked in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1181 . The workaround is to
comment out the code in Transaction.java that checks whether the db.properties
file contains a parameter for encryption. It needs to be fixed - everyone
deploying a fresh db wi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574983#comment-13574983
]
Hugo Trippaers commented on CLOUDSTACK-1181:
I actually broke this by acc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sangeetha Hariharan reassigned CLOUDSTACK-1205:
---
Assignee: Sheng Yang
> Ipv6 - Ubuntu 12.10 guest Vms looses
Sangeetha Hariharan created CLOUDSTACK-1219:
---
Summary: Ipv6 - Provide better error messages when deploying a Vm
with Ip an address that is outside the network's ip range / if the ip address
already is assigned to another Vm.
HI Min,
Thanks for fixing the issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1216
Why we are allowing UUID null ? is there any reason for this ?
I removed the blocker from this defect
mysql> desc user;
+--+-+--+-+-+---
John, can this session be recorded? I will not be in the area on that date..
Thanks,
Abhijith
-Original Message-
From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 2:59 PM
To:
;
Subject: First SF bay area cloudstack meetup!
I don't plan on mentioning all o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574963#comment-13574963
]
Sheng Yang commented on CLOUDSTACK-1218:
The issue is the same as ipv4, we di
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rayees Namathponnan updated CLOUDSTACK-1216:
Priority: Major (was: Blocker)
> UUID is null for admin and faile
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574959#comment-13574959
]
Rayees Namathponnan commented on CLOUDSTACK-1216:
-
HI Min,
Thanks fo
Sangeetha Hariharan created CLOUDSTACK-1218:
---
Summary: Shared Network - After network restart with clean option
, router is assigned a different Ipv6 address. Name resolution for the existing
guest Vms in the network fails.
'mvn -P developer -pl developer -Ddeploydb' greets me below error:
[INFO]
[INFO] --- exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:java (create-schema) @ cloud-developer ---
> WARNING: Provided file does not exist:
/home/frank/dev/incubator-cloudstack/utils/conf/db.properties.override
[WARNING]
java.lang.refle
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sangeetha Hariharan closed CLOUDSTACK-1141.
---
Closing this issue as the original issue mentioned in the bug is fixed and
+0 (Binding)
I liked the way things were and am also of the mindset that the system apache
set up is good enough. This is really an argument on preference, and to me
that’s an un-winnable debate. Imposing preference on an open community is
awkward at best. This entire exercise has been to cast
I don't plan on mentioning all of these here, but for the first time I thought
I would…
The first bay area CloudStack meet up is being hosted by Brocade in San Jose on
the 20th of February, from 6pm-9pm.
Brief agenda:
6:00 Registration, grab a beer and pizza
6:45 An Introduction to Apache Cloud
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sheng Yang resolved CLOUDSTACK-1107.
Resolution: Fixed
> Ipv6 - Unable to extend Ip range for a Ipv6 network using crae
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574921#comment-13574921
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1107:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574911#comment-13574911
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1107:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574912#comment-13574912
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1107:
-
Hi Kelcey,
+1 means you want to previous mailing list way, which would add
"Reply-To" mail header to override the original author in the reply.
That would forgo the ability to capture the original author in the
reply-all.
-1 means you want to maintain the "reply-all" and "cc: mailing list"
style
Before I vote, I am still not sure I understand the full implications of
this vote.
Am I voting to add the "Reply-To: mailing list" to the current system, if I
understand, forgoing the ability to capture the original author in the
reply-all function?
Or,
Am I voting to maintain the "reply-all" a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574885#comment-13574885
]
Ryan Dietrich commented on CLOUDSTACK-1181:
---
I rolled back to commit d3ffce
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1216 is resolved.
Thanks
-min
On 2/8/13 1:59 PM, "Prachi Damle" wrote:
>Updated the bug with details and assigned to Rohit to fix why the 4.1
>schema is not getting setup.
>
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1200
>
>-Prachi
>
>--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574882#comment-13574882
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1216:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Min Chen resolved CLOUDSTACK-1216.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> UUID is null for admin and failed to register user key with 4.1
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574879#comment-13574879
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1216:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574876#comment-13574876
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-774:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574874#comment-13574874
]
Rayees Namathponnan commented on CLOUDSTACK-1216:
-
I am using rpm pac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574864#comment-13574864
]
Ryan Dietrich commented on CLOUDSTACK-1181:
---
Just throwing my 2 cents here,
Updated the bug with details and assigned to Rohit to fix why the 4.1 schema is
not getting setup.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1200
-Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Min Chen
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 1:20 PM
To: Haroon Abdelrahman; Sudha Ponnaganti; cloudstac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prachi Damle reassigned CLOUDSTACK-1200:
Assignee: Rohit Yadav (was: Prachi Damle)
> Unknown column 'vm_instance.d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574860#comment-13574860
]
Prachi Damle commented on CLOUDSTACK-1200:
--
The need of storing disk_offerin
On Feb 8, 2013, at 10:45 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> On Feb 8, 2013, at 10:27 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>>>
>>> On Feb 8, 2013, at 10:19 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Sebastien Goasguen
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 01:52:26PM -0800, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
>
>
> On 2/8/13 1:08 PM, "David Nalley" wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:05 PM, wrote:
> >> Updated Branches:
> >> refs/heads/master 82dc16e58 -> 606fa9df7
> >>
> >>
> >> Add ASL to scripts as a temporary workaround for R
It doesn't explicitly say anything about writing unit test for existing java
file modification when do merge. To make everyone feel fair, we should have a
criteria we can stick to. Since you've been monitoring the merge/ check in, you
may know better what criteria it should be, please start one.
On 2/8/13 1:08 PM, "David Nalley" wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:05 PM, wrote:
>> Updated Branches:
>> refs/heads/master 82dc16e58 -> 606fa9df7
>>
>>
>> Add ASL to scripts as a temporary workaround for RAT breakage. This
>>will get changed to MIT license later
>>
>
>
>Wait - so is this co
Prachi Damle created CLOUDSTACK-1217:
Summary: Need to refactor cloud-engine createVM flow to handle
Storage and Network allocation separately.
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1217
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/C
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 01:06:31PM -0800, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
> I added the ASL to the veewee stuff for the systemvm as a temporary
> measure to pass RAT checks.
OK - I'll clean it up over the weekend then. We don't want to leave it
like that for long.
Thanks Chiradeep.
-chip
I hope you followed the link to
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/DevCloud
Which is the newer way of doing it.
On 2/8/13 1:10 PM, "Shishir Pardikar" wrote:
>All,
>
>I have installed the DevCloud on my machine and am trying to play with it
>to get my feet wet on Cloud Stack
On Feb 8, 2013, at 10:27 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 8, 2013, at 10:19 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
On Feb 8, 2013, at 9:58 PM, Chip Childers
wr
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 01:31:36PM -0800, Brian Federle wrote:
> The code is pretty much ready, I am just doing preliminary testing of it
> before I merge down. I should have it complete and in master by beginning of
> next week, including a basic tutorial on how to implement/install UI plugins.
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 01:27:46PM -0800, Anthony Xu wrote:
> So we changed the criteria for merge, should we post a formal document for
> the criteria? In case someone is not aware of that.
I'm not sure if we have *any* formal document somewhere, but that's a
good idea! Do you want to start one
The code is pretty much ready, I am just doing preliminary testing of it before
I merge down. I should have it complete and in master by beginning of next
week, including a basic tutorial on how to implement/install UI plugins.
Thanks,
Brian
On Feb 8, 2013, at 1:21 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> S
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> On Feb 8, 2013, at 10:19 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>>>
>>> On Feb 8, 2013, at 9:58 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 03:52:25PM -0500, David Nalley
So we changed the criteria for merge, should we post a formal document for the
criteria? In case someone is not aware of that.
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 12:52 PM
> To: Anthony Xu
> Cc: 'David
On Feb 8, 2013, at 10:19 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 8, 2013, at 9:58 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 03:52:25PM -0500, David Nalley wrote:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Chip Childers
w
Sonny: et al:
I see work going on in the ui-plugins feature branch that I assume is
where this work is happening for this. What is the current status of
this work?
Thanks,
--David
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Sonny Chhen wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I would like to discuss a new feature that is
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 10:17:43PM +0100, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> On Feb 8, 2013, at 9:58 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 03:52:25PM -0500, David Nalley wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Chip Childers
> >> wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Builds are cont
I am looking at the bug, could not reproduce this by running locally from
source code. Have updated the bug to ask for setup details. Rayees, please
update the bug at your earliest convenience.
Thanks
-min
On 2/8/13 11:39 AM, "Haroon Abdelrahman"
wrote:
>Min and Prachi,
>
>Could you pls check y
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> On Feb 8, 2013, at 9:58 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 03:52:25PM -0500, David Nalley wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Chip Childers
>>> wrote:
Hi all,
Builds are continuing to fail rig
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574833#comment-13574833
]
Min Chen commented on CLOUDSTACK-1216:
--
Please share the setup details. Also, pl
On Feb 8, 2013, at 9:58 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 03:52:25PM -0500, David Nalley wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Chip Childers
>> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Builds are continuing to fail right now... Due to the check-in of the
>>> .po files.
>>>
>>> The of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574826#comment-13574826
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1066:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574825#comment-13574825
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1066:
-
All,
I have installed the DevCloud on my machine and am trying to play with it to
get my feet wet on Cloud Stack. I am able to login via the VM console or by
ssh'ing, but I am not able to launch the management console via the browser. I
have followed the instructions and read the posts
here
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:05 PM, wrote:
> Updated Branches:
> refs/heads/master 82dc16e58 -> 606fa9df7
>
>
> Add ASL to scripts as a temporary workaround for RAT breakage. This will get
> changed to MIT license later
>
Wait - so is this content MIT licensed or ASL licensed? Who owns it?
We sh
I added the ASL to the veewee stuff for the systemvm as a temporary
measure to pass RAT checks.
On 2/8/13 12:58 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 03:52:25PM -0500, David Nalley wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Chip Childers
>> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Builds are c
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 03:52:25PM -0500, David Nalley wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Builds are continuing to fail right now... Due to the check-in of the
> > .po files.
> >
> > The offending issues can be seen in the Rat report here:
> > htt
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 12:51:13PM -0800, Anthony Xu wrote:
> I checked in a build fix 5 minutes ago, I can build now.
>
> Anthony
>
It wasn't your commit that broke it... Sorry for grabbing the report
that was tied to your commit, but it was the most recent one to hit my
inbox.
The build being
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574812#comment-13574812
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1066:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574810#comment-13574810
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1066:
-
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Builds are continuing to fail right now... Due to the check-in of the
> .po files.
>
> The offending issues can be seen in the Rat report here:
> https://builds.apache.org/job/cloudstack-rat-master/744/artifact/target/rat.txt
>
>
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 12:42:17PM -0800, Anthony Xu wrote:
> CloudStack has plug-in framework to add different devices to
> CloudStack, most of the code should be done in new java files.
> But they need to add a new API to add the device to CloudStack,
> this new API may cross several managers,
I checked in a build fix 5 minutes ago, I can build now.
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 12:48 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Master is out of licensing compliance (WAS:
> [j
Hi all,
Builds are continuing to fail right now... Due to the check-in of the
.po files.
The offending issues can be seen in the Rat report here:
https://builds.apache.org/job/cloudstack-rat-master/744/artifact/target/rat.txt
Do folks think that we should (1) correct them, or (2) exclude them f
CloudStack has plug-in framework to add different devices to CloudStack, most
of the code should be done in new java files. But they need to add a new API to
add the device to CloudStack, this new API may cross several managers, if there
is no unit test for those managers, requiring them to add
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 12:32:57PM -0800, Anthony Xu wrote:
> My point is adding unit test for existing java file should be separate task,
> it should not block developers to change java file. As I said before, we
> should file a bug for each java file which doesn't have unit test, and
> arrange
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Anthony Xu wrote:
> My point is adding unit test for existing java file should be separate task,
> it should not block developers to change java file. As I said before, we
> should file a bug for each java file which doesn't have unit test, and
> arrange resource
My point is adding unit test for existing java file should be separate task, it
should not block developers to change java file. As I said before, we should
file a bug for each java file which doesn't have unit test, and arrange
resources to fix these bugs.
Anthony
> -Original Message
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574797#comment-13574797
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-737:
---
1 - 100 of 244 matches
Mail list logo