Hi Kelcey, +1 means you want to previous mailing list way, which would add "Reply-To" mail header to override the original author in the reply. That would forgo the ability to capture the original author in the reply-all.
-1 means you want to maintain the "reply-all" and "cc: mailing list" style currently we're using. Sorry it's not clarified enough... --Sheng On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 2:34 PM, <kdam...@apache.org> wrote: > Before I vote, I am still not sure I understand the full implications of > this vote. > > Am I voting to add the "Reply-To: mailing list" to the current system, if I > understand, forgoing the ability to capture the original author in the > reply-all function? > > Or, > > Am I voting to maintain the "reply-all" and "cc: mailing list"? > > I am slightly confused by the conversation up to this point. What does a +1 > vote equal? > > Thanks > > -Kelcey Damage > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] >>Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 11:36 AM >>To: Sheng Yang >>Cc: Alex Huang; Brett Porter; Animesh Chaturvedi; David Nalley; Edison Su; >>sebastien goasguen; Daniel Kulp; htrippa...@schubergphilis.com; Marcus >>Sorensen; somikbeh...@vmware.com; Frank Zhang; w...@widodh.nl; >>cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >>Subject: Re: [VOTE] Revert back to old mailing list mechanism, which would >>add "Reply-To: mailing list" to every mail it send out >> >>On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 10:52:54AM -0800, Sheng Yang wrote: >>> Yes. Probably another 48 hours? >> >>OK, thanks. >
