+0 (Binding) I liked the way things were and am also of the mindset that the system apache set up is good enough. This is really an argument on preference, and to me that’s an un-winnable debate. Imposing preference on an open community is awkward at best. This entire exercise has been to cast an arbitrary policy on the community as no one can successfully argue that any method truly is superior.
I am also finding this whole situation is generating more noise then it's solving. I am comfortable adapting to which-ever method is finalized, but for such a policy it would be too challenging for proper consensus to be met, and for half the community to not feel unhappy with the decision. Perhaps we should invoke a higher power (PPMC) to make the decision considering it's arbitrary nature. At least then the voting pool would be significantly smaller. Either way, I think we should wrap this whole thing up and move on. Thanks -Kelcey Damage >-----Original Message----- >From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] >Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 2:40 PM >To: kdam...@apache.org >Cc: Chip Childers; Alex Huang; Brett Porter; Animesh Chaturvedi; David Nalley; >Edison Su; sebastien goasguen; Daniel Kulp; htrippa...@schubergphilis.com; >Marcus Sorensen; somikbeh...@vmware.com; Frank Zhang; >w...@widodh.nl; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: [VOTE] Revert back to old mailing list mechanism, which would >add "Reply-To: mailing list" to every mail it send out > >Hi Kelcey, > >+1 means you want to previous mailing list way, which would add >"Reply-To" mail header to override the original author in the reply. >That would forgo the ability to capture the original author in the reply-all. > >-1 means you want to maintain the "reply-all" and "cc: mailing list" >style currently we're using. > >Sorry it's not clarified enough... > >--Sheng > >On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 2:34 PM, <kdam...@apache.org> wrote: >> Before I vote, I am still not sure I understand the full implications >> of this vote. >> >> Am I voting to add the "Reply-To: mailing list" to the current system, >> if I understand, forgoing the ability to capture the original author >> in the reply-all function? >> >> Or, >> >> Am I voting to maintain the "reply-all" and "cc: mailing list"? >> >> I am slightly confused by the conversation up to this point. What does >> a +1 vote equal? >> >> Thanks >> >> -Kelcey Damage >> >> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] >>>Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 11:36 AM >>>To: Sheng Yang >>>Cc: Alex Huang; Brett Porter; Animesh Chaturvedi; David Nalley; Edison >>>Su; sebastien goasguen; Daniel Kulp; htrippa...@schubergphilis.com; >>>Marcus Sorensen; somikbeh...@vmware.com; Frank Zhang; >w...@widodh.nl; >>>cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >>>Subject: Re: [VOTE] Revert back to old mailing list mechanism, which >>>would add "Reply-To: mailing list" to every mail it send out >>> >>>On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 10:52:54AM -0800, Sheng Yang wrote: >>>> Yes. Probably another 48 hours? >>> >>>OK, thanks. >>
