Review Request: Fix for CS-15268, getting different IP for the VR in case of external router.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6674/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Alena Prokharchyk. Descrip

Re: New wiki: Please add redirects when migrating content

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:02:54AM -0400, David Nalley wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:46 AM, prasanna > wrote: > > On 14 August 2012 02:31, Jessica Tomechak > > wrote: > >> Hello all, > >> I've noticed several people are starting to populate the new wiki which > >> David N set up at > >> ht

Re: Spawning VMs in bridged mode on KVM ( Cloudstack 3.0.2)

After following the documentation here: http://wiki.cloudstack.org/display/~kdamage/CloudStack+3+and+advanced+networking http://confluence.cloudstack.org/display/~kdamage/Anatomy+of+Basic+Virtual+Networking It seems that i would need to create the cloudVirBr bridge and associate that with a physic

Re: Release plan update

On 17/08/2012, at 1:31 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Brett Porter [mailto:br...@porterclan.net] On Behalf Of Brett Porter >> Sent: 16 August 2012 20:26 >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Release plan update >> >> On 17/08/2012, at 12:40 PM

Re: Spawning VMs in bridged mode on KVM ( Cloudstack 3.0.2)

Hello Kelcey, I think i have identified the issue. It seems that Cloudstack is associating the VM's interface with a non-existent bridge cloudVirBr0 instead of the cloudbr0 which it creates. I figured it from the virsh dump xml : I grep'ped to

Build jobs updated

I've updated the build-cloudstack-4.0 and build-cloudstack-master jobs. They now run all the packaging to get stuff into zip files, and they build docs, testclient, Marvin, and agent-simulator too. http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/build-cloudstack-4.0/ Cheers, Ewan.

RE: Release plan update

> -Original Message- > From: Brett Porter [mailto:br...@porterclan.net] On Behalf Of Brett Porter > Sent: 16 August 2012 20:26 > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Release plan update > > On 17/08/2012, at 12:40 PM, Ewan Mellor > wrote: > > > Stability and bugfix work

Re: Release plan update

On 17/08/2012, at 12:40 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote: > Stability and bugfix work: Now - Friday 31 August. > First release candidate build: Friday 31 August. This is just my $A0.02 as someone that cares a lot about release automation... take it for what it is worth, since I'm not doing the work :) Gi

Release plan update

Hi all, We're scheduled to make our first release candidate build at the end of this week. Our primary criterion for this was that we would have resolved all of our licensing and policy issues, so that we can put together a build that meets Apache policy. To that I would like to add these oth

RE: [DISCUSS] Please choose: The build system to use for 4.0

+1 Ant A quick question here, now I cannot find any ant targets for rpm/deb creation, people have to use waf for this task. (please correct me if I'm wrong) I wonder if this is in the scope of build process, if not, is there any document available? Regards Mice -Original Message- From:

Re: Javadocs

That's honestly how javadoc just is. It takes a lot of diligence to maintain a clean javadoc run. As long as javadoc doesn't fail the output is always useful. Darren Sent from my iPhone On Aug 16, 2012, at 6:00 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Ewan Mello

RE: Javadocs

> -Original Message- > From: Ewan Mellor [mailto:ewan.mel...@eu.citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 5:29 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Javadocs > > Is anyone expecting ant build-docs to work? For me, it completes > successfully, but only after printin

Javadocs

Is anyone expecting ant build-docs to work? For me, it completes successfully, but only after printing dozens of exceptions and hundreds of warnings. I find it hard to believe that the output is useful. We should fix it, or delete it. Ewan.

Re: Review Request: Fix build-usage target.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6667/ --- (Updated Aug. 17, 2012, 12:23 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Description

Review Request: Fix build-usage target.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6667/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Description --- The usage/scripts directory

RE: [DISCUSS] Please choose: The build system to use for 4.0

+1. I don't see why we should wait on this. There's people willing to do the work. Let's just get it done. Build systems doesn't affect the quality of the code so it can be checked in at the end of the 4.0 release. --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Ewan Mellor [mailto:ewan.mel...@

RE: Unit tests

> -Original Message- > From: Alex Huang > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 4:48 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: Unit tests > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com] > > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 4:

[ASFCS40] Merges today

Today's batch of fixes have been merged. Mice's fix has also been submitted. The latest commit is 63f47e4ae2b046397abc9c55867fc817643c2b0c. There's a total of 31 checkins, a little more than the last two days combined. I gave a free pass to the following types of fixes: - license fixes - doc/

RE: Unit tests

> -Original Message- > From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 4:27 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: Unit tests > > +1 > It would be good if patch reviewers can ask for unit tests for defect / > feature > su

RE: Unit tests

+1 It would be good if patch reviewers can ask for unit tests for defect / feature submissions during review process -Original Message- From: Ewan Mellor [mailto:ewan.mel...@eu.citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 4:15 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: Unit t

Re: Review Request: cloud.spec change permissions on /etc/cloud/management

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r//#review10446 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On Aug. 16, 2012, 11:06 p.m., Marcu

RE: Unit tests

Thanks Chiradeep! We now have completely passing unit-tests on master for the first time! We should keep it this way. I will enable email notifications on that Jenkins job so that we will know when they break. I suggest though, that we make it a criterion for any patch being submitted for re

Review Request: cloud.spec change permissions on /etc/cloud/management

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r// --- Review request for cloudstack. Description --- fixes permissions in RPM spe

Re: Review Request: Update RPM build for 4.0

> On Aug. 16, 2012, 8:14 p.m., edison su wrote: > > cloud.spec, line 535 > > > > > > I think we need config(noreplace) for this configuration files: > > db.properties/log4j-cloud.xml/tomcat6.conf. Admin usually will ch

RE: [DISCUSS] Please choose: The build system to use for 4.0

I don't think my opinion has changed since my email on the topic last week. It comes down to who is willing to put the time in. None of these systems is going to work if we don't have people to work on them properly. So far, we've had Darren and Hugo both volunteering to work on Maven. That

Re: [WEBSITE][DOCS] Publican-based docs publishing?

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 5:45 PM, David Nalley wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 03:46:12PM -0400, David Nalley wrote: >>> What do folks think of presenting our 'official documentation' in this >>> manner? Is it something worth pursuing? I w

Re: Review Request: Update RPM build for 4.0

> On Aug. 16, 2012, 8:14 p.m., edison su wrote: > > cloud.spec, line 535 > > > > > > I think we need config(noreplace) for this configuration files: > > db.properties/log4j-cloud.xml/tomcat6.conf. Admin usually will ch

Re: Review Request: Update RPM build for 4.0

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6658/ --- (Updated Aug. 16, 2012, 10:04 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Changes ---

Re: Review Request: Update RPM build for 4.0

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6658/#review10434 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On Aug. 16, 2012, 7:26 p.m., Marcus

Re: [ASFCS40] IRC Meeting for Release Tasks?

On 08/16/2012 11:41 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 02:33:25PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: ++1. Plus, it should not become the default method for doing development. If the dev list becomes simply a log of irc discussions, then this needs to be shut down at once. I can under

Re: Review Request: Cleaning up files with tabs instead of spaces, removed release notes for CloudPlatform release

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6656/#review10433 --- Ship it! Seems fine with me, just applied it! - Wido den Hollander

Re: [JENKINS] Thoughts on purging some binaries and some jobs

On 08/16/2012 10:01 PM, David Nalley wrote: Hi folks, Jenkins has begun complaining about available disk space, so I figured I'd start looking. See below how the various jobs are consuming space. Some of these jobs are keeping as many as 20 copies of built binaries, and many of these jobs are

Re: [WEBSITE][DOCS] Publican-based docs publishing?

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 03:46:12PM -0400, David Nalley wrote: >> What do folks think of presenting our 'official documentation' in this >> manner? Is it something worth pursuing? I was thinking having this be >> a docs/ subdirectory on the p

Re: CloudStack Events Plans

So doesn't sound like there are any real objections to the proposal, so no reason not to move forward. At some point we probably need to create a new wiki page listing events and who the event owner and listing who is attending. I personally am thinking something like the tables in this page[1].

Re: [ASFCS40] IRC Meeting for Release Tasks?

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 02:33:25PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > ++1. Plus, it should not become the default method for doing development. > If the dev list becomes simply a log of irc discussions, then this > needs to be shut down at once. I can understand that decision-making on IRC would be a c

Re: [WEBSITE][DOCS] Publican-based docs publishing?

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 03:46:12PM -0400, David Nalley wrote: > What do folks think of presenting our 'official documentation' in this > manner? Is it something worth pursuing? I was thinking having this be > a docs/ subdirectory on the project site (e.g. > incubator.apache.org/cloudstack/docs, is

Re: [DISCUSS] Please choose: The build system to use for 4.0

I would prefer to stick to ant for 4.0, particularly because switching now could be a barrier to some devs in their progress toward bugfixing 4.0, if they have to take some time to get their build environment working again... unless it's the very last thing you do. On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:26 PM,

Re: [DOCS] links within a document.

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 03:37:33PM -0400, sebgoa wrote: > David, IMHO we need to decide on what guides we want to have for > 4.0(I have not seen such discussion), it will be a subset of all > the documentation we have out there. Then we work on migrating the > rest (what is not in publican fmt r

Re: [DISCUSS] Please choose: The build system to use for 4.0

On 08/16/2012 11:26 PM, Chip Childers wrote: My preference is, based on timeline, to use ant for 4.0. I agree on this one. I think a lot will break if we switch to Ant at the last moment. We could switch for 4.1, but I wouldn't do so for 4.0 Wido - chip Sent from my iPhone. On Aug 16

Re: [DOCS] links within a document.

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 03:20:34PM -0400, David Nalley wrote: > So we have a mass of xml files that are assembled into different > documents by other XML files. > So for something I was playing with locally, I built the developers > guide, or well, tried to. It failed (for multiple reasons) I fixed

Re: [DISCUSS] Please choose: The build system to use for 4.0

My preference is, based on timeline, to use ant for 4.0. - chip Sent from my iPhone. On Aug 16, 2012, at 5:12 PM, David Nalley wrote: > Hi folks, > > I am particularly limiting the scope of this to what we do for 4.0, > since that is the pressing timeline. > > Here are the current options: > >

[DISCUSS] Please choose: The build system to use for 4.0

Hi folks, I am particularly limiting the scope of this to what we do for 4.0, since that is the pressing timeline. Here are the current options: * Continue using ant, and have the hacky stuff I wrote as ant targets deal with dependency resolution. (see the differences in the deps-ctrl branch) *

Re: [DISCUSS] Binaries (jars) in our source tree/source releases.

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > > > On 8/14/12 4:08 PM, "dsheph...@godaddy.com" wrote: > >>On 2012-08-14 14:31, Hugo Trippaers wrote: >>> Heya, >>> >>> In end both ant and waf will have to go. As per recent discussions we >>> should leave the rpm/deb building to the dis

Re: [DISCUSS] Binaries (jars) in our source tree/source releases.

On 8/14/12 4:08 PM, "dsheph...@godaddy.com" wrote: >On 2012-08-14 14:31, Hugo Trippaers wrote: >> Heya, >> >> In end both ant and waf will have to go. As per recent discussions we >> should leave the rpm/deb building to the distro's and focus in >> building the jars. In my view also any will be

Re: Review Request: Update RPM build for 4.0

> On Aug. 16, 2012, 8:14 p.m., edison su wrote: > > cloud.spec, line 535 > > > > > > I think we need config(noreplace) for this configuration files: > > db.properties/log4j-cloud.xml/tomcat6.conf. Admin usually will ch

Re: Review Request: Update RPM build for 4.0

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6658/#review10428 --- cloud.spec I

Re: Unit tests

Yes, I just noticed this that jenkins is reporting zero unit test failures. That's awesome! --David On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > Fixed. One of them was obsolete, the other (NetUtils) actually caught a > valid failure. > > On 8/10/12 4:36 PM, "Ewan Mellor" wrote: >

Re: Unit tests

Fixed. One of them was obsolete, the other (NetUtils) actually caught a valid failure. On 8/10/12 4:36 PM, "Ewan Mellor" wrote: >http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/test-junit, by the way. > >Ewan. > >From: Ewan Mellor >Sent: 10 August 2012 16:36 >To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject:

[JENKINS] Thoughts on purging some binaries and some jobs

Hi folks, Jenkins has begun complaining about available disk space, so I figured I'd start looking. See below how the various jobs are consuming space. Some of these jobs are keeping as many as 20 copies of built binaries, and many of these jobs are a bit outdated (the 2.2.x and 2.2.y builds must

Re: [DOCS] links within a document.

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:37 PM, sebgoa wrote: > > On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:20 PM, David Nalley wrote: > >> So we have a mass of xml files that are assembled into different >> documents by other XML files. >> So for something I was playing with locally, I built the developers >> guide, or well, tried

[WEBSITE][DOCS] Publican-based docs publishing?

Hi folks, Wanted to toss this out there and get some reaction. We use Publican to transform our documentation XML into consumable formats like HTML, EPUB, PDF, etc. Publican has a number of other functions, and one of those is publishing a documentation website. I've participated in this with oth

Re: [DOCS] links within a document.

On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:20 PM, David Nalley wrote: > So we have a mass of xml files that are assembled into different > documents by other XML files. > So for something I was playing with locally, I built the developers > guide, or well, tried to. It failed (for multiple reasons) I fixed the > firs

Review Request: Update RPM build for 4.0

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6658/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Description --- Update cloud.spec for curren

[DOCS] links within a document.

So we have a mass of xml files that are assembled into different documents by other XML files. So for something I was playing with locally, I built the developers guide, or well, tried to. It failed (for multiple reasons) I fixed the first, and started to fix the second, when I realized that this c

Re: [PROPOSAL] Breaking CloudStack into subprojects

Previous history has shown that such "umbrella" projects (those with several sub-projects) are usually much more difficult to keep successful than a large project *or* a group of same-level top level projects. So here's my -1 On Aug 15, 2012, at 5:42 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > After doing the merg

Re: [ASFCS40] IRC Meeting for Release Tasks?

++1. Plus, it should not become the default method for doing development. If the dev list becomes simply a log of irc discussions, then this needs to be shut down at once. On Aug 15, 2012, at 3:04 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: > Hi > > Great idea, just a couple of notes: > 1- Any discussions

Re: [Discuss] CloudStack architecture to a loosely-coupled component oriented distributed architecture

On 8/15/12 10:57 PM, "Alex Huang" wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 9:53 PM >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [Discuss] CloudStack architecture to a loosely-coupled >> co

Re: Review Request: CS-15823 Failed snapshot should be marked as Error and cleanup asynchronously

> On Aug. 16, 2012, 6:34 a.m., Nitin Mehta wrote: > > Do we delete DB rows for error conditions for any other resources in CS as > > well or do we want to give snapshots a different treatment here ? I am > > somehow not very comfortable doing hard delete here. > > mice xia wrote: > by perf

RE: AutoScale comments.....(WAS:RE: where features are developed was: Review Request: Merge Kelven's VPC code for Vmware into asf vpc branch)

> -Original Message- > From: Chiradeep Vittal > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 10:42 PM > To: CloudStack DeveloperList > Cc: Pranav Saxena; David Nalley; Vijay Venkatachalam; Alena Prokharchyk; > Deepak Garg > Subject: Re: AutoScale comments.(WAS:RE: where features are > developed was

Review Request: Cleaning up files with tabs instead of spaces, removed release notes for CloudPlatform release

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6656/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Wido den Hollander. Description --- Some

Re: AutoScale comments.....(WAS:RE: where features are developed was: Review Request: Merge Kelven's VPC code for Vmware into asf vpc branch)

Can you address 3-6 ? On 8/16/12 7:52 AM, "Ram Ganesh" wrote: >Changing the subject line to reflect feature being discussed > >Chiradeep, > >> -Original Message- >> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] >> Sent: 15 August 2012 07:32 >> To: CloudStack DeveloperLi

Re: port-range support in createPortForwardingRule API method

On 8/16/12 5:49 AM, "Mukesh Kumar" wrote: >Dear All, >We are trying to setup Cloudstack 3.0.2 with advance network. > >One of our business case, is to forward all the traffic (TCP/UDP), for a >IP that belongs to a network, to an instance within the same network. > >Using createPortForwardingRule

RE: port-range support in createPortForwardingRule API method

Hi Mukesh, You could enable a static NAT which would forward all traffic from a public IP to a private IP. http://download.cloud.com/releases/3.0.0/api_3.0.0/root_admin/enableStaticNat.html -Original Message- From: Mukesh Kumar [mailto:m.ku...@leaseweb.com] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2

Re: [DOCS] Please allow me to introduce myself: Jessica T, CloudStack Tech Pubs

On 08/16/2012 03:02 PM, Jessica Tomechak wrote: Hello all, I've been using the signature "Jessica T, CloudStack Tech Pubs." In case anyone would like to know a bit more about that: I joined Cloud.com in March of 2011 as the sole technical writer. They had two small CloudStack guides in Word for

Re: New wiki: Please add redirects when migrating content

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:46 AM, prasanna wrote: > On 14 August 2012 02:31, Jessica Tomechak wrote: >> Hello all, >> I've noticed several people are starting to populate the new wiki which >> David N set up at >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Index. I applaud the >> effor

AutoScale comments.....(WAS:RE: where features are developed was: Review Request: Merge Kelven's VPC code for Vmware into asf vpc branch)

Changing the subject line to reflect feature being discussed Chiradeep, > -Original Message- > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > Sent: 15 August 2012 07:32 > To: CloudStack DeveloperList > Cc: Pranav Saxena; David Nalley; Vijay Venkatachalam; Alena > Prokha

Re: Review Request: CS-15942: Fixes port forwarding issue for redundant routers

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6655/ --- (Updated Aug. 16, 2012, 2:09 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Pra

Review Request: CS-15942: Fixes port forwarding issue for redundant routers

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6655/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Sheng Yang. Description --

Review Request: errorchecking for basebox build

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6654/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Chip Childers. Description --- Added some

Re: [DOCS] Wanted: a tool to convert Microsoft Word to docbook

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 04:05:08AM -0700, Jessica Tomechak wrote: > A subset of the existing documentation for CloudStack has appeared in the > /docs directory of our repo. The need for the rest of it to follow suit is > well known and tracked here: > > http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15604 >

ApacheConEU registration open

Hi, The registration for ApacheConEU (Germany) has opened! Early bird registrations are available for €450 (Committers receive an additional discount). Committers should have received their e-mail with a promotional code. I just registered and I'll be there! Tickets: http://www.apachecon.eu

Re: [DOCS] Indentation

On 08/16/2012 03:12 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: On Thu, Aug 16, 2012, at 06:13 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: On 08/16/2012 12:45 PM, Jessica Tomechak wrote: Yes, I can fix that. I'll check the docs directory again tonight, so be aware of a commit coming in that might change a lot. grep says we o

Re: [DOCS] Indentation

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012, at 06:13 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > On 08/16/2012 12:45 PM, Jessica Tomechak wrote: > Yes, I can fix that. I'll check the docs directory again tonight, so be > aware of a commit coming in that might change a lot. grep says we only have a handful of files that have tabs,

[DOCS] Please allow me to introduce myself: Jessica T, CloudStack Tech Pubs

Hello all, I've been using the signature "Jessica T, CloudStack Tech Pubs." In case anyone would like to know a bit more about that: I joined Cloud.com in March of 2011 as the sole technical writer. They had two small CloudStack guides in Word for Windows. Ever since then, I've handled CloudStack'

port-range support in createPortForwardingRule API method

Dear All, We are trying to setup Cloudstack 3.0.2 with advance network. One of our business case, is to forward all the traffic (TCP/UDP), for a IP that belongs to a network, to an instance within the same network. Using createPortForwardingRule API method seems good solution, but we're not sur

global configutation validation

There is code in ConfigurationManager that does validation on global configuration parameters. This does not work for all the params by default and you need the params specified in a list so that they are eligible for a check. If you are introducing a config value, that you think is eligible for

Re: [DOCS] Indentation

On 08/16/2012 12:45 PM, Jessica Tomechak wrote: -Original Message- From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2012 1:25 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [DOCS] Indentation On 08/10/2012 01:02 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi, On 10-Au

[DOCS] Cloudbridge needs new documentation

Sebastien/Alex/et al: Thanks very much for noticing these questions. Please see: http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15604 The EC2 content from CP, as well as the rest of the Installation Guide, still needs to be moved to publican, as this bug states. We need to create an Apache CloudStack ver

Re: Review Request: CS-15430 Create snapshot should fail if creating snapshot results in exceeding snapshot resource limit for domain-admin or user accounts.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5806/ --- (Updated Aug. 16, 2012, 10:46 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Changes ---

Re: [DOCS] Indentation

> > -Original Message- > From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] > Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2012 1:25 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DOCS] Indentation > > > > On 08/10/2012 01:02 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 10-Aug-2012, at 3:29 PM, Wido

Ideas for virtual Redundant Router

Hi, At present the redundancy of the virtual redundant routers, VRRP [3], operates outside the scope of CloudStack [2]. And any event that happens outside of CS, like rebooting by ssh-ing into the router vms or a crash/start, is not know by the management server (Sheng's comment[1]). Therefore

Re: Review Request: CS-15823 Failed snapshot should be marked as Error and cleanup asynchronously

> On Aug. 16, 2012, 6:34 a.m., Nitin Mehta wrote: > > Do we delete DB rows for error conditions for any other resources in CS as > > well or do we want to give snapshots a different treatment here ? I am > > somehow not very comfortable doing hard delete here. by performing a global search wit

Re: Review Request: CS-14770. ec2-run-instances and ec2-describe-instances don't return keypair information. Component: AWSAPI.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6203/ --- (Updated Aug. 16, 2012, 8:53 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Prachi Daml

Re: Review Request: Bugfix CS-15970: Fixes Redundant router status when host is XenServer

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6607/#review10395 --- resolved as fixed in http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15970, ship