On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:37 PM, sebgoa <run...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:20 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>
>> So we have a mass of xml files that are assembled into different
>> documents by other XML files.
>> So for something I was playing with locally, I built the developers
>> guide, or well, tried to. It failed (for multiple reasons) I fixed the
>> first, and started to fix the second, when I realized that this could
>> easily be a much larger issue, and so I figured I'd bring it here for
>> discussion.
>>
>> As a side note, I started adding documents to be built in jenkins so
>> we can start catching this kind of thing, but the log for
>> cloudstack-dev-guide is good for this conversation.
>>
>> http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/build-docs-devguide-master/123/console
>>
>> You'll see there is a link to a document, that within the developers
>> guide, doesn't exist. So building the document fails. I am sure that
>> we use that link in other documents, that we assemble but not in this
>> one.
>>
>> Curious as to your thoughts on this - do we just have lots of CI that
>> catches it for us? Is there some way to catch this without CI?
>>
>> --David
>
> David, IMHO we need to decide on what guides we want to have for 4.0(I have 
> not seen such discussion), it will be a subset of all the documentation we 
> have out there.

That is a valid point. I guess we've operated under the assumption
that the documentation set wouldn't change from 3.0.2. to 4.0, but it
could potentially.

> Then we work on migrating the rest (what is not in publican fmt right now) as 
> well as updating/correcting it.
>
> I don't think we should automate right now, we should do a manual 
> configuration of couple guides that are going to build for the release. We 
> could decide on that during the IRC meeting. Then Joe can build them :)

We can not make decisions on IRC.
Decisions must be made here, on the mailing list. Please don't
hesitate to start the conversation.


>
> In that particular case that would mean removing 
> cloud-infrastructure-overview, the title in itself tells me that this does 
> not fit in a developer guide.

Yeah, I am not so worried about the particular case, it's really easy
to solve, I am more worried about the larger principle.

Reply via email to