>
> -Original Message-
> From: prasanna [mailto:srivatsav.prasa...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 11:39 PM
> To: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Regarding cloudstack install guide 3.0.0-3.0.2
>
> On 1 August 2012 11:44, Bharat Kumar wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In
Hi, all
I've posted a draft doc on http://wiki.cloudstack.org/display/COMM/VM+Snapshots
With some limitation and simple test code, VM snapshot for Xenserver and VMware
seems feasible, but for the KVM part, because I'm not familiar with KVM, I have
to postpone it to the next stage or maybe someo
Heya,
I have limited amount of experience with Maven, but I'm willing to help out
here if we decide to go to maven.
@David, This is a good place to get started:
http://www.sonatype.com/index.php/Support/Books/Maven-The-Complete-Reference
This helped me a lot when I was converting projects f
Hi ,
I am not sure what you exactly mean by debugging the system VM code. However
you can ssh into the system VM's ( SSVM & CPVM) and see the log outputs (
/var/log/ ) contains many files like cloud.log , haproxy.log, auth.log etc .
To ssh into the system VM's , you need to do this -
As part of the effort, a very low level service about job control will be
refactored to support better CloudStack operation.
Like process to an operating system, jobs are "process" in a cloud
platform, we are going to improve the job management with following things
in mind
1)
I think this is a great conversation to have, but maybe we should wait until
after the 4.0 release? Seems like it might be a bit of a distraction right now…
On Aug 8, 2012, at 9:38 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> CloudStack 3.x has quite a bit of baggage after years of development. This
> makes it dif
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ewan Mellor [mailto:ewan.mel...@eu.citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 6:02 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: DOCS: problems with using entities
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ewan Mellor
> > Sent: Tuesday, August
CloudStack 3.x has quite a bit of baggage after years of development. This
makes it difficult for new committers to join the project. Even for existing
committers, it is easy to make mistakes. We're looking to make some
fundamental changes to CloudStack to overcome these problems. Please fee
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 6:12 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: DOCS: problems with using entities
>
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath <
> radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.
Koushik,
Do you think this change would affect documentation? "Support for up to 16
VDIs per VM on XS 6.0 and above"
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6229/
Jessica T.
CloudStack Tech Pubs
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6473/
---
(Updated Aug. 9, 2012, 2:24 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
Changes
-
> -Original Message-
> From: Mice Xia [mailto:mice_...@tcloudcomputing.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 10:17 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [Discuss] VM Snapshot
>
> Kelven, Thanks for pointing out this, and yes this is getting
> complicated when volume
Can you add the license headers to the newly created files?
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
--David
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:19 PM, wrote:
> Updated Branches:
> refs/heads/master f99ef5978 -> a25e20aff
>
>
> CS-15604, create Apache version of documentation.
>
> Add new documenta
> -Original Message-
> From: Jamshid Afshar [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of
> Jamshid Afshar
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 12:29 PM
> To: cloudstack; David Nalley; Jamshid Afshar
> Subject: Re: Review Request: Add initial support for Caringo's CAStor
> object storage
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> On 09/08/2012, at 3:01 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>>> If this is a direction CloudStack decides it'd like to go, I'm more than
>>> happy to help :)
>>>
>>> - Brett
>>
>> How much help
On 09/08/2012, at 3:01 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>> If this is a direction CloudStack decides it'd like to go, I'm more than
>> happy to help :)
>>
>> - Brett
>
> How much help are you willing to provide? :)
> I am not sure we have a lot o
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 05:42:22PM -0700, Jessica Tomechak wrote:
> Is there a good place to make a collaborative checklist like this?
> Something like Google Docs, but more Apache-ish?
Maybe the wiki?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/
Best,
Joe
--
Joe Brockmeier
http://
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/08/2012 08:20 PM, Jessica Tomechak wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Jessica Tomechak
> mailto:jessica.tomec...@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> Hello all, We had earlier proposed using the cc-by-sa license for
> documentation, for a variety of
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 5:16 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Writing documentation, where?
>
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 04:48:08PM -0700, Jessica Tomechak wrote:
> > If you like, I c
Thanks Krishna,
If we can help, don't hesitate to ask.
--David
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Krishna Sadasivam wrote:
> I am not sure about the license. This is the first time I am submitting code
> to open source. Let me get back to you on the license and the link for the
> jar.
>
> Thanks
I am not sure about the license. This is the first time I am submitting code to
open source. Let me get back to you on the license and the link for the jar.
Thanks,
Krishna
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 5:16 PM
To: Krishna
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Murali Reddy wrote:
> On 08/08/12 1:16 PM, "Tomoe Sugihara" wrote:
>
>>
>>---
>>This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
>>https://reviews.apache.org/r/6464/
>>-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6464/
---
(Updated Aug. 9, 2012, 12:25 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6458/#review10052
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kelven Yang
On Aug. 8, 2012, 1:02 a.m., Venka
What license is it released under?
We need to likely set it up so that the jar can be downloaded
automagically, but isn't included in the repo by default.
If we were to set ant, ivy, gradle, or maven to do this in an
automated fashion, where would we acquire the jar from?
--David
On Wed, Aug 8, 2
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 04:48:08PM -0700, Jessica Tomechak wrote:
> If you like, I can check the MS Word file in to the repo and anyone can
> help in converting to XML. I assumed this was too painful a task to be
> imposed on the community, but perhaps you are all more patient and
> wonderful than
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 04:51:57PM -0700, Jessica Tomechak wrote:
>> I suggest it would be great to set up a staging server for our doc reviews.
>> Any review request for a doc patch should be able to include a URL to a web
>> page where the
Hi David,
cloud-BrocadeService.jar enables communication with Brocade load balancers.
It won’t be under Apache License. Can I send the jar as an attachment for now?
Krishna
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of David Nalley
Sent: Wednesd
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 04:51:57PM -0700, Jessica Tomechak wrote:
> I suggest it would be great to set up a staging server for our doc reviews.
> Any review request for a doc patch should be able to include a URL to a web
> page where the output can be seen. Can anyone suggest to me how to set this
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6492/#review10050
---
Where does this file come from: deps/cloud-BrocadeService.jar
What i
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 2:10 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Writing documentation, where?
>
> Hi,
>
> Chip's e-mail about the 4.0 release woke me up, I still had to write some
> doc
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 2:10 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Writing documentation, where?
>
> Hi,
>
> Chip's e-mail about the 4.0 release woke me up, I still had to write some
> doc
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 2:10 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Writing documentation, where?
>
> Hi,
>
> Chip's e-mail about the 4.0 release woke me up, I still had to write some
> doc
On 08/08/2012 06:30 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
We need to push this discussion on build systems to a conclusion. Let me
summarize so far.
* We need to be able to build CloudStack in various configurations (support for
the range of hypervisors turned on or off, etc).
Yes
* We would like the b
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6492/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
This is the patch for adding
> -Original Message-
> From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 2:10 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Writing documentation, where?
>
> Hi,
>
> Chip's e-mail about the 4.0 release woke me up, I still had to write some
> docum
Apologies, my first reply only went to Jessica, apparently.
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 02:50:46PM -0700, Jessica Tomechak wrote:
> Hello all,
> We had earlier proposed using the cc-by-sa license for documentation, for a
> variety of good reasons, and I believed this was approved by our mentors
> an
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 4:19 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Build systems [was RE: [DISCUSS] Binaries (jars) in our
> source tree/source releases.]
>
>
>
> > -Original Messa
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 11:13 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; David Nalley
> Subject: Binary dependencies
>
> David (All),
>
> I'm working through the list on the wiki [1], and have noti
> -Original Message-
> From: Ewan Mellor [mailto:ewan.mel...@eu.citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 3:31 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Build systems [was RE: [DISCUSS] Binaries (jars) in our source
> tree/source releases.]
>
> We need to push this dis
Can you go to the UI infrastructure->hosts: click "force reconnect " for the
host? After adding host failed.
Or remove the host, then add it again?
> -Original Message-
> From: Olga Smola [mailto:olya.sm...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 2:10 PM
> To: Edison Su
> Cc: clouds
This is a great idea. As I was playing with the CLVM stuff I began
thinking "this will get really hairy if they keep adding new types".
Your proposal and outline makes sense to me, but I'm not a core
developer :-)
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Edison Su wrote:
> Hi all,
> Seems a lot o
We need to push this discussion on build systems to a conclusion. Let me
summarize so far.
* We need to be able to build CloudStack in various configurations (support for
the range of hypervisors turned on or off, etc).
* We would like the build tool to be able to get the necessary dependencie
Hi all,
Seems a lot of people are interested in how to add new storage support
into CloudStack. But frankly speaking, the current code is not well suited for
such kind of tasks, in term of maintainability and flexibility.
Now it's time to improve or rewrite((if necessary) the ex
On Aug 8, 2012, at 2:51 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 12:31 PM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Dropping NetApp Support
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 8, 20
> -Original Message-
> From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 2:10 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Writing documentation, where?
>
> Hi,
>
> Chip's e-mail about the 4.0 release woke me up, I still had to write
> some doc
>From a developer pov, I've been finding our current release rather difficult
>to follow on the mailing list. I appreciate Chip's work in sending daily
>updates on what's been done. I've been relying on it to monitor the release
>progress but I wonder if this can be done more automatically.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 12:31 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Dropping NetApp Support
>
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:56 PM, John Kinsella wrote:
> > I reached out t
Hello all,
We had earlier proposed using the cc-by-sa license for documentation, for a
variety of good reasons, and I believed this was approved by our mentors
and/or legal. Recently, Joe B. did some work in the doc files and has
inserted the Apache 2.0 license. It also looks like we have changed i
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
>
> [Snip]
>
> So we're < 3 days away from the proposed release candidate being cut.
No we're not. We're 3 days away from the proposed opening of the release
branch, when we would stop developing features, and
Hi,
Chip's e-mail about the 4.0 release woke me up, I still had to write
some documentation...
For 2.2 and 3.0.2 there is a Installation Guide, but where did that come
from? (What source) Are we going to maintain it for 4.0?
In the repository there is /docs and I guess that is the right pla
Edison,
sure, here is link to the attached logs on the wiki DevCloud page
http://wiki.cloudstack.org/download/attachments/9603270/CS+logs.zip?version=1&modificationDate=1344459846433.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Edison Su wrote:
> Could you upload the mgt server log(the log is at
> /opt/clo
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After my draft release plan last week, I've taken the feedback that I got
> (thanks for that, everyone) and I think we're ready to commit to this plan
> now.
>
> The timescales are very tight, but that's the aim - get something ou
Chip,
I've removed the Base64 file from the utils branch.
> Sun Licenses:
> Alex is working on removing these files, and pulling in a jar during
> build.
> We'll need to add the CDDL licensing to the NOTICE file once that work's
> complete.
> incubator-cloudstack/utils/src/javax/ejb/Lo
Work started on this... but progress is exceptionally slow due to the
complexity of finding *where* and *how* we are using each item, plus
the challenge of determining the correct project URL and specific
license that applies to the copy we are using.
I've created the following files: NOTICE, LICE
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:56 PM, John Kinsella wrote:
> I reached out to some contacts at NetApp, their product management team
> quoted the following part of their "NETAPP MANAGEABILITY SDK - EULA.docx"[1]
> to me:
>
> "Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, NetApp grants You a
>
> On Aug. 8, 2012, 6:36 p.m., David Nalley wrote:
> > First, thanks for the patch.
> > I haven't looked deeply in this, but noticed the license header in one of
> > the files needs some work, see the below for more information:
> > http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
> > If you have
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:21 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
(snip)
>> 2 - Assuming that *some* solution for dependency downloads is
>> achieved, do we assume that the license contained within the download
>> is authoritative? I'm pretty sure th
Thanks, https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-cloudstack.git
and your instructions made it clear. I switched to the apache git site
instead of git.cloud.com and to master instead of 3.0.x.
Btw I was using "git diff", but now I understand I need to "git
commit" my changes locally then "
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6473/#review10028
---
First, thanks for the patch.
I haven't looked deeply in this, but no
Hi Chip:
> Patches in the OVM folder:
> Alex sent out a request to Frank for help dealing with these patches:
> incubator-
> cloudstack/plugins/hypervisors/ovm/scripts/vm/hypervisor/ovm/Fixget_sto
> rage_reposExceptionDueToWrongReturnValueCheck.patch
> incubator-
> cloudstack/plugins
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6473/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
Below is the commit message.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> David (All),
>
> I'm working through the list on the wiki [1], and have noticed some
> interesting differences between the listed license type and the
> license included in the JAR that the deps-ctrl branch pulls in.
>
> Examples:
>
> JavaMail
Oh, the premium secondary storage stuff is fixed a few minutes ago... Need to
build vmware plugin before creating systemvm.zip.
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 9:16 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Su
David (All),
I'm working through the list on the wiki [1], and have noticed some
interesting differences between the listed license type and the
license included in the JAR that the deps-ctrl branch pulls in.
Examples:
JavaMail is listed on the wiki page as being the dual GPL/CDDL license
type.
On 08/08/2012 05:59 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
What's the process exactly when the management server adds a host?
Does it ssh in run cloud-setup-agent, then start the agent? Is it
viable to manage agent.properties on your own when it really needs to
be in sync with what the management server (a
I reached out to some contacts at NetApp, their product management team quoted
the following part of their "NETAPP MANAGEABILITY SDK - EULA.docx"[1] to me:
"Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, NetApp grants You a
license to:...Use, reproduce and distribute the Language Librarie
On 8/8/12 10:31 AM, "Pranav Saxena" wrote:
>Hi Alena ,
>
>when you mentioned this -" Start/EndIp addresses in createNetwork define
>the first vlan range for the network. These parameters are not required,
>as the range can be added later with createVlanIpRange command. We can
>make it required
Could you upload the mgt server log(the log is at
/opt/cloudstack/incubator-cloudstack/vmops.log)?
> -Original Message-
> From: Olga Smola [mailto:olya.sm...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 7:46 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Pranav Saxena; cloudstack-us.
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> SDN is more or less an alternative for vlans, which he doesn't want to use
> anyway. He has separate network segments already.
>
> There isn't very much good documentation for cloudstack networking. I
> wanted to do something similar a few m
Hi Alena ,
when you mentioned this -" Start/EndIp addresses in createNetwork define the
first vlan range for the network. These parameters are not required, as the
range can be added later with createVlanIpRange command. We can make it
required in the UI though to force the admin to configure
On 8/7/12 11:54 PM, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote:
>Hey Alena,
>
>Why would we want to explicitly add a vlan for "isolated" networks
>without source nat service? The guest IP allocator works for that
>scenario and the network is not supposed to be shared.
Guest IP allocator works only for Isolated netw
Also I observed that you are cloning the repository from git.cloud.com instead
of the Apache repository which is this
(https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-cloudstack.git ). Clone it
from here and checkout to master since 3.0.x is considered to be a dead branch
as David mentioned.
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> If this is a direction CloudStack decides it'd like to go, I'm more than
> happy to help :)
>
> - Brett
How much help are you willing to provide? :)
I am not sure we have a lot of maven expertise around, but maybe this
provides an even clean
Hi Jamshid ,
You could follow this to submit a patch -
To submit a patch , you might want to go through this document once -
http://wiki.cloudstack.org/display/dev/Git+workflow+in+the+brave+new+world
Procedure for submitting a patch through Review Board Tool -
1) Then once you have generat
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Jamshid Afshar
wrote:
> Hi, I'm having trouble submitting a patch for review. Sorry, I'm new
> to git and Review Board.
>
> I created my working directory from this repository and branch and I
> made my edits:
>
> git clone http://git.cloud.com/cloudstack-oss --bra
Hi, I'm having trouble submitting a patch for review. Sorry, I'm new
to git and Review Board.
I created my working directory from this repository and branch and I
made my edits:
git clone http://git.cloud.com/cloudstack-oss --branch 3.0.x
If I choose "cloudstack-git" at https://reviews.apache.or
On 8 August 2012 20:55, John Kinsella wrote:
> Guys - just noticed something strange happened with a commit last night where
> I added my PGP key to the KEYS file…
>
> (going into details in case this happens to others)
> After adding my key and double-checking things, I committed the change but
What's the process exactly when the management server adds a host?
Does it ssh in run cloud-setup-agent, then start the agent? Is it
viable to manage agent.properties on your own when it really needs to
be in sync with what the management server (and cloud) knows about?
For example you can't just c
John,
I've been following this pattern when doing a push:
# git pull origin master
# git pull --rebase
# git push origin master
-chip
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 11:25 AM, John Kinsella wrote:
> Guys - just noticed something strange happened with a commit last night where
> I added my PGP key to t
+1 the daemon overwriting the file got me a few times, as well…
On Aug 8, 2012, at 6:33 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was looking into the Agent setup and configuration today and found out that
> this is quit outdated.
>
> All the documentation is still pointing to the cloud-setup-
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
> David, did you see my two submissions? I'm not sure who the "you" is in
> your mail.
>
Yes I can see your two submissions. There are a total of 6 at the moment
The 'you' was Wido and Hugo, sorry, I should have made that more clear.
--Davi
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Tomoe Sugihara wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Murali Reddy wrote:
>> On 08/08/12 1:16 PM, "Tomoe Sugihara" wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>---
>>>This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
>>>ht
Guys - just noticed something strange happened with a commit last night where I
added my PGP key to the KEYS file…
(going into details in case this happens to others)
After adding my key and double-checking things, I committed the change but ran
into ASF password issues while trying to do the pu
Hi Chiradeep,
I'm about to write a unit test for CS-15609, as you suggested in the review
thread.
However it seems a little bit heavy weight if follow the guide you posted:
1) About IoC, I had to inject all dependent DAOs/Managers for the class under
test, even if I want to test one method whic
David, did you see my two submissions? I'm not sure who the "you" is in your
mail.
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 7:57 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: ApacheConEU CFP open
>
> On Thu, Jul 2
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6470/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
Adds CLVM as an option for p
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> On 07/26/2012 10:05 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
>>
>> Heya,
>>
>> I would like to do a talk on the current Nicira Nvp integration and the
>> plans for the future. Any other people who want to do a talk? Or should we
>> aim for a shared
Hi Rohit,
thank you for feedback, but I've already tried to skip first step with
setup step by step and still the same problem - I can't create a host.
When I create Zone on the wizard I get an error like
http://prntscr.com/dffjj.
--Olga
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Hi O
Hi Olga,
I think you missed the hint.
On Aug 8, 2012, at 3:13 PM, Olga Smola wrote:
> Hi Edison,
>
> thank you for your feedback, but ever if I don't continue with basic
> zone setup I get the same problem - can't add host.
After you redeploy and redeploydb, and open localhost:8080/client (o
Turns out there were 2 files. Thanks Joe!
We're good now: http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/build-docs-master/17/
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> Already fixed Joe.
>
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>> I see the error. It's a missing tag. I'll
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Murali Reddy wrote:
> On 08/08/12 1:16 PM, "Tomoe Sugihara" wrote:
>
>>
>>---
>>This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
>>https://reviews.apache.org/r/6464/
>>-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6469/#review10021
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Chip Childers
On Aug. 8, 2012, 2:17 p.m., Joe
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6469/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
Fixes a missing tag in the f
On 08/08/12 1:16 PM, "Tomoe Sugihara" wrote:
>
>---
>This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
>https://reviews.apache.org/r/6464/
>---
>
>Review request for cloudstac
Already fixed Joe.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> I see the error. It's a missing tag. I'll submit a patch
> right now.
>
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012, at 08:52 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:40 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>> > This commit broke the build.
>
I see the error. It's a missing tag. I'll submit a patch
right now.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012, at 08:52 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:40 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> > This commit broke the build.
> >
> > http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/build-docs-master/15/
> >
>
> Looking at it
> Patches folder:
> There is an ongoing thread about this topic. Any help needed David?
> incubator-cloudstack/patches/systemvm/debian/
I am really waiting on some of the issues around systemVMs to work
themselves out, and wonder if we wouldn't be better served by
converting all of this
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:40 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> This commit broke the build.
>
> http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/build-docs-master/15/
>
Looking at it now.
We're moving along nicely...
Specific questions below for: Prachi, Ewan, Frank, David
Updated RAT report:
https://github.com/chipchilders/asf_cloudstack_RAT_results/blob/master/_all.txt?raw=true
Outstanding Issues:
WAF scripts:
We need to include WAF in the appropriate top level LICENSE
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
