On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote: > > On 09/08/2012, at 3:01 AM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote: >>> If this is a direction CloudStack decides it'd like to go, I'm more than >>> happy to help :) >>> >>> - Brett >> >> How much help are you willing to provide? :) >> I am not sure we have a lot of maven expertise around, but maybe this >> provides an even cleaner way to get rid of waf. > > > As you'd note from my being behind responding to several threads, I don't > have a lot of bandwidth :) I can help get it started and provide assistance, > but someone else would need to be driving it - and as others have noted, > someone actively developing the project should understand how it works going > forward anyway. > > I wasn't thinking this was something you planned to do before the 4.0 > release. Is the thought that this might save some of the time on > release-related activities, or is it an incremental improvement to consider > beyond that? >
I think that folks are thinking after the initial release at this point. At least I am. Where would someone, who understands ant well enough to get things done but has had a historically rocky relationship with maven, go to grok maven? --David --David
