On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On 09/08/2012, at 3:01 AM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> If this is a direction CloudStack decides it'd like to go, I'm more than 
>>> happy to help :)
>>>
>>> - Brett
>>
>> How much help are you willing to provide? :)
>> I am not sure we have a lot of maven expertise around, but maybe this
>> provides an even cleaner way to get rid of waf.
>
>
> As you'd note from my being behind responding to several threads, I don't 
> have a lot of bandwidth :) I can help get it started and provide assistance, 
> but someone else would need to be driving it - and as others have noted, 
> someone actively developing the project should understand how it works going 
> forward anyway.
>
> I wasn't thinking this was something you planned to do before the 4.0 
> release. Is the thought that this might save some of the time on 
> release-related activities, or is it an incremental improvement to consider 
> beyond that?
>

I think that folks are thinking after the initial release at this
point. At least I am.

Where would someone, who understands ant well enough to get things
done but has had a historically rocky relationship with maven, go to
grok maven?

--David

--David

Reply via email to