> -Original Message-
> From: guang wu [mailto:kingkissk...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 7 June 2012 11:19 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Fwd: How can i get documentation about CloudStack project ?
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: guang wu
> Dat
-- Forwarded message --
From: guang wu
Date: 2012/6/5
Subject: How can i get documentation about CloudStack project ?
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Hi, friends, i'm intersted in the project(CloudStack), i want to do
something change about this project, such as developed
hi, Charles Russel
according to your testing on gluster, do you think it is product ready
cloudstack-over-gluster?
gluster may not be so perfect now .
Eric.
other way to use your gluster, manually you have to mount(gluster) on every
hyptervisor and secondary storage,
then mount --bind
I assume Hugo et al would have to sign the Apache ICLA, even though they are
not committers? They will be contributors so they need to sign the CLA?
--
Chiradeep
On Jun 6, 2012, at 20:59, "David Nalley" wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 10:52 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 9:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 10:52 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Hugo Trippaers
> wrote:
>> Heya all,
>>
>> This afternoon we had a nice chat with Chiradeep about the Nicira
>> integration. It's moving along nicely know.
>>
>> However while setting up a test environment wit
Thanks, but in the pdf of System VMs, VR is not shown in the management
network. Is this correct ? How is management server supposed to talk to VR in
this case ?
Deepak
-Original Message-
From: Clayton Weise [mailto:cwe...@iswest.net]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2012 1:49 AM
To: 'clou
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:07 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:03 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>>>
>>> I'll start by claiming the UI directory.
>>>
>>
>> UI is now done, I am going to take the usage directory next.
>
> Usage is done - I'll take utils next.
Utils is done - I'll take v
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Hugo Trippaers
wrote:
> Heya all,
>
> This afternoon we had a nice chat with Chiradeep about the Nicira
> integration. It's moving along nicely know.
>
> However while setting up a test environment with a branch containing new
> code, i ran into trouble with the s
> -Original Message-
> From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 5:20 PM
> To: de Jong, Mark-Jan
> Subject: RE: 3.0.2 - KVM Agent problem? Please help.
>
> It's a bug in kvm agent code, I fixed the upgrade issue from 2.2.x to
> 3.0.x, but it only worked f
Heya all,
This afternoon we had a nice chat with Chiradeep about the Nicira integration.
It's moving along nicely know.
However while setting up a test environment with a branch containing new code,
i ran into trouble with the secondary storage vm. Troubleshooting that i found
that the master
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:03 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>>
>> I'll start by claiming the UI directory.
>>
>
> UI is now done, I am going to take the usage directory next.
Usage is done - I'll take utils next.
--David
[This is a repost in case anyone didn't catch my original message]
Adding a new language is mainly just adding a new option to the
language select on the login page. After adding the
messages.ru.properties file, change the HTML like so
(where the 'new language' comment is):
A mixture of both but primarily Android. We haven't tried out Cumulus yet.
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 1:25 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: CloudStack UIX
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Clayton Weis
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Clayton Weise wrote:
> None of our techs here ever have, nor have any of our users. We're much more
> likely to use a cell phone than a tablet simply due to the fact that we live
> with them all day long. For us we generally interface with things via
> smartpho
Sort of like this?
http://wiki.cloudstack.org/display/COMM/CloudStack+Example+Configurations
Specifically the "Cloudstack System VMs" document(s).
-Original Message-
From: Deepak Garg [mailto:deepak.g...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 12:56 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.ap
None of our techs here ever have, nor have any of our users. We're much more
likely to use a cell phone than a tablet simply due to the fact that we live
with them all day long. For us we generally interface with things via
smartphone or laptop/desktop/netbook.
-Original Message-
From
First off, Thank You everyone for your feedback. This is good to hear in terms
of trying to improve upon the CloudStack experience.
A few things to note:
Too many clicks:
We have heard the feedback about multiple clicks and are working on trying to
limit the amount. Our first steps to working
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Clayton Weise wrote:
>>Our primary focus for the UI design for 3.0 was ease of use, since that
>>was a major problem in the 2.0.x UI. In particular, we didn't want to
>>overload/overwhelm a new user with a ton of options when they load the UI.
>
> As mentioned on th
> Customizable display columns in the UI.
+1
I think being able to add/remove columns gives a user the ability to decide
what's important to them and sort on it.
> I don't want to hover over each of the VM to get the information that I am
> interested in.
I think it's fine to have it pop if yo
>Our primary focus for the UI design for 3.0 was ease of use, since that
>was a major problem in the 2.0.x UI. In particular, we didn't want to
>overload/overwhelm a new user with a ton of options when they load the UI.
As mentioned on the UIX document on confluence, since the goal is to make it
+1, great suggestion.
--
æ
On 6/6/12 12:58 PM, "Anantha Kasetty" wrote:
>Customizable display columns in the UI. I don't want to hover over each
>of the VM to get the information that I am interested in. I want to have
>the ability to add a column (Say TemplateID) to the VM instance disp
Customizable display columns in the UI. I don't want to hover over each
of the VM to get the information that I am interested in. I want to have
the ability to add a column (Say TemplateID) to the VM instance display
and I should have the ability to sort on that column. Any information that
is di
HI All,
It gets confusing sometime but it will be nice if someone can give an exact
table of which system vm ( Virtual Router, Console Proxy, Secondary Storage )
has vifs in which networks ( public, private, guest ) in the different zones
(Basic and Advanced).
Public Nw -> Traffic sent to this
Forgot to attach the image . Here's the link to the Quick View for a VM. Please
give your suggestions for the same.
http://wiki.cloudstack.org/download/attachments/3572012/cs_usability.jpg
Regards,
Pranav
-Original Message-
From: Pranav Saxena [mailto:pranav.sax...@citrix.com]
Sent: Th
Pluggable UI and job UI are feature requirements that we need to implement, I
guess Sonny would like the feedbacks about general UIX ideas.
Maybe I'm a too boring person, I actually like how Microsoft Outlook navigates,
with sliding tab + single tree pane. For frequent actions, how about to allo
Hi everyone,
[UI developer here]
I also agree that the tree structure was one of the most appealing aspects of
cloudstack 2.0 . It gives an overview of the architecture straight away without
navigating deeply into the UI , leading to lesser number of clicks as well
compared to the current sc
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
>
> For CloudStack Admin Console, we need to innovate in the following areas.
> These all have to do with being able to do more with less action.
>
> - Pluggable UI to configure plugins
+1 (would be +5 if it could be)
> - A monitor pane where r
> We've thought of adding more toolbar 'quick links' or possibly keyboard
> shortcuts for frequent users to access their commonly-used functionality.
> Ideally these could be customizable and stored in user preferences. Any
> other ideas?
I think a simple collapsible tree view would be very helpfu
[UI developer here]
Our primary focus for the UI design for 3.0 was ease of use, since that
was a major problem in the 2.0.x UI. In particular, we didn't want to
overload/overwhelm a new user with a ton of options when they load the UI.
The unfortunate side effect to this is more clicks to get to
I agree. At its core, CloudStack UI is a management console. For management
consoles, the focus should be on how to do something quickly with less
clicks/keystrokes and viewing more with less space. I think 3.0 was a big step
in that direction.
For CloudStack Admin Console, we need to innova
Agreed. The current UI design could do with a major revamp, the constant
clicking is nothing but annoying. Many of my users have commented on how
annoying the interface is, not to mention the complaints I've received
about Firewall Rules and Port Forwards not being on the same screen. I
like th
+1
If it is not possible to get things done at one or at most 2,3 clicks, the UI
navigation would become a painful experience for people who use it at daily
basis.
Kelven
> -Original Message-
> From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 0
I agree with John re the number of clicks required to get to things, it's gets
very tiring.
Geoff
On 6 Jun 2012, at 19:44, "John Kinsella" wrote:
My US$0.02:
The animations look nice - especially when I was new to the product. When
actually trying to get things done, though, they just slo
My US$0.02:
The animations look nice - especially when I was new to the product. When
actually trying to get things done, though, they just slow me down. In
particular, what gets annoying is when I have to click through several
animations to get to a page, like getting to a CS host (6 clicks)
Hello All,
I am Sonny Chhen the Sr. Visual Designer on CloudStack. I wanted to share with
you all a few ideas we have in the works on trying to improve upon the
user-interface and user-experience. I would love to hear your feedback and any
other possible ideas on how we can improve CloudStack.
> -Original Message-
> From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:prasanna.santha...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 1:43 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: bvt question
>
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 04:06:01AM -0400, kangta123 wrote:
> > hello ,
> > there
Yes that is my recommendation from my testing/research. At present Xen doesn't
support gluster natively, but will support NFS. I am working on a possible
over ride to Xen NFS implementation to natively support it but it's not even
ready for a Alpha release at this point. So the trick is to ab
Charles:
Are you recommending that I create an NFS-Gluster proxy [as a temporary work
around]?
I'd mount the Gluster volume locally (on the compute host) but there doesn't
appear to be an option [in the Web interface] to use local file systems in
Basic installations...
TIA,
Eric P.
CC'ing in cloudstack-dev
Folks, this is our java/clojure api that contains both a complete impl
of CloudStack (ex. user, domain admin, global admin), as well a
portable view (ComputeService), which is compatible with ec2,
OpenStack, etc.
Thanks, Andrei for helping ramp up to 3.0!
Cheers,
-Adrian
Hugo,
The Email thread Alex was referring to is "Open vSwitch tunnel Manager (aka
Cloudstack SDN) - community feedback required!"
I actually started doing some work in this direction, but then focused on
something else.
My goal was to get rid of the global configuration flag, in my case
sdn.o
From: Likitha Shetty
Signed-off-by: Likitha Shetty
---
.../cloud/bridge/service/EC2SoapServiceImpl.java | 30 ++
.../core/ec2/EC2AvailabilityZonesFilterSet.java| 102
.../core/ec2/EC2DescribeAvailabilityZones.java | 10 ++
.../cloud/bridge/service/core/e
From: Likitha Shetty
Signed-off-by: Likitha Shetty
---
.../cloud/bridge/service/EC2SoapServiceImpl.java |7 -
.../service/core/ec2/EC2VolumeFilterSet.java | 32 +---
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/awsapi/src/com/cloud/bridge/s
Stand up another system, install fuse libs, mount gluster, and present that
volume as the expected nfs.
Gluster can also be changed to nfs3 but i was very flaky.
Sent via DroidX2 on Verizon Wireless™
Charles Russell
Senior Consulting Engineer
Knowledge Information Solutions, Inc.
P: (757
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 04:06:01AM -0400, kangta123 wrote:
> hello ,
> there are some problems when i using BVT test. I have successfully
> deployed the bvt environment with Simulator host that simulate any resource
> hosts, storages, network and so on. i can see zone, pod, cluster, host,
> s
Hi,
I'm looking for best practices with respect to:
a. when a client should be considering using a NetScaler for load balancing
rather than the virtual router
b. the capacity setting for any given NetScaler model.
I understand that it depends on the type of load that the virtual router or
NetS
hello ,
there are some problems when i using BVT test. I have successfully
deployed the bvt environment with Simulator host that simulate any resource
hosts, storages, network and so on. i can see zone, pod, cluster, host,
storage, ssvm on cloudstack dashboard . but when i test ssvm , it thro
46 matches
Mail list logo
