I assume Hugo et al would have to sign the Apache ICLA, even though they are not committers? They will be contributors so they need to sign the CLA?
-- Chiradeep On Jun 6, 2012, at 20:59, "David Nalley" <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 10:52 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Hugo Trippaers >> <htrippa...@schubergphilis.com> wrote: >>> Heya all, >>> >>> This afternoon we had a nice chat with Chiradeep about the Nicira >>> integration. It's moving along nicely know. >>> >>> However while setting up a test environment with a branch containing new >>> code, i ran into trouble with the secondary storage vm. Troubleshooting >>> that i found that the master brach (which i used to base my changes on) is >>> lacking all build steps for the console-proxy. >>> >>> So my questions are >>> which branch should i base my changes and eventual patch on? 3.0.x, master >>> or another one? >>> If master, why is the console-proxy taken out and how to work around this? >>> >> >> >> You should definitely be building off of a branch based on master in >> the git repo - what errors are you seeing with the console proxy? We >> likely need to fix that. >> >> --David > > That's my fault. I ripped console proxy out of the build-cloud.xml > when I was removing it from the RPM (no idea what possessed me to do > that), and if you didn't need to build systemVMs you wouldn't have > noticed it missing. I just pushed that back in - but it's no longer > part of build-all - but you should be able to build it (and the rest > of CloudStack) with: > > ant build-console-proxy build-all > > Let me know if you run into problems. > > --David
