Re: Clojure has been selected to participate in GSoC 2017!

Having this discussion under the topic GSOC 2017 is increasingly confusing (given that it's now not GSOC or 2017), so I'd suggest starting a new thread if there is more to talk about... On Monday, February 3, 2020 at 5:53:31 PM UTC-6, Daniel Slutsky wrote: > > Hi. > > W

Re: Clojure has been selected to participate in GSoC 2017!

Hi. Wanted to update that I decided not to be involved in GSoC 2020. Another option, similar and different, that some of us are discussing elsewhere is Rails Girls SoC 2020. https://railsgirlssummerofcode.org https://railsgirlssummerofcode.org/about/ I like the idea that it actively seeks

Re: Clojure has been selected to participate in GSoC 2017!

To summarize the GSoC 2020 discussion so far: - Several individuals seem to be interested. - Alex Miller described some past experience and lessons. - .. and explained what is required to make it happen. - Daniel Compton and Clojurists Together offered their administrative help. - We need a small

Re: Clojure has been selected to participate in GSoC 2017!

GSoC 2020 has been announced. https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/how-it-works/#timeline On Thursday, 5 December 2019 00:05:12 UTC+2, Alex Miller wrote: > > Outreachy seems like a great program but like most things, it requires > significant time

Re: Clojure has been selected to participate in GSoC 2017!

expected to spend 5-10 hrs/week for 6 weeks during the project. I'm not aware of anyone with the time or money to commit to an effort like this for Clojure. On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 3:51 PM Noor Afshan Fathima wrote: > Hello, > GSOC would be great. Can someone also look into getting

Re: Clojure has been selected to participate in GSoC 2017!

Hello, GSOC would be great. Can someone also look into getting Clojure to participate in Outreachy? On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 10:18 PM, Alex Miller wrote: > As far as I'm aware the work involved here is: > > - submitting the organization application (in Jan) > - soliciting and w

Re: Clojure has been selected to participate in GSoC 2017!

Great opportunity for someone to contribute! On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 10:35 AM Daniel Compton < daniel.compton.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi folks, I'm the secretary of Clojurists Together. > > Thanks very much for the background on GSoC and the kind words Alex :) > > Clojurists

Re: Clojure has been selected to participate in GSoC 2017!

Hi folks, I'm the secretary of Clojurists Together. Thanks very much for the background on GSoC and the kind words Alex :) Clojurists Together would be happy to help provide the backing admin infrastructure (bank accounts, international payments, etc.) and oversight to help run GSoC. Howev

Re: Clojure has been selected to participate in GSoC 2017!

GSoC is an amazing opportunity if you get the right combination of an appropriately sized project, a motivated student, and a mentor that has both sufficient availability and expertise in guiding (like Ambrose's Typed Clojure work). If any of those aren't right, the project tends to f

Re: Clojure has been selected to participate in GSoC 2017!

quot; or organization can submit a project to GSoC as long as there > are 2+ committers and there are existing releases under an OSI license > (which includes EPL). The organization select projects, connects mentors to > students, prods people about evaluations, and receives $500/complet

Re: Clojure has been selected to participate in GSoC 2017!

Any "group" or organization can submit a project to GSoC as long as there are 2+ committers and there are existing releases under an OSI license (which includes EPL). The organization select projects, connects mentors to students, prods people about evaluations, and receives $500

Re: Clojure has been selected to participate in GSoC 2017!

Would you do it Daniel, would you apply? I apologize for if that sounds like I'm brazenly pushing you. If I had capacity to do that, I would volunteer, alas I'm afraid I don't even know how that works. It would be awesome if Clojure once again accepted in GSoC. How ca

Re: Clojure has been selected to participate in GSoC 2017!

gt;> >> Hi all, >> has there been thoughts about clojure activity in GSoC since 2017? >> >> >> On Monday, 6 March 2017 11:35:41 UTC+2, Daniel Solano Gómez wrote: >>> >>> We are pleased to announce that Google has selected Clojure as a >>> me

Re: Clojure has been selected to participate in GSoC 2017!

. It's not really that hard, just a little tedious to deal with the money parts. On Saturday, November 30, 2019 at 1:37:14 PM UTC-6, Daniel Slutsky wrote: > > Hi all, > has there been thoughts about clojure activity in GSoC since 2017? > > > On Monday, 6 March 2017 11:35:41

Re: Clojure has been selected to participate in GSoC 2017!

Hi all, has there been thoughts about clojure activity in GSoC since 2017? On Monday, 6 March 2017 11:35:41 UTC+2, Daniel Solano Gómez wrote: > > We are pleased to announce that Google has selected Clojure as a mentoring > organisation for this year’s summer of code! This means that Go

[GSoC 2017] KLIPSE

Hello ;) I'm HyeSoo Park. I'm happy to know Clojure community. I'm 3rd year undergraduate student. I would like to apply GSoC 2017 project based on idea "Add cool features to KLIPSE" from (http://clojure-gsoc.org/project-ideas.html). I am familiar with GitHub work

[GSoC 2017] KLIPSE

Hello :) I'm HyeSoo Park. I'm happy to know Clojure community. I'm 3rd year undergraduate student. I would like to apply GSoC 2017 Clojure project based on idea "Add cool features to KLIPSE" from (http://clojure-gsoc.org/project-ideas.html). I am familiar with GitH

GSoC

Hi! I am an undergraduate senior starting my PhD in Programming Languages next year. I am interested in working on some of the Typed Closure Projects listed here , the ClosureScript TypeChecker, Semantic Subtyping, and Extending Annotation Generation. C

Re: GSoC 2017 - KLIPSE

Hi Maitreya, I'm Yehonathan - the author of Klipse. I'd love to hear your ideas around Klipse and to be your mentor for GSoC 2017. You can reach me at: vie...@gmail.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post

Clojure has been selected to participate in GSoC 2017!

should consider becoming a mentor. You can find out more about what being a mentor is about out on the mentors page <http://clojure-gsoc.org/mentors/>. *Students* While it is still to early to formally apply as GSoC student, this is a great time to start thinking about project ideas and

Re: GSoC 2017 - KLIPSE

On Friday, March 3, 2017 at 7:36:27 AM UTC-6, Maitreya Verma wrote: > > Hello, > I am Maitreya Verma, second year undergrad student. > I am very enthusiastic to work on the idea of adding cool features to > KLIPSE for GSoC. There are many other ideas which I think can be &

GSoC 2017 - KLIPSE

Hello, I am Maitreya Verma, second year undergrad student. I am very enthusiastic to work on the idea of adding cool features to KLIPSE for GSoC. There are many other ideas which I think can be implemented on this plugin. Can anybody guide me on how can I work on this plugin. I am quite

Re: [GSoC Idea] Distributed Load Testing Tool in Clojure

Hello, I was reading the mailing list and http://dev.clojure.org/display/community/Project+Ideas+2016 looking for open source project ideas and found this. However, someone has likely implemented what you are looking for: https://github.com/mhjort/clj-gatling More ideas are appreciated. sexta

Re: [GSoC idea] Pluggable back-ends architecture for ClojureScript compiler

As the author of said libraries, I'd love to see somebody pick them up during GSoC and continue the work. The reason why development seems to have stalled, is different for each library: - tools.analyzer and tools.analyzer.jvm are pretty much done and stable, all that's left to do i

Re: [GSoC idea] Pluggable back-ends architecture for ClojureScript compiler

Just wanted to jump in here and say that Thomas is correct. Plugging into the CLJS compiler is probably not the right place to start. The CLJS compiler is built for speed and as such is somewhat less modular than the tools.analyzer/tools.emitter projects. So start there if you're looking to build a

Re: [GSoC idea] Pluggable back-ends architecture for ClojureScript compiler

Would not we want to "plug in" to the Clojure compiler? Feels weird to plug-in to ClojureScript to generate, say, python code. On Monday, February 22, 2016 at 6:52:43 PM UTC-5, Antonin Hildebrand wrote: > > I like the idea. > > I was thinking about a similar project. The goal would be to design

Re: [GSoC idea] Pluggable back-ends architecture for ClojureScript compiler

I like the idea. I was thinking about a similar project. The goal would be to design and implement user-configurable, pluggable system for "jacking" into ClojureScript compilation pipeline as discussed here[1]. The first dog-fooding application could be instrumentation middleware for collectin

Re: [GSoC idea] Pluggable back-ends architecture for ClojureScript compiler

Yeah I forgot about tools.analyzer. Maybe just updating its JS emitter to work with the latest ClojureScript would be a good project. It still wouldn't solve the issue of keeping up with the latest ClojureScript releases, but it seems like it would be a decent scope for a GSoC project

Re: [GSoC idea] Pluggable back-ends architecture for ClojureScript compiler

Clojure or ClojureScript currently use them since they are either incomplete or have performance issues compared to the default implementation. The idea was however to have a pluggable solution that can share as much code as possible. IIRC it all started as GSoC work, so it might be useful to

Re: [GSoC idea] Pluggable back-ends architecture for ClojureScript compiler

That's a really good idea. There are a lot of clojurescript-to-something projects that would benefit from that, along with any future ones. It may help to actually choose a specific backend to work on while you refactor the compiler itself. Also, it would be good to limit the impact on the curr

[GSoC idea] Pluggable back-ends architecture for ClojureScript compiler

*Pluggable back-ends architecture for ClojureScript compilerBrief explanation:* There are a lot of ClojureScript script compiler forks exist to provide different compilation targets other than js. Most of them are currently stuck because of rapid ClojureScript development and difficulties wi

Re: [GSoC Idea] Distributed Load Testing Tool in Clojure

I added this to the page - thanks Markus! On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 9:49:51 AM UTC-6, Markus Hjort wrote: > > *Brief explanation:* Clojure as a language is a good choice for writing > readable load test scenarios. Core libraries and runtime are well suited > for doing highly parallel compu

[GSoC Idea] Distributed Load Testing Tool in Clojure

*Brief explanation:* Clojure as a language is a good choice for writing readable load test scenarios. Core libraries and runtime are well suited for doing highly parallel computation while lazy sequences and transducers are effective for doing calculations on big data structures. All of these

Re: [ANN, GSoC] A Common Clojure Source Metadata Model

Am Donnerstag, 28. Mai 2015 07:57:37 UTC+9 schrieb Colin Fleming: > > […] > > Much of this is specific to editing environments, and more concretely > specific to Cursive. It's also mostly necessary because I'm working from > unexpanded source rather than introspecting a REPL. > I see. I think

Re: [ANN, GSoC] A Common Clojure Source Metadata Model

At the moment, the extension system is very tied to Cursive and to IntelliJ internals. Several people have asked whether I could extract the functionality so it would be reusable, but since I haven't even had time to get my own API public yet this is unlikely to happen - it's a very significant pie

Re: [ANN, GSoC] A Common Clojure Source Metadata Model

Am Freitag, 22. Mai 2015 11:09:40 UTC+9 schrieb Colin Fleming: > > On one of the latest Cognicasts, Colin Fleming talked about a repo where >> library authors can upload extensions that help the IDE understand their >> macros. I have to listen to it again, but it sounded a bit like what you're

Re: [ANN, GSoC] A Common Clojure Source Metadata Model

> > On one of the latest Cognicasts, Colin Fleming talked about a repo where > library authors can upload extensions that help the IDE understand their > macros. I have to listen to it again, but it sounded a bit like what you're > talking about. Right now I can't find that repo, though. Maybe he w

Re: [ANN, GSoC] A Common Clojure Source Metadata Model

Thanks for the great feedback! Am Freitag, 22. Mai 2015 05:48:38 UTC+9 schrieb Laurent PETIT: > > Sorry for jumping late inside the pool, but the topic has retained my > attention from day one. > > As a developer of an IDE plugin (CounterClockWise for Eclipse), I'm very > interested in this effo

Re: [ANN, GSoC] A Common Clojure Source Metadata Model

Sorry for jumping late inside the pool, but the topic has retained my attention from day one. As a developer of an IDE plugin (CounterClockWise for Eclipse), I'm very interested in this effort. Here are my ideas/questions/remarks: - Finding a winning scenario for adoption is key. A perfect tool w

Re: [ANN, GSoC] A Common Clojure Source Metadata Model

It is a non-goal to define any new "standard" metadata for vars as part of the project. But it does seem reasonable that retaining var metadata and making it available would be useful to enable tooling for examples or anything else. On Thursday, May 21, 2015 at 1:15:17 PM UTC-5, Russell Mull wr

Re: [ANN, GSoC] A Common Clojure Source Metadata Model

There are some potential applications for literate programming here. For example, when doing an 'untangle' from your literate program source (to extract the code), the typical way to allow changes to be merged back in is to add comments with line number information. A more structured place to p

Re: [ANN, GSoC] A Common Clojure Source Metadata Model

Just trying to bump this up a bit. "Coding" will start soon, so I'd be happy about some more input. Especially if you have further thoughts or wishes along the lines of https://groups.google.com/d/topic/clojure/E1oxVE4UMxQ/discussion. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: [ANN, GSoC] A Common Clojure Source Metadata Model

On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 3:30:57 PM UTC-5, Fluid Dynamics wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 4:09:54 PM UTC-4, Alex Miller wrote: >> >> Yes, I think that's largely correct. The goal of Richard's project is to >> create an information model (data) describing a project from the >> perspec

Re: [ANN, GSoC] A Common Clojure Source Metadata Model

On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 4:09:54 PM UTC-4, Alex Miller wrote: > > Yes, I think that's largely correct. The goal of Richard's project is to > create an information model (data) describing a project from the > perspective of use. Codeq goes much deeper by integrating code history - > that allo

Re: [ANN, GSoC] A Common Clojure Source Metadata Model

On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 6:17:37 AM UTC-5, Phillip Lord wrote: > > > writes: > > The goal of this project is to develop a comprehensive and extensible > > model for describing Clojure sources from an API perspective. I will > > also write a program that analyses Clojure sources according t

Re: [ANN, GSoC] A Common Clojure Source Metadata Model

On Tuesday, May 5, 2015 at 7:37:47 PM UTC-5, richar...@posteo.de wrote: > > > > Am Mittwoch, 6. Mai 2015 07:17:54 UTC+9 schrieb kovasb: >> >> I'm mostly interested in something like >> http://docs.racket-lang.org/scribble/ >> > > Thanks for the idea! There is http://clojure-scribble.publicfields.

Re: [ANN, GSoC] A Common Clojure Source Metadata Model

On Monday, May 4, 2015 at 6:27:47 PM UTC-5, richar...@posteo.de wrote: > > > > Am Dienstag, 5. Mai 2015 01:56:13 UTC+9 schrieb Sean Grove: >> >> I've been hoping someone would rebuild Codeq >> , now that tools.analyzer (and >> friends) is out and ClojureScript

Re: [ANN, GSoC] A Common Clojure Source Metadata Model

Indeed. I think Emacs docstrings are a bottom line -- Clojure should be able to make these distinctions at least. And this would in turn allow tools to use them. Why can I not click on function names in a docstring and go to the function definition? Phil Bozhidar Batsov writes: > I think the r

Re: [ANN, GSoC] A Common Clojure Source Metadata Model

I think the real problem is the lack of conventions for adding metadata to docstrings. I sorely miss `some-func/var' and SOME-PARAM from Emacs Lisp. It's always clear where you refer to other functions/variables and to parameters. This makes it way easier to read (and parse) a docstring. On 6 May

Re: [ANN, GSoC] A Common Clojure Source Metadata Model

writes: > The goal of this project is to develop a comprehensive and extensible > model for describing Clojure sources from an API perspective. I will > also write a program that analyses Clojure sources according to this > model and outputs data documenting their usage. This could be compared > t

Re: [ANN, GSoC] A Common Clojure Source Metadata Model

Am Mittwoch, 6. Mai 2015 07:17:54 UTC+9 schrieb kovasb: > > I'm mostly interested in something like > http://docs.racket-lang.org/scribble/ > Thanks for the idea! There is http://clojure-scribble.publicfields.net/, which you might know already. Maybe something like that could also be integra

Re: [ANN, GSoC] A Common Clojure Source Metadata Model

I'm mostly interested in something like http://docs.racket-lang.org/scribble/ On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:27 PM, wrote: > > > Am Dienstag, 5. Mai 2015 01:56:13 UTC+9 schrieb Sean Grove: >> >> I've been hoping someone would rebuild Codeq >> , now that tools.analyz

Re: [ANN, GSoC] A Common Clojure Source Metadata Model

Am Dienstag, 5. Mai 2015 01:56:13 UTC+9 schrieb Sean Grove: > > I've been hoping someone would rebuild Codeq > , now that tools.analyzer (and friends) > is out and ClojureScript has made so much progress. Not only would it be > useful for diving into a new cod

Re: [ANN, GSoC] A Common Clojure Source Metadata Model

> data to > be consumed by other tools instead of HTML. In order to foster adoption, I > will > provide extensive documentation, including examples of such consumer > tools, and > emphasize active communication with the community. ☙ > > The project idea comes from Alex Mille

Re: [ANN, GSoC] A Common Clojure Source Metadata Model

I just saw that the plain text formatting is horrible. Sorry for that. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient wit

[ANN, GSoC] A Common Clojure Source Metadata Model

idea comes from Alex Miller, who also is my mentor, together with Reid McKenzie. Coding for the GSoC hasn't started yet. – Until 24 April we're in the warmup phase called community bonding. I wanted to use this time for getting ideas and feedback from you, so I've prepared some

Should Clojure/GSoC join a non-profit?

to bring up the question of whether or not Clojure/GSoC should seek fiscal sponsorship from an organisation like the Software Freedom Conservancy or Software in the Public Interest. Naturally, the first question is to ask is: Why? In the case of GSoC, the reason is money. As part of GSoC, Google

Re: [GSoC] Typed Transient Proposal

Done, thanks for bearing with me. I foolishly didn't even think at first that an attachment would be insufficient -- and it's a bit too bad, since markdown definitely served me better than the provided text box. I realized just a bit too late that it really wanted those boxes filled. On Friday,

Re: [GSoC] Typed Transient Proposal

You should be able to edit the proposal now. Please copy the gist over. On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant < abonnaireserge...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ah yes. Then we're all good! > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Sean Laguna > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I did get the melange s

Re: [GSoC] Typed Transient Proposal

Ah yes. Then we're all good! On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Sean Laguna wrote: > Hi, > > I did get the melange submission in on time, it just points to the gist. > Presumably that means I'm technically on time? > > Best, > Sean > On Mar 27, 2015 3:28 PM, "Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant" < > abonnai

Re: [GSoC] Typed Transient Proposal

Hi, I did get the melange submission in on time, it just points to the gist. Presumably that means I'm technically on time? Best, Sean On Mar 27, 2015 3:28 PM, "Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant" < abonnaireserge...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Sean, > > I'm afraid student applications are a hard deadline, so

Re: [GSoC] Typed Transient Proposal

Hi Sean, I'm afraid student applications are a hard deadline, so you will have to try again next year. I will go through your application over the weekend. Thanks, Ambrose On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Sean Laguna wrote: > Hi, > > I did end up taking your advice and submitting a bit of an a

Re: [GSoC] Typed Transient Proposal

Hi, I did end up taking your advice and submitting a bit of an ambitious proposal! You can find it here: https://gist.github.com/seanlaguna/c2003b52cc197119bdec as well as submitted. I made a bit of a blunder though -- I didn't think about the fact that by submitting my proposal as a gist (an

[GSoC] Attention mentors and students

Hello, all, The student application deadline is coming up at 19;00 UTC, less than seven hours from now. What does this mean for you? *If you are a student…* You must have your application submitted to Melange <https://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/homepage/google/gsoc2015> by 19:00 UTC.

Re: [GSoC] Typed Overtone proposal

The deadline for student applications is tomorrow. If anybody have some thoughts or comments, please don't hesitate and share it here. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note t

[GSoC] Dynalint Proposal

Hello, I have uploaded the proposal to work on dynalint over the summers on melange. This is not the final version but only the first draft that I will be editing based on feedback and more research that I am currently doing. Please let me know if there are any suggestions. I feel dynalint rea

Re: [GSoC] Typed Transient Proposal

Hi Sean, Sounds like you have greater ambitions than simply supporting transients. Please feel free to disregard any suggestions in the project template and make the *you* would like to implement over the summer. Please post it here or on Melange then we can discuss further. Thanks! Ambrose On W

[GSoC] Typed Transient Proposal

Hi, I am a third year computer science PhD student at the University of Chicago, and am interested in submitting a proposal for the typed transients project. I am very interested, in general, about presistency, transience, and the interaction between the two models for operating on data. Persi

Re: [GSoC] Typed Overtone proposal

Try them out here . Thanks, Ambrose On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant < abonnaireserge...@gmail.com> wrote: > core.typed supports a restricted form of dependent types via occurrence > typing. Refinement types will also be > comin

Re: [GSoC] Typed Overtone proposal

core.typed supports a restricted form of dependent types via occurrence typing. Refinement types will also be coming later this year. See some examples here . Thanks, Ambrose On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:34 PM, atucker wrote: > Best of lu

Re: [GSoC] Typed Overtone proposal

Best of luck with your proposal! The main part of my proposal is porting Overtone, that is type checking it > using core.typed, which is a great optional type system with stuff like > dependent types built in > This caught my eye. Does core.typed support dependent types? I might start lookin

Re: [GSoC] Typed Overtone proposal

I've updated my proposal. The main changes are in this section [1]. [1] https://gist.github.com/chrismedrela/7fe431fa5189c2c64bd8#porting-overtone -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegrou

GSoC Project

Hello Guys, I am a computer science senior at LUMS (Lahore University of Management Sciences) in Pakistan and I was introduced to Clojure through my Advance Programming Course this semester so I have been working with Clojure for a few months. I was interested in a few projects for the summer a

Re: [GSoC] Typed Overtone proposal

That sounds a cool idea. One interesting challenge will be how specific you can make the types of things like unit generators, which can be used in very different ways e.g. low frequency for vibrato, high frequency for tones themselves. On 21 March 2015 at 17:14, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant < abonn

Re: [GSoC] Typed Overtone proposal

We should work on this proposal, I sent you some suggestions. Thanks, Ambrose On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Christopher Medrela < chris.medr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello! As you may remember I wanted to work at "Source meta information > model" > project during Google Summer of Code this year

[GSoC] Typed Overtone proposal

Hello! As you may remember I wanted to work at "Source meta information model" project during Google Summer of Code this year, but I've decided to switch to "typed Overtone" project because there was already another student (Richard) who wanted to work at the same project. I believe that Clojure

Re: [GSoC] Source meta information model proposal

Hi Christopher, I recommend still sending a proposal for Alex's project just in case. It's hard to predict what constraints we will need to satisfy for project allocation (we might have a small number of allocations from Google, a student may choose a project with another organisation). Thanks, A

Re: [GSoC] Source meta information model proposal

On Friday, March 20, 2015 at 12:06:34 AM UTC+1, Alex Miller wrote: > > Chris (and anyone else), Daniel mentioned to me in a note that it is ok > for multiple students to submit a proposal for the same project. We do not > know how many spots we will be given as an organization and whether > part

Re: [GSoC] Source meta information model proposal

Chris (and anyone else), Daniel mentioned to me in a note that it is ok for multiple students to submit a proposal for the same project. We do not know how many spots we will be given as an organization and whether particular students will meet whatever guidelines are set out by Google. So I thi

Re: [GSoC] Source meta information model proposal

Found var-link kicking around in my projects dir so I re-published it for this thread. https://github.com/clojure-grimoire/var-link Reid -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com N

Re: [GSoC] Source meta information model proposal

Hello! Alex decided to proceed with Richard. Therefore, I'd like to find some other project. I'm glad to see so much feedback and I'd really like to reply to all your feedback but there is not much time to the end of application period and therefore I will focus exclusively on the another projec

Re: [GSoC] Source meta information model proposal

participating so much in this discussion, since there will be enough time during the community bonding phase of the GSoC. My proposal is already on Melange, the place where all proposals go in the end. I've made it public now (http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/public/google/gsoc2015/

Re: [GSoC] core.typed Annotations and Macros Proposal

: > >> Hi, >> Thanks for replying, I've signed the CA and forwarded this post to the >> core.typed mailing list. >> Can you tell me what should I do for now? >> Thanks, >> Z.Shang >> >> On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 at 5:49:34 PM UTC-7, Di Xu wr

Re: [GSoC] core.typed Annotations and Macros Proposal

typed mailing list. > Can you tell me what should I do for now? > Thanks, > Z.Shang > > On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 at 5:49:34 PM UTC-7, Di Xu wrote: >> >> Welcome, >> >> I participated core.typed GSoC last year, and happy to see another >> Chinese student int

Re: [GSoC] Source meta information model proposal

Alex, glad to see we're on the same wavelength about this more or less. Christopher, some other deliverables worth considering: - What format is documentation in? As Grimoire is evidence, plain doc text is pretty badly formatted on average certainly in comparison to HTML or even markdown.

Re: [GSoC] core.typed Annotations and Macros Proposal

Hi, Thanks for replying, I've signed the CA and forwarded this post to the core.typed mailing list. Can you tell me what should I do for now? Thanks, Z.Shang On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 at 5:49:34 PM UTC-7, Di Xu wrote: > > Welcome, > > I participated core.typed GSoC last year,

Re: GSoC 2015 - Better Clojure/Android integration project discussion

Hello, On Tue Mar 17 13:54 2015, Shubham Jain wrote: > Hey Daniel, > > I am too interested in this project. If by any chance there is an > alternative slot for this project, please do consider my case. > > Regards, > Shubham We will most likely accept only one proposal for a given project. It

Re: GSoC 2015 - Better Clojure/Android integration project discussion

On Tue Mar 17 09:28 2015, Devang Shah wrote: > Hello, > > Now, to get familiar with the lein-droid and the ecosystem, I have gotten > clojure, lein-droid, and Android SDK on my machine. > Anything that you'd suggest so that I get more familiar with the entire > ecosystem and might be useful to u

Re: [GSoC] core.typed Annotations and Macros Proposal

Welcome, I participated core.typed GSoC last year, and happy to see another Chinese student interested in core.typed project, you may forward your email to core.typed mail list[0], also you should first sign CA[1] (if you haven't) before any of your patches get accepted by core.typed or any

[GSoC] core.typed Annotations and Macros Proposal

Hello all, My name is Zhanlin Shang and I'd like to work with the core.typed Annotations and Macros mentored by Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant this summer. This is the first time for me to take part in this kind of event and I hope this mailing list is the right place. I'm a second year undergraduat

Re: GSoC 2015 - Better Clojure/Android integration project discussion

Hey Daniel, I am too interested in this project. If by any chance there is an alternative slot for this project, please do consider my case. Regards, Shubham -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to cloju

Re: GSoC 2015 - Better Clojure/Android integration project discussion

hy a new Clojure plug-in is needed. > > > > > > > Also, can someone highlight in brief some features (of Gradle > plugin) that > > > > we are planning to support? Any known features that are not > supported by > > > > the current build system?

Re: [GSoC] Source meta information model proposal

roject and I wish you the best in your GSoC application. > > I'm somewhat concerned in reading your proposal that while you claim the > proposed data structure represents a "minimal superset of the other > documentation engines", it is by no means a superset of the lib-grim

Re: [GSoC] Source meta information model proposal

me and other experts (like Reid and Francesco!!). I should also mention that another student has already submitted a proposal to GSOC for this project and only one student can work on it. I'm still not exactly sure how that is supposed to get resolved. Anyhow, more comments below. I may als

Re: [GSoC] Source meta information model proposal

Hi Christopher, I'm Francesco, the maintainer of crossclj.info I think it's a very interesting project. Some comments on your proposal: 1) I think the information model is by far most important deliverable. I agree with Reid that a sound "coordinate system" is very important 2) The toolchain y

Students: GSoC application period is now open

reate your application on melange, you will be able to revise it until the application deadline. I am looking forward to all the submissions this year. Best of luck to all! Sincerely, Daniel [1]: https://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/homepage/google/gsoc2015 [2]: http://dev.clojure.org/di

Re: [GSoC] Source meta information model proposal

Hey Christopher, I'm Reid, the Grimoire maintainer. I'm delighted to see that someone besides myself and Alex is interested in this project and I wish you the best in your GSoC application. I'm somewhat concerned in reading your proposal that while you claim the proposed

Re: [GSoC] Source meta information model proposal

Tom lovingly maintains autodoc and the Clojure projects' automated doc generation with it. But it mostly just continues doing what it does. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com

Re: [GSoC] Source meta information model proposal

Christopher: I think considering autodoc to be no longer maintained because the last commit was Sep 1 2014 might be a bit hasty. No commits can mean "stable and working", too, not only "abandoned". Tom Faulhaber commits updates to the published Clojure API docs for Clojure itself and its contrib

Re: [GSoC] Source meta information model proposal

Wishlist: for macros, metadata about the vars a macro will define. (E.g., (defmacro defrecord [...]) will define (->NAME arg...), (map->NAME m) when executed.) This would allow a lot more source analysis for the common case of def* macros which are just fancy ways of def-ing vars, but without h

  1   2   3   4   >