Am Dienstag, 5. Mai 2015 01:56:13 UTC+9 schrieb Sean Grove:
>
> I've been hoping someone would rebuild Codeq 
> <https://github.com/Datomic/codeq>, now that tools.analyzer (and friends) 
> is out and ClojureScript has made so much progress. Not only would it be 
> useful for diving into a new codebase (I've needed it several times when 
> working with a large, unfamiliar codebase), but generating both useful and 
> interesting docs from the structured data should be far easier than ad-hoc 
> analysis.
>
> Just a thought, not sure that's the angle you want to take, but didn't see 
> it on your list and each of the items on the list would probably have 
> benefited from a revamped, well-documented, well-marketed Codeq.
>

Oh, Codeq! I heard about it a long time ago on the Cognicast and it has 
been hopping across my mind now and then. I would also like it to come to 
life again. While it's not quite in the scope of my project, I think it 
could be one of the tools that can be (re)built on top of the metadata from 
my project. Maybe I'm remembering Codeq wrong, but I think it could "just" 
be recording the changes/snapshots of metadata according to my model over 
time by feeding them into Datomic.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to