Am Dienstag, 5. Mai 2015 01:56:13 UTC+9 schrieb Sean Grove: > > I've been hoping someone would rebuild Codeq > <https://github.com/Datomic/codeq>, now that tools.analyzer (and friends) > is out and ClojureScript has made so much progress. Not only would it be > useful for diving into a new codebase (I've needed it several times when > working with a large, unfamiliar codebase), but generating both useful and > interesting docs from the structured data should be far easier than ad-hoc > analysis. > > Just a thought, not sure that's the angle you want to take, but didn't see > it on your list and each of the items on the list would probably have > benefited from a revamped, well-documented, well-marketed Codeq. >
Oh, Codeq! I heard about it a long time ago on the Cognicast and it has been hopping across my mind now and then. I would also like it to come to life again. While it's not quite in the scope of my project, I think it could be one of the tools that can be (re)built on top of the metadata from my project. Maybe I'm remembering Codeq wrong, but I think it could "just" be recording the changes/snapshots of metadata according to my model over time by feeding them into Datomic. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
